1 GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT (WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT & SOIL CONSERVATION) Integrated Watershed Management Programme DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 Block: Bichiwara DISTT - DUNGARPUR (RAJ.) DETAILED PROJECT REPORT YEAR OF SANCTION - 2011-12 EFFECTIVE AREA :- 6635 Ha. ESTIMATED COST:- Rs. 796.20 Office of Project Manager, WCDC, ZP Dungarpur PIA:- AEN,WSDC PANCHAYAT SAMITI- BICHHIWARA
172
Embed
& SOIL CONSERVATION) GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHANwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · Capacity Building plan PIA Leval Format-5 103 Capacity Building plan WCDC Leval
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT
(WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT & SOIL CONSERVATION)
Integrated Watershed Management Programme
DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12
Block: Bichiwara
DISTT - DUNGARPUR (RAJ.)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT YEAR OF SANCTION - 2011-12
EFFECTIVE AREA :- 6635 Ha.
ESTIMATED COST:- Rs. 796.20
Office of Project Manager, WCDC, ZP Dungarpur
PIA:- AEN,WSDC PANCHAYAT SAMITI- BICHHIWARA
2
CERTIFICATE Certified that the undersigned have proposed the appropriate and need based activities required in the watershed project area with active participation of beneficiaries along with consultation of watershed committees( WCs). Approval of watershed project plan and DPR as been obtained from WC Gram sabha. The plan and DPR document of IWMP VII project at PS Bichhiwara Dist. Dungarpur is technically sound, viable and approprite for implementation during the period 2011- 2012 TO 2016-17
We recommended this plan be sanctioned and put to implementation.
Shishod,Palwara, Gamri Deval , Pal Deval , Deval Khas, Vagdari
Shishod,Palwara, Gamri Deval , Pal Deval , Deval Khas, Vagdari
Name of Villages
Garduna, Shishod,Palwara, Bhuwali, Palgamri , Pal Deval, Gamri Dewal, Baron Ka Sher,Dewalkhas, Kandula, Rohan Wara
Garduna, Shishod Palwara, Bhuwali, Palgamri , Pal Deval, Gamri Dewal, Baron Ka Sher,Dewalkhas, Kandula,
Rohan Wara
Project Cost (Rs. In Lakhs) 796.20 796.20
5
DPR TEMPLATE INDEX
S.No. TOPICS Page 1 CHAPTER 1-7
� Location 8 � General Features of watershed (cost and Area Details 8-10 � Climatic and Hydrological Information 10-11 � Other Development Schemes in the Project area 11 � Details of infrastructure in the Project area 11-12 � Institutional arrangements (DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC) 13-19
2 Chapter Basic Data, Analysis And scope 2.1 Demography Details 20-22 2.2 Development Indicators 22-23 2.3 Land use 23-26 2.4 Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis 26-32 2.5 Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status 33 2.6 Land holding pattern 34-35 2.7 Livestock status 36-37 2.8 Fodder status 38 2.9 Farm Implements 39
2.10 NREGS Status 39-40 2.11 Migration Details 40 2.12 Livelihood Details 41 2.13 Existing SHG 42 2.14 Ground Water details 43 2.15 Drinking Water Status 43-44 2.16 Water use efficiency 44 2.17 Slope Details 45-46 2.18 Water Budgeting 46-47 2.19 Soil Details 48 2.20 Soil erosion Status 48-49
3 Chapter : Proposed Development Plan 50-76
4 Chapter Activity wise total abstract cost 77-80
6
5 Chapter Annual Action plan 5.1 Project fund 81-84 5.2 Convergence plan 85-92
7 Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities 105-167
8 Enclosures
8.1 Maps
a Location - District, Block, Village watershed location map b Map of project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map c land use land cover map d Existing water bodies DLT e PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing f GIS based intervention map g Treatment map i.e. proposed works on revenue map
8.2 Documents of Agreements
� Proceedings of Gram sabha for EPA approval � Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution � Documents related to PRA exercise � Proceedings of Gram sabha for DPR approval � Procedings of Panchayat Samiti General body for DPR approval � Watershed Committee Registration Certicate � MoU-PIA-DWMA, PIA-WC(in case of NGO as PIA
7
CHAPTER I IWMP-VII PANCHAYAT SAMITI
BICHIWARA DITT.DUNGARPUR
8
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION 1-I - Location IWMP VII Project is located in Bichhiwara Block. Of Dungarpur District. The Project area is between the latitudes 23°53'-23° 57' & longitudes.73° 34'- 73° 43' It is at a distance of 14-27 Km from its Block head quarters and 15-27 Kms from the district head quarters. There are 7146 no. of habitations in the project area and other details are given below.
1-II. General features of watershed (Cost and Area Details)
S.No. Name of Project (as per GOI) DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 (A Name of Catchment Ghori River (B) Name of watershed area (local Name) Garduna ( C)' Project Area 9250 ha (D) Net treatable Area 6635.00 ha (E) Cost of Project 796.20 Lack
(F) Cost / Hectare Rs. 12000 (G) Year of Sanction 2011-12 (H)
Watershed Code 13020101-12, 13020201-
02,13020301 (I) No. of Gram Panchayats in Project area 6 (J) No. of Villages in Project area 11 (K) Type of Project Other (L) Elevation (Metres) 240 msl (M) Major Streams UPPER Ghori River
9
(N) Slope range(%) 3 - 8%
Macro/Micro information Village wise coverd area (A)
6 1,2,3 5,7,8,10,1,1 PAL DEVAL Pal Deval 03290400 2664 2032
7 1 7, GAMRI DEVAL Gamri Dewal 03290700 365 335
8 1 10 DEVAL KHAS
Baron Ka Sher 03290300 124 113
9 1 10,12 DEVAL KHAS Dewalkhas 03290500 268 234
10 2,3 1,1 DEVAL KHAS Kandula 03292400 495 330
11 2 1,2 VAGDARI Rohan Wara 03292500 477 422
Total Area 9250 6635
10
The Watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone IV B Arid south area The soil texture is Clay Loam,& Silt Loam The average rainfall is 620 mm. The termperatures in the area in the range between 38 - 44 centigrade during summer and 20 - 34 Centigrade during winter. The major crops in the Area are maize, paddy, urad in kharif , wheat & Gram in rabi. 28.86 % land is under cultivation, 68.7% land fallow, 1 % land is wasteland , 5.92 % land is irrigated through well, tubewells, & Canal. 5802 No of households are BPL(81.19 %. households) ,35are landles households ( 0.6 %households ) and 7006 household are small and marginal farmers ( 98.04% household). Average land holding in the area is 0.60 ha. 28.86 %. area is single cropped area.16.97% is double cropped. The main source of iirigation is well, tubewell & miner dam canal. The average annual rainfall (5 Years) in the area is 644 mm. The Major streams in the Watershed are Ghori River .The major festivals in the village are Holi & Depawali. At present this village is having 33298 . population with Communities like ST, General, SC and OBC.
Climatic and Hydrological information
1 Average Annual Rainfall(mm)
Year Average Annual
Rainfall(mm)
1 2003 511
2 2004 464
3 2005 509
4 2006 976
5 2007 520
6 2008 346
7 2009 446
8 2010 800
9 2011 721
10 2012 906
2 Average Monthly Rainfall(last ten Years)
Month Rainfall (mm)
(i) June 65
(ii) July 135
(iii) August 190
11
(iv) September 74
3 Temperature (Degree C)
Season Max Min
(i) Summer Season 44 38
(ii) Winter Season 34 20
(iii) Rainy Season 30 27
5 Runoff
(i) Peak Rate (cm/hr) 15 Cm /Hr
(ii) Total run off volume of rain season (ha.m.) 7919331
(iii) Time of return of maximum flood 10 Year
(iv) Periodicity of Drought in Village area once in Every two year
1-IV- Other Development Schemes in the Project area
S.No. Scheme Name of the Department
Key interventions under the Scheme
Targeted Beneficiaries Provisions under the Scheme
1 MGNREGS R. D. Land levelling, Bundings & WHS talab , Anicut 7731 100 Days Employment for Rural
Housing in each yr.
2 CM BPL Avas& IAY AVAS R. D. AVAS 5802 0.50 Lacs sanctioned per BPL AVASH
1-V-Details of infrastructure in the Project area
Parmeters status
(i) No. of Villages connected to the main road by an all weather-road 11
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 11 (iii) No. of households without access to drinking water 0 (iv) No. of eductional institutions (P) 36 (S) 4 (HS)1 (VI)
12
Primary(P)/Secondary(s)/Higher Secondary(HS)/Vocational institution(VI) (v) No. of Villages with access to Primary Health Centre 7 (vi) No. of Villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary 2 (vii) No. of Villages with access to Post Office 2 (viii) No. of Villages with access to Banks 11
(ix) No. of Villages with access to Markets/Mandis Nil
(x) No. of Villages with access to Agro-industries Nil
(xi) Total quantity of surplus milk Nil No. of Milk collection centres (xii)
Problems and scope of improvement in the Project area The Socio economic conditions of the area can be improved throught increased production which be can achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhacement 2537 Ha land is arable wasteland and 63 ha. is fallow can be brought under cultivation . 393 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased to 450 ha .The productivity gap of major crops in the area as compared with district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicated potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small land holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green houses, agro forestry, fodder, crops) and diversification in livelihood(Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, self employment) 20350 Tone fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development. Improved animal Husbandry Practices can increase the productivity of livestock .1755 no of persons migrate due to unemployment. this migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area through increase in production and diversification in agriculture and livelihoods as mentioned above. Specific Problem of the area in land degradation , water , Agriculture and in Animal Husbandry
The specifice problem is due to hilly area the rain water is not conserved hence percolation of water is less causing low water rechange & crop Production . The Breed of cow and buffallow, goat of not good quality & Buffalow gives milk average two litters per day, Cow 1 litre & goat 0.5 litre perday.
18
Base line survey Formate for IWMP MIS website
Project Name IWMP Dungarpur VII
Total Geographical Area of Project (Lakh Ha.) 9250 Ha.
Treatable Area
Wasteland (Lakh Ha) 0.04723 Ha. Rainfed Agricultural Land (lakh Ha.) 0.01912 Ha.
Total Cropped Area (Lakh Ha) 0.01912 Ha. Net sown area (lakh Ha.) 0.01912
Total No. of Water Storage Structure 188 Total No. of water Extracting Unit 4 Total Storage Capacity of water storage Structures (Cubic meters 3664001
No. Of Household
SC 365 ST 5548
Others 1233
Total Populattion of the Project Area 35685 No. of Household of Landless people 35
Total No. of BPL Household 5802
No. of Person days of seasonal Migration 593730 No. of marginal farmer's Household 5624 Depth. Of Ground water (meters) below Ground level
Pre Monsoon 34 ft. Post Monsoon 22 ft.
No. of person days of seasonal Migration 593730
19
CHAPTER II BASIC DATA, Analysis and scope.
IWMP-VII PANCHAYAT SAMITI
BICHIWARA DITT.DUNGARPUR
20
CHAPTER-II
Socio Economic Features,Problems,and Scope
Table 2.1 (a) Population & House hold Detail
Name of Village Census code Total house hold
Total population Male Female Total SC Total ST
Garduna 03290000 339 1695 785 910 191 1212
Shishod 03290100 875 4932 2485 2447 177 4259
Palwara 03289800 730 3675 1956 1719 153 3522
Bhuwali 03289900 529 2013 1040 973 0 2013
Palgamri 03290200 699 3495 1817 1678 24 3396
Pal Deval 03290400 2231 11155 5485 5670 187 9991
Gamri Dewal 03290700 545 2725 1362 1363 163 1200
Baron Ka Sher 03290300 133 591 352 239 0 591
Dewalkhas 03290500 367 1905 943 962 275 385
Kandula 03292400 203 1024 505 519 0 1024
Rohan Wara 03292500 495 2475 1230 1245 44 1907
Total 7146 35685 17960 17725 1214 29500 Table 2.1 (b)
BPL House hold Land less Marginal farmer Small farmer
Total house hold
SC house hold ST house hold
21
5802 35 4622 1145 7146 365 5548
Table2.2 Development indicators
S.No. Development Indicators State Project Area
1 Per capita income(Rs.) 42434 14700
2 Poverty ratio 0.15 0.86
3 Literacy(%) 60.78 58.65
4 Sex Ratio 921/1000 990/1000
5 Infant mortality rate 52/1000 67/1000
6 Maternal mortality ratio 318/100000 318/100000
The above table indicates (poor average good )socio economic conditions.
Garduna Shishod Palwara Bhuwali Palgamri Pal Deval Gamri Dewal
Baron Ka Sher Dewalkhas Kandula
Rohan Wara Macro
No. 16
460 249 897 544 1019 2032 335 113 234 330 422
25
The Project area has.63 ha of cultivable wasteland .2537 ha of fallow land (total .2600 ha) can brought under cultivation if some irrigation source can be Provided through Construction of WHS like Talab. Tanke, Farm ponds etc. and also through demonstration of rain fed varieties or crops. Construction of WHS can also increase in area under irrigation which is only 5.92 %
63 ha. (1 % of the project area) is under wastelands and can be brought under vegetative cover, with reasonable effort. Activities like Earthen Check dams. Vegetative filter strip. V-ditches. staggered trenches. WHS(Johand) Afforestation of wastelands and Pasture development will be taken up on these lands. Pasture development the land use table shows that there is 341 hectare pasture land(5.13 %) This emphasizes the need for taking up pastureland development works through sowing of promising species of grasses and plantation.
Table 2.4 A Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability Cropping Status ��/����$�$���*,��!��-��/����$�$���*,��!��-��/����$�$���*,��!��-��/����$�$���*,��!��-����
3467 Write for each crop : The farmers are using Deshi varieties of Maize, Udad , Paddy, Wheat, Gram, Moong. Whereas Varieties like Highbrith (Mahi kanchan, Basmti, Lokvan, 3077 and any new varieties ) can increase the production. Crop Rotation
Till - fallow The table 2.4 B shows that only 1912 ha is (28.88%) is 504 double cropped area. Also the crop rotation shows that fallow lands area there. This indicates that there is scope for change in crop rotation in fields where there are fallow lands through soil and Water Conservation measures. crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture. Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation can change the area under single cropping to double and multiple cropping.
'��-�'���*,��!��-��0.34�� 5�6�'���*,��!��-��0.34�� Botenical Name Oryzasativi Botenical Name Zea Maiz Family Gramineae Family Gramineae Origen Origen USA
India Rajasthan Dungarpur DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 India Rajasthan Dungarpur DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12
7500 4500 5500 3271 4500 3750 3575 3000
7�,"�&���'���*,��!��-��0.34�� �
Botenical Name , Vigna munge Family Origen India Rajasthan Dungarpur DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 1800 1665 1400 1250
Ref. :- VITAL Ag. Statistics & base line survey. Study by Omprakash Ahalavat
30
Table 2.4 C. Productivity Gap Analysis (The table can also be given in bar chart form) Productivity kg/ha
Name of the crop India Highest Average in Rajasthan
Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity within state and even within same agro climatic zones. the reasons for this variation are
·The farmers ae using varieties Desi of Maize whereas the recommended varieties likeMahi Kanchan provide 8.5 Qt/Ha yield (Write for all crops)· Lack of availability go good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate quantities and time to the farmers.· Availability of water for cultivation (197 Ha 3.70 % is irrigated table T 2.3) 393 ha. 5.92% is irrigated table T 2.3) The Productivity gap and reason of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop demonstration. crop demonstration would be carried out on improved crops/varieties, improved agronomicpractices. INM IPM mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit. Demonstration of improved methods and economic of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation seeds of Forage crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop rotations.
�� ��'���*,��!��-��0.34�� &���'���*,��!��-��0.34�� Botenical Name Triticum species Botenical Name Cice arietinum Family Gramineae Family Leguminaceae Origen India Origen South West Asia
India Rajasthan Dungarpur DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 India Rajasthan DungarpurDUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12
5500 4150 3000 2198 2000 1750 1550 1527
5*).�'���*,��!��-��0.34�� � Botenical Name Vigna radiata Family Leguminaceae Origen India India Rajasthan Dungarpur DUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 1000 950 650 650
Ref. :- VITAL Ag. Statistics & base line survey. Study by Omprakash Ahalavat
32
Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/ Vegetables/ Floriculture (ha)
Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended Varieties Production
Horticultu
re 3 Ha. Mango, Muhuda, Amali area Desi Langada, kesew
Lands holding(ha) irrigation source wise Land holding(ha) Social group wise Types of Farmer
Total Househol
ds Irrigated (source) Rainfed Total General SC ST OBC Total BPL (i) Large farmer 105 129 210 339 48 0 0 57 105 0
(ii) Small farmer 1382 125 1891 2016 255 93 936 98 1382 1145
(iii) Marginal farmer
5624 139 1650 1789 215 243 4612 554 5624 4622
(vi) Landless person
35 0 0 0 29 0 6 35 35
Total 7146 393 3751 4144 518 365 5548 715 7146 5802 (v) No. of
BPL households
5802 154 3612 3766 29 261 4932 580 5802
Total 5802 154 3612 3766 29 261 4932 580 5802 98.04% land holding belongs to small and marginal farmers who own 91.82.% of total cultivated area. Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility Horticulture/vegetable will be promoted in a part of land with farm pond / Tank construction.The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holding and for diversification and income for large farmers . Horticulture plantation, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, Floriculture: As discussed earlier Horticulture/ vegetable could be more economical to small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. Also the project area has good potential for medicinal & aromatic crops like Sonamukhi, Isabgol, Ashwagandha, Khus , Mehandi, Kapas, Arrndi etc
Agro forestry plantation : To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt plantation winds velocity is high in the project area.
Getting of Vermi Compost Units- Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals and fertilizers on human heath the emphasis would be on cultivation of organic produce through motivating farmers and providing assistance for production of organic input. vermi compost.Production and distribution of quality seed - There is need to ensures that good quality seed is available for cultivators for which adequate seed production would be initiated in watershed areas with the assistance of private sector and agriculture department technologies.
Sprinkler and pipelines for efficient water management practices emphasis on demonstration of sprinklers with adequate financial support and convergence/ private partnership .Establishment of Green house- For growing off season vegetable seeding and other horticultural crops under controlled atmospheric conditions of green house .Establishment of nurseries: Most of the planting material is procured from other parts of the State/ country. The procurement of planting material from distant places causes damage to the planting material and often results in untimely supply. Hence nursery development activity in area .
34
Innovative hi-tech/ export oriented activities: Innovative hi tech/ export oriented project like mushroom cultivation, floriculture, etc, which are in negligible existence at present can be implemented by individual farmers/ Private companies.
Drip irrigation : Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetable, green houses and in nurseries for rational use of irrigation higher yield and quality produce.
35
Table 2.7 Livestock Statues- animals/ milk production / average yield Cow Beff. Goat sheep Poulty
Piggery/Bullock
S.No. Village No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk Muton No. Milk Muton Wool(kg) No. Muton No. N. Total
7 Piggery/Bullock 12324 NA 31487820 31488 Total 41372 12616 54233707.5 54234
In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following activities will be taken up.
Estration
Artificial insemination
Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo Breeding distribution crossbred rams
37
Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health hygiene and feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal health camps, Urea- Molasses treatment demonstration, demonstration of improved method of conservation and utilization of forage crops are proposed.
Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha).
S.No. Item Unit Area/Quantity
1 Existing cultivable area under fodder Ha 1912 ha.
2 Production of green fodder(250 Qt./ha.) Tonns/Year 36/900 T
3 Production of dry fodder (Av. 90 Qt./ha.) Tonns/Year 1876ha./16884 T
4 Area under pasture (341 govt.+50% X 2537) Av. 100 Qt./ha. Ha 1610 ha.
5 Production of fodder (Av.100Qt./ha.) Tonns/Year 16100 T
6 Existing area under fuel wood Ha 15
7 Supplementary feed (6 kg.) Kgs/day 0
8 Silage pits No 0
9 Availability of fodder quintals 33884 T
10 Deficiency/ Excess of fodder quintals 20350 T
The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 54234 and availability 33884) To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and demand there is need for
* Increase in area under fodder crops * Increase in productivity of fodder crops
38
* Development of pastures
*And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few but productive animals.
Table 2.9 Agriculture implements
1 2 3
S.No Implements Nos.
1 Tractor 15
2 Sprayers-manual/power 14
3 Cultivators/ Harrows 786
4 Seed drill 0
5 Any other 0
Farm mechanization and seed banks: An discussed earlies....................... % land holdings belong to small and marginal who own only 13% of total cultivated area so owning of big farm implements by individual farmers is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy farm implements and rent to farmer. Table- 2.10 NREGA Status-No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employment status.
Sr. No. Name of Vallage Total No. of job card. Employment status Activity taken up so far
Name of village No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration
Major reason(s) for migrating
Distance of destination of migration from the
village (km)
Occupation during
migration
Income from suoccupation (Rs.
lakh)
1 Garduna
255 34425 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 56.10
2 Shishod
493 66555 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 108.46
3 Palwara
551 74385 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 121.22
4 Bhuwali
242 32670 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 53.24
5 Palgamri
524 70740 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 115.28
6 Pal Deval
1116 150660 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 245.52
7 Gamri Dewal
410 55350 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 90.20
8 Baron Ka Sher
90 12150 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 19.80
9 Dewalkhas
191 25785 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 42.02
10 Kandula
154 20790 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 33.88
11 Rohan Wara
372 50220 UnEmployment 200 to 250 Labour 81.84
4398 53975 87.96
40
The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities , enchasing farm level economy, increases the income of the peopengaged in animal husbandry by dairy poultry and marketing and addition .(As discussed earlier) and diversification in livelihoods.
The existing livelihoods activites are given below Table2.12(A) Major activities (one Farm) Name of activity No of house holds Average annual income
from the Cultivators 3985 8500 Dairying 710 3500 Poultry 525 5250 Piggery 0 0 Landless- Agri Laboures 35 9600
Table 2.12(b) Major activites(off Farm)
Name of activity Households/ Individuals Average annual income from the
Artisans Carpenter 25 562500/22500 Indi. Blacksmith 50 216000/36000 Indi
The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be strengthened through training and financial assistance.
42
II Technical Features.
Table 2.14 Ground Water
S.No. Source No. Functional depth Dry Area irrigated
Water Availability(days)
i Dug wells 226 9.00 m 130 180ha 250-300 Days
ii Shallow tube wells 25 18 m 5 22ha 365 Days
iii Pumping sets 35 7.00 m 5 75 ha 250 Days
iv Deep tube wells 0 0 0 0 0
Total 277ha
Table 2.15 Availability of drinking water
S.No. Name of the Village
Drinking water requirement ltrs./ day
(1242/days
Present availability of drinking water ltrs/Day
No. of drinking water sources
available
No. functional
No. required repairs No. defunct
1 Garduna 2165362.5 2143709 35/10 15 20 21654
2 Shishod 6300630 6237624 2018 7 15 63006
3 Palwara 4694812.5 4647864 1516 11 10 46948
4 Bhuwali 2571607.5 2545891 14/9 8 16 25716
5 Palgamri 4464862.5 4420214 40/12 35 19 44649
6 Pal Deval 14250512.5 14108007 20/8 17 9 142505
7 Gamri Dewal 3481187.5 3446376 18/12 21 9 34812
8 Baron Ka Sher 755002.5 747452 22/8 35 5 7550
43
9 Dewalkhas 2433637.5 2409301 12/7 15 5 24336
10 Kandula 1308160 1295078 47/10 45 12 13082
11 Rohan Wara 3161812.5 3130194 30/15 35 10 31618
45587587.5 45131711.63 244 130 455875.875
Table 2.16 Water use efficiency Area (Hectare)
Name of major crop
Through water saving devices (Drip/
Sprinklers)
Through water conserving agronomic
practices
Any other (pl. specify) Total
Cotton , Vegetable, Maize, Wheat,
50% 20% _
70%
The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every operational wells There is no water body except Nadi for water harvesting.Nadi in watershed area is not well maintained and not meneged
By the villegers.NREGS planed to excavated but water menegement is required.
S.N. Name of village Anicut Check dam Dam Pond Total 1 Garduna 1 3 0 0 4
2 Shishod 1 3 0 5 9
3 Palwara 2 7 0 1 10
4 Bhuwali 1 7 0 1 9
5 Palgamri 0 9 0 3 12
44
6 Pal Deval 4 23 0 4 31
7 Gamri Dewal 1 6 0 2 9
8 Baron Ka Sher 1 5 0 0 6
9 Dewalkhas 2 9 0 3 14
10 Kandula 1 8 0 1 10
11 Rohan Wara 2 5 0 0 7
G.Total 16 85 0 20 121
Table 2.17 Slope details
Slope of watershed
S.No. Slope percentage area in hectares
1 0 to 3 % 2254
2 3 to 8% 4329
3 8 to 25% 52
4 > 25% 0
As most of the area has slope than 3 % construction of contour bunds can solve the problem of
water erosion in agriculture fields and protect washing of top soil and manures/ fertilizers.
Table 2.18 Water Budgeting
Good Catchment - Normally a funel shaped catchment in hilly terrain with less vegetation Average Catchment - Catchment in the plains wherethereisno dense growth of vegetation
45
Bad Catchment - Catchment with dense growth of vagetation & highly permeable top soil & sub soil.Table 2.18 a) Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table
Rain fall 620 mm
Area Type of Catchments Yield of runoff from
catchments per ha .(cum) use Stranges table
Total runoff
4250 Good 1287.5 5471875 1468 Average 962.5 1412950 1607 Bad 643.75 1034506 7325 Total 7919331
Total 100 234000 Runoff trapped in existin & proposed structures= 407000 .% Runoff trapped = Total runoof trapped x 100/ total available runoff = 5.139 Height of all the structured proposed is between 0.6 metre to 1.5 metre. There is nno structure whose water impounding height is more than 2 metre
Table 2.19 Soil details
S.no. Soil Profile A Major Soil Classes Area in hectares
B Soil Depth Depth(Cms.) Area in hectares 1 0.00 to 7.50 1607 2 7.50 to 45.00 2701
47
3 >45.00 2327 C Soil fertility Status Kg/Ha Recommended Kg/Ha.
N 80 120 P 40 80 K 25 sufficient available Micronutrients PPM Zns 0 8
The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to every farmer every crop season will be provided, which will include the recommendation for application micro nutrient and fertilizers.
Table 2.20 Erosion details
Erosion status in project Area
Cause Type of erosion
Area affected (ha)
Run off(mm/Year) Average soil loss (Tonnes/ha/year)
Water erosion
a Sheet 2180 60 Tonnes
b Rill 3328
c Gully 1127
140
Sub-Total 6635
Wind erosion NA
Total for Project 6635
48
The need is:
* Th check land degradation
* To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock
* To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water conservation measures.
* To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds
* To check Faulty agriculture techniques
* To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks
* To check deforestation of steep slopes
* (For Delineated watershed projects)-To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to recharge Ground Water structures life Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank Stabilisation , loose stone check Dam, Gabions, Earthen embankment(Nadi) and Anicuts would be taken up.
For Flat lands & Cluster Project appropriate intervention shall mentioned.
49
CHAPTER III PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
IWMP-VII PANCHAYAT SAMITI
BICHIWARA DITT.DUNGARPUR
50
CHAPTER – III Proposed Development plan :
The activities are indicative addition I deletion in activities will be as per local conditions Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the habitations of 1/3-12, 2/ 1-2, 3-1 Micro Watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the implementation of IWMP programme. User group were also former.
Grama sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the watershed committee and approval of DPR
S.No. Name of the Gram Panchayat Dated on which Grama Sabha approved EPA
1 SHISHOD 15.12.202 2 PALWARA 11.12.2012
3 GAMRI DEVAL 18.12.2012
4 PAL DEVAL 22.01.2012 5 DEVAL KHAS 25.12.2012 6 VAGDARI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S.No. Names of village
Amount in Lacs earmarked for
EPA
Entry point Activities planned
Estimated cost
Expenditure incurred
Balance Expected outcome
Actual outcome
1 Garduna 2.208 Renovation of old water bodies 2.21 0.00 2.21 Drinking water
available Drinking water
available 2 Shishod 1.1952 3 No.Establiment of hand
pump 1.20 0.00 1.20 Drinking water available
Drinking water available
1 No.Establiment of hand pump 0.45 0.00 0.45 for passengers
welfare for passengers welfare 3 Palwara 4.3056
Renovation of old water bodies 3.86 0.00 3.86 Water leakage
problem removed Water leakage problem
removed 1 No.Establiment of hand
pump 0.45 0.00 0.45 Drinking water available
Drinking water available
4 Bhuwali 2.61
Renovation of old water bodies 2.16 0.00 2.16 Water leakage
problem removed Water likage problem
removed
51
4 No.Establiment of hand pump 1.80 0.00 1.80 Drinking water
available Drinking water
available 5
Palgamri 4.89 Dhoora Const. for Water Supply 1.09 0.00 1.09 Water likage
problem removed Water likage problem
removed 6 Renovation of old water
bodies 2.00 0.00 2.00 Drinking water available
Drinking water available
7 No.Establiment of hand
pump 3.15 0.00 3.15 Drinking water available
Drinking water available
Renovation of old water bodies 2.50 0.00 2.50
For water table increase near wells
drinking water available
For water table increase near wells drinking
water available
7
Pal Deval 9.7536
2 No.Renovation of old water bodies 4.10 0.00 4.10 Water likage
problem removed Water likage problem
removed 8 Gamri
Dewal 1.608 3 No.Establiment of hand pump 1.61 0.00 1.61 Drinking water
available Drinking water
available 9 Baron Ka
Sher 0.5424 shiv mandir ke pas chabutara nirman 0.54 0.00 0.54 Gram sabha Pablic Use
10 Dewalkhas 1.1232 3 No.Establiment of hand pump 1.12 0.00 1.12 Drinking water
available Drinking water
available 11 Kandula 1.584 3 No.Establiment of hand
pump 1.58 0.00 1.58 Drinking water available
Drinking water available
12 Rohan Wara 2.0256 Renovation of old water bodies 2.03 0.00 2.03 Water likage
problem removed Water likage problem
removed Total 31.848 31.85 0.00 31.85
The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dated shown below. Name of the Village / Habitation
5 Pal Deval 25.01.2013 6 Gamri Dewal 22.01.2013 7 Baron Ka Sher 18.12.2012 8 Dewalkhas 14.12.2012 9 Kandula 25.12.2012
10 Rohan Wara 20.12.2012
Transact walk were carried out involving the community for social mapping . Resource mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out. Socio-economic survey was carried out during .12.11.2011 to 20.06.2012 (dates) period conversing all the households and primary date on demography, land holdings, Employment status, Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.
. CAPACITY BUILDING Table-������������ ������������������ ��������������������������� ���� ����
State Remote Sensing Application Centre WAPCOS or other agency was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers usingCartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by WAPCOS : · Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries. · Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area. · Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area. · Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements). · Land Use / Land cover map. · Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map (map enclosed in DPR as annexure------).The GIS based intervention map, PRA based intervention map are annexed as ------.
B)Livelihood Action Plan (LAP): An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Livelihood Action Plan is a pre requisite for availing the funds under the livelihood component. LAP has been prepared by the PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of SHG,SC/ST, women, landless/ assetless households. Details of funds available & their utilisation is as under :
(i) Total project cost Rs. 796.20 Lacs. (ii) Funds available under livelihood component is 9% of total project cost= Rs. 71.658
(a) Seed money for SHGs as revolving fund = �������������� ��
(minimum 60% of livelihood component) No. Of SHG to be formed 172 Nos. --- No of persons (members) in SHGs 1720 Nos.
(b) Seed money for enterprising individuals = ��������������� ��
57
(minimum 10% of livelihood component) -- No of persons identified as enterprising individuals 29 Nos. List of persons & Proposed Activities.
S.No Watershed Committee Name of Person Activity Proposed (c) Funds for Enterprising SHG/Federations of SHG
(Maximum 30 % of livelihood activities)= ���������������� ��
The funding for major livelihood activities will enable the enterprising SHGs/SHG federation to avail a composite loan for undertaking major livelihood activities or to upscale activities as recommended by the WC & approved by WCDC in consultation with line departments.
Details of enterprising SHG/federation is given below : S.No. Name of SHG/ SHG federation Project Name Project Cost in lacs Grant in aid 50%
of project cost or 2 lacs whichever is less
Bank loan
1 11 SHG / Federation 43 21.5 21.5 2 Total * Details of project activities can be prepared in coming years after formation of SHG federation or as the case may be.
C) Production Plan: An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Production System & micro enterprises Action Plan is pre-requisite for availing the funds under the Production System & micro enterprises component. Production plan has been prepared by the PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of Users Group. Details of funds available & their utilisation is as under :
(iii) Total project cost Rs.. 796.20 Lacs (iv) Funds available under Production System & Micro enterprises component is 10% of total project cost= �������������� ��
58
List of persons & Proposed Activities for production system � S.No Name of Person Activities Proposed
1 Horticulture Plantation
Shishod, Palwara, Gamri Deval , Pal Deval, Deval Khas , Vagdari Gram Panchayat
Persons Crop & Fodder Demonstration
(viii) Funds for Animal Husbandary activities 14.92 lacs. Details of is Animal Husbandary activities given below :
S.No. Name of Activity Quantity Unit cost Cost of Activity in lacs
1 Goat Unit (11) 18 30000 540000 2 Buffloow Single 20 20000 400000 Animal Health Cemps 35 10000 350000 Fodders Demonstration 202 1000 202000 Total 1492000 Awareness Programme
Fortnightly Meetings with Livestock keeper to discuss and decide all breedable females to be covered. Creation Of Disease Free Zone: Livestock’s health coverage
Establishment of Pashudhan Seva Kendra (PSK) (Convergence with peer department)
Deworming to reduce worm load and enhance disease resistance. (Convergence with peer department)
Distribution of mineral mixture. (Convergence with peer department)
Free of Cost Vaccination in IWMP area Livestock for H.S., B.Q., F.M.D., PPR, ETV and Sheep Pox.
59
Ensure Hygenic measures to check Zonosis.(DAH/ IWMP)
Construction of Animal Sheds with Manger and Portable Manger With accessories
Provision of Cattle Water Troughs.
Infertility Management: To ensure Livestock’s Productivity
Expansion of AI Coverage/ reduction in no.of infertile females. PCPD+ COMBAT INFERTILITY+ CAMPS INFERTILITY RLDB+ CAMPS INFERTILITY SC COMPONENT Breed Improvment: To ensure Livestock’s Productivity enhancement
A.I. (Convergence with peer department)
Incentive based Mass Castration at Door Step of Scrub Bulls to Check ND Recycling.
Registration of bulls (Convergence with peer department) Bull / Buck Distribution for NS-.Gir, Murrah And Sirohi /Jamunapari Breed Bulls/ Bucks Should Be Distributed For 3yrs 6 (3 In Each Iwmp Area, Where Ever A.I. Facility Is Not Available Round’s O Clock. On 100% Subsidized Rate To WC.
Financial Incentive to the Inseminator for Calf Borns.
Convergence with peer Department/DAH/Agriculture/ATMA/ Board/ Trust/ Goseva
An Assistance to control Malnutrition: Protein Supplementation
Feed & fodder production enhancement.
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN : PIA will prepare annual action plan in the month of January indicating outgoing liabilities as well as new projects which they wish to take during next financial years & will submit to PM(WCDC). These plans will be placed for approval at P.S. (Standing Committee of Production and Agriculture) & Z.P. (Standing Committee of Production) level every year. While preparing Annual Action Plan (AAP) if rates of labour or material in DPR increased or decreased changed rates will be applicable for preparing AAP & the effect of same can be met by converging the remaining works with other schemes.
Revolving Fund to SHG (60% minimum of 9% amount) Nos 172 42.99 42.99 0.00 42.99 0.00 4.30
Revolving Fund to Enterprising Indivdual (10% minimum of 9% amount)
Nos 31 7.17 7.17 0.00 7.17 0.00 0.66
Grant in aid to Federation of SHG Individual (30% maximum of 9% amount)
Nos 11 21.50 21.50 0.00 21.50 0.00 2.10
Total b 203 71.66 71.66 0.00 71.66 0.00 7.06 (c) Consolidation (3%) 0 23.89 23.89 0.00 23.89 0.00 0.00 Grand Total(A+B+C) 0 796.20 431.96 191.60 798.72 826.32 30.80 Action plan prepaired on the basis of SRSAC contour mep of area & field visit in PRA . It dovelopment on need & demand basis.
Assistant Engineer PIA (IWMP) Project Manager WCDC Panchayat Samiti Bichhiwara District Dungarpur
80
CHAPTER- V
Annual Action Plan :-The Project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and according the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative are indicative and can very from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP Wise it can add pages
Through Project Fund 6635.00 796.20 A Proparatory Phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
1st year (2011-12)
2st year (2012-13)
3st year (2013-14)
4st year (2014-15)
5st year (2015-16)
6st year (2016-17)
Total Activity Unit Quantity
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Annual Action Plan :- The Project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and according the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative are indicative and can very from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary t
Through Convergence 6635.00 0.00 A Proparatory Phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA
1st year (2011-12)
2st year (2012-13)
3st year (2013-14)
4st year (2014-15)
5st year (2015-16)
6st year (2016-17)
Total Activity Unit Quantity
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Live Stock Activities 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Revolving Fund to SHG (60% minimum of 9% amount) Nos 25000 172 42.99 172 42.99 0.00 0.00 4.30
Revolving Fund to Enterprising Indivdual (10% minimum of 9% amount) Nos 24000 28 7.17 28 7.17 0.00 0.00 0.66
Grant in aid to Federation of SHG Individual (30% maximum of 9% amount) Nos 200000 11 21.50 11 21.50 0.00 0.00 2.10
Total b 0 71.66 203 71.66 0.00 0.00 7.06
91
(c) Consolidation (3%) 0 23.89 0 23.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grand Total(A+B+C) 0 1622.52 0 796.22 0.00 826.32 30.80 Action plan prepaired on the basis of SRSAC contour mep of area & field visit in PRA . It dovelopment on need & demand basis.
Juniour Engineer PIA (IWMP) Project Manager WCDC
Panchayat Samiti Bichhiwara District Dungarpur
92
CHAPTER-VI
EXPECTED OUT COMES 1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No. Item Unit of measurement
Pre-project Status
Expected Post-project
Status
Remarks
1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)
Meters 9.00 m 8.5 m
2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated No. 130 3 Quality of drinking water Description good-
maintance good
4 Availability of drinking water Description 10-11 Manths 11-12 Manths 5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 393 412 6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description - 332 7 Area under agricultural crop Ha 0 I Area under single crop Ha 1912 2007 Ii Area under double crop Ha 1162 1220 Iii Area under multiple crop Ha 393 412 8 Change in cultivated Area Ha 0
Yield of Maize q/ha 25-30 30-32 Yield of Wheat q/ha 18-22 21-25 Yield of Gram q/ha 15-18 18-20
9 yield of major crops of area
Yield of Paddy q/ha 32-39 39-45 Production of Maize ton 22-23 27-28 Production of Wheat ton 19-21 24-25 Production of Gram ton 3-04 5-6
10 production of major crops of area
Production of Paddy ton 20-21 24-25 11 Area under vegetation Ha 7 20 12 Area under horticulture Ha 7 15 13 Area under fuel Ha 15 22 14 Area under Fodder Ha 3552 4226
93
15 Fodder production Tannes 33884 54234 16 Milk production Litres/day 12616 13246 17 SHGs Active No. 21 60 18 No. of enterprising individuals No. 3 9 19 Income Rs.in la 14700 17000 20 Migration No. 1760 950 21 SHG Federations formed No. 0 5
Critical Assumption
• No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters
• Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
• There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is done.
• Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
• Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the rural areas. • Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.
• The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from participants.
Means of Verification of indicators • Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end of the project period
• Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.
• Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies. • Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual beneficiaries/project-related village and local bodies/PRIs.
• External review missions • Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal
Husbandry
94
Physical Target (Watershed Works) Name of Project
Financial Yearwise Physical Target Name of Head Name of Activity Name of Subactivity Total Target (Qua.)
Unit (ha/no.R
mt Cubicmet
er
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15 2015-16
Total
1.1.1Afforestation (on waterland)
22 Ha 8 10 4 22 1 Watershed Development Works
11.1 Land Development
(Productive use 1.1.2 Afforestation (on total land including wasteland
176 Ha 63 79 35 177
1.1.3 Horticulture (on wasteland)
Ha 0
1.1.4 Horticulture total land including wasteland
78 Ha 17 30 39 86
1.1.5 Agriculture (on wasteland)
Ha 0
1.1.6 Agruculture (on total land inclding wasteland
0 Ha 0
1.1.7 Pasture (on wasteland)
176 Ha 63 79 35 177
1.1.8 Pasture (on total land including wasteland)
495 Ha 177 221 97 495
1.1.9 Other (on wasteland) Ha 0
1.1.10 Other (on land including wasteland)
16 Ha 3 6 7 16
1.2 Soil & Moisture conservation
1.2.1 Staggered Trenching 176 Ha 63 462 203 728
1.2.2 Countour Bunding 1035 Ha 370 79 35 484
1.2.3 Graded Bunding Ha 177 221 97 495
1.2.4 Bench Terracing Ha 0
1.2.5 Others 105 Ha 0
1.3. Vegatative and Engineering Strucuture
1.3.1 Earthen Checks Cubicmeter
0
95
1.3.2 Brushwood Checks Rmt 0
1.3.3 Gully Plugs Cubicmeter
0
1.3.4 Loose bolder Rmt 0
1.3.5 Gabion structure Cubicmeter
0
1.3.6 Others Rmt 0
1.4 Water Harvesting Structure (new created)
1.4.1 Farm ponds Nos. 0
1.4.2. Check dams Nos. 0
1.4.3 Nallah Bunds Nos. 0
1.4.4 Percolation tanks Nos. 0
1.4.5 Ground water recharge structure
Nos. 0
1.4.6 Other Nos. 0
1.5 Water Harvestin structure (Renovated)
1.5.1 Farm Ponds Nos. 0
1.5.2 Check dams Nos. 514 1104 488 2106
1.5.3 Nallah Bunds Nos. 0
1.5.4 Percolation tanks Nos. 0
1.5.5 Ground water recharge structure
Nos. 0
1.5.6 Other Nos. 0
1.6 Water Harvesting Structure (storage capacity New structure
1.6.1 Farm ponds Cubicmeter
0
1.6.2. Check dams Rmt 195 265 120 580
96
1.6.3 Nallah Bunds Cubicmeter
0
1.6.4 Percolation tanks Rmt 0
1.6.5 Ground water recharge structure
Cubicmeter
0
1.6.6 Other Rmt 0
1.7 Water Harvesting Structure (storage capacity Renovated structure
1.7.1 Farm ponds Cubicmeter
0
1.7.2. Check dams Rmt 0
1.7.3 Nallah Bunds Cubicmeter
0
1.7.4 Percolation tanks Rmt 0
1.7.5 Ground water recharge structure
Cubicmeter
0
1.7.6 Other Rmt 0 2 EPA 2.1 No. of EPA
activities Nos. 35 35
2.2 No. of water extracting unit created
Nos. 8 8
3 institutio & Capacity Building
3.1 SHG Formation (Newly Created
3.1.1 No. SHG Nos. 5 25 20 50
3.1.2 Total of SHGs members
Nos. 50 250 200 500
3.2.1 No. of SHG assisted Nos. 10 10 10 30
3.2.2 Total No. of SHGs members
Nos. 115 100 100 315
3.3 UG formation 3.3.1 No. of UG Nos. 60 60
3.3.2 Total No. of members of Ugs
Nos. 600 600
3.4 Formation of federation
3.4.1 No. of fedartion Nos. 5 4 9
3.4.2 Total NO. of memberspf federation
Nos. 515 300 815
97
3.5 Capacity Building
3.5.1 No. of Training Nos. 24 36 16 15 15 106
3.5.2 No. of Persions trained
Nos. 1156 2246 444 458 368 4672
4 Livelihood activities for the asset-less persions
4.1 No. of activities
Nos. 7 10 10 2 29
4 Livelihood activities for the asset-less persions
5 Capacity Building 2.986 2.986 1.592 1.592 1.194 10.351
6 Preparation of DPR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
7 Any other consolidation 0.796 0.796
Total:- 3.384 2.986 2.190 2.190 1.991 12.740
AEN. PM WCDC
102
Capacity Building Plan (PIA Leval)
Name of ProjectDUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 Block BICHHIWARA District DUNGARPUR
Financial Year
No. Head 2011-12 2012-
13 2013-14 2014-
15 2015-16
1
No. of Training Planned
19 28 13 11 14
2
NO. of Persons to be trained
1128 1353 382 420 632 AEN. PM WCDC
103
Capacity Building Plan (WCDC Level)
Name of ProjectDUNGARPUR (IWMP) VII 2011-12 Block BICHHIWARA District DUNGARPUR
Financial Year
No. Head 2011-12 2012-
13 2013-14 2014-
15 2015-16
1
No. of Training Planned
5 6 2 2 1
2
NO. of Persons to be trained 28 43 12 6 8
AEN. PM WCDC
CHAPTER VII TECHNICAL DESIGNS AND ESTIMATESTechnical designs and estimates for proposed activities.
For Estimates GKN of the districts should be used. For Production System activities, rates provided by the Department is to be used & if not vailable than rates of Agriculture/Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry should be used. For Livelihood activities, project norms provided by the Department is to be used & if not available than cost norms of NABARD, NRLM etc can be used.
CHAPTER - VIII Enclosures -
a. Location –District, block, village, watershed location map
b. Map of ____________ IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral & Topo Sheet)
c. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)
d. Treatment map (Indicate proposed works)
e. Cadastral Map on watershed boundary
104
f. Information on Soils, Soil fertility, Land capability, Soil chemical problems like salinity, alkalinity
g. Land Use Land Cover map
h. Information on existing water harvesting structures & well inventory along with GPS co-ordinates.
i. High resolution, latest Remote Sensing Satellite data
Documents of Agreements:
Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval
Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution
Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval
Proceeding of Standing Committee of P.S. for DPR approval.
Proceeding of Standing Committee of Z.P. for DPR approval.
Assistant Engineer, PIA Project Manager, WCDC WD&SC P.S.----------- WD&SC.Distt.--------------
Cost of Plant saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area,sapling not less than 30 cm. height Forest dept. 400 400 Plant 0.00 7.00 0.00 2800.00
3
Transportation of plants from nursery to Planting site upto 40 Km. (GKN,12 Item no. 177( A )
400 400 Plant 0.0 0.874 0 349.60
4loading and unloading of plants
400 400 Plant 0.00 0.31 0.0 124.00
5
Rehandling of plants from camp site to actual planting site up to 500mt. GKN,12 Itemno.176(B)
400 400 Plant 0.67 0.0 268.0 0.00
6Cost of fertiliser & insecticides Incl. application
400 400 Pit 0.0
1.00 0.00 400.00
7Making of thawala 50 cm radius(patharili land )(GKN,12 Item no.117(a)
400 400 Pit 2.60
0.00 1040.00 0.00
8
Planting of forest sapling including soaking in water, cutting & removal of polythene bags, mixing and treatment of soil , backfilling, planting and compaction of soil around the plantson pathrili land (GKN,12 Item no.113(a)
400 400 Plant 4.00 0.0 1600.00 0.00
111
9 Weeding and Hoeing (one time in a year for 2 yr. ) (GKN,12, item no. 116) 800 800
Pit 1.30 0.0 1040.00 0.00
10 Watering for plantation 15lt./ plant twice in a year for 3 year (GKN,2012, Chapter item no. 115)
1200 1200 Plant 1.90 0.0 2280.00 0.00
11 water supply for plants by tanker ( capacity of tanker 1000 Ltr.) up to 10 K.M. lead 12 12 Plant 0.00 100.0 0.00 1200.00
12 watch & ward work for two year (one person) 1 1 month 2000 0.0 2000.00 0.00
Total Amt. 14068.00 4873.60
11 Gapfilling 20% over ItemNo.1 to 8 1488 654.72
Total Amt. 15556.00 5528.32 G. Total Amt. 21084
Labour Component = Rs 15556 Material Component = Rs 5528 Estimated Amount = Rs. 21084 Cost per Hactor = Rs 21084
Cost per Plant = Rs 52.71 Prepared by Checked & submitted by
�� ( 1 X 12 X 2.1 X 0.1 ) 3.02 �� �� ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.1 ) 0.22 �� �� ( 1 X 12 X 3 X 0.2 ) 7.20 �� �� 10.44 0������ 280.31 2981.00 2018.23 21463.206 ���E���1$�������4��������H&����������-��������$���
�� ( 1 X 13 X 2.1 X 0.1 ) 3.36 �� �� ( 2 X 1.5 X 0.9 X 0.1 ) 0.27 �� �� ( 1 X 13 X 3 X 0.2 ) 7.80 �� �� 11.43 0������ 280.31 2981.00 2186.42 23251.806 ���E���1$�������4��������H&����������-��������$���
�� !07�����(�S�����'�7��� � � � �� �� ���� ( 1 X 15 X 2.1 X 0.15 ) 4.73 0������ 264.62 2512.00 1251.65 11881.764 �����$�������������1$����������E�,38����������,�-�����%�D������
�����6��������F����7 �������$���������.�� )�
�� ���� ( 1 X 15 X 2.1 X 1.05 ) 33.08 0������ �� ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.9 ) 1.94 �� .�5���&������� { 1 X 15 X (2.1+0.9 )/2 X 1.5 33.75 0������ HWE xt L & R ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.6 ) 1.30 0������ 8! ���� 70.07 0������ 383.30 1831.00 26857.83 128298.175 ���������+����%���%�B���@(���-���������������-���B��1$���
�� ( 1 X 15 X 2.1 X 0.1 ) 3.65 �� �� ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.1 ) 0.22 �� �� ( 1 X 15 X 3 X 0.2 ) 9.00 �� �� 12.87 0������ 280.31 2981.00 2522.79 26829.006 ���E���1$�������4��������H&����������-��������$�����������
�� !07�����(�S�����'�7��� � � � �� �� ���� ( 1 X 20 X 2.1 X 0.15 ) 6.30 0������ 264.61 2512.00 1667.04 15825.604 �����$�������������1$����������E�,38����������,�-�����%�D�����������6�
�������F����7 �������$���������.�� )�
�� ���� ( 1 X 20 X 2.1 X 1.05 ) 44.10 0������ �� ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.9 ) 1.94 �� .�5���&������� { 1 X 20 X (2.1+0.9 )/2 X 1.5 45.00 0������ HWE xt L & R ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.6 ) 1.30 0������ 8! ���� 92.34 0������ 383.30 1831.00 35393.92 169074.545 ���������+����%���%�B���@(���-���������������-���B��1$������6������
�� ( 1 X 20 X 2.1 X 0.1 ) 4.70 Cum �� ( 2 X 1.2 X 0.9 X 0.1 ) 0.22 Cum �� ( 1 X 20 X 3 X 0.2 ) 12.00 Cum �� 16.92 0������ 280.31 2981.00 3363.72 35772.006 ���E���1$�������4��������H&����������-��������$�����������"������$���