Top Banner
28

...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered

Mar 03, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 2: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 3: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 4: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 5: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 6: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 7: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 8: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 9: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 10: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 11: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 12: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 13: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 14: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 15: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 16: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 17: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 18: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 19: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 20: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 21: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 22: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 23: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 24: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 25: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 26: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 27: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered
Page 28: ...subjected to 5 cycles in accordance with AASHTO T 104 Soundness of Aggregate by use of Magnesium Sulfate. A stone should show a Micro Deval loss of not more than 18% to be considered