Top Banner
© OECD/IEA 2010 © OECD/IEA 2010
19

© OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Cameron Mustian
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010 © O

EC

D/I

EA

201

0

Page 2: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

The current pictureA global oversupply

Page 3: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Gas oversupplyShort and long-term consequences…

2009-10 – Fundamentals

• Demand is falling• Available supplies increasing: Unconventional gas + LNG• Spot prices twice as low as

oil-linked gas prices

Short-term consequences

• Uncertainty on demand recovery and infrastructure investments

• Difficulty to respect TOP• Decoupling between gas and oil

prices?

Long-term consequences

• What is the role of gas in the energy mix?

• Where should companies invest? • Gas glut or supply crunch?

Page 4: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Gas market is not globalBut is certainly globalising

New exporters New buyers

Page 5: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

OECD Gas Demand Some recovery at least?

Source: IEA, Monthly Gas Data, *Preliminary data

OECD -3.4%*Meanwhile China +11%*

Page 6: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

The drop was impressive in Europe

Page 7: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Gas supply highlights

OECD Production has been stable in 2009 -0.7% (+3% in 2008) Production increased in North America and Pacific But declined in Europe (except Norway)

Non-OECD gas production more affected by the crisis Russian and Algerian output declined Turkmen production dropped significantly Production increased in Qatar, India; Yemen started producing

Two major changes The unconventional gas revolution in the US The massive expansion of liquefaction capacity over 2008-13

Global surplus expected for the upcoming years

Page 8: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Unconventional gas impact on the markets

Growth of US unconventional gas has had regional and global consequences

Regional Low utilization of the US LNG terminals – 9 bcm imported in 2008,

13 bcm in 2009 Lower imports of Canadian gas Change in investments: Kitimat LNG was changed from import to

export

Global Aggravation of the oversupply and therefore drop of spot prices More LNG available for the other markets Discourage LNG projects targeting the US: FIDs are unlikely in the

Atlantic basin with the current market conditions All importing countries look at potential unconventional gas

(Australia, Europe, China, India, Argentina, Indonesia) M&A at companies’ level

Page 9: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

LNG Markets A look back at 2009, what to expect for 2010

Problems are now common in new and existing liquefaction plants

There was little growth of LNG trade in 2009 – by an estimated +5% Output has been improving only during the second half of 2009

LNG imports – a contrasted picture LNG imports in Japan and Korea declined by 7 and 9% respectively UK imports increased by more than 10 US LNG imports increased by 30% to 13 bcm China LNG imports increased by 66% to 7.5 bcm New players are appearing: Kuwait, Canada

The year 2010 will see the actual ramp up of production All facilities will progressively increase output Peru and two last Qatari plants expected to start

Page 10: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Massive new LNG supply in sightDespite a slow start, this LNG will arrive on markets…

Source: IEA, NGMR 09

Page 11: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Price decoupling and convergenceFor how long?

Some signs of spot indexation?

A bump or NBP living its own life?

Page 12: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Two different price systems coexistFor how long?

Divergence between spot and oil-indexed gas prices Spot prices half of oil based prices Convergence of spot prices

Consequences Buying gas at spot volumes has been very attractive Pressure on long-term contracts to respect minimum TOP quantities Decoupling of gas prices? Renegotiations of some long-term contracts

Gazprom Statoil GasTerra Have made “public” announcements

Page 13: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Long-term view

Page 14: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Long-term gas demand outlook

Gas demand is growing in any scenario 41% in the reference scenario (WEO 2009) 17% in the 450 scenario

Most of the growth comes from non-OECD countries China and India show the most impressive growth rates Middle East has the largest incremental growth OECD Europe gas demand would grow only by 0.8%/y over

2007-30

Demand is expected to slowly in the medium term Limited growth in OECD countries: back to 2007’s levels by

2014-15 Non-OECD countries gas demand grows by over 300 bcm

between 2007 and 2030

But many uncertainties Economic recovery Gas demand from power generators

Page 15: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

But investments in the upstream sector would still be needed

Additional capacity of around 2 700 bcm, or 4 times current Russian capacity, is needed by 2030 – half to

offset decline at existing fields & half to meet the increase in demand

0

1

2

3

4

5

2007 2015 2020 2025 2030

tcm Fields yet to be developed or found

Currently producing fields

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Share from fields not yet producing(right axis)

Page 16: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Gas oversupplyThe impact on infrastructure use

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019

bcm Unutilised capacity

Total trade

Capacity utilisation rate (right axis)

Use of interregional transport capacity (LHS)

Surplus of 200-250 bcm versus 60 bcm in 2007 (which was tight) But strong regional differences Pipelines less flexible, likely to be more affected And some “surplus” capacity is also desirable for security of supply

reasons

Page 17: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Can the US unconventional gas success story be reproduced elsewhere? The potential of unconventional resources is still poorly mapped

and quantified Even in the United States Difficulty to apply the same methodology as for conventional gas Uncertainties on how much of this gas is actually recoverable?

Some key success factors Identification of the location and potential of the best areas Availability of rigs and of engineers Acceptance by local communities, landowners Resolution of environmental issues (water management) Possibility to link to existing pipeline infrastructure

Once some potential has been identified, population support and respect of environmental regulations will be key

Page 18: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010

Recent developmentsBy country

Australia – the front runner Many CBM/CSM projects

China, India, Indonesia looking seriously at it China, India already producing some CBM Ambitious targets for shale gas in China (15 to 30 bcm by 2030)

Growing interest in Europe GASH initiative to evaluate potential Chevron, Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips and Marathon in Poland Shale gas potential in Sweden, France CBM in the UK But disappointment in Hungary (Exxon and MOL exit the Mako field)

Potential in Latin America Argentina (Neuquén basin)

Page 19: © OECD/IEA 2010. The current picture A global oversupply.

© OECD/IEA 2010 © O

EC

D/I

EA

201

0