+ Faculty prep session October 20, 2009 Beyond the Health Care Proxy: Advance Care Planning for Patients with Serious Illness
Dec 18, 2015
+
Faculty prep sessionOctober 20, 2009
Beyond the Health Care Proxy: Advance Care Planning for Patients with Serious Illness
+Review in this Session
Objectives for small group sessions 1 and 2
Behavior Change Model as it applies to physicians and patients approaching advance care planning
Principles of reflective listening
Use of nominal process
+Objectives: Small group 1
This is session is devoted to developing personal awareness around the issue of ACP and by its conclusion, participants:
will be able to describe circumstances under which they have personally found ACP discussions challenging, and
will, with the help of colleagues, revisit and reframe these challenges
+Objectives Small Group 2
This small group session is devoted to skills practice, and by its conclusion, participants:
will be able to describe an 8 step protocol * useful in guiding advance care directive conversations
will know, and be more comfortable using, phrases that can operationalize those steps in guiding the patient and/or family through this decision making process
will be able to identify prognostic clues in a patient’s clinical presentation
+Behavior Change
Behavior change is the foundational principle underlying both small group sessions, and it applies equally to: what motivates physicians to change
their behavior relative to ACP what motivates patients to engage in
ACP
+
Our tasks As clinicians
identify our patient’s readiness to change (in this case, to engage in ACP)
use what tools and interventions are stage appropriate to help them to move forward
As educators help our learners’ to identify their impediments
to moving forward with ACP help them develop the personal awareness and
skills that will enable them to move forward
+Stages of change Precontemplation
Not yet acknowledging that there is a need for ACP or that they are seriously ill; not interested in discussing, see no need, are in “denial”
Contemplation Acknowledging that they may indeed by seriously ill, but ambivalent,
on a teeter-totter, but not yet ready or sure of what might be the right choices to make; may be more receptive to discussion
Preparation/Determination Getting ready to change; active gathering of information, trying to
decide what is best
Action Actively making decisions; open to support, help, guidance from
others
Maintenance, Relapse,Transcendence
+Listening and Thinking Reflectively
Thinking reflectively is inherently part of good reflective listening and includes
interest in what the person has to say
respect for the person's inner wisdom
key element is a hypothesis testing, using phrases like “So you feel...” “It sounds like you...” “You're wondering if...”
+Levels of Reflective Listening and Responding Repeating or rephrasing – listener repeats or
substitutes synonyms or phrases; stays close to what the speaker has said
Paraphrasing – listener makes a major restatement in which the speaker’s meaning is inferred
Reflection of feeling – listener emphasizes emotional aspects of communication through feeling statements – deepest form of listening
+Nominal Process
Allows everyone present to contribute to discussion
Levels the playing field
Enables those who are quiet and have difficulty “getting in” or “finding a place at the table” to have space and time automatically allotted to them
Facilitator starts discussion by inviting the most junior, youngest, or newest person to speak first, moving through the group by age/experience etc, to the last person
+Nominal Process
In nominal process, there is no discussion of ideas to begin with.
Participants are asked to contribute a single idea or thought as concisely as possible. The facilitator turns to each participant and continues to do that until all ideas have been solicited. Only then does discussion begin.
This is useful in groups of 6 or more, or even in a smaller group if you know, or discover, there is someone who does all the work for the entire group, of if you have one person who dominates discussion.
You may, or may not, choose to use this technique