- 1 - International High School Board of Education Oakland Unified School District October 25, 2006
Mar 27, 2015
- 1 -
International High SchoolBoard of Education
Oakland Unified School District
October 25, 2006
- 2 -
Criteria for International High School decision
Criteria Question
OUSD Need Would OUSD newcomer students benefit from having an option for a high school focused on newcomer students?
Proven Record of Success Has International High School shown a track record as an institution that can help newcomer students attain academic achievement and college readiness?
Community Support Is there community support for such an option?
Facilities Availability Are there facilities available to house Internationals in its first year and beyond?
Decision to be made Should OUSD open an International High School in the district for 07-08?
*Internationals defines newcomer students as those who have been in the country 4 years or fewer
- 3 -
• Criteria for International High School decision
• Need for a newcomer school option at OUSD
• Proven record of success
• Community support
• Facilities availability
• Summary
• Recommendation
Agenda
- 4 -
• OUSD is committed to providing a range of programmatic options to meet the diverse needs of OUSD student population
• As OUSD progresses towards better serving Oakland’s diverse student population, we constantly evaluate the different programs available to help us further our goal
• English Language Learners currently make up approximately 28% of OUSD’s student population
• We’ve looked at other newcomer programs and Internationals Network of Public Schools has proven success and demonstrated results
• Internationals Network of Public Schools would like to open a public small autonomous school within Oakland Unified School District to serve newcomer students (Newcomers are defined as being in the country for 4 years or fewer)
• It would serve as an option within the OUSD EL program for students and families to choose from
• It would start with 100 9th grade students in its first year of opening
• It could potentially serve as an example of practices for strengthening the existing OUSD EL program
Overview: Why International HS at OUSD?
- 5 -
OUSD Need: OUSD CELDT 1&2 Student Performance
School % not passing
ELA/ ELD Class
% not passing
Math Class
CBIT 19% 34%
College Prep & Architecture 39% 46%
Mandela 16% 60%
Media 38% 36%
Oakland High 20% 28%
Oakland Tech 23% 42%
Robeson 50% 63%
Skyline 11% 32%
High Schools with largest EL population based on 05-06 CELDT Testing
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) 1&2 students would benefit from a strong academic newcomer program
*Not passing is defined as getting a D+ or less in a class (this is based on redesignation criteria for EL students) ** Redesignation criteria: CST level of basic or better in English, CELDT level of 4 or 5, passing grades (C- or better), teacher recommendations and parent approval
- 6 -
• Criteria for International High School decision
• Need for a newcomer school option at OUSD
• Proven record of success
• Community support
• Facilities availability
• Summary
• Recommendation
Agenda
- 7 -
Proven Record of Success: International High School Overview
• Internationals Network for Public Schools has over 20 years of experience and currently supports nine high schools in New York
• Internationals’ students come from over 100 countries and speak over 55 languages
• More than 80 percent of students qualify for free or reduced price lunch
• Together, Internationals faculty members speak nearly 30 different languages
Other (90countries)
Per u
France
Guinea
YemenBangladesh
Haiti
Other Spanish Speakers
PolandColombiaMexico
Ecuador
DominicanRepublic
China
InternationalsStudents
100%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
- 8 -
The mission of Internationals Network for Public Schools is to provide quality education for recent immigrant students by developing a network of small, public
high schools based on the Internationals Approach
The mission of Internationals Network for Public Schools is to provide quality education for recent immigrant students by developing a network of small, public
high schools based on the Internationals Approach
Appendix: Internationals’ Mission and Vision
The Internationals Approach to Educating English Language Learners:
• Heterogeneity and Collaboration Heterogeneous and collaborative structures that build on the strengths of every individual member of the school community optimize learning
• Experiential LearningExpansion of the 21st century schools beyond the four walls of the school building motivates adolescents and enhances their capacity to successfully participate in modern society
• Language and Content IntegrationLanguage skills are most effectively learned in context and emerge most naturally in purposeful, language-rich, experiential, interdisciplinary study
• Localized Autonomy and ResponsibilityLinking autonomy and responsibility at every level within a learning community allows all members to contribute to their fullest potential
• One Learning Model for AllAll learners, faculty and students participate in similar collaborative learning and work structures which maximize their ability to support one another
The Internationals Approach to Educating English Language Learners:
• Heterogeneity and Collaboration Heterogeneous and collaborative structures that build on the strengths of every individual member of the school community optimize learning
• Experiential LearningExpansion of the 21st century schools beyond the four walls of the school building motivates adolescents and enhances their capacity to successfully participate in modern society
• Language and Content IntegrationLanguage skills are most effectively learned in context and emerge most naturally in purposeful, language-rich, experiential, interdisciplinary study
• Localized Autonomy and ResponsibilityLinking autonomy and responsibility at every level within a learning community allows all members to contribute to their fullest potential
• One Learning Model for AllAll learners, faculty and students participate in similar collaborative learning and work structures which maximize their ability to support one another
- 9 -
Proven Record of Success: International High School Results
• International High Schools have higher graduation rates than New York City averages for four, five, six, and seven year cohorts
• Additionally, International schools have consistently lower dropout rates across cohorts
- 10 -
Proven Record of Success: International High School Results
NationalAverage
New YorkState
New York City Brooklyn IHS Internationalat LaGCC
ManhattanIHS
72%
84%
67%
95%90% 91%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
• International High School students attend college at rates well above national, state, and city averages
Percent of Graduating Seniors Attending College
- 11 -
• Criteria for International High School decision
• Need for a newcomer school option at OUSD
• Proven record of success
• Community support
• Facilities Availability
• Summary
• Recommendation
Agenda
- 12 -
Community Support: Engagement and Outreach
Internationals has engaged with numerous groups and has received positive support, some groups include:
• District groups: Migrant Education Program/Refugee Education Program (MEP-REP), District English Language Advisory Committee (DELAC)
• Community Organizations: Asian Pacific Islander Youth Promoting Advocacy and Leadership (AYPAL), Oakland Community Organizations (OCO), Unity Council, East Bay Asian Youth Center (EBAYC), International Institute of the East Bay, Lao Family Community Development, International Rescue Committee, Bay Area Immigrant and Refugee Services (BAIR), Alameda County Refugee Coordination Council, East Bay Vietnamese Association
• Currently engaging with: Arabic and African groups (St. Paul’s Episcopal, church in Lakeview area, mosque in Castlemont area, Islamic mothers group)
• Parents at targeted middle school site meetings: Havenscourt, Elmhurst, Calvin Simmons, Roosevelt
• Sent letters (in 4 languages) to student homes, asked principals to send letters out at school, disseminated information with parent liaisons, family resource centers and teachers of 8th grade EL classes
Next steps:• Get on agenda of future CBO meetings with parents to increase parent exposure• Expand outreach efforts to next phase of middle schools
- 13 -
Community Engagement: Target Middle Schools
% of CELDT 1 & 2 for Asian and Latino subgroup populations
Middle Schools Asian% Latino%
Bret Harte Middle School 19 8% 25.6% 25.7%Calvin Simmons Middle School 59 24% 13.3% 61.4%Claremont Middle School 1 0% 2.8% 10.9%Cole Middle 1 0% 8.9% 10.5%Edna M Brewer Middle School 14 6% 35.7% 16.4%Elmhurst Middle School 37 15% 1.6% 56.9%Explore 0 0% 1.1% 17.4%Frick Middle School 8 3% 2.5% 36.1%Havenscourt Middle School 35 14% 4.2% 57.3%James Madison Middle School 15 6% 1.4% 50.1%Lowell Middle School 2 1% 8.0% 8.0%Melrose Leadership Academy 6 2% 1.6% 94.8%Roosevelt Middle School 24 10% 46.6% 33.2%Urban Promise Academy 3 1% 4.9% 84.1%Verdese Carter Middle School 0 0% 6.2% 8.6%Westlake Middle School 19 8% 31.8% 16.4%Total 243
1 and 2 total
Subgroups (Schoolwide)CELDT 05-06
- 14 -
• Criteria for International High School decision
• Proven record of success
• Need for a newcomer school option at OUSD
• Community support
• Facilities availability
• Summary
• Recommendation
Agenda
- 15 -
Facilities Options:
The Need:
• YEAR ONE: Facilities needs - 4-5 classrooms, 2 offices
• FULL SIZE: Facilities needs (assuming 400 students) - 17 classrooms, science lab, etc.
Evaluation Process:
• Continued discussion with facilities as they complete their facilities inventory assessment. Assessment target date of completion: mid November
• SHORT-TERM: Location assessment of school sites and discussion with NExOs regarding schools to determine which campuses could house 4-5 additional classrooms
• LONG-TERM: Evaluate currently unused and underused facilities and overall school portfolio for future facilities availability
- 16 -
Facilities Evaluation
Possible Options Pros Cons
Short term: Share campus with another high school or middle school in central Oakland
• Diverse newcomer population• Few small schools in this area
• May have to use portables• May not be viable long-term solution
Short term/Long term: Occupy currently vacant school facility in OUSD
• Good use of under-utilized, paid-for school site space• Possible long-term solution• Provides new students with a non-portable based environment
• Vacant school facility may be needed for other district purposes• May be costlier to not share a campus as a new school
Long-term: Higher education facility space or facilities based on further school portfolio analysis
• Would not have to share campus• Won’t have to worry about re-location
• Annual space availability fluctuates at higher education facilities• Other OUSD schools may have priority on these facilities
- 17 -
Criteria for International High School decision
Criteria Question Evaluation
Proven Record of Success
Has International High School shown a track record as an institution that can help newcomer students attain academic achievement?
CRITERIA MET: 20 years of experience with newcomer students; proven higher rates in student graduation, retention and academic achievement
OUSD Need Would OUSD newcomer students benefit from having an option for a high school focused on newcomer students?
CRITERIA MET: Current newcomer students would benefit from a college prep option at OUSD; OUSD CELDT 1&2 students could benefit from school focused specifically on their achievement needs
Community Support
Is there community support for such an option?
CRITERIA MET: Received positive support from families and community leaders
Facilities Options
Are there facilities available to house Internationals in its first year and beyond?
CRITERIA LIKELY TO BE MET: Based on initial conversations, options for short term facilities likely
Recommendation: OUSD should open International High School 07-08
- 18 -
Appendix
- 19 -
Appendix: Internationals Provides 8 Types of Direct Support to Its Schools
• Mentors for Principals• Professional Development• Curriculum Development and Sharing• Leadership Development• Research and Evaluation• Advocacy and External Relations• New School Development• Teacher and Student Recruitment
- 20 -
RegentsPerformance
(Math)
2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003
76.4%71.8%
0.0%
62.8% 62.5%
0.0% Unavailable
64.9%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
In addition, Internationals student performance on the English and Math Regents is comparable to overall city averages and has demonstrated a successful performance increase
RegentsPerformance
(English)
2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003
80.9%
70.4%
0.0%
76.6%
67.5%
0.0%
93.0%
84.2%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Note: Bronx International, International at Prospect Heights and Flushing International did not have senior classes in 2002-03 or 2003-04Source: 2002-03 and 2003-04 Annual School Reports; Update on the Performance of LEP / ELL, New York State Education Department (February 2005)
Perc
en
t of
Tota
l (%
)
Perc
en
t of
Tota
l (%
)
BrooklynInternational
International at LaGCC
ManhattanInternational
BrooklynInternational
International at LaGCC
ManhattanInternational
City Avg
Percent of Students Meeting RegentsGraduation Requirements – English (2004 vs. 2003)
Percent of Students Meeting RegentsGraduation Requirements – Math (2004 vs. 2003)
ELLCity Avg
City Avg
ELLCity Avg
Internationals High School Students Outperform City ELL Average on Regents Tests…
- 21 -
Appendix: Current OUSD Newcomer Work
• MEP-REP conducting middle school refugee census, and specifically newcomers in 8th grade (in country 4 years or less). Target completion date: 10/27/06
• Instructional Services EL team is engaging in evaluation of newcomer program effectiveness. Target completion date: 12/15/06
• Elizabeth Macias, 6-12
• Dahyana Otero, K-5
- 22 -
Appendix: OUSD HS with largest EL populations ( based on 05-06 CELDT)
Total Number of ELs
Number of EL CELDT 1&2
% of District EL CELDT 1& 2
High Schools Asian% Latino%Architecture 107 31 10.23% 0.0% 93.5%Business and Information Tech 128 37 12.21% 0.0% 89.2%Mandela 121 32 10.56% 9.4% 90.6%Media 82 47 15.51% 0.0% 89.4%Oakland High 356 82 27.06% 53.7% 34.1%Oakland Tech 147 31 10.23% 54.8% 38.7%Robeson 69 12 3.96% 8.3% 75.0%Skyline 147 31 10.23% 38.7% 29.0%Total from schools with highest EL 1157 303 89.91%
High School District Total 1493 337
Subgroups (CELDT 1&2 only)
- 23 -
Appendix: EL Programmatic Support Structures Currently in Place for HS
School ELD Programs
EL Support in Core Programs Teacher Capacity
CBIT Basics 1& 3
Level A & C
-EPH – Spanish for Spanish Speakers
-SEI Algebra & Geometry, Biology, World Cultures & History
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish
EL Support Staff: ELD Teacher
College Prep & Architecture
Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
-EPH – Spanish for Spanish Speakers
-SEI World History
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish
EL Support Staff: AP
Mandela Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
-EPH – Spanish for Spanish Speakers
-SEI Intro. Algebra, Algebra & Geometry, Biology, Chemistry, Physiology, U.S. History, World History, Am. Gov/Econ.
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish
EL Support Staff: Counselor and Lead Teacher
Media Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
-EPH – Spanish for Spanish speakers
-SEI Intro. Algebra, Algebra & Geometry, Biology, U.S. History, World History
CLAD Teachers
EL Support Staff: ELD Teacher
Robeson Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
ELD 5
-EPH – Spanish for Spanish Speakers
-SEI Algebra & Geometry, Biology, U.S. History, World History, Am. Gov/Econ.
CLAD Teachers
EL Support Staff: Principal- Spanish Speaker
(Based on information provided by RA &A)
SEI = Structured English Immersion
EPH = Español para Hispanos (Spanish for Spanish Speakers)“Basic” = first level in the Hampton Brown High Point CurriculumCLAD = Crosscultural, Language and Academic Development certificate (authorizes teacher to teacher English Learners)
- 24 -
School ELD Programs EL Support in Core Programs Teacher Capacity
Oakland High Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
ELD 5
-SEI Intro. Algebra, Algebra & Geometry, Biology, Chemistry, U.S. History, World History
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish, Cantonese
EL Support Staff: AP
Oakland Tech Basics I, 2 & 3
Level A, B & C
-EPH-Spanish for Spanish Speakers
-SEI Intro. Algebra, Algebra & Geometry, Phys. Science, Biology, Chemistry & Physiology, US History, World History, Am. Gov/ Econ.
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish
EL Support Staff: Bilingual Liaison
Skyline Basics 1
Level A, B & C
-SEI Intro. Algebra, Algebra, Adv. Algebra & Geometry, Biology, Intro Chemistry & Chemistry, US History, World History, Am. Gov/ Econ.
CLAD Teachers
L1 Support: Spanish
EL Support Staff: Bilingual Liaison
(Based on information provided by RA &A )
Appendix: EL Programmatic Support Structures Currently in Place for HS
SEI = Structured English Immersion
EPH = Español para Hispanos (Spanish for Spanish Speakers)“Basic” = first level in the Hampton Brown High Point CurriculumCLAD = Crosscultural, Language and Academic Development certificate (authorizes teacher to teacher English Learners)
- 25 -
Appendix: OUSD Next Steps to Strengthen Current EL Programs
• Clearly defined course options available to English Learners.
• Clearly defined structures of effective high quality Newcomer programs.
• Provide support to Newcomer ELL teachers.
• Provide training and support to principals, counselors, and ELL Support Staff