Top Banner
Fernando Cotait Maluf Chairof Medical OncologyDepartment São José Hospital São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
45

09 state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Jul 12, 2015

Download

Health & Medicine

ONCOcare
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Fernando Cotait Maluf

Chairof Medical OncologyDepartment

São José Hospital

São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Page 2: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

•Advancedstagesatdiagnosis (~75%)

•Highlychemotherapy-sensitive

• Complete clinicalresponse to platinum-based CT: 70-85%

•Stage III: 20-25% of complete remissionat 5y

Page 3: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

• 81 studies

• 6885 patients

•StageIIIandIV

•Cytoreductivesurgeryfollowedbyplatinum-based CT

Bristowet al. J ClinOncol, 2002

Page 4: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

• CT platinum-basedversus CT NON platinum-based1,2

• HR death: 0.88 [0.79 – 0.98]

OvarianCancerMeta-Analysis Project (GynecolOncol, 2002) 1

AdvancedOvarianCancerTrialistsGroup (2002) 2

OvarianCancerMeta-Analysis Project (J ClinOncol, 1991) 3

•CT anthracyline-basedversus CT NON anthracyline-based3

•Absolutesurvivalbenefit: 5% ( p = 0.02)

•CisplatinversusCarboplatin1,2

• HR death: 1.02 [0.93 – 1.12]

•Platinum-dosenotassociatedwithsurvivalbenefit3

Page 5: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

•MONOCT platinum-basedversus POLICT platinum-based1,2

• HR death: 0.91 [0.75 – 1.05]

OvarianCancerMeta-Analysis Project (GynecolOncol, 2002) 1

AdvancedOvarianCancerTrialistsGroup (2002) 2

ICON 3: CarboplatinvsCarboplatin + Paclitaxel

Page 6: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

GOG 111 andOV 10(Intergroup)

McGuireetal, N Eng J Med, 1996;

n=386,suboptimalcytoreduction III/IV

SLPSG

PT 18m 38m

PC 13m 24m

Piccartetal, J Nat CancerInst, 2000;

n=668, debulkingsurgery, II-IV

SLPSG

PT 17m 35m

PC 12m 25m

Page 7: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Standard arm IV

D1 D2

IV IV

D1 Paclitaxel IV 135mg/m2/24hs

D2 CisplatinIV 75mg/m2

D1 D2 D8

IVIP IP

Experimental arm IV/IP D1 Paclitaxel EV 135mg/m2/24hs

D2 CisplatinIP100mg/m2

D8 PaclitaxelIP60mg/m2

GOG 172

Armostrong e al, NEJM, 2006;

N=429, optimaldebulkingsurgery, stage III

SLPSG

PT IV 19m 50m

PT IV/IP 24m 65m

Only 42% ofptscompletedtreat. IV/IP arm

Page 8: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

GOG randomized studies: IV vs IP

PFS (m) %Advantage OS (m) %Advantage

IV IP IV IP

Alberts -- -- 41 49

Markman 22 28 27 52 63

Armstrong 19 24 20 50 65 25

* Statisticallysignificant : p < 0.05

Page 9: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

AdvancedOvaria

nCancer

(n = 637)

RANDOMIZATION

CarboplatinAUC 6 + Paclitaxel

180mg/m2

q 21 days x 6 cycles

Katsumata N, Lancet: 374, 2009

CarboplatinAUC 6 + Paclitaxel

80mg/m2 d1,8,15

q 21 days x 6 cycles

Page 10: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Katsumata N, Lancet: 374, 2009

Progression-freeSurvival Overall Survival

Page 11: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

AdvancedOv

arianCancer

(III/IV)

(n = 718)

RANDOMIZATION

PrimaryCitoreduc

tion

Vergote I, NEJM: 363 2010

Platinun-CT

x 3 cycles

IntervalCytored

uction

Platinun-CT

x 3 cycles

Platinun-CT

x 6 cycles

Page 12: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Vergote I, NEJM: 363 2010

OverallSurvival Overall Survivalvs Residual Disease

Page 13: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Vergote I, NEJM: 363 2010

Citoreduction CT CT Citoreduction

Complete resection

20.4% 50.0%

Page 14: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Vergote I, NEJM: 363 2010

Citoreduction CT

CT Citoreductio

n

Pos-op Death 2.5% 0.7%

Hemorraghe G III/IV 7.1% 4.1%Infection 8.1% 1.7%

DVT/PE 2.5% 0%

Page 15: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

GOG-0218: Scheme

Stratification

• PS

• Stage/Citoreduction BEV 15 mg/kg

15 months

Paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2

Carboplatin(C) AUC 6

Carboplatin(C) AUC 6

Paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2

Carboplatin(C) AUC 6

Paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2

Placebo

PlaceboBEV 15 mg/kg

First-line : Epithelial

OV, PP or F

• Stage III optimal

• Stage III suboptimal

• Stage IV

n=1800 (planned)

R

A

N

D

O

M

I

Z

E

I

II

III

Arm

1:1:1

Page 16: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

GOG-218: Progression-Free SurvivalArm I

CP

(n=625)

Arm II

CP + BEV

(n=625)

Patients with event, n (%)423

(67.7)

418

(66.9)

Median PFS, months 10.3 11.2

Stratified analysis HR

(95% CI)

0.908

(0.759–1.040)

One-sided p-value (log rank) 0.080a

+ BEV (Arm II)CP (Arm I)

+ BEV → BEV maintenance (Arm III)Pro

po

rtio

n s

urv

ivin

g p

rog

ress

ion

fre

e

Months since randomization

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

0 12 24 36

Arm III

CP + BEV BEV

(n=623)

360

(57.8)

14.1

0.717

(0.625–0.824)

<0.0001a

Page 17: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Adverse event (grade when limited), n (%)

Arm I

CP

(n=601)

Arm II

CP + BEV

(n=607)

Arm III

CP + BEV BEV

(n=608)

GI eventsa (grade ≥2) 7 (1.2) 17 (2.8) 16 (2.6)

Hypertension (grade ≥2) 43 (7.2)b 100 (16.5)b 139 (22.9)b

Proteinuria (grade ≥3) 4 (0.7) 4 (0.7) 10 (1.6)

Pain (grade ≥2) 250 (41.7) 252 (41.5) 286 (47.1)

Neutropenia (grade ≥4) 347 (57.7) 384 (63.3) 385 (63.3)

Febrile neutropenia 21 (3.5) 30 (4.9) 26 (4.3)

Venous thromboembolic event 35 (5.8) 32 (5.3) 41 (6.7)

Arterial thromboembolic event 5 (0.8) 4 (0.7) 4 (0.7)

CNS bleeding 0 0 2 (0.3)

Non-CNS bleeding (grade ≥3) 5 (0.8) 8 (1.3) 13 (2.1)

RPLS 0 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2)

GOG-218: Select Adverse EventsOnset between cycle 2 and 30 days after date of last treatment

RPLS = reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndromeaPerforation/fistula/necrosis/leak

bp<0.05

Page 18: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

ICON 7: Scheme

• Open-label study

• Endpoints

– primary: PFS

– secondary: RR, OS, safety, QoL, cost effectiveness, translational

• Stratification

– FIGO stage/surgery; time since surgery; GCIG group

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 q3w

CarboplatinAUC6* q3w

Bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg q3w

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 q3w

CarboplatinAUC6* q3w

18 cycles

Stage I or IIa (grade

3 or clear cell) or

stage IIb–IV EOC,

PP, FTC

(n=1,520)

Page 19: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

ICON 7: Progression-Free Survival

Control Experimental

Events, n (%) 130 (17) 111 (15)

Log-rank p=0.098

Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.81 (0.63–1.04)

Sobrevida 1-ano, % 93 95

1.00

0.75

0.50

0.25

0

Pro

port

ion s

urv

ivin

g

Time (months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

Page 20: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

ICON 7: Select Adverse Events

6.2

2.5 2.1 1.3 0.4

11.6

4.1

1.50.4 0

29.1

2.0

9.2

25.9

4.4 5.0

1.7 1.3

39.6

6.7

3.6

0.4 0

28.3

2.8

12.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45Control (n=753)

Research (n=745)

ATE = arterial thromboembolism; CHF = congestive heart failure; RPLS = reversible posterior leucoencephalopathy syndrome; VTE = venous thromboembolism

Patients

(%

)

Page 21: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

GOG 218 and ICON 7: Comparison of TrialsTrial GOG-0218 ICON7

Number of patients 1,800 1,520

Setting/design •Double-blinded, placebo-controlled

•First-line setting

•3-arm study:

Arm I: CT + placebo

Arm II: CT + Bevacizumab (5 cycles)

Arm III: CT + Bevacizumab (extended)

•Bevacizumab continued for 16 months

•Bevacizumab dose: 5mg/kg/week

•Rigid AUC for carboplatin

• Open-label

•First-line setting

• 2-arm study:

Arm A: carboplatin/paclitaxel (CT)

Arm B: CT + Bevacizumab

•Bevacizumab continued for 12 months

•Bevacizumab dose: 2.5mg/kg/week

•Flexibility in AUC for carboplatin

Patient population Post-cytoreductive surgery

Sub-optimally debulked stage III/IV

Macroscopic optimally debulked stage III

Post-cytoreductive surgery

I or IIa (grade 3 or clear-cell histology)

IIb–IV (all grades and histological types)

Target disease Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary

peritoneal cancer

Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary

peritoneal cancer

Stratification • PS (0–1 vs 2)

• Stage (III vs IV)

• FIGO stage

• ≤ vs>4 weeks after surgery

• GCIG group

Primary endpoint • Investigator-assessed PFS data

• Exploratory: IRC-assessed PFS data

• Investigator-assessed PFS data

Page 22: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

P

R

I

M

A

R

Y

T

R

E

A

T

M

E

N

T

0 3 6 12 18 24

Refractory

Resistent

Sensitive

Highlysensitive

Months

Page 23: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

12

33

59

< 6 months

12-18 months

> 18 months

Overall ResponseRate (%)

Intervalfrom prior platinumtreatment (months)

Page 24: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Platinum-

Sensitive

Platinum-

ResistantorRefrac

tory

Platinum-

basedTherapy

Page 25: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Platinum-sensitiveovariancancer

ΔT >6 m

RANDOMIZATION

CarboplatinAUC 5 a 6 EV

OR

Cisplatin75mg/m2 EV

q 21 days

CarboplatinAUC 5 EVOR

Cisplatin50mg/m2 EV+

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 EVQ 21 days

Parmar MK, Lancet: 361, 2003

ICON-4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 Trial

Page 26: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Parmar MK, Lancet: 361, 2003

Overall Survival

ICON-4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 Trial

Page 27: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Pujades E etal, J ClinOncol, 2010

Inclusion Criteria:

• Platinum-sensitive (> 6 m)

• 1 or 2 prior platinum-based CT

• Measurable disease (image or CA125)

RANDOMIZATION

CarboplatinAUC 5 EV + Paclitaxel 175

mg/m2 IV 3

q21dx6 cycles

CarboplatinAUC 5 EV + DoxoLipossomal

30 mg/m2 IV 1 h

q 28 days x6 cycles*

*or until PD in patients with stable disease or response

CALYPSO: Scheme

Page 28: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Pujades E etal, J ClinOncol, 2010

CALYPSO: Progression-Free Survival

Page 29: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

•Endpoints

– primary: PFS

– secondary: ORR, OS, response duration, safety

– exploratory: IRC, CA125 response, ascites

•Stratification: time to recurrence, cytoreductive surgery

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2

days 1 and 8 q3w

CarboplatinAUC4 q3w

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2

days 1 and 8 q3w

CarboplatinAUC4 q3w

Bevacizumab 15mg/kg

Placebo

EOC = epithelial ovarian; PP = primary peritoneal; FTC = fallopian tube carcinoma

PD

PD

Bev.

15mg/kg

Pretreated

platinum-sensitive,

EOC, PP or FTC

(n=480)

Placebo

OCEANS: Scheme

Page 30: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

OCEANS: Patients Characteristics

CharacteristicCG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242)

Median age, years

(range)

61

(28−86)

60

(38–87)

Age ≥65 years, % 38 35

Race, %

White

Other

92

8

90

10

ECOG PS 0, % 76 75

Histologic subtype, %

Serous

Mucinous/clear cell

Other

84

3

14

78

5

17

Platinum-free interval, %

6–12 months

>12 months

42

58

41

59

Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent disease, % 10 12

Page 31: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

OCEANS: Progression-free SurvivalCG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242)

Events, n (%) 148 (61) 119 (49)

Median PFS,

months (95% CI)

8.6

(8.3–10.2)

12.3

(10.7–14.6)

Stratified analysis

HR (95% CI)

Log-rank p-value

0.451

(0.351–0.580)

<0.0001

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

Pro

po

rtio

n p

rog

ress

ion

fre

e

0 6 12 18 24 30

242 168 31 8 3 0CG + PL242 195 73 22 7 0CG + BV

MonthsNo. at risk

Page 32: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

OCEANS: Progression-free Survival vs Subgroups

Median PFS

(months)

Baseline risk factorNo. of

patientsCG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242) HR (95% CI)

CG + BV

better

CG + PL

better

All patients 484 8.4 12.4 0.49 (0.40–0.61)

Platinum-free interval,

months6–12 202 8.0 11.9 0.41 (0.29–0.58)

>12 282 9.7 12.4 0.55 (0.41–0.73)

Cytoreductive surgery

for recurrent diseaseYes 54 7.5 16.7 0.50 (0.24–1.01)

No 430 8.4 12.3 0.49 (0.39–0.62)

Age, years <65 306 8.5 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.62)

≥65 178 8.4 12.3 0.50 (0.34–0.72)

Baseline ECOG PS 0 367 8.6 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.60)

1 116 8.3 10.6 0.61 (0.39–0.95)

HR0.2 0.5 1 2 5

Page 33: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

OCEANS: Response Rate

Duration of response CG + PL

(n=139)

CG + BV

(n=190)

Median, months 7.4 10.4

HR (95% CI) 0.534

(0.408–0.698)

p<0.0001a

100

80

60

40

20

0

%

78.5

57.4 PR = 61

PR = 48

CR = 17CR = 9

Difference: 21.1%

p<0.0001

aCompared for descriptive purposes only

CG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242)

Page 34: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Median PFS

(months)

Baseline risk factorNo. of

patientsCG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242) HR (95% CI)

CG + BV

better

CG + PL

better

All patients 484 8.4 12.4 0.49 (0.40–0.61)

Platinum-free interval,

months6–12 202 8.0 11.9 0.41 (0.29–0.58)

>12 282 9.7 12.4 0.55 (0.41–0.73)

Cytoreductive surgery

for recurrent diseaseYes 54 7.5 16.7 0.50 (0.24–1.01)

No 430 8.4 12.3 0.49 (0.39–0.62)

Age, years <65 306 8.5 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.62)

≥65 178 8.4 12.3 0.50 (0.34–0.72)

Baseline ECOG PS 0 367 8.6 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.60)

1 116 8.3 10.6 0.61 (0.39–0.95)

HR0.2 0.5 1 2 5

Page 35: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Median PFS

(months)

Baseline risk factorNo. of

patientsCG + PL

(n=242)

CG + BV

(n=242) HR (95% CI)

CG + BV

better

CG + PL

better

All patients 484 8.4 12.4 0.49 (0.40–0.61)

Platinum-free interval,

months6–12 202 8.0 11.9 0.41 (0.29–0.58)

>12 282 9.7 12.4 0.55 (0.41–0.73)

Cytoreductive surgery

for recurrent diseaseYes 54 7.5 16.7 0.50 (0.24–1.01)

No 430 8.4 12.3 0.49 (0.39–0.62)

Age, years <65 306 8.5 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.62)

≥65 178 8.4 12.3 0.50 (0.34–0.72)

Baseline ECOG PS 0 367 8.6 12.5 0.47 (0.36–0.60)

1 116 8.3 10.6 0.61 (0.39–0.95)

HR0.2 0.5 1 2 5

Page 36: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Platinum-

Sensitive

Platinum-

ResistantorRefrac

tory

Retrospectiveanalysis: 111 pts

Recurrence< 3m orØ Response

Median OS 6

months

SV <4months 32%

SV <12months 73%Markmanet al. GynecolOncol, 2004

Page 37: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

LiposomalDoxorrubicin

Gemcitabine

Paclitaxel (weekly)

Docetaxel

Topotecan

Etoposide (oral)

Vinorelbine

Ifosfamide

Page 38: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

AURELIA/MO22224: Scheme

Physician’s choice:

Bevacizumab

15mg/kg q3w or

SOC

•Endpoints

– primary: PFS

– secondary endpoints: ORR (RECIST and/or CA125), biological progression-free interval, OS, QoL, safety

•FPI: October 2009 (recruitment: 24 months)EOC = epithelial ovarian; PP = primary peritoneal; FTC = fallopian tube carcinoma; PLD = pegylated liposomal doxorubicin;

SOC = standard of care

Bevacizumab 10mg/kg q2w or

15mg/kg q3w+

chemotherapy (physician’s

choice, as in control arm)

SOC

Progression

Progression

Chemotherapy alone

(physician’s choice):

paclitaxel 80mg/m2qw or

topotecan4mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15

q4w or 1.25mg/kg days 1–5 q3wor

PLD 40mg/m2 q4w

EOC, PP or FTC

that relapsed

within <6 months

after platinum-

based

chemotherapy

(n=300)

Page 39: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer
Page 40: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer
Page 41: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer
Page 42: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

PARP inhibitors

Randomized Phase II trial: (Ledermann et al, ASCO , 2011)

N = 265

CTOlaparibvs Placebo

PFS: 8.4 vs 4.8 months (p< 0.00001)

Phase II trial: (Penson et al, ASCO , 2011)

N = 41

Carboplatin + Gemcitabine + Iniparib

OR: 70%

Page 43: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer
Page 44: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Convidados

Internacionais

Page 45: 09   state of the art of the management of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer