Transcript
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
1/21
The TheoreticalFoundations of Accounting
Standards: The Conceptual Framework and
accounting research
Geo rey WhittingtonCFPA
Cam ridge !ni"ersity
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
2/21
The #eed for a ConceptualFramework
• For Standard Setters $ a framework to impose consistency etween standards%
• Also to de&ne concepts that em ody principles $ to achie"e
'high (uality) standards that meet the needs of users%
• For users and preparers of accounts$ to help interpretationof standards% *specially important for internationalcon"ergence%
• Also to fll gaps in standards: particularly important whenthey are not 'rules ased) +hence$ not encouraged in !SA,%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
3/21
-imitations of a ConceptualFramework
• .t should not e regarded as a set of immuta leassumptions leading logically to a uni(ue truth%
• This is ecause &nancial reporting deals with the needs of
many di erent users and a great "ariety of transactions%/ence$ there are di erent ‘truths’ for di erent users andfor di erent transactions%
• /ence$ it should lea"e scope or interpretation at standard0setting le"el%
• Also$ the Framework itself should e adaptable o"er timeas needs and types of transaction change%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
4/21
The *1isting .AS2 ConceptualFramework
• 3ates from 1989 $ so need for re"ision%
• 2ased on the FASB Framework%
• 2ut +mercifully, shorter than the FAS2Framework%
• /as gaps +e%g% measurement, andam iguities +lia ility4e(uity distinction5,%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
5/21
The Conceptual Framework 6e"isionPro7ect
• Started in 2 ! as part of FAS2 con"ergence%
• 3ri"en largely y FASB technical sta $ and 7oint
.AS24FAS2 meetings%
• /ence$ re"ects FASB needs and past e1perience%
• Conse(uent detailed documents and percei"ed'Anglo0Sa1on) orientation +e%g% Stewardshipissue,%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
6/21
The 'Acti"e) 6e"ision Programme
• A: 8 7ecti"es and 9ualitati"eCharacteristics +chapters ; < pu lishedin easurement +currently deferred,%
• 3: The 6eporting *ntity +*3
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
7/21
'Future) Programme• *: Presentation and 3isclosure%
• F: Purpose and Status%
• G: Application to not0for0pro&t entities%
• /: 8"er0"iew and possi le conse(uential
amendments%• Completion: '2eyond
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
8/21
Progress to date +easurement$ etc%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
9/21
Pro lems of 8 7ecti"es and9ualitati"e Characteristics
• This is the only section to e fnalised %
• .t contains unda$ental di&culties %
• >aking Ste#ardship a component of 3ecision !sefulness isthe main pro lem of Chapter +8 7ecti"es,%
• Su stituting 'epresentational Faith ulness for 6elia ility isthe main pro lem of Chapter B +9ualitati"e Characteristics,%
• 6e7ection of (rudence as a characteristic is a conse(uenceof these changes%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
10/21
Stewardship • 6efers to the eedbac) role implied y accounta ility%
• Formalised y economists in Agency theory%
• *n or$ation asy$$etry etween principal +in"estor,and agent +manager, is alle"iated y &nancialreports%
• Stewardship +agency, re(uires $onitoring o paste+ents as well as estimating future cash ows +as indecision usefulness,%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
11/21
Stewardship <• Concern with stewardship as a central element in corporate
go+ernance seems to e a ,uropean rather than a #orthAmerican emphasis$ possi ly re ecting institutional di erences%
• -S emphasis on role of fnancial $ar)ets as a discipline onmanagement +share prices$ de t co"enants etc%,%
• Stewardship is particularly rele"ant in ‘not or proft’ and publicsector areas +recent work of .PSAS2, and in co.operati+es andother mutual organisations%
• The entity approach +as opposed to proprietorship , adopted inChapter of the new Framework may lead to under0emphasison stewardship4corporate go"ernance issues%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
12/21
Faithful 6epresentation• Sounds wonderful?
• 2ut why su stitute it for 'eliability/
• 6elia ility refers to relia le representation of #hat is purported to be represented %
• Faith ul 'epresentation has connotations of representing ‘econo$ic pheno$ena’ % This may include an element of'ele+ance $ which is the other main (ualitati"echaracteristic%
• A 'Tro7an /orse) for Fair 0alue 5
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
13/21
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
14/21
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
15/21
.ssues for 6esearch• The unresol+ed issues of the Framework
pro7ect pro"ide a full agenda for research%
• The issues are lin)ed $ e%g% *lementde&nition$ recognition and measurement%
•
Add to that the pro lems of particularapplications +pensions$ insurance contracts$etc%, and the scope is enormous%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
16/21
What can academic researchcontri ute5
• 3heory : oth deducti"e +logical deduction from assumptions, andinducti"e +rationalisation of practice,%
Theory has een unfashiona le$ ut is eing re"i"ed$ e%g% throughanalytical models using agency theory$ and "aluation models of Penman$
8hlson and others%
• ,$pirical studies4 history$ sur"eys of practice$ econometric studies ofmarket reaction and "aluation$ etc% *mpirical research has dominatedacademic research for a out D= years%
These should inform the de ate ut not determine it: the element of 7udgment will e decisi"e and is essentially political%
• .n the past$ academics were perhaps too am itious and hoped to sol"ee"erything?
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
17/21
What are academics doing5• #ew +or relati"ely new, 7ournals: Accounting /oriEons +AAA, and
Accounting in *urope +*AA, speci&cally encourage academicpapers with policy application%
• Within them are regular commentaries su mitted to .AS2 +andFAS2, y academic panels of AAA and *AA%
• These draw on research papers in other academic 7ournals%
• Academics also contri ute to the standard0setting processthrough other odies$ such as *F6AG) s PAA.#* initiati"e%
• This is welcome$ ut more needs to e done to unite academicresearch and policy0making%
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
18/21
An *1ample: The 3e&nition of*(uity
• This is an o "ious proble$ o the 5onceptual Fra$e#or) %
• The Framework currently de&nes , uity as a residual : assets minus lia ilities% A credit that is not alia ility must e e(uity% A lia ility is a present o ligation whose settlement is e1pected to gi"e riseto an out ow of 'resources em odying economic ene&ts) % /ence$ the or$ o settle$ent is theasis of the de&nition%
•
Application proble$s of this de&nition in .AS B ha"e led .AS2 to de"iate from it in two caseswhere it ga"e counter0intuiti"e results: % Commitments to settle in the num er of shares that will yield a gi"en "alue+'shares to the
"alue of%%%),
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
19/21
The .AS24FAS2 Position• 3e t4*(uity is part of the *lements phase of the 5onceptual Fra$e#or) re+ision %
• .n the shorter term$ it is addressed for &nancial instruments in the FASBcon+ergence progra$$e +a ad idea5,%
• 2oth pro7ects are currently in abeyance +until 'after @une
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
20/21
Some Conceptual .ssues• What is the e(uity4 de t distinction for5 Ste#ardship points to proprietorship +owners,$ ut decision.use ulness
points to risk0 earing aspects and a wider range of in"estors%
• Should e(uity e de&ned as a residual and$ if not$ how do other ele$ent
defnitions +particularly lia ilities, a"oid inconsistency 5
• .f e(uity is a residual$ ho# should its residual character be defned 5+settlement$ loss a sorption$ etc%,% The settlement criterion has causedparticular pro lems for co.operati+es with putta le shares%
•
/ow should recognition and $easure$ent criteria apply to e(uity if it is nolonger de&ned as a residual5
• /ow do we reconcile the balance sheet classi&cation of e(uity with theneed for an e(uity measure to de&ne proft 5
8/16/2019 Theoretic A
21/21
Some 6esearchContri utions
• ,F'A (AA* , discussion paper '3istinguishing etween -ia ilities and *(uity)pro"ides a thorough discussion of the conceptual issues%
• 3oes ha"e one acade$ic author : a good e1ample of academic in"ol"ement%
• Proposes a 7oss Absorption approach%
• 8ther academic contri utions include 2otosan et al% +
top related