Top Banner
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context <Insert Date Here> <Insert Your Name>, Trainer
14

© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

© 2013 ESD 112.All rights reserved.

Putting Evidence

Into Context<Insert Date Here>

<Insert Your Name>, Trainer

Page 2: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Learning Target:To have the skills, knowledge and confidence to use eVAL to support the integration of multiple measures of evidence into educator evaluation

Page 3: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Essential Questions:How do different types of measures and evidence fit into an evaluation cycle?

When submitting artifacts as evidence, why is it important to provide information about those artifacts to the evaluatee or evaluator?

How does the eVAL tool support multiple measures of evidence?

1

2

3

Page 4: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Important Principles About Evidence

1. The requirement for multiple measures of evidence over time (more than one).

2. Importance of quality over quantity

3. Based on naturally occurring documents and materials.

4. The importance of selecting artifacts that measure growth as described in your district’s adopted instructional framework.

Page 5: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Types of MeasuresFor Teacher Evaluations For Principal Evaluations

1. Planning documents 1. Classroom observations

2. Classroom observations 2. Parent and student surveys

3. Self-assessment & reflection 3. School climate surveys

4. Perception survey data 4. Evaluator/teacher/self reports

5. Peer evaluation

6. Portfolios

7. Student achievement data

8. Student work samples

Source: OSPI, 2013

Page 6: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Evaluation…from beginning to end

1. Self-assessment2. Goal-setting3. Evidence gathering4. Formative feedback5. Repeat Steps 3 & 46. Summative scoringSource:

OSPI, 2013

Page 7: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

To Prepare for ScoringEvaluatee’s self-assessment

Goal-setting conference

Gathering of formative evidence

against the framework(shared responsibility)

Conference with formative feedback

Repeat cycle of gathering formative evidence,

conferencing and feedback

SUMMATIVE SCORING

1

2

3

4

5

FINAL

• Observations (2)• Student growth (>1)• Other artifacts that provide

evidence of criteria, using the instr or ldrshp frameworkSource: OSPI, 2013

Page 8: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Evidence vs. Artifacts

Evidence:Something that furnishes proofinstructional/leadership and professional practice ● student growth

Artifact:1. Something created by humans usually for a practical purpose.2. Something characteristic of, or resulting from, a particular

human institution, period, trend, or individual (evaluatee) .

Source:Merriam-Webster

Dictionary

Page 9: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Observationsvs.

ArtifactsObservations are appropriate for classroom or leadership-based activities, or other live professional activities.

Page 10: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

STATE CRITERIA# CRITERIA

1 Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement.

2 Demonstrating effective teaching practices.

3 Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs.

4 Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.

5 Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.

6 Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.

7 Communicating and collaborating with parents and the school community.

8 Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.

Page 11: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Observationsvs.

ArtifactsWhen observations won’t produce the required evidence, artifacts may be used as an alternate demonstration of growth or in the state’s criteria.

Page 12: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

STATE CRITERIA# CRITERIA

1 Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement.

2 Demonstrating effective teaching practices.

3 Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs.

4 Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.

5 Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.

6 Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.

7 Communicating and collaborating with parents and the school community.

8 Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.

Page 13: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Multiple measures of evidence(more than one required for each area of growth identified)

Teacher communicates

frequently with families

about the instructional

program and conveys

information about

individual student

progress.

Teacher makes some

attempts to engage

families in the instructional

program.

Information to families is

conveyed in a culturally

appropriate manner.

1. Evidence of frequency: four weekly blogs with info re: instructional program.

2. Evidence of individual student progress: current grades on our district’s SIS.

3. Evidence of attempts to engage families: additional “family nights” offered.

Page 14: © 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Essential Questions:How do different types of measures and evidence fit into an evaluation cycle?

When submitting artifacts as evidence, why is it important to provide information about those artifacts to the evaluatee or evaluator?

How does the eVAL tool support multiple measures of evidence?

1

2

3