What are the most important controls on reservoir quality in carbonate sequences? The main controls on reservoir quality (porosity and permeability) in carbonate sequences are : • depositional fabric (primary lithofacies, texture) • mineral dissolution (creation of secondary porosity) • mineral precipitation (cementation and replacement) • karstification (an important from of mineral dissolution/precipitation) • compaction • fracturing
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
What are the most important controls on reservoir quality in carbonate sequences?
The main controls on reservoir quality (porosity and permeability) in carbonate sequences are : • depositional fabric (primary lithofacies, texture) • mineral dissolution (creation of secondary porosity) • mineral precipitation (cementation and replacement) • karstification (an important from of mineral dissolution/precipitation) • compaction • fracturing
Effects of early diagenesis on reservoir quality, Burial diagenesis will modify reservoir Quality (RQ) further information required in purple
INITIALLY POROUS AND PERMEABLE UNIT (Sedimentology)
MARINE DIAGENESIS following deposition Cementation, little effect on poroperm. no dissolution
EXPOSED
(Sedimentology)
Close to unconformity
METEORIC PHREATIC limited dissolution, cementation by low Mg calcite around grains
METEORIC VADOSE Extensive dissolution limited but patchy cementation (especially at pore throats)
Poroperm decrease, framework resistant to mechanical compaction during burial
Porosity increase, permeability lowered, framework resistant to mechanical compaction
COMPACTION LIMITED?
RQ poor RQ good RQ moderate RQ moderate RQ moderate - good
no yes
no yes
no yes
yes no
Effects of Burial diagenesis on reservoir quality
COMPACTION (Effective Stress)
CEMENTATION (Petrography)
DISSOLUTION (Petrography)
BURIAL DOLOMITISATION (Petrography)
FRACTURING (Well Data)
UPLIFT AND EXPOSURE (Seismic)
Quantification of effects?
Source of cement Extent of cement
Cementation
Yes (compartmentalise)
No source of cement? Hydrocarbon filling? (Geochemistry)
Effects of meteoric diagenesis on reservoir quality
Effects on RQ if yes
Meteoric Diagenesis • Was there an aragonite precursor? (I.e. of Pre- Cambrian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic or Tertiary age) • Was it a humid climate at time of exposure? (Palaeogeographic position) • Was there a high rate of water drainage? (elevation, climate, size of hinterland) • Was reprecipitation of dissolved CaCO3 as cement limited (due to high drainage)?
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
Effects of karstification on reservoir quality
Effects on RQ if yes
Sequence Boundary Karst • Is there a joint/fracture system which may have had high water throuhput? (may be so if in faulted/folded terrain, if uplifted or recognizable on seismic) • Was there an aragonite precursor? (I.e. of Pre- Cambrian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic or Tertiary age) • Is the reservoir close to the unconformity/above the water table? • Is the pore system matrix dominated? (vuggy porosity may have poor permeability, caverns may be detrimental to drilling) • Can overlying clays/shales be ruled out? (May infiltrate porous zone beneath)
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
MODIFYING TERMS
GENETIC MODIFIERS SIZE* MODIFIERS
PROCESS DIRECTION OR STAGE
SOLUTION s CEMENTATION c INTERNAL SEDIMENT i
ENLARGED x REDUCED r FILLED f
CLASSES mm**
TIME OF FORMATION
PRIMARY P pre-depositional Pp depositional Pd SECONDARY S eogenetic Se mesogenetic Sm telogenetic St
MEGAPORE mg
MESOPORE ms
MICROPORE mc
large lmg
small smg
large lms
small sms
256
32
4
1/2
1/16
Use size prefixes with basic porosity types: mesovug msVUG small mesomold smsMO microinterparticle mcBP *For regular-shaped pores smaller than cavern size **Measures refer to average pore diameter of a single pore or the range in size of a pore assemblage. for tubular pores use average cross-section. For platy pores use width and note shape
Genetic modifier are combined as follows: ABUNDANCE MODIFIERS
Percent porosity (15%) Ratio of porosity (1 : 2) Ratio and percent (1 : 2)(15%)
• Refers to pores formed where soft body parts lived in body cavities (e.g., gatropods) or pores where internal partitioning in otherwise solid material (e.g., rudist wall structures)
• may add considerably to the total porosity of grainstones and packstones
• are commonly enlarged by dissolution to form moldic or vuggy porosity
• an example follows of 10 perm plugs measured from three coral heads (Holocene), yielding average porosities of 47, 63 and 53 %
BC POROSITY intercrystalline porosity
• Forms between crystals of dolomite or limestone
• provides one of the most “evenly distributed” types of porosity in carbonates (except for vugs)
• occurs as mesoporosity and macroporosity in dolomites
• occurs as microporosity in limestone (within the lime mud matrix
BP POROSITY interparticle porosity
• Intergranular pores from spherical triangles between packed spheres and irregular between platy grain shapes
• rare in lithified rock--not commonly preserved due to cementation
• commonly is modified by thin isopachous rim cements that form in the marine phreatic
• common in jurassic carbonate of the Middle East and accounts for the success of these giant reservoirs
KV POROSITY keystone vug porosity
• Forms by the natural bridging of sand grains to form a “keystone arch” with pore space below it
• forms in the swash zone of beaches
• relatively rare porosity type
• recognized in the Pleistocene of the Bahamas
FENESTRAL POROSITY
• A porosity type commonly associated with algal stromatolite lithofacies
• voids formed within algal laminations by algae forming bridges and growing over other algal layers or by air/gas pockets within algal layers
• “fenestra” means window in latin and refers to the window-like openings within algal layers
• fenestral porosity may not be effective porosity
• created by branches or tubes winding and bridging together to form pore space between their framework elements (not within them)
• one of the most difficult pore types to indentify
• may be relatively unimportant, since detritus commonly fills such spaces at the time of deposition
MO and VUG POROSITY moldic and vuggy porosity
• molds retain original particle shape
• vugs are irregular in shape
• aragonite grains are subject to dissolution and the formation of molds and vugs
• molds can leach further to form vugs
• the term MV porosity is coined for moldic-vuggy porosity combinations that are often difficult to separate
• moldic porosity (especially oomoldic) may represent isolated pores with non-effective porosity
MAJOR TECTONIC SETTINGS FOR CARBONATES
• Large offshore banks or platforms
• The sides of major cratonic blocks
• Intracratonic basins
• Sub-basins on wide shelves
FR POROSITY fracture porosity
• Brittle versus ductile behavior: dolomites fracture more readily than limestones
• Orientation of most natural fractures is verticle
• Maximum amount of porosity due to fracturing (e.g., in the Monterrey Shale of California) is about 6 %
• It is commonly beneficial to induce fracturing in the area surrounding the borehole to increase daily production rates: acid-fracs with propants
• Presence of fractures is critical for reservoir facies development in tight boundstones that grade to wackestones and in chalk deposits (coccolith mudstones)
• Fractures can be categorized descriptively as follows:
open fractures
closed fractures
fractures swarm
open microfractures
closed microfractures
PROBLEM: how to distinguish natural from articially induced fractures in cores
1. Look at the orientation of fractures, most of which should be vertical; partings caused by “unloading” will be subpareallel to bedding
2. Look for the presence of mineral cements lining the fracture
Recommendation: drill exploration holes at the intersection of fracture zones if
possible; lineament analysis by LANDSAT imagery is useful for determining where
such intersections occur. If a fracture intersection can be found within an
“exploration fairway”, such as a barrier reef trend, the odds for success are
dramatically increased.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DOLOMITE FORMATION
• SOURCE OF Mg
SEAWATER
Mf-RICH CLAYS FOR CEMENT
SKELETAL Mg CALCITE
• FLUID FLOW SYSTEM
• SUITABLE Mg/Ca RATIO
RESERVOIR QUALITY
POROSITY PERM
EXCELLENT > 20 % > 100 md
GOOD > 15 % > 50 md
FAIR 5 – 15 % 10 – 50 md
POOR < 5 % < 10 md
DIAGENETIC PHENOMENA AFFECTING CARBONATES
• MINERALOGIC STABILIZATION
ARAGONITE, CALCITE
• NEOMORPHISM (REPLACEMENT)
CALCITE, CALCITE
• DOLOMITIZATION
CALCITE, DOLOMITE
• CEMENTATION
VOID-FILLING CALCITE,
DOLOMITE or EVAPORITES
• SILICIFICATION
• PRESSURE SOLUTION / COMPACTION
• DISSOLUTION / KARSTIFICATION
• BRECCIATION / FRACTURING
DIAGENESIS
DEFINITION: THOSE NATURAL CHANGES WHICH OCCUR IN SEDIMENTS BETWEEN THE TIME OF INITIAL DEPOSITION AND METAMORPHISM
COMMON CARBONATE MINERALOGIES
MINERAL FORMULA CHARACTERISTICS ARAGONITE CaCO3 TRACE IMPURITIES; ORTHORHOMBIC MG-CALCITE CaCO3 4-25% Mg IMPIRITIES; HEXAGONAL CALCITE CaCO3 TACE IMPURITIES; HEXAGONAL DOLOMITE CaMg(CO3)2 50% or so Mg; HEXAGONAL
FRESH WATER VADOSE ENVIRONMENT
• CEMENTS TEND TO BE – MENISCUS
– PENDULOUS
• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS – LEACHING OF ARAGONITE
– SLIGHT CEMENTATION
– COMMON POROSITY
FRESH WATER PHREATIC ENVIRONMENT
• CEMENTS TEND TO BE
– ISOPACHOUS BLADED
– EQUANT CALCITE
– INTERLOCKING CRYSTALS
– COARSER TO PORE CENTER
• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS – SOME LEACHING OF ARAGONITE; LEACHING MAY BE ACCOMPANIED BY
CALCITE REPLACEMENT.
– LOW POROSITY
– RAPID CEMENTATION
– SYNTAXIAL OVERGROWTHS ON ECHINODERMS
MARINE PHREATIC ENVIRONMENT
• CEMENTS TEND TO BE – ISOPACHOUS ARAGONITE NEEDLES
– MICRITIC Mg-CALCITE
– COMMONLY INTERBEDDED WITH INTERNAL SEDIMENT
– SOMETIMES BOTRYOIDAL
– SOMETIMES BORED
• OTHER CHARACTERISTICS – NO LEACHING
– SLOW CEMENTATION EXCEPT WHERE TIDES PUMP WATER THROUGH SEDIMENT
– POLYGONAL BOUNDARIES
– MANY MINOR DISCONFORMITIES
DEEP SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENT
CHARACTERISTICS:
• DISSOLUTION or CEMENTATION POSSIBLE
• SLOW RATES OF DIAGENESIS CAUSED BY:
– NEAR-SURFACE STABILIZATION OF ARAGONITE & Mg-CALCITE TO
FORM CALCITE
– NEAR-SURFACE CEMENTATION REDUCES POROSITY & PERMEABILITY WHICH INHIBITS WATER MOVEMENT IN THE DEEP SUBSURFACE
PERMEABILITAS OF ROCKS AND SEDIMENTS
• Tightly cemented criniodal limestone ……10 md
• Uncemented carbonate mud ……0.01 – 10 md
• Sucrosic dolomite ……0.1 – 150 md
• Cemented quartz or sandstone
or carbonate grainstone ……10 – 300 md
• Poorly cemented quartz sandstone
or carbonate grainstone ……300 – 500 md
• Unconsolidated quartz sandstone
or carbonate grainstone ……>1000 md
• Fractured sandstone or carbonate ……>1000 md
COMPARISON OF MAJOR SUBSURFACE DIAGENETIC CONTROLS