Top Banner

of 16

09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

Apr 07, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    1/16

    Flexure and Shear

    using EB FRP Reinforcement

    Tams NAGY-GYRGYLecturer, CE, Ph.D.

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    2/16

    fib

    Initial load Mo = service moment acting during strengthening

    Mo

    is typically larger than the cracking moment Mcr

    the calculation is based on a cracked section

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    3/16

    fib

    1. full composite action of concrete and FRP is maintained

    until the concrete reaches crushing in compression or the

    FRP fails in tension (such failure modes may also be characterized as

    2. composite action is lost prior to class 1 failure, e.g. due to

    pee ng-o o e

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    4/16

    fib

    Steel yielding followed by concrete crushing

    Steel yielding followed by FRP fracture

    Concrete crushing(high reinforcement ratios brittle and undesirable failure mode)

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    5/16

    fib

    Debonding and bond failure modes

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    6/16

    fib

    Bond behaviour of RC members strengthened with FRP

    Most failures observed caused by peelingoff of the EBR element.These depends on the starting point:

    in an uncrackedanchorage zone

    caused atflexural cracks

    caused atshear cracks

    caused by the unevennessof the concrete surface

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    7/16

    fib

    Bond behaviour of RC members strengthened with FRP

    Also was observed FRP end shear failure (or concrete ripoff)

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    8/16

    fib

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    9/16

    fib

    VRd = min (Vcd + Vwd + Vfd , VRd2 )

    Vfd = 0.9 fd,e Efu fbw d (cot + cot ) sin

    fd,e = design value of effective FRP strain=w

    d = effective depth of cross section

    f = FRP reinforcement ratio equal to 2tfsin / bw for continuously bonded shearreinforcement of thickness tf or (2tf/bw)(bf/sf) for FRP reinforcement in the form of

    f

    Efu = elastic modulus of FRP in the principal fibre orientation

    = angle of diagonal crack with respect to the member axis, assumed equal to 45 = angle between principal fibre orientation and longitudinal axis of member

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    10/16

    fib

    Vfd = 0.9 fd,e Efu fbw d (cot + cot ) sin

    = k k = 0.8

    fd,e = fk,e / f f= 1.3

    , ,

    fu

    .

    ffu

    /

    cme,f

    E

    f.

    30032

    170 Fully wrapped (or properly anchored) CFRP - FRP fracture controls:

    Side or U-shaped CFRP jackets:

    fu

    .

    ffu

    /

    cm

    .

    ffu

    /

    cme,f

    E

    f.;x

    E

    f.min

    30032

    3

    56032

    17010650

    Fully wrapped AFRP (FRP fracture controls):fu

    .

    ffu

    /

    cme,f

    E

    f.

    47032

    0480

    Note that in the equations () fcm is in MPa and Efu is in GPa.

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    11/16

    Taljsten

    Where f= 0.6fu

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    12/16

    fib

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    13/16

    Comparison of the axial compressive stress as a function of the

    axial strain for an unreinforced, reinforced with steel stirrups and

    - , , .

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    14/16

    fib

    (c

    /

    fck

    )

    (c / cc )

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    15/16

    fib

    Circular column

    Continuous confinement Confinement with gaps

    f = fu

  • 8/4/2019 09 Strengthening 2009 Nov9

    16/16

    Teng et. al.

    Rectangular column