© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Writing a Research Manuscript
Dec 18, 2015
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Identify the essential components of a typical manuscript and summarize the purpose of each.
Discuss why the abstract is such an important part of the manuscript.
List the basic “rules of thumb” for formatting manuscripts using APA style.
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Title Page Abstract Introduction Method Results Discussion References
Appendices Author Note Footnotes Table Captions Tables Figure Captions Figures
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
1
Running Head: GUNS AND CHEWING GUM
Guns and Chewing Gum: The Perception of Reality of
Problem Behaviors in Public Schools
Neil Salkind1, Douglas Adams, Craig Dermer, Jackie
Heinerikson, B. Jones and Erin Nash
University of Kansas
Running Head
Title
Authors
Institutional Affiliation
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
A one-sentence statement of purpose A brief description of participants A brief description of results Any conclusions being offered
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
2
AbstractIn a 1994 New York Times article, Barry O’Neill traced the evolution of two lists (one from the 1940s and one from the 1980s) of reportedly serious behaviors in the public schools. He found the origins of the list…
ExampleAbstract : Meet the word count limitation ( 150-250 word), then:Purpose of the study( this paper aims to…….FindingsImplicationsMust be written at the end of your research
Running head appears on each page
No indent
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Outlines background of problem Helps reader understand problem States purpose of study
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
3
Guns and Chewing Gum: The Perceptions and Reality of Problem
Behaviors in Public Schools In 1994, Barry O’Neill (O’Neill, 1994) wrote an article that
appeared in the Sunday Magazine section of the New York Times,
titled “The History of a Hoax.” The article traced the evolution of
two lists of the reportedly most serious behaviors in the public
schools, one list generated during the1940s and one list
generated during the 1980s.
Title Level 1 heading
All text is double spaced
1.5 inch margin
1.5 inch margin
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Describes how the study was conducted The most common subheads are
◦ Participants—who they were and what special characteristics they had; what instructions were given
◦ Instruments—what tests, drugs, computers, etc., were used
◦ Data Analysis—how the data were analyzed
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
5rankings of the seriousness of a list of behaviors as a function of
whether or not the respondents currently teach in the public
schools.
Method
Participants
The sample consisted of predominantly middle class U.S.
Midwestern adults who ranged in age from 23 to 58 years with a
mean age of 37.2. There were 125 females and 25 males, with
113 of the total sample currently teaching and 36 not.
Level 1 heading Level 2
heading
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Insert Table 1 about here
Guns and Chewing Gum
5
The list of behaviors (organized alphabetically) is shown in Table 1. This list was compiled based on interviews with 30 adults, 15 of whom currently teach in the public schools. Reference to
where table 1 should be placed
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Descriptive statistics Outcomes of inferential statistical tests References to tables and figures
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
6
Results and Discussion
Tables 2 and 3 represent the same data organized in
different ways. Table 2 shows the most serious
behaviors ranked by the sample of teachers and
nonteachers. Table 3 shows the 13 most serious
behaviors listed in alphabetical order and the associated
ranks and average “seriousness” score for the total
sample, teachers and nonteachers.
Level 1 heading
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Evaluation of study◦ How this study relates to past studies◦ What the results mean
Contributions the study makes Implications and limitations Results and discussion are sometimes
reported together in one section
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Sources consulted during course of study Must be in appropriate format
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Guns and Chewing Gum
9
References
Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, B.J. (1996). The manufactured
crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Boston. Addison-Wesley.
Gallup poll of public attitudes toward the public schools.
(1987) Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 28-29.
King-Stoops, J., & Meier, W. (1978). Teacher analysis of
the discipline problem. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 354.
Males, M. (1992). Top school problems are myths. Phi
Delta Kappan, 72, 54-55.
O’Neill, B. (1994, March 6). The history of a hoax. New
York Times Magazine, 31, 15-21.
Level 1 heading
Book reference
Journalarticle
references
Magazine/Periodicalreference
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Appendices◦ Non-essential but important information◦ Often original data or drawings
Author Notes◦ Supplementary information
Footnotes◦ Elaboration on references or other technical
points in manuscript
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Table Captions—a list of tables to follow and their respective captions
Tables◦ Text arranged in columns or rows◦ Numbered consecutively
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Figure Captions—identify each of the figures with a number and title
Figures◦ Actual figures
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind.
Some important format rules: Type should be readable Use 12-point Times Roman or Courier type Double-spaced One-inch margins Use appropriate page numbering Indent first line of each paragraph 5-7 spaces Type headings according to standards One space after all punctuation Do not indent the abstract Start the list of references on a new page