UCSF Child Care Status Report Backup Care Proposal

Post on 06-Feb-2016

33 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

UCSF Child Care Status Report Backup Care Proposal A collaboration of CACSW and the Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Child Care. Growth of On-Site Child Care. 296. 272. 238. 155. Lucia Opens. Kirkham Opens. MB Opens. 125. LHTs expansion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript

UCSF Child Care Status Report Backup Care Proposal

A collaboration of CACSW and the Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Child Care

Growth of On-Site Child Care

2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

238

272

125

155

FY02/03 FY05/06 FY07/08 FY09/10 FY10/11

Lucia OpensMB

Opens

LHTs expansion

*Meets Chancellor Bishop’s commitment from 2001 to increase child care slots by 300%

296

Kirkham Opens

•273 children being served at 3 campus centers (will be 296 when Lucia Center opens)

•163 (60%) are School of Medicine•61 (22%) are Medical Center•49 (18%) split between other 3 schools

•1,300 families on the wait list •46% need care for a child under 2 years of

age

Current Child Care Enrollment

3

Enrollment Goal & Progress

4

UCSF Status Current Enrollment

Enrollment Goal

Gap

Students, Residents, Postdocs

25% 20% +5%

Staff 35% 40% -5%

Faculty 45% 40% +5%

UCSF Demand

5

     3-24

months 2-3 years 3-5 years Total     

WAIT LIST Kirkham 0 57 97 154    Laurel Heights 289 266 185 740    Mission Bay 193 54 68 315    Lucia (infant center) 142 0 0 142    Total 624 377 350 1351        

Supporting Demand at UCSF

• Increase capacity for child care slots to 2% of total UCSF population by 2014 for a total of 420 slots (an additional 124 slots)

• Increase capacity to 3% in years 2014, and beyond

• Permanent child care site at Mission Bay to coincide with hospital expansion in 2014

6

Back Up Care Proposal

7

8

Back Up Care: motives & models

On-going discussions with UCSF CACSW, Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on Childcare, CCFL and SACSW.

Other peer institutions offer back up care programs.

Precedent with other UC campuses, notably UC Berkeley pilot program.

Peer Institutions Comparisons

9

UC Berkeley UCSF UCLA Duke Stanford GW Yale MIT

               Students 35,838 2,693 39,500 13,662 19,535 24,900 13,470 10,253Staff & Faculty 19,995 19,014 30,444 34,600 12,900 8,900 12,962 12,204

Total 55,833 21,707 69,944 48,262 32,435 33,800 26,432 22,457                 

Back Up Care Program Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes YesIn Home Care

Offered Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 

Co-Pay Amount$2- $4

per hour n/a none $7-$15

per hour $15 per

hour $10 per

hour$7 - $15 per hour

$12-$16 per hour 

Center Based Care Offered Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No 

Elder Care Offered Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes  No

10

Back Up Care: Key factors

Should serve a broad UCSF population (childcare model)

Very limited space and financial resources.

Recognition that any new program that is introduced should have its costs offset by user fees.

UC Berkeley Program: Background

11

Back-up Care Advantage Program Launched in March 2009 (S. Zedeck, Vice Provost Academic Affairs & Faculty Welfare)

Pilot program for ~300 Assistant Professors Maximum 80 hours/year back-up care program Co-pay Structure:

- $2/hour per child for center-based care- $4/hour for up to 3 dependents for in-home- No annual service fee

UC Berkeley Program: Results

12

98 Assistant Professors or approximately one-third of eligible group registered

UC Berkeley used over 1,318 hours of care in the first program year

Represents 291 unique days saved in absenteeism 99% of all care provided was in-home Average of 30 requests/month with 99.6% fill rate

Participants rated satisfaction with the back-up care program 4.8 out of 5

UC-wide interest

13

UCSF Pilot Program: Assumptions

14

• 250 of eligible UCSF population will utilize service.

• Users will pay an annual service fee of $100 and co-pay for days utilizing service.

$6/hour in-home care $15/day center-based care

• Annual allowance of 15 days per employee per year.

• Maximum of 50% of days for in-home care.

15

Program features •Back up care at Bay Area Bright Horizons full service centers:

• San Francisco• Palo Alto• San Jose• Marin (before/after school care only)

•Back up care at non-Bright Horizons network of providers nation-wide.

•In-home care through network of in-home care agencies (child and adult care).

•24x7 care and service availability.

•Crisis Care Assist – rapid response program when national or local disaster and/or health emergencies impact availability of care.

16

Funding Strategy

Minimum Annual Program Cost

Annual Service Fee

Co-Pay Cost vs Recovery

$48,000

In-home and center based child and adult care

15 allowances annual per user

$50,000 -

Assumes co-pay to provider is $15/$25/day or $6/hour

$2,000

17

•Pilot a program for 250 UCSF faculty, staff, students, residents and postdocs.

•Requires $100 annual service fee (covers cost of program).

•Assign program management to CLS Family Services (during pilot program only).

•Develop partnership with UC Berkeley, and possibly other UC sites, to leverage program goals and costs.

•Identify funding contingency to fill gap if 250 do not register IF the university wants to make this investment.

Pilot Program

18

•January – February 2011• Negotiate contract with Bright Horizons Family Solutions

• Requires 30 days advance notification

•March 2011• Launch program• Open enrollment for all eligible UCSF populations

•May 2011• Report on 3 month utilization statistics

•June 2011• Pursue shared contract with UC Berkeley

Timeline

19

Child Care and Early Education

School-Age Programs

Educational Advising

Adult Caregiving Support

Questions & Answers

top related