1-2 November 200 4 Who visits British forests and what do they do? Sheila Ward Forestry Commission Economics & Statistics United Kingdom
Dec 29, 2015
1-2 November 2004
Who visits British forests and what do they do?
Sheila Ward
Forestry Commission Economics & Statistics
United Kingdom
1-2 November 2004
2
Introduction
• Background to forestry recreation statistics in Britain
• Survey methodologies:• Local on-site surveys
• Automatic counters
• All forests surveys
• Quality of experience
• Household surveys
• Future developments
1-2 November 2004
3
Background
• Forestry Commission programme of on-site monitoring started in 1995
• On-site survey methods: • local on-site surveys • automatic counters• all forests methodology piloted in 2002, run from 2004• quality of experience piloted in 2002, run from 2003
• Household surveys: Day Visits Survey, Public Opinion of Forestry
1-2 November 2004
4
Local on-site surveys: methodology
• Programme started 1995 - by 2001, 24 surveys covering over 3,000 interviews
• Local surveys - focus on main sites• Interviewer administered questionnaires• Visitors interviewed as they leave• Topics covered include:
• Group composition• Whether travelled from home, transport, distance travelled• Frequency of visits• Main purpose of visit• Ratings of facilities
1-2 November 2004
5
Local on-site surveys: results
• For 2001, results from surveys at 12 districts included:
• One quarter of visitors were senior citizens (aged 60+) and one fifth were children.
• 46% lived locally (within 15 miles/ 24 km) of the site and 33% were holidaymakers.
• Over two thirds had visited the site before.
• 40% were there for a walk and 20% for fresh air and exercise.
1-2 November 2004
6
Automatic counters
• Around 100 vehicle and/ or people counters installed on-site (mainly busier sites)
• Some problems with data reliability
• Calibration exercises carried out to estimate average number of people per vehicle
• Reports produced giving trends in visitor numbers
1-2 November 2004
7
All forests: methodology
• Piloted at 2 areas in 2002; running in Wales in 2004 and Scotland in 2004-06
• Representative sample of recreational forest blocks (usage, population)
• Interviewer administered questionnaires + counting of visitors at all access points
• Visitors interviewed as they leave
• Many blocks have very low usage, so few interviews per day
• Model to estimate total visitors
1-2 November 2004
8
All forests: methodology
• Topics covered include:
• Group composition
• Whether travelled from home, transport, distance travelled
• Frequency of visits
• Main purpose of visit
• Expenditure
1-2 November 2004
9
All forests: results
Wales(Jan – July)
Scotland(June – Aug)
Total interviews achieved 539 143
Average interviews per hour 0.7 0.3
% male 65 62
% day trip 81 71
% visited before 81 73
% walking 73 71
% saying forest very importantor only reason for visiting
61 60
1-2 November 2004
10
Quality of experience: methodology
• Piloted in 2002; running in England from 2003
• 3 sites selected each year
• Interviewer administered & self completion questionnaires
• Visitors interviewed as they leave
• Focus groups to follow up on specific user groups, e.g. mountain bikers
1-2 November 2004
11
Quality of experience: methodology
• Topics covered include:
• Group composition
• Whether travelled from home, transport, distance travelled
• Frequency of visits
• Main purpose of visits
• Rating of facilities
• Importance of facilities
• Impact of other visitors
• Disturbances to visit
1-2 November 2004
12
Quality of experience: results
Grizedale, NW England, 2003:
Importance v satisfaction
‘go ape’ course
Being able to enjoy scenery/ views
Play equipment
Leaflets & information
1-2 November 2004
13
Future developments
• Alternative methodology for quality of experience at quiet sites being used in 2004 - interviews of households in local community rather than on-site interviews.
• Review of & improvement to all forests methodology
• Improved automatic counters at key sites