Zachary Tess D7 Project Manager. US 14 – New Ulm to North Mankato ADT & Serious Crashes 2009 AADT (HCAADT: 12.6%); 2007-2011 K+A Crashes.

Post on 01-Apr-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Zachary TessD7 Project Manager

Highway 14 New Ulm to North Mankato ADT and Crashes

RSA High Crash Intersections Fatalities (8 total) Serious Injury (5 total)

2009 ADT– 12.6% Heavy Vehicle Traffic (2007-2011 K+A Crashes)

New Ulm Pop. 13,500

Courtland Pop. 600

Nicollet Pop. 1100

North Mankato / Mankato Pop. 52,700

US 14 – New Ulm to North MankatoADT & Serious Crashes

2009 AADT (HCAADT: 12.6%); 2007-2011 K+A Crashes

Constrained

Corridor Typical - (WB Construction Shown)

Constrained Corridor TypicalConstruction - 2018 $16.4M - $24.6M $14.1M - $21.2M

R/W $0.3M $1.0MHigh TensionCable Barrier

$1.7M *$1.2M

*Future Consideration

Additional Pavement & Aggregate needs◦ 14’ inside median vs. 4’ shoulder ◦ Loonheads – U-turns for truck/agg equipment◦ Crown correction–cheaper than drainage structures

Still need R/W (south side utility poles)

Construction Difference

Pavement andaggregates

$1.5M

Loonheads $0.5MCrown

Correction$0.3M

Current R/W Costs - $12K/acre

• Provided by District Real Estate Rep

When Construction + R/W becomes equal between alternatives

• $46K/acre – Assumes HTCB in both alternatives

• $66K/acre – HTCB only in constrained

R/W Cost per acre $12,000

ConstrainedCorridorTypical

Construction - 2018 $16,407,934 $14,106,085High Tension Cable Barrier

$1,700,000 $1,200,000

R/W $241,612 $966,446

Total $18,349,546 $16,272,531

R/W Cost per acre $46,386

ConstrainedCorridorTypical

$16,407,934 $14,106,085

$1,700,000 $1,200,000

$933,950 $3,735,799

$19,041,884 $19,041,884

• 8’ SHOULDERS (DIMINISHING RETURNS FOR WIDER SHOULDERS)• KEEP 12’ LANES FOR HIGH SPEED RURAL• MINIMIZE MEDIAN WIDTH (ALLOW 3’ DEFLECTION IN THRU LANES)• RUMBLE STRIPS BOTH SIDES (CRASH HISTORY OF

DROWSY/INATTENTIVE DRIVERS)• STICK WITH TUBE DELINEATORS & CONSIDER CABLE IF FUTURE

NEED

SAVES 10’ OF WIDTH AND UNWARRANTED CABLE BARRIER~$1.5M+$1.7M

• 53’ MEDIAN WIDTH WITH 1:4 INSLOPES AND 10’ DITCH BOTTOM (SAVES 13’ AND ALLOWS SPACE FOR RCI)

• 12’ RIGHT LANE AND 8’ SHLD ON WB TH 14 (SAVES ADDITIONAL 2’) DELAY INSTALL OF CABLE BARRIER UNTIL WARRANTS ARE MET

SAVES 25’ OF R/W FOR ENTIRE PROJECT~$230,000 r/w +MATERIAL COSTS+$1.2M CABLE

RAISED MEDIAN BARRIER•USE OF 2’ SHLD REDUCES MEDIAN WIDTH BY 8’ •REDUCED MAINTENANCE AND SNOW MELT PROBLEMS•SIMILAR COST TO HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER•USE OF 8’ SHLD LIKE OPTION 1 YIELDS 10’ WIDTH REDUCTION

WIDTH REDUCTION SAVES ~$1.5M

Tech Memo

Constrained◦ Pros

Less impacts to farmland/wetlands

Evaluation for other corridors statewide

◦ Cons Higher Construction Cost Higher Maintenance Cost

Corridor Typical◦ Pros

Lower Construction Cost Introduction of alternative

intersection treatment types – RCUTs

Lower Maintenance Cost

◦ Cons Additional

farmland/wetland impacts

Construction◦ $10M - $15M

4-lanes only No Interchange

R/W◦ $4M

4-lanes Relocations Interchange

*Currently Unfunded

Why to west?◦ RSA – Critical Crash rate intersections

TH 14/TH 111 in Nicollet TH 14/TH 99 in Nicollet

◦ Local and Political Momentum Local Infrastructure planning/needs

Wastewater treatment planning – North Mankato City expanding

2000 population – 890 2010 population – 1100 23.5% increase

TH 14/TH 15 Intersection Discussion◦ Alternatives◦ Discussion of inclusion with MN River Bridge in

New Ulm in 2018

Contact Information◦ Zachary Tess – D7 Project Manager◦ Zachary.tess@state.mn.us◦ 507-304-6199

Corridor Website◦ http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d7/projects/14newulm

tonmankato/

top related