Page 1
© 2004 discussit.org
NOTICETHIS PRESENTATION MAY BE COPIED
AND DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT COST. IT MAY ALSO BE MODIFED IF THE CREDITS AND THIS NOTICE ARE NOT REMOVED.
You are encouraged to send copies of derived articles and upgraded slides to [email protected] . The most recent version of this work may be found at www.discussIT.org.
Page 2
© 2004 discussit.org
e-GuidewaysBruce A. McHenry
[email protected]
Bruce A. McHenrywww.discussIT.org
April 2nd, 2004Revision 2.01PRJ
Page 3
© 2004 discussit.org
AcknowledgementsPresentation created by:
Bruce A. McHenry e-Guideway Association ([email protected] )Modified by Palle R Jensen
Particular thanks to:RUF International (Palle Jensen)MegaRail Transportation Systems (Kirston Henderson)
Special thanks to Professor Jerry SchneiderUniversity of Washington for hisInnovative Transportation Technologies web site
Page 4
© 2004 discussit.org
Transportation is Vital to US• Consumes 19% of average household expenditures ($7,759)• 4,000,000,000,000 passenger-miles in four-wheel vehicles• 200,000,000 four-wheel vehicles• Consumes 14 million barrels/day out of 20 million total• Air carriers only 500,000,000,000 passenger miles (1/8 of car miles)
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Page 5
© 2004 discussit.org
Current Political Sense
“Freedom Car”
High Speed Trains
Maglev Trains
Light Rail
Page 6
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
Page 7
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
Page 8
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
• Electrolysis, distribution, storage and conversion of H2 incurs substantial energy losses
Page 9
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
• Electrolysis, distribution, storage and conversion of H2 incurs substantial energy losses
• Solves none of the “presenting complaints” about congestion, safety, etc.
Page 10
© 2004 discussit.org
High Speed Trains
• < 300 miles: slower than 100MPH guideways door-to-door and far more costly on passenger-mile basis
• > 300 miles: slower and more expensive than planes
Maglev trains have similar characteristics, only much, much more expensive.
Page 11
© 2004 discussit.org
Light Rail
• Typically serves only 1% of commuters where used
• Average subsidy per passenger equivalent to purchasing a car
• Relatively slow
• Requires large amount of public space
Page 12
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
High Speed Trains
Maglev Trains
Light Rail
Page 13
© 2004 discussit.org
Winning Platforms
e-Cars Hybrid Electric Cars
e-Guideways
Page 14
© 2004 discussit.org
Remember…
Page 15
© 2004 discussit.org
3000 killed100 billion damage
Page 16
© 2004 discussit.org
3000 killed every month100 billion damage every year
42,000 deaths/yr.10x injuries
100 billion/year property damage
Photo: Philip Greenspun
Page 17
© 2004 discussit.org
October November December
January February March
April May June
July August Sept.
October November December
January February March
April May June
July August Sept.
October November December20022003
January
What would politicians do if a 9/11 happened every month?
Page 18
© 2004 discussit.org
What is a Dualmode Vehicle?
A dualmode vehicle travels under manual control on the street network for some portion of its trip, and operates under automatic control on an exclusive guideway for some other portion.
Images courtesy of RUF International
Page 19
© 2004 discussit.org
What is an e-Guideway?
Animation depicting cars assembling into car-trains on the guideway.
Ruftrain.exeAnimation courtesy of RUF International
Page 20
© 2004 discussit.org
WHY?
Page 21
© 2004 discussit.org
1. Safety
Images courtesy of RUF International & AVT Train.com
Guideways support high speeds with great safety…
Page 22
© 2004 discussit.org
… because they are separated from crossing vehicles and animals.
Page 23
© 2004 discussit.org
Footnote: Braking on the guideway would be swift and certain.
Images courtesy of RUF International
Page 24
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
50-75% average aerodynamic drag reductionbecause only the first and last cars experience large drag forces
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 25
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
>>2x reduction in rolling resistance because:
1) if the steel guideway
is very smooth…
2) then the wheels can be hard with low rolling resistance
e.g. multiple polyethylene wheels that will roll smoothly over expansion joints
Page 26
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
In RUF design, rail wheels are
smooth wheels.
Traction friction can be
adjusted by changing
pressure against top rail
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 27
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
Another 3x reduction in rolling resistance possible due to:
3) appropriatesize, low average weight (1000 lbs.)
> 6x less rolling resistance
Photos courtesy of Global Electric Motorcars, LLC
Page 28
© 2004 discussit.org
Maglev?
Magnetic levitation can offer much more reduction in rolling resistance.
However, aerodynamic drag would still dominate running efficiency.
Image courtesy of AVT-Train.com
Page 29
© 2004 discussit.org
Maglev?
Magnetic levitation might someday offer much more reduction in rolling resistance.
However, aerodynamic drag would still dominate running efficiency.
Image courtesy of AVT-Train.com
Page 30
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MUCH MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
2-4x aerodynamic & 6x rolling friction reductions
=> Running efficiency improves 2-4X
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 31
© 2004 discussit.org
Cd = 0.15 Cd = 0.07 w/o wheels
Image courtesy of Roane Inventions
Page 32
© 2004 discussit.org
Running Efficiency Gain
1:3
Page 33
© 2004 discussit.org
Allows cars to be lighter and much less expensive to run.
3. MOSTLY ELECTRIC PROPULSION
Electrified guideway
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 34
© 2004 discussit.org
3. MOSTLY ELECTRIC PROPULSION
Solves range problem of all-electric cars. Makes e-cars practical…within urban areasor between them.
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 35
© 2004 discussit.org
What is the Propulsion Efficiency?
New natural gas power plants (50%)
Transmission efficiency (85%)
Electric motor efficiency (90%)
Overall: 38%
Compare with 15% for typical internal combustion engine (ICE) or 25% for hybrid-electric
Page 36
© 2004 discussit.org
Propulsion Efficiency Gain
2:3
Page 37
© 2004 discussit.org
Overall Efficiency Gain
1:4.5
Page 38
© 2004 discussit.org
Conventionally Sized Van: 25 MPG at 65 MPH
At 100 MPH it would get 11 MPG.(25 / (100/65)2)
Efficiency decreases approximately as square of speed when aerodynamic drag predominates
New CAFÉ?
Page 39
© 2004 discussit.org
Conventionally Sized e-Van: 11 * 4.5 = 50 MPG at 100 MPH
Prius (mid-size) Car:30 MPG at 100 MPH30 * 4.5 = 135 MPG at 100 MPH
New CAFÉ?
Page 40
© 2004 discussit.org
$1.70MEDIAN SIZE CAR:
15HP at 55MPH
ON e-GUIDEWAY:→ 100MPH with 3x better running efficiency…
Generation & transmission cost of 1 kWh: $0.10
What is the electricity cost to travel 100 miles in an hour? Running efficiency gain = 3Efficiency of electric motor = 90%Loss due to higher speed = (100/55)3 = 6.0Power needed at 100MPH: 15*6/3*0.9 = 33 HP or 25 kW
Cost to Power a Mid-Size Car?
Page 41
© 2004 discussit.org
$2.50MEDIAN SIZE CAR:
15HP at 55MPH
ON e-GUIDEWAY:→ 100MPH with 3x better running efficiency…
Generation & transmission cost of 1 kWh: $0.10
What is the electricity cost to travel 100 miles in an hour? Running efficiency gain = 3Efficiency of electric motor = 90%Loss due to higher speed = (100/55)3 = 6.0Power needed at 100MPH: 15*6/3*0.9 = 33 HP or 25 kW
Cost to Power a Mid-Size Car?
Page 42
© 2004 discussit.org
$1.50 on e-Guideway at 100 MPH
2.5 cents per mile
vs.
50 MPG at 70 MPH
2 gallons at $1.50 = $3.00
3.0 cents per mile
100 Miles in Mid-Size Car?
Page 43
© 2004 discussit.org
4. LAND USE
Guideways carry about 10x as many passengers/hr as a normal lane. (2200/hr vs. 22,000/hr)
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 44
© 2004 discussit.org
4. MUCH LOWER LAND USE
Because about 1/10th footprint of an ordinary lane
Image courtesy of MegaRail Transportation Systems
Image courtesy of RUF International
Page 45
© 2004 discussit.org
1:100
Page 46
© 2004 discussit.org
less than
1:100
Page 47
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Any time, door-to-door
Page 48
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Image courtesy of RUF International
Congestion free
Page 49
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Page 50
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Can work, sleep or play
Page 51
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Page 52
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
• Any time, door-to-door
• Congestion free
• Can work, sleep or play• Faster than air travel up to 500 miles. > Door-to-door DC to NYC areas: <3 hours > Sleep across the nation over the weekend At 3 cents per mile, $100 one-way single- occupancy
Page 53
© 2004 discussit.org
6. DRAMATICALLY REDUCED CAR MAINTENANCE
• Vastly simpler electric motor– No ignition system– No valves– No piston rings– No motor vibration
• Regenerative braking
• No muffler
• No clutch
• No high speed salt spray
Page 54
© 2004 discussit.org
7. INEXPENSIVE SHORT-TERM CAR RENTAL
Because of low maintenance, virtually zero accidents, and reduced pick-up and point-of-return constraints. Will order cars according to need, e.g.:
• One person commuter car • Family outing SUV• Cargo van• Sleeper cars• etc.
Page 55
© 2004 discussit.org
8. AUTOMATED FREIGHT
• Less need for trans-shipment terminals.
• Faster
• Greater predictability and shorter lead times facilitate “just-in-time” delivery systems
Page 56
© 2004 discussit.org
9. NATIONAL SECURITY
End dependence on Middle East oil
=> Freedom from risk of supply disruption
=> May end funding repressive régimes
Page 57
© 2004 discussit.org
BUT• Does it make economic sense?
• Will it fit downtown?
• What about the visual impact?
• How long will it take?
Page 58
© 2004 discussit.org
COST?
Page 59
© 2004 discussit.org
Cost Components1.Power generation
2.Guideway construction
Page 60
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Page 61
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use 3.7 billion Mwh (2003)
Page 62
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway
Page 63
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway 1,000 miles/yr or 67hrs/yr at 15 mph and 2kW = 134 kWh/vehicle/yr30,000 miles/yr or 300 hrs/yr at 100 mph and 25 kW = 6,900 Kwh/vehicle/yr
Page 64
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway 1,000 miles/yr or 67hrs/yr at 15 mph and 2kW = 134 kWh/vehicle/yr30,000 miles/yr or 300 hrs/yr at 100 mph and 25 kW = 6,900 Kwh/vehicle/yr150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand
Page 65
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand1,400 billion ton-miles of truck freight partially converted to1,000 billion ton-miles of e-van freightAverage van load: 800 lbs2000/800 * 1000 = 2,500 billion miles of e-van freighte-van uses 40 Kwh on guideway per 100 miles.4 * 2500 = 1000 billion Kwh = 1.0 billion Mwh e-freight
Page 66
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand.4 * 2500 = 1000 billion Kwh = 1.0 billion Mwh e-freight
Projected demand increase due to e-guideways is2.5 billion Mwh
Probable doubling of electricity supply
Page 67
© 2004 discussit.org
We can generate another 4 billion Mwh.
If fuel costs increase sharply, we will know that we MUST generate another 4 billion Mwh.
Page 68
© 2004 discussit.org
So while DEMAND CAN BE MET WITH OIL OR GAS FIRED POWER PLANTS, we might use
New Power Systems
Page 69
© 2004 discussit.org
So while DEMAND CAN BE MET WITH OIL OR GAS FIRED POWER PLANTS, we might use
Wind Farms
Image courtesy of Energy Electronics Institute, National AIST, Japan
Solar Cell Farms
Page 70
© 2004 discussit.org
&
Page 71
© 2004 discussit.org
We might also use meltdown-proof nuclear reactors based on transportableuranium pebbles
Image courtesy of Eskom, South Africa
Page 72
© 2004 discussit.org
“Pebble Bed” Nuclear Power
Ima
ge c
ourt
esy
of
Esk
om,
Sou
th A
fric
a
Page 73
© 2004 discussit.org
GuidewayConstruction
Cost?
Page 74
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles of Guideway?
How many miles needed for metropolitan areas?
Page 75
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles of Guideway?
WDC is a metro area with 6 million residents30x30 mile grid with 2 mile separation
=> 30 * (15+15) = 900 miles150 miles per million residents-or-100 subway miles * 4 = 400100 beltway miles = 100Total miles = 600100 miles per million residents
Page 76
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles Total?
• 100 miles per million metro area residents
• 200 million metro area residents nationwide
=> 20,000 miles of metro guideway
40,000 miles along interstates
Page 77
© 2004 discussit.org
Cost of E-Guideway
EXPENSIVE!.. and we can only take an educated guess:
• 20,000 metropolitan miles @ $40 million per mile = $800 billion
• 40,000 miles of interstate @ $5 million per mile = $200 billion
• System cost about the same as initial construction of the interstate highway system ($1 trillion)
Page 78
© 2004 discussit.org
e-Guideways will be Expensive
so…Can they be justified? Would they pay off?
Page 79
© 2004 discussit.org
#1: Value of Saved Drive-Time
Frees up about 30 minutes from 55* min avg. daily drive time: .5 * 365 = 183 hrs/yr.
Eliminates >80% of long distance driving (4000* miles/yr): 3200 / 60 = 53 hours/yr.
120 million drivers (est.) (183 + 53) * 120M = 28,320 million hr/yr
$5/hr * 28M = $140B
* Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Page 80
© 2004 discussit.org
#2: Value of Time Not Stuck in Traffic
80% reduction of time stuck in traffic at cost of $517/person* (2001) and estimated cost of $1300 per capita by 2015 (8% growth*)0.8 * 1300 * 120M (est.) = $125B
* Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Page 81
© 2004 discussit.org
#3: Savings from Eliminated Accidents
Approximately $100 billion/yr saved on insurance premiums and cost on non-covered accidents.
Additional savings in personal medical expenses. $100B?
Value of lives saved: $40B?Injuries not suffered: $40B?
Page 82
© 2004 discussit.org
#4: National Security
At least $100 billion/yr. for reduced cost of military preparedness and stabilization operation in Middle East.(e.g. Additional cost of Operation Iraqi Freedom is approximately $100 billion/yr in FY 2004, 2005)
Ought to be funded by $1 per gallon tax on 100 billions gallons consumed annually?
Page 83
© 2004 discussit.org
#5: Reduced Cost of Car Maintenance & Repair
Savings of at least $50 billion/yr.
Page 84
© 2004 discussit.org
#6: Reduced Cost of New Cars
Doubling the longevity of cars: $150 billion
1/3rd reduction in the price of 50% of new cars owing to the simplicity and lighter weight of all-electric drive: $50 billion offset by the increased complexity of hybrid dualmode vehicles -$50 billion.
Page 85
© 2004 discussit.org
#7: Savings Due to Car Sharing
Sharing of cars much more conveniently and affordably because of greatly reduced point-of-return requirements and liability. No first car, second or third one reduces $300 billion capital investment in new cars by perhaps 10%-20% = $15-30 billion (out of $150 billion) Also, car sharing and smaller cars able to self park in dense configurations will also pare parking expenses (and make it possible to reduce or eliminate street parking). If 5% of 200m cars could pay $10 instead of $50/month to park: 10m * 40 * 12 = $5 billion.
Page 86
© 2004 discussit.org
#8: Less Truck Driving
50% reduction in the cost of drivers for combination trucks: $20 billion
Page 87
© 2004 discussit.org
#9: Reduced Highway Maintenance
$29 billion → $20 billion
→ much less
Page 88
© 2004 discussit.org
#10: End of Subsidies for Other Transit
Light rail, bus, AMTRAK, airlines subsidies vary by year but range from $10 to $20 billion at Federal level alone.
Page 89
© 2004 discussit.org
Total Value > $0.5T/yr. Suggests that the e-guideway construction costs could be paid back to society only two years after operation commences…
Page 90
© 2004 discussit.org
Total Value > $0.5T/yr. Suggests that the e-guideway construction costs could be paid back to society only two years after operation commences… if vehicles are dualmode capable at that time.
Page 91
© 2004 discussit.org
Another Economic Justification
e-guideway construction and associated redevelopment will employ at least 600,000 Americans ($100B / $150,000)
Page 92
© 2004 discussit.org
And Many Quality of Life Benefits
• Improved mobility & safety i.e. access to friends, family & recreation
• Dramatic lowering of traffic impact on high density areas
• Potential to remodel public spaces
• Dramatic improvement in ripeness of fruits and vegetables
• Major facilitator of Internet commerce
Page 93
© 2004 discussit.org
RUF International is #1
Page 94
© 2004 discussit.org
Maxi-ruf: Attractive Public Transport
Page 95
© 2004 discussit.org
MegaRail is #2
MegaRail Transportation Systems propose a micro-rail for urban areas and a separate higher capacity system for interstate use.
Page 96
© 2004 discussit.org
Several More Serious Entrepreneurs
?Image Credits: German Autoshuttle, Tritrack, Blade Runner
Page 97
© 2004 discussit.org
Needs of e-Guideways
About 10 years and about $100 billion R&D investment (10%) is desirable to optimize designs and manufacturing processes for eventual construction throughout the continent.
Progress could be greatly with a series of high value prizes for engineering “bake-offs”
Investment to date only about $4 million.
Page 98
© 2004 discussit.org
What is to be Done?
Ramp R&D funding levels up towards $10 billion/yr to support series of highly rewarded engineering “bake-offs”.
Contrast with national Amtrak subsidy (>$1 billion), the “Freedom Car” ($1.5 billion), Maglev ($2.0 billion), and NASA ($10 billion).
Page 99
© 2004 discussit.org
What is to be Done?
Ramp R&D funding levels up towards $10 billion/yr to support series of highly rewarded engineering “bake-offs”.
Contrast with national Amtrak subsidy (>$1 billion), the “Freedom Car” ($1.5 billion), Maglev ($2.0 billion), and NASA ($10 billion).
Presidential commitment comparable to Kennedy’s goal of a “Man on the Moon” to design and build the first system on Oahu.
Page 100
© 2004 discussit.org
- OR -
• New private company with mission to develop guideway and vehicle designs
• Returns on investment expected in 5 – 15 years
• ROI to be negotiated with eventual clients, many of which could also be investors
Page 101
© 2004 discussit.org
Timetable
• About 10 years for series of design competitions and prototyping including first major build in Hawaii.
• About 10 years to construct functional coast-to-coast network
• Nice target date? 2025: The bicentennial of George Stephenson’s first passenger train (1825).