ѓ䉊䅏 ᆳགྷ ႎ रຍ ςᣔ ݣᄱႁឭᱜ ᬣ⇦㫼≸䄂 3HUSHUlNDI ⇦⩝䛺㣤⩌ 2014 Ꭱ႐ 喍ڲ䘕䉱 ϲӈ䊍䬲喎
2014
1989
450
25
iPad† Android‡
3D
2004 PDF
1998 Android
Apple† App Store†
Google Play‡ iOS§ Newsstand
Android
†Apple App Store iPad iPhone
‡Android Google Play§iOS
Lisa Stewart 2011
1985
199360
Lisa
New Haven
1
60%
Daniel F. BiedmaTecpetrol SA
Chip Corbett
Francisco GiraldoJean-Paul LafournèreGustavo Ariel MarínPedro R. NavarreAndreas SuterGuillermo Villanueva
Ivan VelaPetroamazonas EP
2014 26 3
©2014
Joe Amezcua Jean-Pierre Bourge Jorge Bolanos Burbano Juan Carlos Rodriguez Adriana Rodriguez Zaidiza Luis Miguel Sandoval NeiraJorge Vega Torres Austin Boyd
Fausto Caretta Joao Felix Christopher Hopkins Petroamazonas EP Pablo Luna
Avocet CMR CMR-Plus D ie lectr ic ScannerECLIPSE FMI i -DRILL Inte l l iZone CompactLiftWatcher NOVA P3 Petrel Platform ExpressPowerDrive Orbit PowerDrive vorteX PURE Techlog
Vx
CLEANPERF FLO-PRO M-I SWACO
CIPHER
1. Alvaro M Companies Look to Boost Production at Mature Oil Fields in Ecuador, The Wall Street Journal 2012 2 1 http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120201-713643.html 2014 8 1
2.
42
PERU
COLOMBIA
ECUADOR
Quito
2000 mi
0 200km
Pac i
f ic
O c e a n
Sucumbíosprovince
Napoprovince
Nueva Loja
Oriente basin
Marañón basin
Putumayo basin
Shushufindi-Aguarico
N
^ Oriente
Putumayo Oriente Mara ón 1969
1972 40 25 10 6 N-S
10%
1969
37 5.9
1986 125,000 /
19,900 /
2011 40,000
/ 6,360 /
2010
2012 1
EP Petroecuador Empresa Pública
de Hidrocarburos del Ecuador
JV
CSSFD
15[1]
75,000 / 11,900 /
2014 8
60% 70
60
40,000
CSSFD JV
Oriente 400
150
OOIP
37 2014 1
12 1.9
Oriente -
1°- 2° 40 25
10 6 67
220
[2]
432014
0
40
80
120
160
20102008200620042002200019981996199419921990198819861984198219801978197619741972
0
40
20
80
60
100
20102008200620042002200019981996199419921990198819861984198219801978197619741972
^ 1972 1986
Oriente
Hollin Napo 6
Hollin Napo T U
M2 Tena [3]
-[4]
Napo T U Tena
Hollin
Napo T
U
T T U U
90%
-
1969
Napo U 2,496 /
396.8 / Napo T
2,621 / 416.7 /
1972
19,200 / 3,050 /
1977
120,000 19,100
1994 100,000
/ 15,900 /
40,000 /
130,000 / 20,700 /
0
20
40
60
80
^ 2012 1
75,000 30,000
44
Napo
gAPI0 150 0 1
Y,300
X,900
X,925
X,950
X,975
Y,000
Y,025
Y,050
Y,075
Y,100
Y,125
Y,150
Y,175
Y,200
Y,225
Y,250
Y,275
Y,300
Y,400
Y,500
Y,600
g/cm31.95 2.95
0.45 –0.15
0.5 0 mD0.01 10,000
0.5 0
ohm.m0.2 200 1 0
mV–121 –9
U
B
T
U
T
^ Techlog
2010
35%
CSSFD
Tecpetrol SA 25%
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &
Co. LP 10%
2012 1
EP Petroecuador
15
[5] JV
CSSFD 2013
2 EP Petroecuador
Petroamazonas Ecuador SA
Petroamazonas EP PAM
PAM CSSFD JV
100
45,000 / 7,150
/ [6]
60% 75,000 /
2012 1
30,000 / 4,770 /
2011 10 4
CSSFD
2012
AWP 22
25
[7] 35
29
2012
4 3 CSSFD JV 2012
Techlog 152
M
3.
4. -
5. Alvaro 1
6. Lafournere J-P Dutan J Naranjo M Bringer FSuter A Vega J Bola os J Unveiling Reservoir Characteristics of a Vintage Field, Shushufindi Project, Ecuador SPE 171389 SPE
2013 10 22-25
7.
452014
A
A
D
E
C
B
C E
Napo
0 1 0.5 0
0.5 0
ohm.m0.2 200
mV–121 –9
B D
^ Techlog M Napo 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
T U
2012 2013
S N
Napo – M2 U
T U
Napo – B
U
T
U
T
2
1.2
200
m
656
ft
^ Napo T
U T T
U
46
^ Sacha Hollin Napo T
Napo U
^
NESW
Shushufindi-Aguarico
10
6.2
1 0.6
Sacha
7 4
67 Napo T
U
T U
472014
^
-
[8]
Napo T U [9]
2.54 cm
1 in.
^
48
X,606 ft X,612 ft
X,610 ft X,616 ft
U
X,605 ft X,608 ft X,611 ft X,614 ft
X,615 ft
X,613 ft
X,609 ft
X,607 ft
Napo
gAPI0 150 g/cm31.95 2.95
0.45 –0.15
0.5 0 mD0.01 10,000
mDkh
0.01 10,000
0.5 0
0.5 0
ohm.m0.2 200 FractionCore Oil Saturation
1 0
mV–121 –9 FractionCore Water Saturation
1 0
1 0
mDkv
0.01 10,000
X,475
X,500
X,525
X,550
X,575
X,600
X,625
X,600
U
^ Techlog Napo U U U
Napo 1 2 3 4 NMR
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
Napo T U
[10]
[11]
8. White HJ Skopec RA Ramirez FA Rodas JABonilla G Reservoir Characterization of the
Hollin and Napo Formations Western Oriente Basin Ecuador Tankard AJ Suárez Soruco R
Welsink HJ Petroleum Basins of South America62 1995 573–596
9. Corbett C Lafournere J-P Bolanos J Bolanos
MJ Frorup M Marin G The Impact of Layering on Production Predictions from Observed Production Signatures Ecuador SPE 171387 SPE
2013 1022-25
10. Greb SF DiMichele WA Gastaldo RA Evolution and Importance of Wetlands in Earth History
Greb SF DiMichele WA Wet lands Through Time
399 2006 10-40
11. Lafournere 6
492014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
SSF-128DSSF-127DSSF-094
SSF-127DSSF-094
^ WOR
WOR WOR
[12]
CSSFD
ECLIPSE
MULTZ
MULTZ 0 1
0
MULTZ
0
CSSFD Petrel E&P
[13]
80%
[14]
CSSFD
125 0.506
60 0.243
2,630 802
1,820 555
CSSFD
2012 2013
NapoT NapoU
EOR
NapoT NapoU
[15]
CSSFD
CMR-Plus
Dielectric Scanner
[16]
CSSFD
[17]
CSSFD
50
^ MICP
SEM NMR CMR CIPHER
CIPHER
CMR CMR-Plus CIPHER
CIPHER T2 NMR
T2 T2 T2 33
T2
1
234
%
17
14 1712 16
12
mD
800
400 800150 250
10
μm
30
255 10
5
μm
20
10 202 10
2
μm
120
40 808 40
8
CIPHER CMR
7 8
6 73 51 2
Core NMRCMR
MICP SEM
CIPHER
CIPHER
CMR
160 40063.5 209
68 [35.5]28 [14.6]
X,000
X,025
T2,
ms0.3 5,000
T2
T2
CMR-Plus
ms0.3 5,000
T2
X,000
X,025
MeasuredDepth, ft
CIPHER
T2
NM
R
Echo
am
plitu
de
12. Chan KS: Water Control Diagnostic Plots SPE 30775
SPE 199510 22–25
Bailey B Crabtree M Tyrie J Elphick J Kuchuk F Romano C Roodhart L Water Control
12 1 200030–51
13. Hoffman DR Petrel Workflow for Adjusting Geomodel Propert ies for Simulat ion SPE 164420 SPE
2013 3 10–13
14. Corbett 9
15. Gozalbo E Bourge JP Vargas A Lafournere JP Corbett C Geomodel Validation Through
Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) and Simulation in the Shushufindi Field Ecuador GEO-DE-EG-04-E VIII INGEPET 2014 11
3–7
16. Lafournère J-P Dutan J Hurtado J Suter ABringer F Naranjo M Bourge J-P Gozalbo E
Selection of Optimum Completion Intervals Based on NMR Calibrated Lithofacies SPE 169372 SPE
2014 5 21–23
CMR Allen D Flaum C Ramakrishnan TS Bedford J Castelijns KFairhurst D Gubelin G Heaton N Minh CCNorville MA Seim MR Pritchard T Ramamoorthy
R Trends in NMR Logging12 3 2000 2–19
Carmona R Decoster E Hemingway J Hizem M Mossé L Rizk T Julander D Little J McDonald TMude J Seleznev N Zapping Rocks
23 1 201136–52
17. CIPHER Clerke EAAllen DF Crary SC Srivastava A Ramamoorthy R Saldungaray P Savundararaj P Heliot DGoswami J Bordakov G Wireline Spectral Porosity Analysis of the Arab Limestone From Rosetta Stone to CIPHER SPWLA 55
2014 5 18–22
512014
50 CSSFD PAM[18]
CMR
IntelliZone Compact
LiftWatcher
Vx
MAXR PURE NOVA
PowerDrive vorteX
FMI Platform Express
9606 9612
9610 9616
^ AIM
52
^ 2013 H2 2015 H1 H2 2013 H1 2014
Aguarico
H2
2014 H1 2015 10
CSSFD
2014 2015
Aguarico Shushufindi
AGU-29;
;
T U ;U ; U
Shushufindi U;
;
; AGU-19
ShushufindiShushufndind
AGU-29
Development area boundary
(AGU-29)
2013 2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
8 7
910
AGU-29
AGU-19
NN
20,0000 ft
0 5,000m
20,0000 ft
0 5,000m
2012 CSSFD
2013 2014
CSSFD
2014 2015
CSSFD
CSSFD JV
2012 12 CSSFD
Centro de Manejo Integrado del
Activo Centro MIA
18. Marin G Paladines A Suter A Corbett C Ponce G Vela I The Shushufindi Adventure SPE 173486 SPE
201310 22-25
532014
^ AIM CSSFD
AIM AIM
AIM [19] CSSFD JV
AIM
AIM
ESP
1 90
AIM
CSSFD
ESP
AIM
AIM
99% [20]
AIM
AIM
[21]
AIM
ROP
AIM
AIM
54
CSSFD JV
PowerDrive Orbit
RSS
PowerDrive
vorteX
[22] i-DRILL
[23]
RSS
^ Aguarico
^ AIM
19. Rodriguez JC Biedma D Goyes J Tortolero MA Vivas P Navarre P Gozalbo E Agostini D
Suter A Improving Reservoir Performance
Asset SPE 167835 SPE2014 4 1–3
Bouleau C Gehin H Gutierrez F Landgren K Miller GPeterson R Sperandio U Trabouley I Bravo da Silva L The Big Picture: Integrated Asset Management 19 4
2007/2008 34–48
20. Bremner C Harris G Kosmala A Nicholson B Ollre A Pearcy MSalmas CJ Solanki SC Evolving Technologies: Electrical Submersible Pumps
18 4 2006/2007 34–48
21. Goyes J Biedma D Suter A Navarre PTortolero M Ostos M Vargas J Vivas PSena J Escalona C A Real Case Study
Well Monitoring System and Integration Data for Loss Production Management Consorcio Shushufindi SPE 167494 SPE
2013 10 28–30
22. PowerDrive vorteXCopercini P Soliman F El Gamal
M Longstreet W Rodd J Sarssam M McCourt I Persad B Wil l iams M Powering Up to Dri l l Down 16 4
2004/2005 4-9
23. i -DRILLCentala P Chal la V Durairajan B Meehan R Paez L Partin U Segal S Wu S Garrett I Teggart B Tetley N Bit Design Top to Bottom 23 2 2011
4–17
552014
FCV
FCV
^ ESP
FCV
FCV
M-I SWACO FLO-PRO[24]
[25]
2011 30 2014
22
LWD
CSSFD JV
PURE
CLEANPERF
P3 PURE[26]
6
1
14
Napo U
1994 Agencia de Regulación
y Control Hidrocarburífero (ARCH)
Napo T
U Tena
T
U ARCH
CSSFD
IntelliZone
Compact
[27]
IntelliZone Compact
CSSFD JV
ARCH
AIM
2013 12
CSSFD
SSF-136D IntelliZone
Compact
• U T
•
•
•
•
• CSSFD AIM
•
•
•
56
IntelliZone Compact
IntelliZone Compact
T
U
IntelliZone Compact
Vx
T
U [28]
700 / 110
/ 350 / 56 /
CSSFD JV
2014
Napo U
CSSFD
600- 800 1,970 -2,620
125
U
JV
125
2012 5 CSSFD
实验区块 1
实验区块 2
N
10,0000 ft
0 2,500m
关井生产井注水井弃井
^
PA1 PA2
CSSFD JV EOR
1 PA1
2
PA2 125
[29] PA1 PA2 OOIP
20% 27% CSSFD
30 0.121 60
600- 800
PA1 PA2
PA1 6 PA2
24.
25.
26. PURE Bruyere FClark D Stirton G Kusumadjaja A Manalu DSobirin M Martin A Robertson DI Stenhouse A
New Practices to Enhance Perforating Results18 3 2006
18–35
Behrmann LWalton IC Chang FF Fayard A Khong CKLangseth B Mason S Mathisen A-M Pizzolante I Xiang T Svanes G Optimal Fluid System for Perforating 19 1
2007 14–25
27. Rodriguez JC Dutan J Serrano G Sandoval LM Arevalo JC Suter A Compact Intelligent Completion: A Game Change for Shushufindi Field SPE 169483 SPE
2014 521–23
D y e r SEl-Khazindar Y Reyes A Huber M Raw IReed D Intelligent Completions A Hands-Off Management Style 194 2007/2008 4–17
IntelliZone CompactBeveridge K Eck JA Goh G
Izetti RG Jadid MB Sablerolle WR Scamparini G Intelligent Completions at the Ready
23 3 201118–27
28. Vx Atkinson I Theuveny B Berard M Conort G Groves JLowe T McDiarmid A Mehdizadeh P Perciot P Pinguet B Smith G Williamson KJ A New Horizon in Multiphase Flow Measurement
16 4 2004/200552–63
29.
572014
^
T
U
2012 6 SSFD-151D
2012 8
CSSFD
PA2
CSSFD JV EOR
CSSFD
CSSFD JV
40,000
2014
Petroamazonas EP
20
2012 2
60% 45,000 /
75,000 /
Petromazonas EP
CSSFD JV AIM
CSSFD JV IntelliZone
Compact
EOR
RCNH
0
20
40
60
80
2014-082014-022013-082013-022012-082012-02
2014 NW2013 NW2012 NW
2014 WO2013 WO2012 WO
^ 2012 2
WO / NW
/ 2013 1
10,000 / 1,590 /
58