© Timothy A. Thompson, 20 07 1 Sell offs, spin offs, carve outs and tracking stock Corporate Restructuring Tim Thompson
Dec 11, 2015
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
1
Sell offs, spin offs, carve outs and tracking stock
Corporate RestructuringTim Thompson
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
2
Defining divestitures
Selling assets, divisions, subsidiaries to another corporation or combination of corporations or individuals
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
4
Divestitures (2)
Company A w/o subsidiary B
Old Sub B
Company C
Cash, securities or assets as consideration
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
5
Features of divestitures
Selling corporation typically receives consideration for the assets sold cash securities other assets
Divestitures are typically taxable events for selling corporation (new basis for purchaser)
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
6
Spin offs
Typically parent corporation distributes on pro rata basis, all the shares it owns in subsidiary to its own shareholders.
No money generally changes hands Non taxable event
as long as it jumps through substantial hoops
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
7
Spin offs
Company A without Subsidiary B
Subsidiary B
Shareholders own shares of combined company. Own the equity in subsidiary implicitly.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
8
Spin offs (2)
Company A after spinoff
New company BShareholders
receive Shares of
company B
Old shareholders still own shares of company A, which now only represent ownership of A without B.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
9
Equity carve outs
Also called partial IPO Parent company sells a percentage
of the equity of a subsidiary to the public stock market
Receives cash for the percentage sold
Can sell any percentage, often just less than 20%, just less than 50%, are chosen.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
10
Equity carve out (partial IPO)
Company A without subsidieary B
Subsidiary B
Shareholders implicitly own 100% of equity of subsidiary B through their Company A shares.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
11
Equity carve out (partial IPO)
Company A without subsidieary B
Portion ofSub B equity
Not soldX % of sub B equity sold
To market for cashIn IPO
Shareholders now own 100% of Company A (without B)And (1-X)% of Company B implicitly
Through their company A shares
X % ofCompanyB shares
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
12
Motivations for transactions Market for corporate control
Asset are more valuable to alternative management team
Divestiture, spin off, carve out, tracking stock
Unlocking hidden value Stock market problem or management problem?
Improving management incentives Divestiture, spin off, carve out, tracking stock
Agency costs Divestiture, spin off, carve out, tracking stock
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
13
Moving assets to more highly valued user
Division no longer has a “strategic fit” Returning to the core business
(undiversifying) Buyers might simply be willing to pay
too much! Spin off, carve out, may set up a
subsequent control transaction Or the threat may improve incentives
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
14
Focus management
Part of undiversification Easier to run, more able to focus efforts
Superior performance measurement Because you can use direct equity for
compensation (divestiture?) By the stock market?
Reduction in bureaucracy/Decision making authority Internal capital markets/external cap markets
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
15
Unlocking hidden value
Creation of pure play Stock market issue, spin off/carve
out/tracking stock Market can’t value tobacco/food, steel/oil Makes a control play for sub easier later
Sell high! Internet subs in 1998-99 Biotech Gold subs/Japanese subs in late ’80’s
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
16
Other reasons Reduction in agency costs Tax/regulatory factors Bondholder wealth expropriation
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
18
Stock price reaction to sell off Statistically positive response (Table
10.5 in Gaughn), but small Pre-sell off performance is
contradictory Good performance, may be leakage Poor performance, may be reason for
restructuring
Post-sell off performance of parent Contradictory (Jain vs. Klein in Kaiser)
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
19
Motives for divestiture Kaplan and Weisbach
Change of focus or corporate strategy (43) Unit unprofitable or mistake (22) Sale to pay off leveraged finance (29) Antitrust (2) Need cash (3) Defend against takeover (1) Good price (3) Total (103)
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
20
Defensive divestitures
Company is worried about being taken over sells “crown jewels” so they’re not
attractive anymore does an leveraged recap and sells the dogs
More generally, divestitures follow leveraged acquisitions pay down debt and restructure company to
be most valuable going-forward
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
21
Divestitures: government requirements An acquisition by company C of
company A (which owns company B)
Company B and Company C may represent an antitrust problem
Buy company A agreeing to divest company B
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
22
Divesting business unit to managers All the above reasons are possible Less bureaucracy, may no longer
fit corp strategy Leveraged buyout benefits as well Can you get this with spin offs?
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
23
Divestiture vs. other restructuring In divestiture is that buyer pays cash (usually)
for the whole sub. Depends on price. If the price (after tax) is
better than spin off results, then sell. (May depend on strategic interests).
In divestiture, parent no longer controls. In divestiture, parent stuck with liabilities
buyer doesn’t want. Divestitures move with the M&A market
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
24
Bad bidders become good targets? Kaplan and Weisbach
271 large acquisitions completed 1971-1982
44% divested by 1982 Diversification acquisitions four times
more likely to be divested
Mitchell and Lehn Companies with “negative” responses to
acquisitions tend to divest more frequently Become takeover targets more frequently
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
25
Analysis Is division worth more to you or to
buyer? Present value of operating free cash flows
at divisional WACC Less divisional “debt” liabilities going with
buyer Compare with the after-tax, after-fees
divestiture proceeds Strategy value of keeping/divesting?
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
26
Buyers of acquired units In contrast to acquirers of public
companies Buyer’s stock price reaction to
acquisitions of units is small positive. Jain finds this temporary, but studies
of many more acquired units contradicts this finding.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
28
Central features of spin offs Spin offs are a distribution of
subsidiary shares to parent company shareholders
As such, no money (necessarily) comes into the parent company as a result
No shares (or assets) of the subsidiary are sold to the market (IPO) or to acquirer (divestiture)
Distribution in most instances is tax free
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
29
Requirements for Tax-free Distributions
Section 355 of IRC, “Distributions of stock and securities of a controlled corporation”
“transaction not used principally as device for distribution of earnings and profit…,” I.e. a valid business purpose
active business requirement is met Parent must control and must distribute control*
80% of control, not nec. 80% of market value Continuity of interest and control requirement Sub cannot have been acquired in last five years by parent in
taxable transaction Divesting parent or spun-off sub cannot be acquired within two
years of spin off, or spin off loses tax free status
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
30
IRS Guidelines for Spinoffs
Generally acceptable business purposes: provide an equity interest to employees facilitate primary stock offering facilitate a borrowing cost savings, fit and focus, competition facilitate a tax free acquisition of the parent
(Morris Trust transaction) Risk reduction
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
31
What if the spin off is taxable? Corporate level
Parent corporation recognizes a gain equal to the difference between the fair market value of property distributed less the parent’s tax basis in the net assets of the divested sub
Can be very large or small, depending on the size of the gain
Shareholder level Dividend taxable at ordinary rates, equal to the fair market
value of the property received, that is, the fair market value of the spun off sub
Spin offs that fail to qualify are generally, cancelled
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
32
What’s a Morris trust? Essentially it was a way to turn a taxable divestiture into
a tax free spin off with a subsequent tax free merger Spin off assets you want to keep to your shareholders in
tax free spin off Remaining assets are a sub you wanted to divest Acquirer buys the remaining assets in tax free merger and
avoided taxable aspect of divestiture Two-year no acquisition of parent intended to eliminate
the “Monetizing Morris Trust” transaction
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
33
Spin off as takeover defense Hostile suitor
Spin off a division with highly appreciated assets
Acquirer buys parent triggers prior spin off to be taxable
Tax “poison pill” ITT threatened this in battle with
Hilton
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
34
Spin offs in 1990’s
1991-mid 1996, $100 bn in tax-free spin offs Probably another $100 bn since Huge ones
AT&T/Lucent Technologies/NCR GM/EDS
Most much smaller Internet subsidiaries of “bricks and mortar”
parents
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
35
Spin off studies Older studies (Kaiser)
Some evidence of pre-spin off postive performance (18%, Miles and Rosenfield)
Positive reaction on average (2%) Not due to wealth redistribution from bondholders
on average (Marriott?) Larger spin offs – larger % price reaction Cusatis, Miles and Woolridge
Post spinoff positive performance both for parent and subsidiary
Both more active in takeovers
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
36
Spun off entity performance On average, very good performance Just correcting for value losses from
earlier acquisitions? Not all spun off companies are stars
3M/Imation Interco/Converse & Florsheim Allen Group/TransPro Inc. Ralston Purina/Ralcorp Holdings
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
37
Some recent spin offs Pepsi/Tricon
Pepsi originally wanted to establish a captive channel for fountain beverage business, but found they needed to alleviate competitive barriers to expanding that business (many more restaurant chains)
Whitman Corporation/Hussman/Midas Conglomerate discount, conflicts among management
of divisions No synergies between bottlers/heavy industry/auto
service RJR/Nabisco Holdings
Tobacco litigation, discounting food company Carl Icahn, Bennet Lebow
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
38
How can spin offs generate money for parent? Borrow at the sub level and
dividend to parent pre spin off Borrow money sole recourse to
sub, proceeds go to parent Fraudulent conveyance problem? Do a carve out first: internet subs
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
39
Variants of spin offs Split offs
Divesting parent corporation distributes stock in sub to its shareholders in exchange for some of their parent stock
Exchange may or may not be pro rata May avoid 355 entirely
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
40
Limited split off Abercrombie and Fitch Dutch auction
Limited’s shareholders specify an exchange ratio, within a range, under which they would exchange a share of Limited for a fraction of a A&F share (.73-.86)
After tabulation, Limited finds the ratio for which they can distribute 90% of A&F stock, probably won’t be prorata
Exchanging shareholders probably get a premium, with no tax
Benefits Shareholders can rearrange holdings in parent tax free Also, because the split off effects a buyback, there is
less EPS dilution than a spin off
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
42
Tax treatment of carve outs No shareholder tax, usually If selling newly issued sub shares,
then non taxable If selling shares owned by parent,
then taxable on gain! Why do the latter? Produce
income? Avon Japan (1987), USG?
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
43
Carve outs
Why sell a partial stake? Pure play
Get the stock market to understand business
Once unit is revalued, the parent will be revalued as well (still owns the rest)
Setting up a sale later Make it harder to pierce the veil
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
44
Other motives for carve outs Divisional managers incentives
Kraft/Phillip Morris Thermo Electron
Sell “hot” properties Gold subs in mid ’80’s Japanese subs in late ’80’s Internet subs in ’97-’99 Why not sell all of it?
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
45
Targeted stock
Special class of common stock designed to provide equity return linked to operating performance of a distinct business unit (targeted business)
Splits company’s operations into two (or more) publicly traded equity claims, but allows businesses to remain as wholly owned segments of parent organization.
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
46
Target stock vs. spin off
Spin off creates equity of subsidiary, but subsidiary is no longer owned by, or
controlled by the management of parent company
new spun off stock has no equity claim on the assets or cash flows of the old parent company
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
47
Target stock vs. carve out
Like a carve out, payoff on target stock is a function of the performance of the target business
Like a carve out, parent company mgmt usually maintains control over business, but control is 100% w/ target stock
Unlike carve out, the target shares are not subsidiary shares
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
48
Target stock is not stock of the targeted business Target stock is stock of the consolidated
company, not the targeted business (sub) Does not represent legal ownership interest
in the assets of the sub Receives dividend rights against computed
earnings of sub Voting rights (in decisions of corp) float as
function of market value of the equity of sub
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
49
Features of target stock
Reduces, but does not eliminate, cross-subsidization of business units
No legal separation or transfer of assets from corporation to sub
Target stock structure does not alter board or director composition or mgmt control of the corp
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
50
Features of target common Features in each target share have
to be decided: Notional allocation of debt, other
assets and liabilities How will joint costs be allocated? Proxy statement describing
amendments to corporate charter, shareholder vote req
Non taxable event
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
51
Distribution of target shares Pro rata stock dividend paid to existing
holders Sell target shares to new public
investors, with remainder held by parent proceeds retained by sub proceeds allocated elsewhere in company
Shares issued in acquisition of target company
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
52
Cash flow rights
Dividend policy subject to discretion of board
“Available dividend amount” = fixed dollar level adjusted over time to
net income, dividends or other distributions
fixed as % of target business net income attributable to Targeted shareholders
Same limits on dividends as usual
© Timothy A. Thompson, 2007
53
Voting rights
Floating voting rights proportional to market value of underlying
business Asset disposition and liquidation rights
in liquidation of corporation, distribution to shares would be in proportion to market value
if the parent sells the sub, net proceeds can be paid to target, or can exchange for target shares