1 Aarhus Convention Task Force on Electronic Information Tools Sofia, Bulgaria 23-24 June 2003 Chris Jarvis Information Policy Manager
1
Aarhus Convention Task Force on Electronic Information Tools
Sofia, Bulgaria23-24 June 2003
Chris Jarvis
Information Policy Manager
2
Introduction
1. EA Experience
2. EA/UNEP Project
3. Information Delivery Framework
3
Environment Agency
•Non Departmental Public Body responsible to Department of the Environment
•Wide range of duties and powers relating to environmental management
•11,000 staff across England and Wales
•8 Regional Offices, 26 Area Offices
•~100 staff respond to >350,000 requests
•We place a high priority on the provision of information in achieving environmental goals
4
1. EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
• Information Services
•Public Participation
5
EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
What’s in your backyard?
7
EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
• Information Services
17
Information Services: property search
•Providing Environmental Information of direct importance to a decision-making situation
•Highly tailored service
•Developed to meet a specific need
•User led development
•Environmental benefit
18
Information Services: property search
request
Customer Contact
Log +track
Acknowledge
Distribute for answers
Up
to
12
functions
Compileresponse
Sendout and log
cheque
Area/ Regional Finance
reconciliation
exceptionsRe-allocation of resources
ReceiptConfirmation of payment
• it costs us a lot of time and money
• to provide different information
•at the wrong time
19
Electronic transaction
Solicitor Prints ReportWeb Service
Nationally maintained data layers
Information Services: property search
20
But not quite that easy...
21
EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
• Information Services
22
EA Experience
•What’s in Your Backyard?
• Information Services
•Public Participation
23
Public Participation:Public Registers
Application Advert ConsultationResponses
Licence Monitoring Action ...
Public Register
24
Public Participation:Does it Work?
• Are people aware?
• Are paper files convenient?
• Is the information presented meaningfully?
• Is location in offices convenient?
• Do we reach a wide cross-section of society?
• Could we do better?!
25
Engaging Citizens
•Make information relevant to everyday lives
•Link Information Systems to Participation Systems
•Provide access without effort, where and when required
•Use novel techniques to reach all of society
• (Please tell us how to do it!)
26
Our Way Forward:
•Electronic access to actual documents
•Real time ‘flagging’ of live decisions
27
Public Participation:Public Registers
Application Advert ConsultationResponses
Licence Monitoring Action ...
Public Register
28
Our Way Forward:
•Research into social aspects of engagement
•Partnerships with local community groups
•Electronic ‘open forums’
•Record interests and provide relevant information
•Assess impacts on our own organisation
•Electronic access to actual documents
•Real time ‘flagging’ of live decisions
29
DEFRA EC
VARs WIYBY V2
Documents
eRegisters
Education
What’s happening/have your say, local data to analyse, etc.
Communities
e.g. libraries - what’s happening in your area
Individuals
FoI Scheme
Local Government
Registers, planning etc.
Insurance, Consultancies and other spin offs
Land Development
Commercial
Residential
Data
Property Search
+ Environmental Messages
+ SIC Specific Guidance
+ SIC Specific Guidance
Business Info.
DUNS No.
Financial Investment
Financial Services
30
2. EA/UNEP Project: Backgound
•EA/UNEP collaboration since 2000
•Building upon experience
•Senior Support
31
Project: Current Status
• ‘Seedcorn’ funding
•Bid to UK FCO funding
•Seeking Partners
•… and advice, comments, information ...
32
Project Proposal
•Capacity Building
•Develop pilots/proof of concepts
•Deliver a framework
– common requirements
– engender consistency
– identification of funding streams
– identification of user needs
… linked to EU ‘INSPIRE’ initiative
33
Environments do not respect political boundaries
INSPIRE
Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
The INSPIRE objective:
The preparation of a framework legislative act aimed at making available relevant, harmonised and quality geographic information for the purpose of the formulation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of Community environmental policy-making
Complementary
.
Public
Sector
Info
rmati
on
Environmental
Information
INSPIREEnabled Access
Copyright
Databases
Data Protection
Ratification of Aarhus
WFD
Habitats
Noise
INSPIRE
Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
35
INSPIRE Principles (1)
• Data should be collected once and maintained at a level where this can be done most efficiently
• It should be possible to combine spatial information from different sources across Europe in a seamless way, and to share it amongst many users and applications
• It should be possible for information collected at one level to be shared with other levels
INSPIRE
Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
36
INSPIRE Principles (2)
• Geographic information needed for good governance at all levels should be readily available
• It should be simple to discover which geographic information is available and under what conditions it can be acquired and used
• Geographic data should be easy to understand and interpret, i.e. user-friendly
INSPIRE
Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
37
3. EA/UNEP Project Framework
From Inspiration to practice ...
• Reference Data and Metadata
• Architecture & Standards
• Environmental Thematic Data
• Implementation Structures & Funding
• Impact Analysis
• Data Policy & Legal Issues
38
Architecture and Standards
Interoperability
39
What is interoperability?
• Interoperability:
– ‘capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner that requires the user to have little knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units’ [ISO 2382-1]
40
What is interoperability?
• In other words:
– ‘the ability of systems to talk to one another in an agreed manner’
•Adoption of standards is the keystone to interoperability (SOAP, WMS, WFS, SQL, HTML, XML)
41
Interoperable GIS?
• Interoperable GIS
– Spatial components and standards that allow the communication described above.
•A standardised manner of discovering, querying, retrieving, and disseminating digital geographic information
42
But what does this mean?
Routes and Timetables(MapInfo)
Local Maps(ESRI SDE)
Registers(ORACLE)
Mobile
Work
Home
Hazards(Intergraph)
Local Government
Environment
al Services
Transport
Services
Central
Government
School
Standar
ds
Standar
ds
Standar
ds
Standar
ds
Network
43
Why do we want interoperable GIS?
•Greater access to decision support information
– Opening-up isolated data islands
•Better customer/citizen service
– Real-time access and delivery of a wider range of data sources and services
44
Why do we want interoperable GIS?
•More efficient system implementations
– No re-invention of the wheel
•Reduced reliance on proprietary/vendor specific platforms, data sources, and components
– Ability to swap-out components in best-of-breed architectures
45
Drivers - Simple Accessibility• Interoperability can be the glue that binds multiple,
complex resources into more simple views
Data ProvidersCommercial
ServicesN.G.O’sSchools
ServiceAgencies
GovernmentDepartments
Local Authorities
Interoperability SOAP - XML - GML - WFS - WMS - HTTP - ISO Interoperability
Planning
Portal
INSPIREGI Gateway
46
Data - Standards•Data interfaces that conform to
defined model standards allow diverse systems to...
47
Finally ...
… Semantic Interoperability
48
Data ?
• Raw Data
• Basic Data
• Primary Data
• Operating Data
• Core Data
• Non-core Data
• Key Data
• Essential Data
• Fundamental Data
• Reference Data
• Framework Data
• Core Reference Data
• Thematic Data
• Core Thematic Data
• Product Data
• Statistical Data
• Catalogue Data
• Temporal Data
49
Oh, yes . . . well
• Spatio-temporal Data
• Value-added Data
• Public Data
• Personal Data
• Private Data
• Commercial Data
• Tradable Data
• Business Data
• Cadastral Data
• Metadata
• Spatial Data
• Geospatial Data
• Topographic Data
• Geodetic Data
• Map Data
• Raster Data
• Vector Data
• Territorial Data
50
. . . it all depends.
• Geodata
• Quality Data
• Processed Data
• Geoinformatic Data
• Census Data
• Large scale Data
• Small scale Data
• Environmental Data
• Event Data
• Archive Data
• Re-usable Data
• Geomatic Data
• Heritage Data
• Sectoral Data
• Public Sector Data
• Library Data
51
I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realise
that what you heard is not what I meant.
Alan Greenspan
Chair of the US Federal Reserve
… who happily admits that since he became a central banker, he has learnt to mumble with
great incoherence