1 台台台 EMBA 台台 : 983 台台台台台台台台台台台 2010/8/8 台台台台台台台 (TV 62 台 ) 台台台台台台台台台 指指指指 : 指指指 指指 指指指 M9801916 指指指 M9801926 指指指 M9801928 指指指 M9816204 指指指 M9816221 指指指 M9901907 指指指 M9916229 指指指
Feb 05, 2016
EMBA : 983 2010/8/8(TV 62)
: M9801916 M9801926 M9801928 M9816204 M9816221 M9901907 M9916229
Q & A
TFT-LCD
TFT-LCD
10SharpSamsung LGAUOCMI(CMO-Innolux)SharpSamsung LG AUO CMIBOE68TCL8CEC-PandaSharp68LED LED
TFT-LCD TFT LCD50 ~70%62
-1
Ellram(1990) ()
Dickson(1966) 23
Patton(1996) 7
-2(2003) AHP(2004), (2008),,(2009),
-3 (95); , Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C., (1991), Vendor selection criterion and methods, European Journal of Operational Research 50, 2-18.
AHP 1971 Saaty (Analytical Hierarchy ProcessAHP),UncertaintyAHP
Setting Priorities Generating Set of Alternatives Choosing a Best Policy Alternatives Determining Requirements Allocating ResourcesPredicting Outcomes Measuring Performance Designing a System Ensuring System Stability Optimization Planning Resolving Conflict ( Risk Assessment )
AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)AHP ()
AHP
No
Yes
AHP
AHP CR
6
10,25,AHP,616AHP
-()
Sheet1
AA BB
9:17:15:13:11:11:31:51:71:9
Sheet1 (2)
Sheet2
Sheet3
- SamsungLG* Sharp TV
- AHP 9
Sheet1
AA BB
9:17:15:13:11:11:31:51:71:9
Sheet1 (2)
A
Sheet2
Sheet3
AHPConsistency IndexCIConsistency RatioC.R.C.R.0.1 10 8 ,2
-
-AHP
-
-Level 2
_26.2%,30.0%,
_15.9%,31.9%,
_24.9%,60.9%,
-
-
AHP AHP ,, CI > 0.1 AHP
EMBA : 983 2010/8/8(TV 62)
,!