Top Banner
© Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy
12

© Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

© Mark Godfrey

What’s in it for agriculture and forests?

Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy

Page 2: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Will farmers and foresters benefit?

“Our analysis demonstrates that the economic opportunities for farmers and ranchers can potentially outpace - perhaps significantly - the costs from climate legislation.”

- USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, July 22, 2009

Page 3: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

How might landowners benefit?

- New biofuel or wind power markets

- Financial incentives for renewable energy and agricultural emissions reductions ( $75 million to $100 million annually from 2012-2016).

- Offsets (about $1 billion per year in 2015-20 to almost $15-20 billion in 2040-50 gross revenue).

Page 4: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

http://www.treehugger.com/carbon-offsets-suzuki.jpg

The offset concept

Page 5: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Offsets in Cap-and-Trade

EPA(prints allowances

equal to cap)

Allowances to emit CO2

Offsets = Additional Allowances

©Scott Warren

Page 6: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Why offsets are popular

- Helps to keep costs down

- Builds political support by expanding beneficiaries

- Can provide benefits beyond carbon, such as water quality and habitat

Page 7: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Some potential land-based offset activities

- Improved forest management

- Afforestation (tree planting on crop or grazing land)

- Conservation tillage or other soil carbon management

- Methane management from cattle lots

Page 8: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

A TNC Ohio Project Example: Afforestation at the Edge of Appalachia

- 500 acres

- 75,000 tons of CO2

Page 9: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Likely sources of offsets in the U.S.

Page 10: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Will this promise be delivered?

- USDA tasked with identifying eligible land-based activities.

- the offsets must come from “additional” projects that would no have occurred without the additional incentive an offset credit creates

- Offsets must be quantifiable, verifiable, transparent and enforceable.

- Must be “permanent” or at least very long term. Farmers may need to make commitments for up to 100 years, or buy replacement credits.

Page 11: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

Summary

- Offsets are important to getting political support, and lowering costs of cap-and-trade.

- They offer potentially huge economic opportunities for farmers and other landowners.

- Land-based activities can also help us to protect water quality and habitat.

- However, offsets must meet rigorous standards and require commitments that may not be acceptable to many landowners.

Page 12: © Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.

© Mark Godfrey

Lucy Miller-TNC

Thank you.

Bill StanleyThe Nature [email protected]