1 1 Next Generation Accountability Model Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. NCDPI Collaborative Conference for Student Achievement April 19, 2011
1 1 Next Generation Accountability Model Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. NCDPI Collaborative Conference for Student Achievement April 19, 2011.
Mar 27, 2015
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
11
Next Generation Accountability Model
Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D.NCDPI
Collaborative Conference for Student AchievementApril 19, 2011
2
School AccountabilityTaking Stock of Progress to Date
3
AgendaMaking progress
o Review of Our Model
o Post-Secondary Readiness
o Progress on Simulations
o Federal Update: No Child Left Behind Reauthorization
o Multi-State Assessment Consortium Update
o Feedback and Discussion
NCDPI’s Response to Framework For Change
SBE’s Framework For Change
Blue Ribbon Commission Report
Accountability and Curriculum Reform
Effort
Essential Standards
Assessments
Accountability
Accountability and Curriculum Reform
Effort
Goal: Institute an accountability model that…
improves student achievement
increases graduation rates
closes achievement gaps
Student Achievement
Post-SecondaryReadiness
Based on authentic assessments
Metric to be determined
Robust measures using more historical data
5-year cohort
Students meeting the Future-Ready Core requirements
Indicators
7
StudentGrowth
Graduation Rates
Math CourseRigor
Student Achievement
Post-SecondaryReadiness
Graduation Rates
Math Course Rigor
Based on North Carolina’s Next Generation Summative Assessments
Indicators
8
StudentGrowth
Student Achievement
Post-SecondaryReadiness
Student Growth
Graduation Rates
Math Course Rigor
Indicators
Post-SecondaryReadiness
Graduation Rates
Math Course Rigor
Δ
Δ
Δ
Absolute Performance Index Growth Index
9
10
Lower PerformanceHigher Growth
Higher Performance Higher Growth
Lower PerformanceLower Growth
Higher PerformanceLower Growth
Performance Index
Gro
wth
In
dex
Proposed Uses (of indicators)
Report
Reward and Sanction
Target Assistance
11
Levels at which indicators might be used
State
LEA
School
Classroom
Student o Revised Student Accountability
o RttT and Educator Effectiveness Workgroup
o Teacher Evaluation Tool
o Much is decided;key issues remain outstanding
12
13
• Future-Ready Core Inclusion
• More Robust Growth Model
• Five-Year Grad Rate
• Index System (including bonus points)
• Student Accountability Updated
o Review of Decisions
o Outstanding Issue• Post-Secondary Readiness
State
LEA
School
14
Post-SecondaryReadiness
o Importance of Readiness
o RFP Response
o Other Measures?
Simulations
04/10/23 15
16
Lower PerformanceHigher Growth
Higher Performance Higher Growth
Lower PerformanceLower Growth
Higher PerformanceLower Growth
Performance Index
Gro
wth
In
dex
17
o Four years of data from EVAAS to model new growth component
o Initial Finding: Stability in identifying higher and lower performing schools when changing weighting
o Checks and balances
o Additional results to come
Simulation Status
18
Federal Focus on…o Readiness
o Low-achieving schools
o Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Systems
o Flexibility
By this spring?
19
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
o Formative and Diagnostic Tools and ProcessesWill be used by teachers and students to diagnose a student’s learning needs, check for misconceptions, and/or to provide evidence of progress toward learning goal
o InterimOptional comprehensive and content-cluster measures; Designed to provide actionable information
o SummativeMandatory comprehensive accountability measures; Using computer adaptive testing and performance tasks
20
Questions and
Discussion
Related Documents
