Top Banner
1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002
49

1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Dulcie Bailey
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

11

In-Bound Logistics

John H. Vande Vate

Fall, 2002

Page 2: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

22

Exam 2

0 0

1

8

6

20

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

< 40 < 50 <60 <70 <80 <90 <100

Page 3: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

33

Scores

• Average 81

• Std. Dev: 11

• Remember: All questions about grading submitted IN WRITING

• Probably made mistakes

• Happy to review grading

• Unwilling to discuss grading

Page 4: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

44

Causes of Bullwhip Today

• Product Proliferation/Mass Customization– More varieties of products

• Build-to-Order – Prohibits pooling orders to smooth

requirements

• Lean– Prevents pooling releases to smooth

demand on the supply chain

Page 5: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

55

Why Lean (Just-In-Time)?

• Reduces inventory– Capital requirements– Etc

• Reduces handling – Direct-to-Line

• Improves Quality – See problems quickly

• Increases launch speed

Page 6: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

66

Why Not Lean?

Capacity

• Changes in requirements create upstream inventory

• Changes in requirements raise transport costs

Reliability

• Distant supplies subject to disruption

Page 7: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

77

Lean Works

When

• Total volume is relatively constant

• Product variety is limited

• Changeovers are fast and cheap

• Suppliers are nearby

Page 8: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

88

US Auto Industry

• Total volume is relatively constant

• Product variety is limited

• Changeovers are fast and cheap

• Suppliers are nearby

Page 9: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

99

How Lean Works

• Manufacturer has standing PO with supplier– Releases permission to supply against that PO

– Daily quantities or even more frequent to match planned production

Page 10: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1010

How Lean Works

Daily Reciept

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

01-Apr-02 06-Apr-02 11-Apr-02 16-Apr-02 21-Apr-02 26-Apr-02

Page 11: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1111

A Financial Model

Cash Acct

From Revenues

Cash Expenses

Page 12: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1212

Invest

Sell Assets

A Financial Model

Cash Acct

From Revenues

Cash Expenses

Page 13: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1313

Controls

When Cash balance reaches here

Invest enough to bring it to here

Page 14: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1414

Controls

When Cash balance falls to here

Sell assets to bring it to here

Page 15: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1515

Controls

T

b

t

Page 16: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1616

Trade-offs

• Opportunity cost of Cash Balance• Transaction costs of investing and

selling assets• Set the controls, T, t and b to balance

these costs

Page 17: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1717

Inventory Analogy

• Cash Expenses Daily Production reqs.• From Revenue Constant supplies• Sell Assets Expedited order• Invest Excess Curtailed order

Page 18: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1818

Trade-offs

• Opportunity cost of Cash Balance

• Transaction costs of investing and selling assets

• Cost of holding Inventory

• Supply chain costs of expediting and curtailing orders

• Set the controls, T, t and b to balance these costs

Page 19: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

1919

Cost Components

Cost of Inventory

• H: an interest rate on the value of the goods ($/item/year)

Cost of Expediting• E: extra transport costs (above std) ($/event)

Cost of Curtailing• C: disruption costs - savings over std transport

($/event)

Page 20: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2020

Total Cost

• Minimize H*Average Inventory Level E*Expected number of times we expedite C*Expected number of times we curtail

Page 21: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2121

Simple Model

• Simple model of production requirements

Probability

• Avg demand: a units/day 1 – 2p

• Above avg demand: a + units p

• Below avg demand: a - units p

• Standard Supply: a units/day

Page 22: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2222

A Markov Process

0 2 b Tt… … …

“Cash Balance”

p p p p p

p p p p p

1

1

1-2p

Page 23: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2323

Transition Matrix

0 … b … t … T0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 p 1-2p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 1-2p p 0 p 1-2p p… 0 p 1-2p p

b 0 p 1-2p p… 0 p 1-2p pt 0 p 1-2p p

… 0 p 1-2p pT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Drop . So k refers to k

Instead of b, t, T we find b, t, T

Page 24: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2424

Steady State Probabilities (i): Steady state probability “cash balance is

i* (0) = p(1) • 2p(1) = p(2) • 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=2, 3, …, b-1• 2p(b) = (0) + p(b-1)+p(b+1) • 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1)• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=t+1, t+2,…, T-2• 2p(T-1) = p(T-2) (T) = p(T-1)

Page 25: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2525

Steady State Probabilities (i): Steady state probability “cash balance is i* (0) = p(1) => (1) = (0)/p• 2p(1) = p(2) => (2) = 2(1) = 2(0)/p• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=2, 3, …, b-1• 2p(b) = (0) + p(b-1)+p(b+1) • 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1)• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=t+1, t+2,…, T-2• 2p(T-1) = p(T-2) == (T-2) = 2(T-1) = 2(T)/p (T) = p(T-1) == (T-1) = (T)/p

Page 26: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2626

Steady State Probabilities (i): Steady state probability “cash balance is i* (0) = p(1) => (1) = (0)/p• 2p(1) = p(2) => (2) = 2(1) = 2(0)/p• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=2, 3, …, b-1

• 2p(2) = p(1)+p(3) == 4(0) = (0)+p(3) (3) = 3(0)/p

• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1) • 2i(0) = (i-1)(0)+p(i+1) • (i+1) = (i+1)(0)/p

Page 27: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2727

Steady State Probabilities (i): Steady state probability “cash balance is i* (T) = p(T-1) => (T-1) = (T)/p• 2p(T-1) = p(T-2) => (T-2) = 2(T-1) = 2(T)/p• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=t+1, t+2,…, T-2• 2p(T-2) = p(T-1)+p(T-3) == 4(T) = (T)+p(T-3)

(T-3) = 3(T)/p

• 2p(T-i) = p(T-i+1)+p(T-i+1) • 2i(T) = p(T-i-1)+(i-1)(T) • (i+1)(T) = p(T-i-1) (T-i-1) = (i+1)(T)/p

Page 28: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2828

Summary

(i) = i(0)/p, i=1, 2, …, b (T-i) = i(T)/p, i=1, 2, …, T-t

• Still have to solve• 2p(b) = (0) + p(b-1)+p(b+1) • 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1)

Page 29: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

2929

Between b and t

• 2p(b) = (0) + p(b-1)+p(b+1)

• 2b(0) = (0) + (b-1)(0)+p(b+1) • b(0) = p(b+1) (b+1) = b(0)/p

Page 30: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3030

Summary

(i) = i(0)/p, i=1, 2, …, b (T-i) = i(T)/p, i=1, 2, …, T-t

• We just solved• 2p(b) = (0) + p(b-1)+p(b+1) (b+1) = b(0)/p• Now we have to solve…• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1)

Page 31: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3131

Between b and t

• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1)• 2(T-t)(T) = (T) + p(t-1)+(T-t-1)(T)• (T-t)(T) = p(t-1) (t-1) = (T-t)(T)/p

Page 32: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3232

Summary

(i) = i(0)/p, i=1, 2, …, b (T-i) = i(T)/p, i=1, 2, …, T-t (b+1) = b(0)/p

• We just solved• 2p(t) = (T) + p(t-1)+p(t+1) to get (t-1) = (T-t)(T)/p

• Now we have to solve…• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t

Page 33: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3333

Between b and t

• 2p(i) = p(i-1)+p(i+1), i=b+1, b+2,…, t• 2b(0) = b(0)+p(i+1) (i+1) = b(0)/p

Page 34: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3434

Summary (i) = i(0)/p, i=1, 2, …, b (T-i) = i(T)/p, i=1, 2, …, T-t (i) = b(0)/p, i = b, b+1, …, t

• And (t-1) = (T-t)(T)/p

• So• b(0)/p = (T-t)(T)/p (T) = b(0)/ (T-t) and (T-i) = i(T)/p, i=1, 2, …, T-t becomes (T-i) = [ib/(T-t)](0)/p

Page 35: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3535

Summary (i) = i(0)/p, i=1, 2, …, b (i) = b(0)/p, i = b, b+1, …, t (i) = [(T-i)/(T-t)]b(0)/p, i=t, t+1, …, T-1 (T) = b(0)/(T-t)

• 1 = (i) = • = (0) + (i(0)/p: i = 1, .., b-1) + (b(0)/p: i = b, .., t)

+ (ib(0)/[p(T-t)]: i = 1, .., T-t-1) + b(0)/[T-t]

= (0) + b(b-1) (0)/2p + 2(t-b+1)b(0)/2p

+ (T-t-1)b (0)/2p + b(0)/[T-t]

= (0) + [T+t-b]b(0)/2p + b(0)/[T-t] = (0)[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]/[(T-t)2p]

Page 36: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3636

Calculating (0)

• 1 = (0)[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]/[(T-t)2p] (0) = 2p(T-t)/[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]

Page 37: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3737

Costs

• Expected number of times we expedite (0)*Number of “Days” in Year

• Expected number of times we curtail (T)*Number of “Days” in Year

• Average Inventory Level (i(i): i = 0, .., T)

Page 38: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3838

Average Inventory

i(i) = • = (i2(0)/p: i = 1, .., b-1) + (ib(0)/p: i = b, .., t-1) +

(i(T-i)b(0)/[p(T-t)]: i = t, .., T-1) +Tb(0)/[T-t]

= b[3T(T-t) – 2(T-t)2 + 3(t2 – b2) + 6b-4] (0)/6p

5 points extra credit for first to find any errors

Page 39: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

3939

Average Inventory

i(i) = b[3T(T-t) – 2(T-t)2 + 3(t2 – b2) + 6b-4] (0)/6p

(0) = 2p(T-t)/[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]

i(i) = b[3T(T-t) – 2(T-t)2 + 3(t2 – b2) + 6b-4] (T-t)/

[6p(T-t+b) + 3b(T-t)(T+t-b)]

Page 40: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4040

Costs

• Expected number of times we expedite (0)*Number of “Days” in Year• 2p(T-t)N/[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]• Expected number of times we curtail (T)*Number of “Days” in Year• 2pbN/[2p(T-t+b) + b(T-t)(T+t-b)]• Average Inventory Level (i(i): i = 0, .., T) b[3T(T-t) – 2(T-t)2 + 3(t2 – b2) + 6b-4] (T-t)/

[6p(T-t+b) + 3b(T-t)(T+t-b)]

Page 41: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4141

Convert Variables

• Focus on the differences

• b, x, yT

b

t

b

x

y

Page 42: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4242

Optimize• Expected number of times we expedite• E*(0)*Number of “Days” in Year• E2pyN/[2p(y+b) + by(y+2x+b)]• Expected number of times we curtail• C*(T)*Number of “Days” in Year• C2pbN/[2p(y+b) + by(y+2x+b)]• Average Inventory Level• H(i(i): i = 0, .., T) • Hby[3Ty – 2y2 + 3x(x+2b) + 6b-4]/ [6p(y+b) + 3by(y+2x+b)]

Page 43: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4343

Optimize• Total Cost• {6pN(Ey+Cb) + Hby[3(b+x+y)y – 2y2 + 3x(x+2b) + 6b-4]}/ [6p(y+b) + 3by(y+2x+b)]

Page 44: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4444

DellParameter Value Solution Solve forp 0.5 b 4 b 4 69 t 10 x 6 Max YN 250 T 12 y 2 2E 500C 300H 10a 147State Probability Inventory Adjust Total Cost Average Inventory Avg. Days of Supply

0 0.013333333 0 1666.666667 8156.267 448.96 3.05414971 0.026666667 1.84 02 0.053333333 7.36 0 Max Inventory Max Days of Supply3 0.08 16.56 0 828 5.63265314 0.106666667 29.44 05 0.106666667 36.8 0 Total Adjustment Costs Total Inventory Costs6 0.106666667 44.16 0 3,666.67$ 4,489.60$ 7 0.106666667 51.52 08 0.106666667 58.88 09 0.106666667 66.24 0

10 0.106666667 73.6 011 0.053333333 40.48 012 0.026666667 22.08 200013 0 0 014 0 0 015 0 0 016 0 0 017 0 0 0

Page 45: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4545

Additional Constraint

• Can’t curtail more than one days usage

• On average y a

Page 46: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4646

Parameter Value Solution Solve forp 0.5 b 4 b 4 69 t 10 x 6 Max YN 250 T 12 y 2 2E 500C 300H 10a 147State Probability Inventory Adjust Total Cost Average Inventory Avg. Days of Supply

0 0.013333333 0 1666.666667 8156.267 448.96 3.05414971 0.026666667 1.84 02 0.053333333 7.36 0 Max Inventory Max Days of Supply3 0.08 16.56 0 828 5.63265314 0.106666667 29.44 05 0.106666667 36.8 0 Total Adjustment Costs Total Inventory Costs6 0.106666667 44.16 0 3,666.67$ 4,489.60$ 7 0.106666667 51.52 08 0.106666667 58.88 09 0.106666667 66.24 0

10 0.106666667 73.6 011 0.053333333 40.48 012 0.026666667 22.08 200013 0 0 014 0 0 015 0 0 016 0 0 017 0 0 0

Page 47: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4747

Differences

• Constant Stream of Releases punctuated by Expediting and Curtailing

• If supplier can see inventory and knows T, can anticipate and plan for coming expedited and curtailed orders

• Have to set a lower bound > 0 to protect against disruptions – safety stock

• Complicates the calculation of cost of Expediting

Page 48: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4848

Example: Shipments

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 8

15

22

29

36

43

50

57

64

71

78

85

92

99

10

6

11

3

12

0

12

7

13

4

14

1

14

8

15

5

16

2

16

9

17

6

18

3

19

0

19

7

20

4

21

1

21

8

22

5

23

2

23

9

24

6

Page 49: 1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

4949

Example: Inventory

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000