Top Banner
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses 01-19-11
49

01-19-11

Jan 06, 2016

Download

Documents

Yosef

NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses. 01-19-11. Steady-State Maxwell EM Analysis: PF and TF Coil Loads: Current Scenario #79 with 10% Headroom. ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil Assembly Exported to Maxwell. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 01-19-11

NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and

ANSYS WB Static Stresses01-19-11

Page 2: 01-19-11

Steady-State Maxwell EM Analysis:PF and TF Coil Loads:

Current Scenario #79 with 10% Headroom

Page 3: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil Assembly Exported to Maxwell

Page 4: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil Assembly Exported to Maxwell (2)

Page 5: 01-19-11

Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure

Page 6: 01-19-11

Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Y-Z PlaneCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

Maxwell and Opera Field Results Agree within 3%

Page 7: 01-19-11

Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Coil SurfacesCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

Page 8: 01-19-11

Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Coil Surfaces(2)Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

Page 9: 01-19-11

Maxwell Results: Current Density on Coil SurfacesCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

Page 10: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Full Model Mesh

Hex Dominant MeshElement Size = 5 cm# Nodes = 685908# Elements = 131969

Page 11: 01-19-11

TF Outer Leg OOP Torque and Force, Fixed Ends, No Clevis LoadCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

TF OOP Torque = 1.271E06 ft-lbfTF OOP Force = 12 x 24,103 lbf = 2.892E05 lbf

Page 12: 01-19-11

TF Inner Leg OOP Torque, OOP Force/ Flag: Fixed EndsCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

OOP Torque = 9.99E04 ft-lbfOOP Force/Flag = 9.99E04 ft-lbf/ (1 ft x 36) = 2.775E03 lbf

Page 13: 01-19-11

Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: Half Plane TF OOP TorqueCurrent Scenario #79w/ Headroom

Results1/2 Plane OOP Torque

(lbf-ft)

Maxwell/ ANSYS 2.492E+06

Design Spreadsheet 2.853E+06

Page 14: 01-19-11

Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF1AU Vertical ForceCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

ResultsPF1AU Vertical Force

(lbf)

Maxwell/ ANSYS 2.324E+04

Design Spreadsheet 2.541E+04

Page 15: 01-19-11

Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF2U Vertical ForceCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

ResultsPF2U Vertical Force

(lbf)

Maxwell/ ANSYS -3.073E+04

Design Spreadsheet -3.192E+04

Page 16: 01-19-11

Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF3U Vertical ForceCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

ResultsPF3U Vertical Force

(lbf)

Maxwell/ ANSYS 6.394E+03

Design Spreadsheet 6.528E+03

Page 17: 01-19-11

Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF5U Vertical ForceCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

ResultsPF5U Vertical Force

(lbf)

Maxwell/ ANSYS -2.496E+05

Design Spreadsheet -2.403E+05

Page 18: 01-19-11

Transient Maxwell EM Analysis:Vacuum Vessel Disruption Load:

Centered-Plasma Disruption Scenario

Page 19: 01-19-11

For the current quench mode, five cases shall be assessed by simulating the linear decay of current at the rate specified for the five locations.

For the VDE/Halo mode, four cases shall be assessed. In each case the current in the centered plasma shall be decreased as indicated while the current in the offset plasma shall be increased as indicated to simulate plasma motion. Forces due to induced currents shall be added to forces due to halo currents.

Page 20: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil and VV w/ PortsExported to Maxwell

Page 21: 01-19-11

Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure: w/ Ports

Page 22: 01-19-11

Maxwell Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports Mesh:VV Mesh Settings: Element Length = 3 cm, Faceting Angle = 5 degrees

# Elements = 3.32E06

Page 23: 01-19-11

Magnetic Flux Density on Y-Z Plane: VV w/ Ports: End of QuenchCurrent Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

Maxwell and Opera Field Results Agree within 3%

Page 24: 01-19-11

Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: Start of Quench

1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 25: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: Start of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 26: 01-19-11

Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 27: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 28: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 29: 01-19-11

ANSYS DM Solid Model: Vacuum Vessel w/ Port Extensions

Page 30: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Static Structural Model w/ Ports: MeshVV Mesh Settings: Automatic Sweep, # Div. = 3; Element Size = 2 cm; No Mid-side Nodes

# Nodes = 312928# Elements = 273458

Page 31: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Model: Loads and Boundary Conditions

Fixed Face

Face Radial Displacement = 0

OOP Torque = 2.85E06 ft-lbf

Pressure =14.7 psi

Page 32: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: Force Density1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

ForceAnomalies

Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

Page 33: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

Page 34: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress (2)1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

Page 35: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress (3)1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

Page 36: 01-19-11

ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil and VV Exported to Maxwell

Page 37: 01-19-11

Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure: w/o Ports

Page 38: 01-19-11

Maxwell Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports Mesh:VV Mesh Settings: Element Length = 2 cm, Faceting Angle = 1 degree

# Elements = 2.50E06

Page 39: 01-19-11

Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: Start of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 40: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: Start of Quench

1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 41: 01-19-11

Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench

1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 42: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 43: 01-19-11

Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 44: 01-19-11

ANSYS Static Structural Results, Ports excluded from EM Solution: Force Density1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 45: 01-19-11

Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: von Mises Stress1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 46: 01-19-11

Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: von Mises Stress (2)1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Page 47: 01-19-11

Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: Margin of Safety1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Factor of Safety = 1.0Max. Stress = 26,000 psi

Page 48: 01-19-11

Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: Margin of Safety (2)1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

Factor of Safety = 1.0Max. Stress = 26,000 psi

Page 49: 01-19-11

1st