Top Banner
1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway
16

1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Gregory peters
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

1

1

The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists

QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007

Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen

Statistics Norway

Page 2: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

2

Evaluation Tools

Checklists for question and questionnaire evaluation:

• Simplified version of Forsyth’s O-Questionnaire Review Coding System and Snijker’s Expert Questionnaire Appraisal Coding System

– text evaluation

• Own checklist inspired by Don Dillman– evaluation of visual design

Page 3: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

3

Page 4: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

4

Page 5: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

5

Page 6: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

6

What can survey methodologists contribute with?

• Focus on text and concepts – simple, unambiguous and clear

• Simple and consistent use of visual effects– Both on symbols and numbers (nonverbal language), and on text

(verbal language)

• Interaction between text and visual design

• Information flow

• Knowledge of cognitive processes

Page 7: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

7

Example I: unclear text I

Page 8: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

8

Example II: unclear text

Page 9: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

9

Example: text and visual design that doesn’t play together well

Page 10: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

10

Example: text and visual design that play together

Page 11: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

11

Example II: text and visual design that play together

Page 12: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

12

Example: poor information flow

Page 13: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

13

Example: good information flow

Page 14: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

14

Additional evaluation criteria when it comes to web applications

• Technical preconditions– Speakers, java, flash, etc.

• Evident confidentiality and data security measures

• Efficiency– Speed of server and PC

• The screen layout– Size, scrolling

• Navigational tools– Menus, buttons, links, etc.

• Audio and video effects

Page 15: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

15

Discussion

• Do you agree or disagree with our conclusions concerning what survey methodologists can contribute with?

• Do you have any experiences yourselves?

• Other things survey methodologists can contribute with?

• What can survey methodologists learn from traditional Web-design?

• Do you know of any literature on this topic?

Page 16: 1 1 The Usability of a Website evaluated by Survey Methodologists QUEST Workshop, Ottawa 2007 Bente Hole, Tore Nøtnæs and Gustav Haraldsen Statistics Norway.

16

If you have comments or questions, do not hesitate to contact us:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]