1 12-13 EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level 12-13 EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates.

1

12-13 EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates

The following slides contain a combination of state-level 12-13

EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates that you can

use to compare your school/district Reading 3D data to state

outcomes. You can populate the blank templates with your own

data by running your mCLASS “Comparing Populations” and

“Correlation/Effectiveness” reports where applicable. For

reference, please note that our data analysis indicates that NC

state performance tracks relatively close to national mCLASS

performance.

If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

2

DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison (BOY-EOY 12-13)

The above DIBELS RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at all benchmarks in SY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide #3, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding EOY percentages.

3

DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13)*

• * “State” percentages reflect all NC K-3 students assessed with mCLASS:Reading 3D at EOY 12-13

Grade

Percent of students in each DIBELS instructional category(End of Year 2012-13)

Students at benchmark level

Students below benchmark level

Students well below benchmark level

School/District

State School/District

State School/District

State

Kindergarten 73% 16% 11%

1st Grade 66% 13% 21%

2nd Grade 71% 13% 16%

3rd Grade 66% 13% 21%

4

DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

The above DIBELS RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3

students assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 5-7, run

this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

5

DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

BOY Intensive Students

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing well below benchmark levels

Grade

Students at benchmark level

Students below benchmark level

Students well below benchmark level

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 45% 26% 29%

1st Grade 30% 18% 52%

2nd Grade 11% 20% 69%

3rd Grade 10% 15% 75%

6

DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

BOY Strategic Students

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below benchmark levels

Grade

Students at benchmark level

Students below benchmark level

Students well below benchmark level

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 67% 22% 10%

1st Grade 58% 20% 22%

2nd Grade 45% 34% 20%

3rd Grade 39% 33% 28%

7

DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

BOY Benchmark Students

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing at benchmark levels

Grade

Students at benchmark level

Students below benchmark level

Students well below benchmark level

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 89% 9% 2%

1st Grade 84% 10% 6%

2nd Grade 90% 6% 4%

3rd Grade 87% 10% 3%

8

TRC Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13)

The above TRC RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide 9, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

9

TRC Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13)

Grade

Percent of students in each TRC instructional category(End of Year 2012-13)

Students above proficient

Students proficient

Students below proficient

Students far below proficient

School/District

State School/District

State School/District

State School/District

State

Kindergarten 45% 20% 11% 24%

1st Grade 27% 32% 16% 25%

2nd Grade 34% 30% 9% 27%

3rd Grade 41% 18% 15% 26%

10

TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

The above TRC RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 11-13, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

11

TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

BOY Students Far Below Proficient

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing far below proficient

Grade

Students above proficient

Students proficient

Students below proficient

Students far below proficient

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 12% 18% 15% 55%

1st Grade 5% 20% 19% 56%

2nd Grade 1% 12% 9% 78%

3rd Grade 4% 9% 17% 70%

12

TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)

BOY Students Below Proficient

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below proficient

Grade

Students above proficient

Students proficient

Students below proficient

Students far below proficient

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 29% 27% 16% 28%

1st Grade 15% 36% 23% 26%

2nd Grade 9% 35% 16% 40%

3rd Grade 16% 23% 25% 36%

13

TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13);

BOY Students Proficient and Above

Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing proficient and above

Grade

Students above proficient

Students proficient

Students below proficient

Students far below proficient

School/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

StateSchool/District

State

Kindergarten 64% 20% 9% 7%

1st Grade 41% 36% 14% 10%

2nd Grade 46% 34% 8% 11%

3rd Grade 55% 21% 13% 11%