WHEN LEADERS DONT LEAD CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICES 2011 FALL CONFERENCE OCTOBER 25-26, 2011 DR. GREGORY W. GRAY CHANCELLOR.

Post on 28-Mar-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

WHEN LE

ADERS DON’T

LEAD

C A L I F O R N I A C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E

C H I E F I N S T R U C T I O N A L O F F I C E ’ S 2 0 1 1 FA L L C O N F E R E N C E

O C T O B E R 2 5 - 2 6 , 2 0 1 1

D R . G R E G O R Y W . G R A Y

C H A N C E L L O R

R I V E R S I D E C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E D I S T R I C T

EDUCATION DEFICIT

“”The growing education deficit is no less a threat to our nation’s long-term well-being than the current fiscal crisis.”

Gaston CapertonPresident of the College Board

RECENT CUTS TO CCC BUDGET

2009-10 More than $500 million cut from the community college budget ($190

million general apportionment & $313 million categorical) Student fees raised from $20 to $26 per unit

2010-11 $126 million received for enrollment “growth”

2011-12 More than $300 million cut with possibility of mid-year “triggers” Student fees raised from $26 to $36 per unit with possibility of $46

No COLA received since 2007-08

WHAT

’S B

ROKEN?

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-121,800,000

2,000,000

2,200,000

2,400,000

2,600,000

2,800,000

3,000,000

Community College Student Headcount

Data for 2011-12 is estimated at 93.5% of 2010-11.

Num

ber o

f Stu

dent

s

A NEW REALITY

“Where we were once among the top states in high school graduation rates, access to higher education, and degree completion rates, the state now ranks among the bottom ten in most categories.”

John Aubrey Douglass

Can We Save the College Dream?The death and life of California’s public universities

ANNUAL TUITION/FEESYEAR UC CSU 4- Year Nat'l Avg CCC 2-Year Nat'l Avg

2001-02 $ 3,859 $ 1,876 $ 3,766 $ 330 $ 1,608

2002-03 $ 4,019 $ 2,005 $ 4,098 $ 330 $ 1,674

2003-04 $ 5,530 $ 2,572 $ 4,645 $ 540 $ 1,909

2004-05 $ 6,312 $ 2,916 $ 5,126 $ 780 $ 2,079

2005-06 $ 6,802 $ 3,164 $ 5,492 $ 780 $ 2,182

2006-07 $ 6,852 $ 3,199 $ 5,804 $ 600 $ 2,266

2007-08 $ 7,517 $ 3,521 $ 6,191 $ 600 $ 2,294

2008-09 $ 8,027 $ 3,849 $ 6,591 $ 600 $ 2,372

2009-10 $ 9,311 $ 4,893 $ 7,050 $ 780 $ 2,558

2010-11 $ 11,279 $ 5,285 $ 7,605 $ 780 $ 2,713

STATE 2008-09 2009-10 % CHANGE

CALIFORNIA $ 600 $ 780 30.0%

NEW MEXICO $ 913 $ 1,125 23.2%

NORTH CAROLINA $ 1,422 $ 1,684 18.4%

FLORIDA $ 2,283 $ 2,553 11.8%

NEW YORK $ 4,033 $ 4,057 0.6%

MINNESOTA $ 4,565 $ 4,697 2.9%

NATIONAL RATES – LOW TO HIGH

The discrepancy between CSU, UC and community colleges is not new. However, it is during the last 10 years that the gap has increased substantially. Between 1971 and 2000, per student revenue increased 23% and 24% for UC and CSU, respectively, while community college revenue rose a mere 4%. The report, Financing California’s Community Colleges, concludes that no change in the missions of UC and CSU can account for this disparity; obviously the California legislature simply places a higher priority on funding its 4-year colleges.

Financing California’s Community Colleges

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-1 0

2010-11

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

Average Annual Tuition/Fees for Resident Undergraduate Students

UC CSU National Avg forPublic 4-yr

CCC National Avg forPublic 2-yr

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

• Not $

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

• Not our educational programs

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

• Not performance

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

• NO LEADERSHIP

A LEADER DEFINES REALITYFOR THE PEOPLE HE OR SHE

LEADS

DECISIONS OF LEADERS

• Put your contributions “out there” or keep it to yourself to avoid upsetting anyone

• To lead is to live dangerously

• Risk

LUCK ?

A person you would follow to a place

you would not go yourself

JACK WELCH’S 4 E’S

• Energy

• Energize

• Edge

• Execute

COLLEGE PRESIDENTS

• Today’s presidents are not tomorrow’s presidents.

• Increasingly diverse campuses have not had increasingly diverse leaders.

• The nature of presidential work is changing and many new presidents are unprepared for key aspects.

• The traditional presidential pipeline is insufficient – at the top and bottom – to fill expected need.

THE BIG FIX

“Forget tinkering on the margin. California must completely re-imagine its system of higher education.”

John Aubrey Douglass

Boom: A Journal of California, Summer 2011

HOW THE MIGHTY FALLAND WHY SOME COMPANIES NEVER GIVE IN

JIM COLLINS

“Every institution is vulnerable, no matter how

great. No matter how much you’ve achieved, no

matter how far you’ve gone, no matter how much

power you’ve garnered, you are vulnerable to

decline. There is no law of nature that the most

powerful will inevitably remain at the top.

Anyone can fall and most eventually do.”

The signature of the truly great versus the merely successful is not the absence of difficulty, but the ability to come back from setbacks, even cataclysmic catastrophes, stronger than before.

Great nations can decline and recover. Great companies can fall and recover. Great social institutions can fall and recover. And great individuals can fall and recover. As long as you never get entirely knocked out of the game, there remains always hope.

RCCD LEADERSHIP TRAINING ACADEMY

A

U

T

O

N

O

M

Y

top related