© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved. CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
CARE’s Program Approach
CARE’s Program Approach
2 • 2 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
• A world of hope• Tolerance and social justice• Poverty overcome • People live in dignity and
security• Global force• Partner of choice• Worldwide movement • Unshakable commitment
to the dignity of people.
CARE’s Vision: Guiding document
2 • 3 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
Our mission is to serve individuals and families in the poorest communities in the world. Drawing strength from our global diversity, resources and experience, we promote innovative solutions and are advocates for global responsibility. We facilitate lasting change by:
•Strengthening capacity for self-help
•Providing economic opportunity
•Delivering relief in emergencies
•Influencing policy decisions at all levels
•Addressing discrimination in all its forms
Guided by the aspirations of local communities, we pursue our mission with both excellence and compassion because the people whom we serve deserve nothing less.
CARE’s Mission: Guiding Document
2 • 4 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
1. Build capacity to respond to disasters
2. Global advocacy
3. Organizational evolution
4. Information and knowledge management
5. Shared expertise in key areas of competence
6. Stronger governance and decision-making processes
2 • 5 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
CI Programming Principles
• Promote empowerment
• Work with partners
• Ensure accountability & Promote responsibility
• Address discrimination
• Promote the non-violent resolutin of conflict
• Seek sustainable results
2 • 6 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
A rights-based approach forces us to look at underlying causes of:
•Poverty
•Issues of power and gender
•Issues around poor governance
We must address these issues if we are to achieve a lasting impact
2 • 7 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
Social Social PositionPosition
For Poverty Eradication and Social JusticeFor Poverty Eradication and Social Justice
EnablingEnablingEnvironmentEnvironment
HumanHumanConditionCondition
2 • 8 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
• To connect with our strategic direction, we need:
– Long-term interventions
– Measurable results
– Continuous learning and improvement
• Studies show that short-term projects are a disconnect with our mission
• They do not have a sustainable impact on the underlying causes of poverty and injustice
2 • 9 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
The AID Effectiveness Debate
The Paris Declaration
Accra Agenda for Action
•Ownership•Alignment•Harmonization•Results•Mutual Accountability
•Predictability•Country Systems•Conditionality•Untying
Busan 2011?
•Program Based Approaches•Accountability to Effectiveness• What else?
3 • 10 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
A coherent set of initiatives by CARE and our
allies that involves a long-term commitment to
specific marginalized and vulnerable groups to
achieve lasting impact at broad scale on
underlying causes of poverty and social justice
3 • 11 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
• Clearly defined goal
• Thorough analysis of underlying causes
• Explicit theory of change
• Coherent set of initiatives
• Organizational and social learning
• Contribution to broad movements for social change
• Leverage of influence of financial and other resources
• Accountability systems
CharacteristicsCharacteristics
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
Discussion
The Water+ Theory of Change and the Program Approach
Malaika Wright, Water Team, CAREOctober 4, 2010
Our New Goal
Poor women and school-aged girls improve their lives
Our Old Goal
To enhance the livelihood security of rural and urban poor communities through equitable
access, efficient use, and sustainable management of limited and dwindling water
resources.
The Theory of Change
Health
Environment/
Climate Change
Livelihood/
Food Security
Education
More secure access to WATER+
services
Gender-sensitive WATER+ policies,
institutions, & social norms
Gender-equitable control over
WATER+ services
Poor women & school-aged girls improve
their lives
WASH access for household use
Access to WASH services including
menstrual management in
schools
Gender-sensitive maintenance of water
resources & adaptation to climate
change
Access to Water for productive uses with a
focus on women’s livelihoods
Gender-sensitive WASH health policies, institutions, & social
norms
Policies, institutions, & social norms
support gender-sensitive school WASH
provision
Policies, institutions, & social norms that
support ecologically sustainable water
resources & resilience to climate change
Policies, institutions, & social norms that support women’s water dependent
livelihoods
Girl’s & women's health needs are
voiced with impact on policy & services
Building confidence and leadership in
schools
Gender-equitable control of
maintenance of water resources
Girls & women's livelihood needs & interests heard &
addressed
+ x
Cros
s-Se
ctor
al L
inks
={ {
Theory of Change
Goal: Pastoralist school-aged girls, particularly the most vulnerable, exercise their rights and have an
improved sustained quality of life
Pastoral communities protect and enhance theirlivelihoods and asset base
Girls - including the most mobile - access services
Women and girls exercise their rights
x+
Effective girl’s empowerment support structures within communities and schools influencing customary and formal institutions
Availability and use of quality, girl friendly services: educationhealthwater & sanitation
Improved natural resource and livestock management through adaptation to drought, and preparedness and resilience to emergencies through key, strategic interventions
Economic security and mutual support through women and girl’s income and savings groups and through their diversified engagement in the pastoral economy and natural product based activities
Harmonisation of customary, religious and formal constitutional and other laws to protect and enforce girls’ and women’s rights
Harmful traditional practices abandoned
Accountable and influential pastoralist customary institutions, and fora.Strengthen land use policy and practice
Thank You
3 • 20 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
WARMU PQF: Segou, Mali
• Program Approach:Bold steps in People Management, limit distractions, and promote
constant reflection and problem solving
• Impact Measurement :MDI+ means applying MDI to our specific impact populations.
• Partnerships:The CARE-Partners image of scale and power has to change, starting
with our strategic partners. Ex: budgeting, planning joint journey,
new types of sharing, learning & visibility.
3 • 21 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
ALLISON BURDEN’s VIEW:
“A CARE that has fully embraced and humbly reflects the PA implications (of coherence and change) will become a credible herald of social change for the partners we work with, and thus making an irreplaceable contribution to the promotion of social change and end of poverty in societies we work in/for.”
3 • 22 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
WARMU PQF:Monrovia, Liberia
THEORY OF CHANGE CONSULTANCY OBJECTIVES:
– Analyze Liberian context and development policies– Define impact population and develop TOC for the CO– Refine FISP TOC– Advise CARE Liberia on next steps
3 • 23 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
Impact Goal:
• Consolidated peace through a more productive, fairer and cohesive society, and ensured food security and quality of life for vulnerable women, youth and adolescents
3 • 24 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
THEORY OF CHANGE: (a+b) cd
Inclusive community groups mobilized, networked and empowered to build social cohesion and leverage voice
(
Specialized groups of women and youth engaged with decision makers and service providers at multiple levels to improve access to critical resources and services
+
X
Social Cohesion
Capacities Governance
Appropriate technical and management capacities and systems of government institutions, civil society, private sector are strengthened to act upon poverty and social justice issues effectively
Stronger platforms, mechanisms and voice have achieved transparent and accountable government institutions that ensure pro-poor policies and rights protection
)
Access to Resources and Services
3 • 25 CARE’s Program Approach
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
Impact Population: Rural, Chronically Food Insecure WomenGoal: Consolidate Peace, Ensure Increase Food Security and Quality of Life
Social Cohesion
Access Capacity Governance
Groups support social cohesionRights and accountable governance
Increase HH incomesBuild Technical Capacity
Gender norm
s/SA
A
Wat S
an Support
Em
power/T
FT
VS
LA
Health servicesIncomeWater
Land
Equitable A
ccess and Use of
Resources
NutritionAg ProductivityVSLA
Value Chains
FFS
VSLA
© 2010 CARE USA. All rights reserved.
QUESTIONS?????
THANK YOU!!!