1 CSPL Sales Review for 2012-13 Month April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Total Sales 238.08 255.0 7 259.1 0 Segment Sales April Sales May Sales June OEM 207.63 228.10 229.91 Retail 21.22 17.50 19.95 Exports 7.42 7.23 8.14 Fleet 1.81 2.25 1.10 Total 238.08 255.07 259.10 Mn. Rs
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
CSPL Sales Review for 2012-13
Month April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total
Total Sales 238.08 255.07 259.10
Segment Sales April Sales May Sales June
OEM 207.63 228.10 229.91
Retail 21.22 17.50 19.95
Exports 7.42 7.23 8.14
Fleet 1.81 2.25 1.10
Total 238.08 255.07 259.10
Mn. Rs
Analysis of Raw Material cost to % of sales 2012-13
PO:
Month April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total
Budgeted Material Consumption 44.70 46.06
Actual Material Consumption 48.33
51.85
Mn Rs.
3
Capacity Utilization for Year 2011 – April to Mar 2013
Pelhar April May June July August Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MarInstalled Capacity ( Million Sets)
0.76 0.83 0.83
Utilized Capacity (Million Sets)
0.33 0.45 0.50
% Utilization 43% 55% 61%
8/22/2012 4
EXPORTS ProjectsPROJECTS Status on JUNE 2012
HONDA A countermeasure was given to Honda ,where CSPL-TVF-3PLE-1 material is to be used. All the materials available in Pelhar and Unit I were under deviation ,traced one roll at haridwar which was without deviation and passes HES specs hence procured that from Haridwar, on which gloss patches were printed . These patches passes in fuel oil resistance test where as fails in E10 and E20 solution for both Type 4 and Type 6 panels. Testing presently under process for original Honda Decal for E10 and E20 solution reports will be submitted by July 1st week
MIO-PINK(Yamaha Indonesia)
Printing done with following combination and test conducted results found as under,Material used as 1.PVC WB80 PA 10 11LLY2.PVC WB80 PA T1 11LLY3.CSPL-WVF-3P-14.CSPL-WVF-3P-2Printed OC with following combination 1.V3 + 45% Non silicon 8228 OC2.V3 + 8600 OC3.V3 + SIEKO 5412 UVAll the material printed with V3 + Sieko 5412 UV fails in WOM after 400hrs,where as material printed with other two OC passes in WOM till 400 hrs and is continued for 900hrs
KUBOTA Approved Drawing submitted (K7564-65231,K7311-65206,K7721-65801,K2581-65205) on 14.6.2012 and 18.6.2012. Awaiting for the release of the P.O
8/22/2012 5
Membrane Switch Projects
TYPE OF MEMBRANE SWITCH
STATUS IN JUNE 2012
LGLG samples will be submitted by 11-07-12
LG quote submitted on 2.7.2012 ,awaiting feedback from Mktg
Membrane switch production set-up
Location finalized for MS assembling (In dial post curing area) .Layout to be finalised
Membrane Switch Equipments
Testing equipments (MS tester, life tester & Hipot tester) ordered, expected by mid July 2012
Hot air oven will be ordered after positive feed back from LG
Manpower2 man power to be taken from production for involving in MS start up production activities. Existing 2 persons
8/22/2012 6
RAW MATERIAL TRACKING SHEET
Raw material
PE - No. of samples dispatched – April to Mar 2013
Month
2010-11 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Average Target
Background : approved Brandboad : approved Clear and well file
information
6 NAVY CUT ACP, 59cmx 89cm ITC 22-Jun Awaiting feedback
7 NAVY CUT Reverse printing 17" x
22" ITC 22-Jun
As per the instructions received by Nandini kindly stop all the sample developments on clear acrylic.We will not be using 3mm clear acrylic henceforth.We are going to try some alternate base material
12
PE - Exports samples developed in the month of Exports
Sr. No JOB Customer
Costing Sampling
1
KUBOTA (225 RFQ)
KUBOTA39 RFQ Submitted on PC22 RFQ Submitted on PVC22 RFQ Submitted on PVCTotal 83 RFQ Submitted
2
KUBOTA (225 RFQ)
KUBOTA39 RFQ Submitted on PC22 RFQ Submitted on PVC30 RFQ Submitted on PVCTotal 91 RFQ Submitted
3 Sample Development KUBOTA 30 pcs. Each submitted Dt. 28-06-2012
4 Sample DevelopmentSample DevelopmentSample DevelopmentSample Development
KUBOTAKUBOTAKUBOTAKUBOTA
HOLD for Customer Inputs
PO:
SCM – RM Cost Saving as % on Total Receipt April to Mar 2013
In Lac
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Actual SavingsTarget
Month2010-11 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Actual
Purchasing Value 817 1073 1122
Target 57 75 79
Actual Savings 5.1 89 15.5
% 9% 118% 20%
PO:
Inventory Analysis (Material Rx Vs Consumed) April to Mar 2013
Total 12.720 5.785 0.057 6.053 6.110 12.391 12.419
Production - Process Performance Average Printing M/C Efficiency % - April to Mar 2013
73
75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
6665 65 65
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
Avg.
(11-
12)
Apr-
12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Aug-
12
Sep-
12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
13
Feb-
13
Mar
-13
Target Average
26
Production - Process Performance Summary – Machine wise printing Idle / down time June
Month
Description
Avg. (11-12)
Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12Sep-12 Oct-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13
Total Loading Time (min.) 204595 162714 184178 201729
Total Down Time (min.) 61233 58657 59206 61105
Total Down Time (%) 30.00 36.05 32.15 30.29
Reasons of Down Time
Planned Shut Down13681 20864 12757
13638
Screen Related 4655 36094568
3571
Process Related 3882430045 37828
39305
Ink Related2894
3474 31403561
Maintenance Related 1180 665 9131030
27
% OT Cost to Production – April to Mar 2013
• New Model AAGA – Super Splendor processed on short lead time.• Increased changeovers in SPD due to Brand Migration at HMC• M/C Allocation for ITC Sampling
% OT Cost to ProductionTraget % OT Cost (Support) % OT Cost (Production) % OT Cost (Total)
28
Production- Process Performance Punching Machines Efficiency % - Pelhar - April to Mar 2013
Machine April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Actual (Avg)
Target (Avg)
REBOLINI -1 91 87 87
REBOLINI -2 82 82 94
BHARAT BIG -1 83 72 98
BHARAT BIG -2 89 89 81
BHARAT SMALL -1
82 78 91
BHARAT SMALL -2
76 76 70
29
In-house Rejection – Area wise % (Pelhar) April to Mar 2013
5.96%
6.85%
5.10% 5.13%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%Av
g. (1
1-12
)
Apr-
12
May
-12
Jun-
12
Jul-1
2
Aug-
12
Sep-
12
Oct
-12
Nov-
12
Dec-
12
Jan-
12
Feb-
12
Mar
-12
Rejection %
Month
30
In-house Rejection – Value wise % April to Mar 2013
Targ
et
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.009.00
10.00
8.007.19
9.44
8.13
Unit 1PelharHaridwar
DIAL Rejection trend
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct
Pricol 16 15 20.71 10.54 14.58 9.5 9.56
Continental 50 24 52.38 30.83 34.08 28 31.44
Diffuser 0 0 41.82 64.77 43.04 27.94 39.25
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pricol Continental Diffuser
Internal Rejection – Quantity % April to Mar 2013
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
A: 1
1-12
A: 1
0-11
012345678
Pelhar Target
Internal Rejection
April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Target Actual11-12
Actual 10-11
Pelhar 4.05 3.63 3.85 4.0% 4.0 5.7
33
Line Rejection PPM – BAL VarrocApril to Mar 2013
Actu
al:
11-
12 Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
W & C
Target
Line Rejection – BAL (2011-12)
Line rejection ppm from Varroc - PantnagarTARGET2011-12
ACHIEVED2011-12
TARGET2012-13
APRIL 12
MAY-12
JUNE-12 JULY-12 AUG-12
SEP-12 OCT-12 NOV-12 DEC-12 JAN-13 FEB-13 MAR-13
3000 11909 3000 6001 11986
34
Vendor Rating - Bajaj
CSPL (Vendor) Rating from BAJAJ [2012-13]
Customer Standard APRIL MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
BAL – WC (100487)
< Level 2
2 3 3
BAL – Haridwar (111407)
< Level 2
2 2 2
35
Line PPM feedback from M&M FES
Line ppm: MM FES
Actual 2012-13Actual 11-12 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
TARGET LR PPM <250 ppm
618 258 13
% GR Rejection = 0 3 0 0
Actu
al 1
1-12 Ap
r
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
M&M FES - Line ppm [12-13] Target: 250 ppm
36
Line PPM feedback from Tafe
Line ppm: Tafe
Actual 11-12
Actual 2012-13
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
TARGET <100 ppm 865 250 0 0
865
250
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000 Past trend Target Actual
37
4. Summary of Complaints
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
No. of Complaints 3 2 6 1 Nature of Complaints low Gloss 1 Complaints by Customer Varroc – Chakan 1
Sr.No Customer Complaint Description Root Cause Corrective Action
1 IYM-Surajpur Graphic Cut in 1CK2 Levelling of blade on one side of die
found out to be uneven.
1] Work instruction amended for the method of visual checking of deepcut,2] job training provided to the inspectors.
2 IYM-Surajpur
Ink peel off in Yamaha Emblem (5KAB CRUX)
Uncoated metallic particles have less cohesive force as compared to coated metallic particles used in ink preparation.
Coated metallic particles to be used. Bill of material amended and also the process routing changes in SAP.
3 IYM-Surajpur Air Bubbles in 1CK3 New material was used - inadequate
validationPPAP methodology to be followed for new material introduction
4 Bajaj - Waluj
Disc. 125 ST Shade Variation found in Flame red for batches 446052012 & 70062012
Variation in deposition of metallic partcile on base film during printing in single batch.
Uniform stirring during ink issue also stirring prior to pouring ink on the screen.
5 Continental-Bengaluru
Smoke Variation found in HDT Diamler in 1 pieces in lot size of 300 of batch number 2021211 at customer assembly line at Continental, Bangalore on 20/06/2012.
Setup sheet is not identified at printing stage before proceeding for further operation leading to mixing of setup sheets/dials with Ok sheets/dials at final inspection.
Setup Sheets/Dials to be crossed completely using permanent marker in printing stage itself.Illumination inspection to be done on Cluster instead of light table.
6 Continental-Bengaluru
Green and white dots found in HDT Daimler in 59 pieces in lot size of 300 of batch number 2021211 at customer assembly line at Continental, Bangalore on 20/06/2012.
Leakage in screen due to removal of emulsion coating from non image area leading to green and grey ink transfer on image area while printing 5th Colour and 6th colour respectively
Before commencing printing a pc sheet with lamination and/or rough pc sheet will be printed and checked for ink leakage and same will be done after every 100th and for last sheet and leakages if any will be touched up by PVA
5. Summary of Corrective actions - June
HMC-G– Quality Failure ReportPlant SL
No.Material Code
Material Description
Problem Analysis Action Type Reason Counter Measures
HMC-G 1.
2.
240512
5940312=09
2470512=09
3160612=09
CBZ Stripes
KWAH Front Cowl Blk Blue
KVEG CVG
KWAH Front Cowl cover BHG
Incomplete back cut
Incomplete back cut(10-12%)
-Incomplete back cut(25-30%)
-Incomplete back cut(3-5%)
-Samples sent to plant
-Samples sent to plant
-Samples sent to plant
-Samples sent to plant
-Process lapse
-Process and inspection lapse
-Process and inspection lapse
-Process and inspection lapse
-Yet to be received
-Yet to be received
-Yet to be received
-Yet to be received
HMC-D – Line feedback
Customer Issue Batch No. Observation CAPA / Comments HMC-D 1.Craters observed in model
splender plus AAEA
2.Skinning observed in stripes of model AAEA SBK -model AAEA P.maroon
3.Top film removal hard observed in stripes of model AADA BLK Sil
-Splendor pro color SBK
4.Hole punching in stripes
5.Incomplete back cut at tab location in side cover color SBK
5560412
2640512
0320120376
3100512
0520120425
-
0520120425
-Observed after lacquering process.-Reduces after cleaning with IPA.
-Observed in 10-15% stripes -obsd. In 20-25% pcs.
-Observed in 30-40% stripes
-observed in 30-40% stripes
-Repeated problem & Observed in the materials belonging to march 12
-Observed in 30-35% pcs.
-Yet to be received from plant -IPA cleaning introduced prior to lacquering and after that no problem has been reported.
-Yet to be received from plant .
-do-
-Yet to be received from plant.
-Yet to be received
-Inform to all concerned with compiled data.
-Yet to be received.
Customer Line feedback-Yamaha SP
Customer Issue Batch No. Observation CAPA / Comments IYM-SP 1.Ink peel off in yamaha
emblem model 5KA
2.Craters in stripes of model 1CK3
5470412
0120120743
-Ink peel off while removal of top application film
-Problem repeated
-Problem observed at edges in different locations after lacquering
-Submitted on 23.04.2012
-Submitted on 26.06.2012-Fresh batch yet to be delivered
-Submitted on 26.06.2012-Fresh batch after c/m yet to be received
Major Highlights (Quarter-1)
• April12: First Surveillance Audit inline with TS:16949/2009 conducted by Bureau Veritas.
MACHINE-WISE DOWNTIMES FOR CYLINDER PRESSES – April to Mar 2013
MTBF – Mean Time Between Failures; MTTR – Mean Time To RepairDowntime for Rolt is not considered as there are some manufacturing defects which lead to downtimes.
Machine Total Downtime(mins.)
Avg. Downtime per day (mins.)
Avg. MTBF (mins.)
Avg. MTTR (mins.)
Sakurai-01 465 18.6 21367.65 465
Sakurai-02 115 4.6 7408 38
SPS-01 205 8.2 8599 51.25
SPS-02 60 2.4 21570 60
SPS-03 0 0 43200 0
SPS-04 30 1.2 14390 15
SPS-XP 320 12.8 8576 80
Others 430 35.33 2177.62 57.63
TOTAL (JUN’ 12) 1700 68.00 1507.73 95.86
TOTAL (MAY’ 12) 1960 40.80 1579.80 42.70
TOTAL (APR’ 12) 982 40.80 1579.80 42.70
TOTAL (Mar’ 12) 2429 83.29 879.40 51.68
46
TOTAL MAINTENANCE DOWNTIME (MINS.) – April to Mar 2013