Cost Recovery Pricing Model Cost Accounting Method used to set rates since 2009 21 st Century School Fund and University of California-Berkley’s Center for Cities and Schools Presentation at OMC conference in July 2012 Met with the Ministry in April 2013 to discuss the model Reviewed by COSBO at their June 2013 meeting Presented at OASBO Conference May 2014 Training session for CUS Outreach Coordinators June 2014
19
Embed
Cost Accounting Method used to set rates since 2009 21 st Century School Fund and University of California- Berkley’s Center for Cities and Schools.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Cost Recovery Pricing Model Cost Accounting Method used to set rates since 2009 21st Century School Fund and University of California-
Berkley’s Center for Cities and Schools Presentation at OMC conference in July 2012 Met with the Ministry in April 2013 to discuss the model Reviewed by COSBO at their June 2013 meeting Presented at OASBO Conference May 2014 Training session for CUS Outreach Coordinators June
2014
GoalsUncomplicated to use and explainCustomizable - using individual Boards' data and
policies/proceduresUses valid, reliable and consistent data found in
consolidated financials available to the publicTo set Evidence Based Rates that are transparent,
accountable and equitable
CostsReflects Direct and indirect costs that are
associated with activities and extended hours used for community use at schools
Adjusts for changes in costsAllows for analysis of costs to aid in decision
making
BenefitsUtilizes publicly funded facilitiesSupports community organizationsReduces costs to participantsBuilds partnerships that benefit students, families
and communitiesIncreases community access to servicesPromotes community engagement at schools
Analytical Tools – EFIS DataPERMITTED HOURS BY SPACE TYPE
Sports and Recreational (e.g. basketball, yoga) 16,631
Health and Wellness (e.g. nutrition program, blood donation) 536
Child Care Programs 55,964
Arts and Cultural (e.g. community theatre, concerts) 10,622
Supports for Recent Immigrants 35
Social (e.g. bbq, meet and greet) 202
Community Services (e.g. employment aid) 2,188
Meetings (e.g. neighbourhood action) 3,298
Leadership (e.g. Scouts, Guides) 1,559
Aboriginal-focused Programs -
Supports for Low-income Communities 4,300
Other: Event 4,280
Total 113,139
By Age
0-6 Years (EL/
Kinder-garten)
30%
7-12 Years (Elementary)41%
13-18 Years (Secondary)
13% Other16%
Permitted Hours by Age Groups
Permitted Hours by Age Groups Permitted Hours by Activity
AgeProv. Avg. in
2010-11Board Data
Form E
0-6 Years (EL/Kindergarten) 21.0% 29.9%
7-12 Years (Elementary) 32.0% 40.9%
13-18 Years (Secondary) 19.0% 12.8%
Other 28.0% 16.3%
100.0% 100.0%
School-age Children 72.0% 83.7%
By Activity
Permitted Hours by Activity
Permitted Hours by Activity
AcitivityProv. Avg. in
2010-11Board Data
Form E
Educational 14.0% 13.3%
Sports & Recreation 33.0% 11.7%
Child Care 29.0% 63.6%
Other 24.0% 11.3%
100.0% 100.0%
Healthy Lifestyles & Children 76.0% 88.7%Educa-tional13%Sports &
Recreation12%
Child Care64%
Other11%
Permitted Hours by Activity
Strategic QuestionsHow to fund your Board's CUS program in times of budget
constraints?Are you using funding in a responsible manner?Does the way you charge for facilities support the goals and
policies of your Board?Are programs and activities priced fairly and transparently?
By SpaceTotal Hours and Value of Community Use Hours
Type of SpaceTotal Number of
Hours% of Use
Total Value of Permitted Hours at Cost Recovery
Rate
% of Cost
Gymnasiums 40,539 36.0% 911,281$ 52.3%
Fields 4,308 3.8% 133,985$ 7.7%
Classrooms 50,809 45.1% 338,666$ 19.4%
Other Spaces 16,977 15.1% 360,070$ 20.6%
Total 112,633 100.0% 1,744,001$ 100.0%
Gymna-siums52%
Fields8%
Classrooms19%
Other Spaces
21%
Distribution of Value of CUS HoursBy Space Type
Projecting by CategoryIF Category B applied subsidy is 100% then revenue would be -$ IF Category C applied subsidy is 59% then revenue would be 67,063.26$ IF Category D applied subsidy is 0% then revenue would be 82,488.38$ IF Category E applied subsidy is -100% then revenue would be 2,801.21$
TOTAL 152,352.85$
Estimated cost of weekend Category A OT Wages using X 1.5 rate $43 95,911.50$
Space Type HOURS A A Weekend B C D EGeneral Purpose Room 1278 393 11536 167 366Single Gym 3715 193 37598 4430 1333Field 497 39 5612 53Auditorium 199 14 5 15 5Parking Lot 10 16 5Classroom 12357 1421 53886 3041 784 195Cafeteria 508 61 76 637 41Double Gym 1077 111 4452 617 62
Space Type $$$ A A Wknd B C D EGeneral Purpose Room -$ 16,877.50$ -$ 1,472.57$ 15,723.35$ Single Gym -$ 8,299.00$ -$ 39,067.29$ 57,322.46$ Field -$ 1,677.00$ -$ 734.95$ -$ Auditorium -$ 602.00$ -$ 255.75$ 193.58$ Parking Lot -$ -$ 83.20$ 63.42$ Classroom -$ 61,081.50$ -$ 8,953.86$ 5,631.15$ 2,801.21$ Cafeteria -$ 2,601.50$ -$ 5,613.19$ 887.26$ Double Gym -$ 4,773.00$ -$ 10,882.45$ 2,667.16$
95,911.50$ -$ 67,063.26$ 82,488.38$ 2,801.21$
EFIS DATA - Hours by Space Type - IF Scenarios
PROJECTIONS USING IF SCENARIOS
A-100% B-100% C-65% D-0% E-+100% Joint Use-100% Music Lessons-65%
$-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
Custodian Costs Recovered Rental Costs Recovered
Cost Recovery Value of Space Used
By Category
EFIS Schedule 10CSCHEDULE 10 C - SCHOOL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES