02 margot yapp

RTPARCTF

California Statewide Needs AssessmentLocal Transportation System

2012 Update

April 10, 2013

Noise

Buses

Air &GHG

Energy

Storm water

Pedestrians

Bicyclists

• What are pavement conditions statewide? • How much will it cost to maintain pavements?

Bridges? Essential components? • What is the funding shortfall? • What is impact of different funding scenarios?

Study Objectives

Local Streets Huge Part of State Network

81% of California’s pavements are owned by cities and counties!

39%

24%4%

15%

18%

StreetSaverMicroPaverCartegraphOtherNo PMS

PMS Software Used92% of total miles are included in a

PMS

New Things in 2012 Assessment

• Sustainable practices• Complete streets• Bridge scenarios

RTPARCTFPavements

Average Statewide PCI

67.8 (2008)

65.8 (2012)68 (Cities)62 (Counties)

Statewide Average PCI = 66

This doesn’t look too bad …

So Why is 66 Critical?

Statewide Trends

2008

71- 80 (Good)

50-70 (At Risk)

0 -49 (Poor)

Pavement Condition Index

2012

87% of counties have average

rating of “at risk” or “poor”

Prev. Maint. Costs Increasing

AC Overlay Costs Increasing

Sustainable Practices

Recycling technologies

If just 50% of eligible projects use recycled

materials, we can save $8.8 billion!

RTPARCTF

Bridges

Who Owns Bridges? National Bridge Inventory• 11,863 bridges

• 6,300 are on-system• 5,584 off-system

Non-NBI bridgesApprox. 3,500

Bridges Are Getting Old

55% require rehabilitation

or replacement

It’s Not Just Roads and Bridges

• Sidewalks• Curb ramps• Curb & gutter• Storm drains

• Street lights• Signs• Retaining walls

Transportation Asset NeedsPavement 72.4$ Essential Components 30.5$ Bridges 4.3$

Totals 107.2$

10 Years ($B)Funding

13.3$ 8.7$ 3.0$

25.1$

Shortfall(59.1)$ (21.8)$

(1.3)$ (82.1)$

Total Transportation Needs

56 cents/galor

76 cents/day!

Pavement Funding Scenarios

1. Existing funding ($1.33 billion/year)2. Transportation CA measure ($1B/yr)

a. Bond i.e. $4.23 billion/year for first 5 years, $1.33 billion for next 5 years

b. No bond i.e. $2.33 billion/year

3. Maintain current PCI at 664. Efficiency scenario5. Best mgmt practices

1. Existing Funding ($1.33 B/year)

PCI drops to 53Unfunded backlog grows to $66 B

2a. No bond ($2.33 B/year)

PCI drops to 60Unfunded backlog grows to $50 B

2b. Bond ($4.2B/$1.3B)

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

$37.5 $37.5 $37.7 $38.7 $37.4$40.0 $41.5 $42.3 $43.5 $45.5

67 67 68 6869

6866

6564

63

Year

Bac

klog

($ b

illio

n)

PC

I

Scenario 2b. Transportation BondPCI drops to 63Unfunded backlog grows to $45 B

3. Maintain PCI = 66 ($3.2 B/year)

PCI stays at 66Unfunded backlog stays at ~$39 B

4. Efficiencies ($4.1 B/yr)

PCI improves to 71Unfunded backlog drops to $30 B

5. BMP ($7.2 B/year)

PCI improves to 84Unfunded backlog eliminated

% Pavements

in Failed Condition

% Pavements

in Good Condition

6.6% 56%25% 46%23% 68%21% 71%20% 78%16% 83%0% 100%

Impacts of Different Scenarios

Scenarios Annual Budget ($B)

PCI in 2022

Current Conditions - 661. Existing Funding 1.33$ 532A. No bond 2.33$ 602B. Bond $4.23/$1.33 633. Maintain PCI = 66 3.23$ 664. Effi ciency Savings 4.11$ 715. Best Mgmt Practices 7.23$ 84

The percent of roads in failed

condition will increase from 6.6% to

25% by 2022 under current funding.

RTPARCTF

What’s “failed” condition?

Average Sufficiency Rating

Existing budget will result in SR = 75

Percent Structurally Deficient

Existing budget will result in 38% structurally deficient

bridges.

Tehama County

Conclusions

• Transportation system is not great and it’s not getting better– 25% of roads will be failed in 10 years– 38% of bridges will be structurally deficient

• Additional funding required to hold infrastructure together

• Deferring repairs will cost much more later!

Conclusions

• Delays in funding will cost

RTPARCTF

? Contact:Margot Yapp, P.E.

Nichols Consulting Engineers, [email protected]

(510) 215-3620