Top Banner
1. II. ill. IV. V. 1 . ulti-religious * 041-A00151 ). l **
35

한국종교사의 이해* - s-space.snu.ac.krs-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/4688/3/ReligionandCulture_v10... · 개벽 사상은 한마디로 신천지대 망 사상이다)) ...

Feb 14, 2018

Download

Documents

duongxuyen
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • *

    - -

    1.

    II.

    ill.

    IV.

    V.

    1 .

    **

    .

    .

    (multi-religious

    society) . 1

    multi-religious situation) .

    .

    * 2002 {KRF-2002-041-A00151 ). 2 2 } l '. 1 2 .

    **

  • 152

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . (shamanism)

    ' 1)

    .

    1 1863

    .

    .

    ))

    3)

    .

    .

    1 ) l 1999 4 81-96" 4 3- 1. (Shamanism)

    2) 1 . eschatology) .

    3) 1945 1985 . 1(; 1966), 1 11.1. IF 5(~ 2003), 199-200

  • 153

    1 .

    .

    .

    .

    . H

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . |

    .

    }. .

    .

    . d=

    xl"(macro-perspective) micro-perspective) J

    . "(middle range perspective)

    4) {religious tradition)

    eligious phenomenon as a whe)" .

    (independent and complete)

    ._5)

    4) !L [j 2 1988, 52-60. 5) faith) {tradition) .

  • 154

    . .

    .

    . ^cr

    .

    1

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    '6)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . Wilfred Cantwell Smith , The End and Meaning 01 ReliRion, Harper & Row , London, 1978; c~ , 1991 ,

    6) : 11 " 200 I.

  • 155

    . H

    .

    (folk-beliefs)

    {the indigenous religious tradition in Korea)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ( experiential

    realism) ~

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

  • 156

    ll.

    .

    .7)

    .

    J= .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    1. 1

    .

    7) . . . L . . .

  • 157

    .

    .

    .

    (ultimate value)

    .. 8)

    (1) (2) .. 9)

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    2. 2

    2

    .

    .

    .

    8) ( ) 51 .

    9) 1 . 1991 , 16-20.

  • 158

    Jtt ru

    1

    12 11

    ( ) -

    ( ) -

    -

    -

    (1 919 ) -

    1 .

    . 10)

    ill.

    1.

    . 8

    .

    .

    10) 1)

  • 159

    2 .

    20 .

    .

    01 H.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2.

    OJ= O}

    . 0

    . .

  • 160

    .

    . .

    (i ;

    .

    .

    3.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    L

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    1) (Shamanism)

    .

  • 161

    11)

    . M.

    ( ecstasy)

    (soul journey)

    12)

    .

    .

    f. possession)

    . (directly xperienced deity)

    .

    . .

    .13)

    .

    14) f-, .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    11 ) r F l 1999 4 81-96.

    12) Mircea Eliade, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, New York: Pantheon, 1964.

    13) n 1 22-23 . 14) u 1 2

  • 162

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2) (

    f .

    .

    . (cosmic norm)

    .

    )5)

    (sky god) high-god) .16)

    E

    .

    . .

    (high

    god) (deus otiosus) .

    . lndra)

    {

    .

    .

    15) (Ultimate Reality) . . .

    16) J= . : U 1] 2003) pp .3 -45.

  • 163

    (mythic motif) 17)

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    {Brahman)"

    (complex) .

    .

    3)

    18) .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ). .

    .

    17) f: .2j ~ 1997. 18) J 1999

    1999.

  • 164

    .

    .19)

    . 1

    .

    .

    }71

    .

    1

    .

    .

    .

    .

    :

    .

    . @ ) (2) () ~(3)

    .

    .

    19) : 8 {( ) 7 ) 8 9 ) 9) . I d)' ~ 1997. .

  • 165

    N.

    . BCE 57

    BCE 37 BCE 18

    6 (53-145) 8 (234-285) 17

    (356-401) .

    . BCE

    108-AD. 313) 2(372)

    .

    (BCE 108 ) (BCE 57-18),

    .

    ~ . 1

    .

    . 1

    .

    - .

    I

    .

    .

    .

    . l

    .

    L

    .

    .

    .

  • 166

    1.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    L

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    )0) .

    )1)

    .

    .

    .

    20) 788( 4) . J

    21 ) 2 " 1986, 19-22.

  • 167

    .

    @ (2) (3)

    .

    . L

    .

    .

    .

    2.

    2(372)

    2 '. 391 2

    . l (384)

    10 524 4

    . .

    537

    .

    S .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • 168

    .

    .

    .

    .

    I .

    .

    .

    . L

    L

    l

    .

    3.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . 3

    . .

    OJ OJ

    .

  • 169

    .

    .

    )2)

    1

    .

    625 650 30

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    )3)

    .

    .

    v.

    1.

    .

    .

    . L

    22) 1 227-231

    23) { 5 ; 2002.

  • 170

    .

    .

    .

    '24)

    .

    1

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    R.

    7

    .

    .

    OJ=

    .

    {cultural integrity)

    . .

    24) J 1 ; 1991 , 9-44

  • 171

    .

    (complex) .

    (absolut belief-system) .

    01=71

    )5)

    .

    .

    .

    . %

    pluralism).

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (dogmatic)

    . .

    .

    .

    )6)

    25) 1 247-262.

  • 172

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    self-negation)

    )7)

    . .

    X)

    E .

    .

    )8)

    29)

    .

    30) .

    .

    .

    26) . . .

    27) . (value) (validity) .

    28) G B() 51 .

    29) . (situation of cultural complex) .

    30) .

  • 173

    (organized religion)

    unorganized religion) .

    .

    2.

    (organized religion) (unorganized

    religion) .

    (1) : (2)

    (3)

    .

    .

    1)

    1

    .

    )1)

    .

    .

    32) .

    . .

    (1 055-1101) 1158-1210) .

    [

    .

    31 ) . 32) -

    1. 118-123 .

  • 174

    .

    . -

    .

    1[;'

    .

    2)

    .

    .

    . .

    1

    .

    33) (1 328-1396) (1 337-1398)

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    33) . l .

  • 175

    3)

    }

    .

    .

  • 176

    .

    (shamanism)

    .

    @ (Shamanism)

    .

    .

    )5)

    .

    .

    @

    )6)

    .

    .

    35) "!H 2002. 142-276.

    36) . J] 1996. d ; 1997. 13 1997.

    15 -

    f J] 1990.

    LF 1979 J]

    1988. --- Jj

    1994 dl 1994.

  • 177

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    {latent popular

    religious tradition) .

    @

    .

    . semi-official religion)

    (public religion) .

    . 1

    .

    37)

    .

    . (non-organized public

    religion) .

    .

    10 .

    .

    37) (4 ) 1 .(5 ') 2 ~J 4 ) 2 I l .

  • 178

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    2)

    .

    . .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    3.

    . OJ=

    .

    .

    (social integrity initiated by religion)

    .

    .

    3 .

  • (1) (single religion society)

    (2) (Single-religion-leading Society)

    (3 ) (multi-religious society)

    @ (Multi-religious complex society)

    @ (Multi-religious open society)

    179

    (1) .

    .

    .

    . ~ (2)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (3)

    . L

    L

    .

    "(cultural integrity)

    .

    @ @ .

    (principle of religious pluralism)

    .

  • 180

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . %

    .

    .

    OJ=

    .

    .

    .

    f

    . . OJ=

    .

    .

    @ ( ) (2) {

    ) (3) 3 @

    .

  • 181

    3

    ~

    Official

    () religion

    - 0

    )

    Public ritual

    ()

    religion - 0 ()

    0 A A ()

    *

    Popular

    A ~m

  • 182

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (popular religion)

    latent religion) .

    .

    marginal)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (public ritual religion)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • 183

    (official religion) popular

    religion) .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    OJ

    .

    .

    .

    .

    3 8)

    .

    38) J] " 2001.

  • 184

    History of Korean Religions From the Ancient Priod to Corea Dynasty-

    Y oon, Y ee-heum

    Korean religion today constitutes the most outstanding forms of

    multi-religious situation" in the world. That is, on the one hand, Korean

    religion preserves the original forms of world classic religions. On the other

    hand, Korean indigenous religions such as Shamanism and new religions coexist

    with world classic religions.

    The idea of Korean religion under multi-religious situation" is complex and

    abstract. Korean religion means a cultural complex which represents Koreans'

    religious experiences. Korean people have adopted diverse foreign religions

    upon Koreans' general characteristic.

    In spite of the diversity, Koran religions have the general characteristic that

    can be called tolerant inclusivism." This idea represents Koreans' religious

    world view which harmoniously meets the need of the times. Tolerant

    inclusivism is a core of Korean thought in that it is found not only in Korean

    indigenous religions but also in pure-orthodox doctrines" of imported world

    religions. The harmony of Korean religions means practical and empirical

    harmony with others in reality of life." N ow we call the practical norm and

    ideal of tolerant inclusivism as han-mut (great wonderfulness)."

    The history of Korean religion with han-mut" can be divided in three

    periodical orders. The first is the ancient period of Korea called old Chosun."

    Magic was the main religious form. Three indigenous religious traditions in this

    period were Shamanism , belief in Supreme Being, and self-cultivation practices.

    Once Chinese characters were adopted to ancient Korea, it caused the upheaval

    called the first cultural shock."

    The second period can be defined from the first cultural shock to Chosun

    dynasty. The Chinese characters became a primal cause of step forward which

  • 185

    led pre-historic period to ancient period. This also made Korea follow Chinese

    culture. 1n Three N ations period, although magic was still dominant, oriental

    classic religions were adopted and began flourishing. Thse classic religions

    became a metaphysical canon which could criticize th self and the world.

    They were different from pre-historic religions in truth-questing aspects.

    Confucianism became an intelligent characteristic and constitutional ideology,

    but it excluded the lower class. Buddhism, however, had effect on all social

    classes as Buddhism mixed th classic ideas with magic.

    Corea dynasty stood in between the Three N ations period and Chosun

    dynasty period. It means that this period was laid on a very complex situation

    and also revealed social and cultural chaos. The primary reason of such a

    chaotic multi-religious situation in Corea dynasty was the confusion of Corea

    governments policies. The secondary reason was the absence of one dominant

    religion. Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in Corea became secularized so

    that they lost their function as classic religions and developed the history of

    religion intrrelating with Korean indigenous religions.

    Chosun was a typical classic dynasty founded on Confucianism. However,

    after two major wars with Japan and China in the middle period, Chosuns

    social order was seriously broken. At the end of Chosun, Christianity was

    planted with modern technology and western culture that caused the second

    cultural shock."

    N ow the history of Korean religion is in the third period and bears an

    unprecedented multi-religious situation in the world. That situation in Korea is

    the miniature of plural-culture situation" in the present world, So, to

    understand the history of Korean religion would be helpful to understand the

    history of world religion.

    Key words: Korean religion, The history of Korean religions, multi-religious

    situation, tolerant inclusivism , experiential realism , han-mut, magic,

    shamanism , high-god, self-discipline tradition, culture shock period,

    classic religion, Confucianism , Buddhism.