Top Banner
© Moritz Buschmann; Novem ber 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer
18

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

From myth to reality:

Globalisation and public spending in

OECD countries revisited

Reseaerch Note

by Marius R. Busemeyer

Page 2: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

The research problem (1)

Research question:

How does globalisation affect public

spending in OECD countries?

Page 3: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

The research problem (2)

Two hypothesis:

1. “Efficiency thesis”: Globalisation leads to lower taxes because decision makers fear the exodus of capital → lower public spending (“race to the bottom”)

2. “Compensation thesis”: Globalisation leads to problems in societies, these problems have to be compensated by governments → higher public spending

Page 4: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

The research problem (3)

Literature:

• Trend: empirical evidence for “compensation thesis”

• Domestic institutions and parties matter

Page 5: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

The research problem (4)

Criticism on results in the literature:

• old data (until mid. 90s)• static view (level of globalisation, not change)• “efficiency thesis” too simplistic• Narrow approaches (long run and broad effect)• No distinction between eras of globalisation

(data pooling)

Page 6: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Research design (1)

Dependent Variables:

• total public spending (% of GDP)• total public social spending (% of GDP)• total spending on social transfers (% of GDP)• Non social public spending (% of GDP)

Page 7: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Research design (2)

Independent Variables:

• trade openness (∅ imports/exports % of GDP)

• KOF index (realized trade, capital flows and domestic financial trade barriers)

• Net capital transfers (% of GDP)

Page 8: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Research design (3)

Control Variables:• Unemployment• Inflation• Well-being (national income per capita)• Age distribution (share of pop. <15 + >65)• De-industrialization index• Female labour force participation• Parties (Social Democrats in government)• EU-Membership in the 90s (Maastricht Criteria)• Country size

Page 9: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 10: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Research design (4)

The Model:

• No data pooling of years• Simple cross-sectional regression• Dynamic model investigating differences of the

variables within countries + Error Correction Model (ECM) to include long term effects (lagged variables)

Page 11: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 12: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 13: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 14: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 15: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 16: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 17: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Page 18: © Moritz Buschmann; November 2009 From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited Reseaerch Note by Marius R. Busemeyer.

© Moritz Buschmann; November 2009

Conclusion

What has to be discussed?

• “compensation thesis” outdated?

• what about “efficiency thesis”?

• problem of causation

• methodological lessons to learn?