Www.icdr.org | 1 BECOMING A “PREFERRED” SEAT OF ARBITRATION: CRITERIA AND EXAMPLES Mark Appel 27 September 2013 ABA 5 th Annual Moscow Dispute Resolution.

www.icdr.org | 1

BECOMING A “PREFERRED” SEAT OF ARBITRATION: CRITERIA AND EXAMPLES

Mark Appel27 September 2013

ABA 5th Annual Moscow Dispute Resolution Conference

www.icdr.org | 2

The ICDR Experience

• No institutional preference for particular cities or states

• Strong institutional policy in favor of building local capacity through education, training and partnership

• Number of seats (2012): 25

• Historically preferred places of arbitration

www.icdr.org | 3

Key Considerations for Parties

• Judiciary – international reputation and perception

• Independent, impartial, competent, predictable

• Does not favor domestic parties and/or interfere in arbitrations

• Track record of respecting NY Convention and other international standards/treaties

• Speed of courts in deciding cases (months or years?)

• Supportive statutory framework• Mirroring international expectations of process

• Establishing public policy support for arbitration

• Creating clear and limited role for judiciary

• Creating effective enforcement regime

www.icdr.org | 4

Key Considerations for Parties

• Easily accessible• Visas not required for hearing attendance or can be obtained

quickly and inexpensively

• Regular intercontinental flights

• Modern hotel and hearing facilities

• Freedom of advocate choice• Parties not obligated to obtain domestic counsel

www.icdr.org | 5

Thank You

Mark AppelSenior Vice President

Europe, Middle East, AfricaInternational Centre for Dispute Resolution

T: +356 99 54 77 99E: AppelM@adr.org