- Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets

Portfolio committeeMay 2007

SIYANDA

NAMAKWA

KGALAGADI

PIXLEY KA SEME

FRANCESBAARD

North West

North West

NCDMA08

Hantam

Ubuntu

Mier

NCDMA06

NCDMA08

Karoo Hoogland

Kareeberg

Nama Khoi

Emthanjeni

Kamiesberg

Khai-Ma

Siyancuma

NCDMACB1

!KheisNCDMA07

NCDMA08

NCDMA07

RichtersveldKai !Garib

SiyaThemba

Thembelihle

NCDMA09

Umsobomvu

Tsantsebane

Renosterberg

/ / Khara Hais

Ga Segonyana

Kgatelopele

NCDMA06

Gamagara

Dikgatlong

Sol Plaatje

Magareng

Phokwane

- Northern Cape - - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National Strategic review of the National

water sector backlogs and water sector backlogs and targetstargets

MEC JF van WykDepartment Housing and Local Government

2

Meeting the Targets Meeting the Targets

THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES sets out the targets for addressing water and sanitation backlog.

2005 - 09

2007

2007

2008

2010 All PEOPLE have access to a functioning basic SANITATION facility

All PEOPLE have access to a functioning basic WATER SUPPLY facility

All CLINICS have adequate and safe WATER SUPPLY and SANITATION SERVICES

All BUCKET TOILETS on formal areas (pre ’94) are eradicated

All SCHOOLS have adequate and safe WATER SUPPLY and SANITATION SERVICES

3

School servicesSchool services 21 school (3,048 learners) not water onsite. 17 of the 21 in Kgalagadi Funding needs = R960,000 DWAF Funding Channel Awaiting Final Allocation

Ratio of 1 to 33 learners (average taken 1:25 girls and 1:40 boys) 279 schools do not meet norm – an estimated 1,667 toilets

required.

Water supply Total

No water on school site 21

Cost per water supply

To supply from community point @ R10,000 each R210,000

Drilling & equipping at 5 sites @ R150,000 each R750,000

TOTAL R960,000

School with toilet Nr of schools

Flush VIP Total Cost @ R6,600 VIP

R25,000 flush

All below basic 119 13 539 552 R3,882,400

Mixed 33 29 179 208 R1,904,400

All basic & above but below the ratio norm

127 861 46 907 R21,828,600

Total 279 903 764 1,667 R27,617,400

4

Clinic water and Clinic water and sanitationsanitation

2 clinics in Siyanda district Total need R900,000 DWAF Funding Channel R 1.2M (Sufficient)

Water needs at clinics

Clinic water cost

Sanitation needs at clinics

Clinic sanitation

cost

Frances Baard 0 R0 0 R0

Pixley ka Seme 0 R0 0 R0

Kgalagadi 0 R0 0 R0

Namakwa 0 R0 0 R0

Siyanda 2 R300,000 2 R600,000

Northern Cape 2 R300,000 2 R600,000

5

SIYANDA

NAMAKWA

KGALAGADI

PIXLEY KA SEME

FRANCES BAARD467

10825643

0

8900

448

1506

3771

1121

Bucket eradication in Bucket eradication in formal settlementsformal settlements

Buckets = 6,846 Funds received R 65,9M Ring fenced bucket funds

sufficient. Municipalities to sign off for inclusion in DORA

Although funding should be sufficient, challenges still exist to eradicate the backlog Bulk services should first be in place Tender procedures are time consuming Delivery rate must increase significantly

6

Dikgatlong 28 R364,000 R5,294,479 R0 Yes YesDMA Frances Baard 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesMagareng 0 R0 R2,394,556 R0 Yes YesPhokwane 0 R0 R2,260,894 R0 Yes YesSol Plaatje 1,093 R14,209,000 R5,691,900 R8,517,100 No R8,517,100 YesDMA Pixley ka Seme 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes R7,500,000 YesEmthanjeni 413 R5,769,000 R0 R5,769,000 No R5,769,000 YesKareeberg 738 R14,144,000 R9,999,500 R4,144,500 No R1,579,363 NoRenosterberg 518 R6,734,000 R5,743,500 R990,500 No R990,500 ProblematicSiyancuma 1,116 R14,508,000 R2,000,000 R12,508,000 No R12,508,000 ProblematicSiyathemba 168 R5,592,000 R3,325,500 R2,266,500 No R2,266,500 YesThembelihle 199 R3,500,000 R3,079,500 R420,500 No R420,500 NoUbuntu 264 R3,432,000 R1,894,500 R1,537,500 No R1,537,500 YesUmsobomvu 355 R6,194,000 R5,057,500 R1,136,500 No R1,136,500 YesDMA Kgalagadi 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesGamagara 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesGa-Segonyana 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesMoshaweng 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesDMA Namakwa 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesHantam 40 R520,000 R3,352,207 R0 Yes YesKamiesberg 52 R676,000 R502,586 R173,414 No R173,414 PossiblyKaroo Hoogland 30 R390,000 R0 R390,000 No R390,000 PossiblyKhâi-Ma 166 R2,158,000 R0 R2,158,000 No R2,158,000 YesNama Khoi 114 R1,482,000 R6,636,483 R0 Yes YesRichtersveld 46 R3,542,000 R112,156 R3,429,844 No R3,429,844 Yes!Kheis 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes Yes//Khara Hais 973 R12,649,000 R915,000 R11,734,000 No R11,734,000 YesDMA Siyanda 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesKai !Garib 0 R0 R89,900 R0 Yes YesKgatelopele 264 R3,432,000 R248,000 R3,184,000 No R3,184,000 YesMier 4 R52,000 R0 R52,000 No R26,640 YesTsantsabane 265 R3,445,000 R862,100 R2,582,900 No R2,582,900 YesTOTAL 6,846 R102,792,000 R59,460,261 R60,994,258 No R65,903,761

Nam

akw

aSi

yand

a

Reach bucket

target Dec 2007District

REVISED ALLOCATION TO

ENSURE ERADICATION OF BUCKETS (April

07)

Pixl

ey k

a Se

me

Fran

ces

Baa

rdK

gala

gadi

NEED/ shortfall for

bucket eradication in formal areas

only

Adequate funding to eradicate remaining

formal buckets? (Dec 06 )Municipality

Buckets formal Dec

2006 DWAF

Total bucket funding required

Ringfenced MIG bucket & PIG 2006/2007

Bu

cket

– P

red

icti

on

en

d

Bu

cket

– P

red

icti

on

en

d

20

07

20

07

Confirmation by Municipalities on 12 April 2007 to reach Bucket targets on

Formal Stands by Dec 2007Yes = 22No = 2

Problematic = 4Historically no buckets = 4

7

Municipalities Reporting:Municipalities Reporting:Bucket 07 Target not ReachedBucket 07 Target not Reached

Municipality

Challenges Comments

Kareeberg Funding shortfall - R 10M counter fundingConstruction period for bulk infrastructure

High level of service preferredUnit costs extremely highNo access to counter funding

Thembelihle Strydenburg Community wants High LOSInfrastructure needs to be developed (Water & Sanitation)

Community wants High LOS – do not want dry system – prepared to wait for flush

8

Municipalities Reporting:Municipalities Reporting:Bucket 07 Target problematic if challenges not Bucket 07 Target problematic if challenges not

resolvedresolved

Municipality Challenges Comments

Renosterberg

Water supplyContract for water expected completion Dec 07

Top structures completedReady for connection once water supply completed

Kamiesberg Community wants higher LOSWater supply inadequate

Interim solution needs to be negotiated with community

Karoo Hoogland

Community wants higher LOSBulk infrastructure can not support high LOS

Feasibility report on infrastructure requirementsInterim solution needs to be negotiated, e.g. conservancy tanks

Siyancuma Douglas (started 2005) slow construction & quality problemsR 8M needed to resolve problem

R 8M additional funding neededAccelerated construction programme by new implementation team

9

Water supply to Households Water supply to Households (2008)(2008)

HH living in settlements and towns that do not have access to water supply services within 200m = 12,779

Need R159.1 million to provide for water at community standpipe @ R10,500 per HH

Shortfall R90.1 million 6 WSA 66% required in Moshaweng

Will target be reached?? 26 WSA Yes 6 WSA No

New Regional Bulk Water Grants via DWAF not included

PkS13%

Kgalagadi66%

Namakwa3%

Siyanda7% FB

11%

Backlog distributionper DM

10

Sanitation supply to Sanitation supply to Households (2010)Households (2010)

This includes; No sanitation Pits Buckets on informal stands

Backlog = 38,849 HH Need = R381.9 mil Norm

Dry sanitation @ R6,600 Waterborne @ R13,000

Shortfall R290.2 million 13 WSA

Will target be reached without shortfall funds? 19 WSA Yes 13 WSA No

No sanitation803721%

Pits2309759%

Buckets on informal771520%

11

Backlog on farmsBacklog on farms

MunicipalityWater

backlog on farms

Cost to provide water @ R6,500 per HH on farms

Sanitation backlog on

farms

Cost to provide sanitation

@R6,000 per HH on farms

Frances Baard 2,096 R13,624,000 2,309 R13,855,279

Pixley ka Seme 1,286 R8,359,000 6,027 R36,162,000

Kgalagadi 218 R1,417,000 757 R4,542,000

Namakwa 970 R6,305,000 2,943 R17,658,000

Siyanda 2,539 R16,503,500 7,021 R42,126,000

TOTAL 7,109 R46,208,500 19,057 R114,343,279

Based on 2001 Census. (Updated where more accurate data became available)

Low priority at Municipal level No dedicated funding exists Backlog targets will not be met if current

processes are maintained

12

Key Impediments hampering Key Impediments hampering deliverydelivery

Revision of the MIG 2007/2008 MIG bucket eradication allocations according to the Northern Cape’s report ‘Strategic review of the national water sector backlogs and targets’

Business plan compilation is time consuming and quality information lacks

Insufficient long term planning at municipal level Support to municipalities not always coordinated Unsustainable development – Water borne sanitation is

implemented in areas where water infrastructure is in adequate and treatment works too small

Tender procedures are time consuming due to lack of capacity at municipal level

Housing projects are implemented at a slow pace Small funding allocations to municipalities Water shortages in areas delays implementation of projects

where households will not accept dry sanitation Quality of construction is a cause of concern Lack of technical staff on municipal level Update and verify all backlogs on formal and informal stands Project management MIG funding is ring fenced within municipalities for water and

sanitation services and not per district

13

How can delivery be How can delivery be acceleratedaccelerated

Multi year business plans combined with increased DORA funding

Channeling funding through DM Assistance with business plans Prioritising water and sanitation

projects Housing projects accelerated Monitoring/tracking progress Capacity building & training Shared services and O&M units at DMs Interim sanitation provision &

promoting sustainable development

14

Moshaweng challenges - Moshaweng challenges - WaterWater

ISRDP Node Former cross-border area – incorporated in

NC in 2006 8 000 HH still below RDP level –

Projected funding required R 88M to meet target date

Projected Shortfall on current MIG allocation = R 60M

To meet target of 2008 – Average of 4000 HH need to be served p.a.

15

Moshaweng challenges - Moshaweng challenges - SanitationSanitation

ISRDP Node Former cross-border area – incorporated in NC in

2006 14 000 HH needs basic sanitation – estimated budget

R92.5M (Dry sanitation) Historically no Buckets in Moshaweng Average number of toilets constructed over past two

years = 1 100 pa (2300 total). (Constraint – funding) To meet target of 2010 – Average of 3 500 units

needs to be constructed p.a. HHs are starting to demand higher LOS – flush

Infrastructure major challenge – remote rural area with very limited water and nono bulk sanitation infrastructure

Capacity of municipality limited – institutional and technical support important

16

Moshaweng Moshaweng – Sanitation – Sanitation ScenariosScenarios

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Toilets p.a.

2007 2009

Years

Double up

Constant

Funding scenarios

Scenario 2007 2008 2009 2010

Historic MIG funding R 6M R 6M R 6M R 6M

Double up (Preferred implementable option)

R 6.6M R 13.2M R 26.4M R 46.2M

Predicted funding shortfall

R 0.6 R 7.2M R 20.4M R 40.2M

Constant R 6.6M R 28.6M R 28.6M R 28.6M

Predicted funding shortfall

R 0.6 R 22.6M R 22.6M R 22.6M

Thank YouThank You