YADVINDER MALHI - Home · Web viewd: Durbin Watson statistic. Residuals were not significantly autocorrelated according to this statistic. Residuals were not significantly autocorrelated
Post on 26-Feb-2021
3 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Supplementary tables and figures
Table A. Parameters used to estimate NPPfineroot through the mass balance approach presented in
the manuscript. Mean values for both plots in each site plus/minus standard errors are presented.
Site Rh(Mg C ha-1 yr-1)
Litterfall( Mg C ha-1 yr-1)
MortAG
( Mg C ha-1 yr-1)NPPbranchfall
(Mg C ha-1 yr-1)Fcwd MortBG
( Mg C ha-1 yr-1)
AC 3.23±0.56 2.41±0.220 0 0.038±0.008 0.25±0.25 0
AA 2.99±0.33 1.21±0.064 0.66±0.33 0.270±0.11 0.25±0.25 0.045±0.041
Table B. Soil characteristics and nutrient composition in the upper horizons at plots AC1 and
AC2 at the Alerce Costero site and plots AA1 and AA2 at the Alerce Andino site. Values shown
are the averages of the soil profiles obtained in each plot
Plot Effective Soil
deptha
(cm)
Surface horizon depth(cm)
Bulk density(g/cm3)
pH SOMb
%C/N N
(%)P
(Olsen)(ppm)
K(ppm)
Ca(ppm)
Mg(ppm)
Na(ppm)
Alc
(ppm)
AC1 63 23 0.75 4.09 9.57 34.5 0.17 3.1 72 100 71 28 715AC2 43 16 0.70 4.11 10.06 32.7 0.18 3.1 94.3 114.3 63.3 25.3 893AA1 72 18 0.16 4.23 78.70 113.2 0.40 5.2 470 510 204 94 410AA2 94 20 0.22 4.32 59.99 83 0.43 7.2 553 700 239 97 303
a: Soil depth where roots can potentially develop and extract water and nutrients without any apparent physical or chemical restriction.b: Soil organic matterc: Exchangeable Al
Table C. Volume equations used for Fitzroya trees in Alerce Costero (AC) and Alerce Andino
(AA). Statistics associated to the equations are also presented
Site V(withoutbark)a R2b RSE‡ DW¶ V(withbark)
a R2b RSEc DWd
AC 0.00023*DBH2.17614 0.96 0.1910 1.46 0.00022*DBH2.18308 0.96 0.1936 1.41
AA 0.00008001*DBH2.4823 0.99 0.2131 1.59 0.00006877*DBH2.5071 0.99 0.2102 1.58
a: V(withoutbark) : volume without bark in m3, V(withbark): volume with bark in m3. DBH is in cm. b: Adjusted R2
c: Residual standard errord: Durbin Watson statistic. Residuals were not significantly autocorrelated according to this statistic.
Figure A. Structure of the studied forests at top: the Alerce Costero National Park and bottom:
Alerce Andino National Park (Photos: Yadvinder Malhi).
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-2
)
100
200
300
400
500
600
AC AA
Tem
pera
ture
(o C
)
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
AC AA
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m m
onth
-1)
200
400
600
800 AC AA
Hum
idity
(%
)
40
60
80
100
120
AC40
60
80
100
120
AA
Month
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Soi
l tem
pera
ture
(o C
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
AC AA
Figure B. Mean monthly radiation, temperature, relative humidity, soil temperature, and total
monthly precipitation in Alerce Costero (AC) and Alerce Andino (AA) between November 2011
and October 2012. White dots in the figures indicate values estimated from climate data from the
weather station at Puerto Montt. Error bars indicate ±1 SD.
(a)
Num
ber o
f tre
es h
a-1
100
200
300
400
500
600
All species AC1 Fitzroya AC1
(b)
Num
ber o
f tre
es h
a-1
100
200
300
400
500
600
All species AC2
(c)Fitzroya AC2
(d)
Bas
al a
rea
(m2 h
a-1)
5
10
15
20
25
All species AC1
(e)Fitzroya AC1
(f)
Diameter class (cm)
10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90
Bas
al a
rea
(m2 h
a-1)
0
5
10
15
20
25
All species AC2
(g)
Diameter class (cm)
10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90
Fitzroya AC2
(h)
Figure C. a-d) Diameter distribution of all species and Fitzroya trees in AC1 and AC2 plots. e-
h) Basal area for the same components in both plots.
Num
ber o
f tre
es h
a-1
100
200
300
400
500
All species AA1
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Fitzroya AA1
(a) (b)
Num
ber o
f tre
es h
a-1
0
100
200
300
400
All species AA2
(c)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Fitzroya AA2
(d)
Bas
al a
rea
(m2 h
a-1)
5
10
15
20
25
All species AA1 (e)
5
10
15
20
25
Fitzroya AA1 (f)
Diameter class (cm)
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
100-
110
110-
120
120-
130
130-
140
140-
150
150-
160
160-
170
170-
180
180-
190
190-
200
200-
210
210-
220
220-
230
230-
240
Bas
al a
rea
(m2 h
a-1)
0
5
10
15
20
25
All species AA2 (g)
Diameter class (cm)
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
100-
110
110-
120
120-
130
130-
140
140-
150
150-
160
160-
170
170-
180
180-
190
190-
200
200-
210
210-
220
220-
230
230-
240
0
5
10
15
20
25
Fitzroya AA2 (h)
Figure D. a-d) Diameter distribution of all species and Fitzroya trees in AA1 and AA2 plots. e-
h) Basal area for the same components in both plots.
Diameter class (cm)
2-10
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
100-
110
110-
120
120-
130
130-
140
140-
150
150-
160
160-
170
170-
180
180-
190
190-
200
200-
210
210-
220
220-
230
230-
240
Woo
dy b
iom
ass
(Mg
C h
a-1
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60AC1 AC2 AA1 AA2
(a)
Diameter class (cm)
2-10
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
100-
110
110-
120
120-
130
130-
140
140-
150
150-
160
160-
170
170-
180
180-
190
190-
200
200-
210
210-
220
220-
230
230-
240
Woo
dy p
rodu
ctiv
ity (M
g C
ha
-1ye
ar-1
)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5AC1 AC2 AA1 AA2
(b)
Figure E. a) Total woody biomass for trees ≥2 cm DBH along different diameter classes in each
plot, b) The same as a), but for total woody productivity.
(b)
Species
FC DW NN MC SC Others0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0NPPACW AA1
NPPACW AA2
Mortality AA1 Mortality AA2
(a)
Species
FC DW NN Others
NP
PA
CW
and
mor
talit
y (M
g C
ha
-1 y
ear-1
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0NPPACW AC1
NPPACW AC2
Mortality AC1 Mortality AC2
Figure F. Aboveground coarse wood productivity (NPPACW) and mortality in trees ≥ 10 cm DBH
in the Coastal (a) and the Andean plots (b). FC: Fitzroya cupressoides, DW: Drimys winteri, NN:
Nothofagus nitida, MC: Myrceugenia chrysocarpa, SC: Saxegothaea conspicua.
Month
February May August November
Bra
nch
turn
over
(Mg
C h
a- 1
Mon
th-1
)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6AC1
AC2
AA1
AA2
Figure G. The seasonal cycle in branchfall (every three months) in each plot between February
2012 and November 2012. The month of February 2012 includes branches fallen in the period
November 2011-February 2012. Error bars show ±1 SE.
Total litterfall productivity
Month
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Twigs
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Reproductive material
Mg
C h
a-1
Mon
th-1
0.00
0.03
0.05
Leaves (other species)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20AC1
AC2
AA1
AA2
Alerce needles
Figure H. The seasonal cycle in canopy litterfall (bottom) and its components (non-Fitzroya
leaves, needles, reproductive material and twigs) between November 2011 and October 2012.
Error bars show ±1 SE.
Plot
AC1 AC2 AA1 AA2
Litte
rfall
(Mg
C h
a-1
yea
r-1)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Needles Leaves other species Reproductive material Twigs
Figure I. Litterfall per component (in Mg C ha-1 year-1) per plot.
top related