-
Indian Journa~ of ChemistryVol. 22A, March 1983, pp 267-269
Planar NickeI(II) & Copper(II) Complexesof otential
Antimalarial Drugs, N\ N4_Disubstituted Thio &
Selenosemicarba-
~ones of 2-Acetylpyridine
YUDHVIR K BHOON*
Chemis ry Department, Sri Venkateswara College,haula Kuan, New
Delhi 110021
and
mHN P SCOVILL & DANIEL L KLAYMANI .
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.DiY
1
ision of Experimental Therapeutics,Washington, D.C. 20012,
USA
Recei ed 11 June 1982; revised and accepted 12 November 1982
Complexes J the general composition MIl(SAm)X and MIl(SeAm)X
(M;:rCu. i; SAm-H and SeAm-H are thio andse1enosemicarbazone
derivatives respectively of 2-acetylpyridine;and -CI-, B~-, 1-,
OAc- or NO.) have been isolated andcharacterized ~n the basis of
magnetic and spectral measure-ments. Plana geometry is assigned to
all the complexes.
Thiosemicarbazones belong to a special class ofchela ing
molecules which possess a wide range ofmedicinal prppertlesl-4•
2-Acetylpyndine-4-phenyl-3-thiosemicar~azone has shown antimalarial
activityand a seires of mono and disubstituted (at N4)
thio-semicarbazones have been recently synthesized toknow about the
molecular features essential for anti-mala ial andlantileukemic
activitiesv", From these stu-dies, it was inferred that among the
compounds whereN4 atom waslincorporated into a six or
seven-memberedring such as piperidine, piperizine or azabicyclo
[3,2,2]nonane system, the potency was manifold. Amongsuch
compounds, 3-azabicyclo[3,2,2]nonane-3-thio-carboxylic
acid-2[(I-(2-pyridyl)ethylidene)] hydra-zide, I, has been found to
be not only the mostpoten; ial a timalarial drug but it also
possessesantileukemic propertiesv'", Since the biologicalactivity
of such type of compounds is thought to bedue to their potential
chelating+" behaviour with thetrace elements, we have initiated
studies on thetransition metal complexes of (I) and its
seleniumanalogue, Se1\m-H, II.
The prese t note describes the preparation andcharacterizat on
of copper(II) and nickel(II) com-plexes of SAm-Hand SeAm-H by
magnetic and spect-ral measurements. All the compounds have
beenassig ed square-planar geometry.
The 3Jazabicyclo[3,2,2]nonane- 3-thiocarbox
ylicacid-2-[1-(2-~yridyl)ethylidene] hydrazide, SAm-H andits
selenium analogue-Se/vm-H were prepared (by therepor ed methods="
and were recrystallized frommethyl aleoh 1.
~..-",,"}'Nrz'1cH:3 ~ '-J)
n,SeAm-H
Preparation of comp/exes-Copper(U) complexes ofSAm-H and SeAm-H
were easily prepared by addingthe ethanolic solution of the
appropriate copper(II)salt to the boiling ethanolic solution of the
ligand inequimolar ratio. In the case of iodo complexes,
anammonical solution of cuprous iodide was added tothe ligand
solution. In each case, the yellow colourof the ligand solution
changed to dark-brown; thesolution was allowed to crystallize by
slow evapo-ration. After several days, dark crystalline andshining
compounds separated out which were filteredoff and recrystallized
again from ethanol.
In the case of nickel(II) complexes, however, redneedle shaped
crystalline compounds separated outwhich were filtered off and
washed with ethanol anddried in vacuo over P4010•
The magnetic susceptibility measurements werecarried out at room
temperature using the Faradaymethod with Hg[Co(CNS)4] as the
calibrant. Theabsorption spectra of the complexes were recorded
innujol mull on a DMR-21 spectrophotometer, andinfrared spectra
were recorded in KBr on a PE-621Grating IR spectrophotometer.
From the analytical data (Table 1), it is obviousthat all the
complexes are of 1 : 1 (metal: ligand)type. The magnetic moments of
the copper(II) com-plexes (Table 1) are in the range 1.75-1.90 B.
M. asexpected for mononuclear planar copper(II) com-pIexes8-12. All
the nickel(II) complexes are diamagneticand hence planar geometry
can be easily assigned tonickel(II) complexes.
The ligand SAm-His present in the thione from asshown by its PMR
spectrum. A signal at M.23 isobserved due to the N-H proton. The
absence of anylow-field signal also favours this formulation. Sucha
molecule is expected to have electronic absorptionbands mainly
arising from n-'lt* transitions of C=Sand C=N parts of the
molecule. SAm-H showsbands at 25510 and 31250 cm-1 in chloroform
solutionwhich may be assigned to n-'lt* and 'It-7t*
transitionsrespectively. The selenium analogue, SeAm-H, showsa band
at 27550 cnr? due to n-ts" transition.
The blue shift of n-'lt* transition in SeAm-H could
267
-
INDIAN J. CHEM., VOL. 22A, MARCH 1983
Table l-e-Elemental Analyses and Magnetic Moment Datafor the
Complexes
Compound Found (Calc.), % (Le!! (B.-. --------- M.) at
M C N H 298K
SAm-H 63.57 18.54 7.28(63.31) (18.61) (7.14)
SeAm-H 55.01 16.04 6.30(54.84) (15.83) (6.14)
[CuIl(SAm) en 15.84 47.87 13.96 5.23 1.80(J 5.74) (47.63)
(13.74) (5.01 )
[CuII(SAm) Br] 14.29 43.20 12.60 4.72 1.96(14.04) (43.14)
(12.48) (4.68)
[CulI(SAm) I] 12.93 39.07 11.40 4.27 1.75(12.84) (38.64) (I
1.25) (4.14)
[CuII(SAm) OAc] 15.00 50.99 13.22 5.66 1.90(14.86) (50.78)
(13.08) (5.48)
[CuII(SAm) N03] 15.33 46.32 13.51 5.06 1.87(15.18) (46.18) (J
3.44) (4.94)
[CuII(SeAm) CI] 14.18 42.86 12.5 4.69 1.78(14.04) (42.74)
(12.43) (4.56)
[CulI(SeAm) BrJ 12.93 39.07 11.39 4.27 1.90(12.74) (38.93) (11.2
) (4.14)
CulI(SeAm) I 11.80 35.66 10.40 1.86(11.67) (35.43) (10.28)
[CuIl(SeAm) OAcl 13.50 45.91 11.90 5.10 1.85(13.44) (45.67)
(11.77) (5.04)
Table 2-PMR Spectral Data of SAm-H, SeAm-H and TheirNickel(II)
Complexes (Chemical Shifts in 8 ppm)
Moiety SAm-H [NiII(SAm) SeAm-H [NiII(SeAm)Cll en
Terminal methy- 4.05-4.2d 3.90d 4.1-4.3d 3.85dlene protons
1.658 1.708 1.208Cyclic protons 1.658(methylene)
2.3-2.6' 2.188 2.68 2.148Methyl protonsC-H (terminal) 2.138
2.0-2.2 1.5-1.75dN-H 4.238 2.42dS/Se proton 15.28
s=singlet; d=doublet, t=triplet.
be possibly due to the presence of basic substituentNH2• on the
C=Se moiety, which compensates theeffect of red shift expected in
SeAm-H due to thehigher energy of nonbonding selenium orbital
andlowering of the energy of,.; orbital due to
smallerelectronegativity of selenium relative to
sul-phur13-16,18.
SAm-H and SeAm-H chelate with metal ions in thethiol from as
shown by IR studies". Thus, both n-,.*and ,.-,.* transitions of C=S
and C=Se will be absentin the spectra of the complexes and bands
due to ,.-,.*transitions of C=N group and ligand-metal shouldbe
observed. These transitions have been found toappear at 22780 and
26460 cm-l respectively.
However, [CuII(SAm-H)CI] shows a very weakband at 16470 cm? (E =
158). The value of molarextinction coefficient of this band rules
out its assign-ment as M-+L or L~M charge-transfer band, andhence
it could possibly be the d_d19,20 band expectedfor planar
coppertfl) complexes. This band appears
268
at higher energy (17860 cm-l, e=387) in he selepiumanalogue.
Appearance of this band at h gher energy(17860 cm", e=387) and with
greater in nsity in theselenium analogue is justified in view of
the greaterligand-field strength of the selenium anI·logue
com-pared to that of the sulphur compound.
The absorption spectra of other cop I er(H) com-plexes, recorded
in nujol mull, show the -d band atdifferent positions and the
complexes CO~d be arran-ged in the following order of decreasin.
ligall(~-fieldstrengths: CulI(SeAm) F>CuIl(SeAm) OAc>
CuIl-(SAm) (NOa) >CuII(SeAm) (N03»CuIl(~eAm) CI>CuII(SAm)
CI>CulI(SeAm) Br>CuII(SA I ) BrACuJI(SeAm) I> CuII(SAm)
I.
The nickel(lI) complexes do not show any bandbelow 10000 cm-1 in
the absorption sdectra whichsupports their planar geometry as
concluded fro I themagnetic susceptibility measurements. I
The PMR spectra of both the ligands have beenrecorded in CDCla
and the results arelpresen~ed inTable 2. Only the aliphatic protons
give well-definedsignals while the aromatic protons of ~yridine
ringappear in both the spectra as ill-defined pea s dueperhaps to
the stealing of intensity by aliphaticprotons of the bicyclo ring.
An interdsting featureof the PMR spectrum of SeAm-H is thel
appea~anceof a broad signal in the low-field regien (~15.~),
inaddition to another peak at ~2.42 WhlC~ representsN-H proton. The
low-field signal is of the rightntensity and position to represent
Se-~.proton; thesignal could possibly arise due to the dY9amic
equili-brium between the selenone(III) and sele I il(rV) ormsof
SeAm-H.
Most of the peaks due to the aliphatic protons inthe ligands
shift towards TMS position ~Inthe spectraof the corresponding
nickel(II) cOl.nple~es, and thisshift could possibly be due to the
presence of para-magnetic octahedral nickeI(I1) complexes in
solutionphase due to the axial coordination! f the
solventmolecules'" to the planar complex.
References1 Campbell M J M, Coord chem Rev, 15 (197 ) 279.2
Klayman D L, Bartosevich J F, Griffin T S Mason C J &
Scovill J P, J mednl Chern, 22 (1979) 853.3 Klayman D L, Scovill
J P, Bartosevich J F & Mason,
J rnednl Chern, 22 (1979) 1367.
-
4 Scovill J P, Klayman D L & Franchino C F, J mednl Chem(in
press),
5 Martner ~G, Antibiotic and chemotherapy, 6 (1956) 51.6 Figgls
B & Harris C M, J chem Soc, (1959) 51.7 Albert A" JAm Pharm
Assoc, 47 (1956) 8.8 Martin r L" Mitra S & Sherwood R C,
(unpublished
work).9 Sacconi & Cini R, Ann Chim (Rome), 42 (1952)
723.
10 Norti T, !Ann Acad Sci Eennicae Ser A II, 86 (1963) 7.11
Donoghue J T & Drago R S, lnorg Chem, 2 (1963) 572.12 Figgis
BIN & Harris C M, J chem Soc, (1959) 855.13 Jones C .t &
McCleverty J A, J chem Soc, (1968) 2829.14 Jansen M J, Rec Trav
chim Pays Bas Be/g, 79 (1960) 454,
464.
NOTES
15 Benson S W & Kistiakowsky G B, J Am chem Soc, 64(1942)
80.
16 Hosoya H, Tanaka J & Nagakura S, Bull chem Soc Japan,83
(1959) 850.
17 Saksena B D & Kagarise R E, J chem Phys, 19 (1951) 994.18
Bhoon Y K, Mitra S, ScoviII J P & Klayman D L, Trans
metal Chem, (in press).19 Raevskii 0 A, Shagidullin R R, Kitaev
Yu P & Minkin
V I, Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR, 178 (1968) 112.20 Ali M Akbar,
Livingstone S E & Phillinps D J, Inorg chim
Acta,S (1971) 493.21 Wayland B B & Wisniewski M D, J chem
Soc, A17 (1971)
2727.
269