The new definition of “good dog” _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
Post on 07-Apr-2018
220 Views
Preview:
Transcript
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
1/20
The new definition of good dog
Posted onAugust 1, 2011 by rufflyspeaking
Ive been thinking about this a lot today because of something a friend is going through, and
thought it was worth exploring with the group of you.
Ive been interested in dogs long enough, and been reading about them long enough, to have
seen some broad swings in training. Im not talking about positive/negative reinforcement,
though that is certainly the case (and I honestly think its a mistake to see this as a
progression from bad to good its a lot more of a pendulum swing, and I would predict
things will move back the other way in the next twenty or so years); what I mean is a change
in the definition of the well-trained dog.
It has historically been the case that training was a preparation for the dog to work a job; you
were teaching the dog the vocabulary it needed for its role in life. The basic stuff was all the
same whether herding or protecting or sending messages or a hundred other things, dogs
need to not run off on their own, need to come when called, need to stay close to a handler,
need to pick up and carry stuff when asked. So thats what basic training was heel and sit
and down and stay and so on. A few people got very interested in doing those basic
exercises super well, which is where competitive obedience comes from competitive
obedience is like compulsory figures in figure skating. Youre doing a few simple things with a
very, very high degree of style and consistency.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
2/20
But whether the commands were done at that very high level or on a more normal level, the
goal was never to be that the dog just did THAT. It was supposed to lead to a life with a dog
that was just a normal life where the dog did stuff. Its sort of like teaching a toddler what the
word cup and then cupboard means you dont do it so you can say cup! cupboard!
when the kid is eighteen years old. You do it so you can say Hey, go get me some coffee
when youre in the kitchen. The basic commands for a dog were in order to facilitate a day
where you go move a bunch of sheep, or walk down a dangerous street and collect rent, or
deliver milk, or patrol a wall. Stay was stay there and dont move so I dont get shot whenI peer around this corner, not an exercise to see how straight the legs were.
When dogs lost their jobs, over the course of the 20th century, for a long time the basic
commands kept their place in training and obedience. You took a puppy to a class that
taught sit and down and stay, and the further classes were refining those same basic
commands. The focus of training became competitive obedience, which I honestly think is
kind of a tragedy because so few of the students would ever go on to compete and we lost
the idea that the commands were part of normal life and not a style exercise.
In maybe the 90s trainers began to realize that the usefulness of a beautiful retrieve and finish
was pretty low in the real world, because nobody was using dogs to send messages to
soldiers anymore (where the dog should quickly deliver the message and then get ready to
run with the soldier to the commanding officer) or in fact to do anything that a retrieve and
finish is good for. Hand me something and then get ready to move was no longer a problem
that anyone was trying to solve.
What people WERE trying to solve were the issues that come when you have a whole bunch
of frustrated dogs living with no exercise in close proximity to other dogs. Because, as you
know, humans have ALSO lost a lot of their jobs. But were still the same inside we still
envision ourselves as hunters or fishers or farmers or explorers or messengers or warriors. And
we buy dogs that satisfy those internal envisionings, not the crappy office job we actually
have. We buy big retrievers and mastiffs and border collies and livestock guards and hunting
dogs, and so do all our neighbors, and then the dogs are living far closer to each other than
theyd ever choose to live and theyre not getting any exercise and they have no job or outlet
and they start acting badly.
So trainers began to try to solve the problems of dogs biting other dogs, dogs pulling on leash,
dogs who didnt get along at the dog park, dogs who werent happy with strangers
approaching them, dogs who were distracted by moving objects, and so on.
The expectation moved from well-trained dogs are useful dogs to well-trained dogs are
endlessly tolerant of absolutely anything and never discipline, punish, or predate on anything.
With this new expectation came new words its FASCINATING. When I do a book search,
from 1800-1980 theres ONE book that uses the phrase dog aggressionthe Monks of New
Skete book that came out in 1978. From 1980 to 2000 there are about a hundred books
using that phrase or close to it. From 2000 to 2011 there are almost a THOUSAND.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
3/20
Reactive has exploded; before 2000 it was almost always used positively a dog who has a
quick response time. After 2000 its now in thousands of references to bad dogs, poorly
trained dogs, unsocialized dogs.
There will be more new words I told my friend today that I needed to go copyright motion
insecurity before somebody decides that we have to rename the urge dogs have to chase
moving objects!
I said earlier that I thought it was a tragedy that training didnt move away
from competitive obedience sooner and I do mean that. But I think we may have done an
even bigger disservice to dogs by saying that the new role of the good dog is basically a big
body pillow.
So here are the big questions -
1) Is it in fact normal for dogs to endlessly tolerate everything?
2) Are we insisting that dogs be perfect when theyre not in fact perfect? Where is the place
for the dog whos just plain grouchy, and its not a training error but personality?
3) Are we doing justice to owners by implying that this new expectation of behavior is valid for
all dogs? (To use a specific example, saying that we can help their terrier not chase cats, or
help their chow not react to other dogs.)
4) Why exposure and not avoidance? That is, if you have a dog who lunges at other dogs,
why is the answer to helping that dog (and yes, I do keep putting helping in quotes because
thats how I ALWAYS hear it used now its not training, its helping, implying that the dog
WANTS this help and is incomplete without this help) going out and finding 40 other dogs to
expose the dog to (whether in a class or in a park or whatever) and not avoiding other dogs?
Why is one right and one wrong?
5) Do we need a revival in an understanding of dogginess? (A celebration of Jungian dog
archetypes, if you want to get fancy-dancy?) Can we re-find the validity of the warrior dog,
messenger dog, defender dog, hunting dog in our own backyards?
Talk to me! I am very interested to hear if you think I am completely off-base, or if you have
thoughts to add or ways to solve these problems. Should I start a new blog like the Art of
Manliness called the Art of Dogginess? :) Hmmm primal weekends with dogs howling at the
moon it could work!
You may also enjoy:
How to find a trainer or behaviorist
Adopting a dog from a pound, shelter, or rescue part 3: The first monthTrainin' hatin'
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
4/20
30 THOUGHTS ON THE NEW DEFINITION OF GOOD DOG
The importance of trusting dogs to understand metacommunication
Dog training: The difference between skill and strategy
This entry was posted in Dog Behavior and Training by rufflyspeaking. Bookmark the
permalink [http://blacksheepcardigans.com/ruff/dog-behavior/the-new-definition-of-
good-dog/] .
Miriam Dalfen
onAugust 1, 2011 at 6:29 am said:
Far too many people have a vision of dogs as some sort of animate
stuffed toy, or a Disneyfied semi-person on four legs. They areshocked when the dog actually behaves likelikean animal! And
more specifically, they dont understand their breeds purpose and
cant figure out why theie vicious terrier wants to kill those cute little
squirrels, or their husky drags them down the street and takes off it it
gets loose. We recently had someone posting one a message board
concerned because their puppy was following them everywhere and
because it seemed to be food obsessed (hello, its a Basset Hound,
theyre walking stomachs).
Joanna Kimball
onAugust 1, 2011 at 6:46 am said:
I totally agree, Miriam, and I think its even worse when their trainers
(heck, when the massive community of trainers) supports them in it.
Food obsessed should be struck from the vocabulary forever.
Theyre DOGS, you idiots. For five million years theyve had to bolt as
much food as possible whenever they found it. The ones who DONT
do that are the bizarre anomalies.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
5/20
Miriam Dalfen
onAugust 1, 2011 at 7:04 am said:
One of our better Basset trainers believes that Bassets (and other
hounds) are more food obsessed than other dogs because a dog thatwas perpetually hungry would be a more motivated/better hunter.
Miriam Dalfen
onAugust 1, 2011 at 7:05 am said:
You may be able to train some breeds to leave food thats been left on
a counter or table, but with a Basset its much more productive to
simply bang your head against a wall and dont leave stuff within
reach.
Ruth
onAugust 1, 2011 at 9:01 am said:
You should try the standard training regimen with a dog thats not really
food or toy driven. The trainer will look at you like youve grown horns
and insist you must be doing it wrong (the look on her face when she
waived a piece of peperoni in front of his nose and he turned aroundand headed in a different direction was priceless, to be fair to her once
he proved her wrong she coped very well and helped us manage
anyway). Not that he doesnt LOVE peperoni, but thats not enough to
hold his attention when he decides hes not interested.
But no, its not normal for a dog to tolerate everything. The really good
ones allow us to train that into them, and humanity has been breeding
for that for at least a few generations, but no, not even close.
The place for the grumpy dog is with someone who understands that
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
6/20
avoidance is a valid technique for handling a dog! I think a certain
amount of exposure is nessecary, but avoidance should be used more
often, though it takes an on-the-ball owner/handler to do it properly so
maybe thats why its NOT used more often.
Id love to see more dogs doing things besides just being
companions (not that thats not a huge amount of work sometimes). It
doesnt have to be the traditional doggy tasks, just doing THINGS.Were teaching our puppy to pull a cart, both for use around the
property and for competition, the work does him good, helps keep his
mind going, as well as his body, and once he got over his WTH is that
thats following me?? he seems to enjoy it.
Red Dog Mom
onAugust 1, 2011 at 9:13 am said:
Great post. Ive said for years that you cant expect all dogs to get
along with all other dogs. You dont like every other person you meet
so why should your dog like every dog he or she meets.
Anthropormorphizing doesnt even begin to cover what weve done to
dogs and, yes, Im guilty of it too at times.
Melissa
onAugust 1, 2011 at 9:49 am said:
Its not natural for dogs to accept everything but in todays world its
important that they try. A dog growls at a person and suddenly theyre
dangerous and you have everyone watching them for a mistake and
if one happens the fate of your dog can be out of your hands.
Avoidance isnt a luxury many can afford with the needs today of
having our dogs out and about, taking them everywhere, dog parks,
boarding, pet parties. Lets be honest, the average pet owner isnt
willing to give up their social lives for their dogs.
Should we help a dog overcome its basic instincts, it goes back to
what Ive already said, to be socially acceptable yes, I think so.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
7/20
Personally I dont expect my dogs to be perfect but I do try to make
sure they are rounded enough to be acceptable in public as our dogs
cant control others and its our job to keep them safe.
rufflyspeaking
onAugust 1, 2011 at 9:57 am said:
Melissa I absolutely agree that right now dog ownership means all those
things, if youre not willing to move your life around to make your dog(s) happy.
I guess my question would be something like WHY on EARTH do we have
pet parties? The dogs are usually angry, stressed, frustrated, or hugely
overstimulated and crazy; its only for the humans, so why do we tell
ourselves that our dogs should like it? Because we like the thought of it,
because WED like it, and we want our dogs to be the primates that we are.
What I would like to see is somebody saying Wait a sec; this is insane. The
dog at the pet party thats biting every other dog as they run past is the onlyone acting like he should, honestly. Dogs arent supposed to tolerate chaos.
But the biting dog gets cuffed on the side of the head or has an owner
apologizing and stuffing cookies in his mouth to control him.
I think my short answer is that yes, at this point in time thats whats socially
acceptable. And I wonder if theres any way we can change the idea of
whats socially acceptable.
Laurel
onAugust 1, 2011 at 12:33 pm said:
This is a great point. The biggest problem with normal dog behavior is
that humans dont tolerate it. Like Ruth said above, the place for a
dog who doesnt tolerate everything is with the owner whos willing to
give the dog a sane, comprehensible environment. You would not
*believe* how blind people are to dogs extremely clear signals (except
you would, of course), or how unwilling they are to let dogs get out of
situations that scare and worry them.
The best thing we could do for letting dogs be dogs is to teach people
about dog body language and signals. If you can SEE how stressed it
makes your dog to be hugged or be in a chaotic environment or meet
strangers, you can either try to desensitize the dog to that stress or
stop exposing the dog to it. But if you cant see dog behavior, youre
going to keep hugging terrified dogs until one of them bites you.
If you can see dog behavior, you can also figure out what stresses
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
8/20
YOUR dog, which isnt what stresses everyones dog. My lab mix
loves a party: shes the one at the park whos right in the middle of 7
other dogs playing chase. But shes got a particular kind of goofy-
happy play-motivated personality, and she has really good dog
manners from tons of puppy playtime and growing up around some
cranky older dog-ladies who would have chomped her in a heartbeat if
she forgot who was in charge.
Ruth
onAugust 1, 2011 at 4:32 pm said:
Some exposure can help, but you have to be able to tell when
its not helping and when to stop, and so many people cant.
One of the dogs that regularly comes to pulling practices is a
rescue with some dog aggression (and hyperactivity) issues.The owner keeps her well in hand, and seperated from the
other dogs by a bit more than usual, and keeps an very close
eye on her the whole time theyre there. The owner told me
last time they were there that this is pretty much the only
social time she took with the dog because she knows she
can count on the other owners to control THEIR dogs properly
around her. She also told me that the extra exercise from
pulling, as well as the carefully supervised exposure to other
dogs was slowly making a difference in her dog. The dog is
becoming less likely to attempt to jump at or lash out at a dog
passing by, and more tolerant in general of the various dogs
they saw. (She is working with a trainer as well, just in case
anyone was wondering, this was infact the trainers idea.) She
is completely ok with the fact that this will likely never be a dog
she can take to the dog park and let go. All she wants is to
have a bit more control for those times when exposure to
another dog is unavoidable.
I think what shes doing is a perfect example of the right mix of
exposure and avoidance needed to keep the dog under
control.
priscilla babbitt
onAugust 1, 2011 at 7:06 pm
said:
Thanks for this discussion, my carly is a huge puller and
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
9/20
ive had her in three cgc classes , starting at 4months ,
she is afraid of people so the she always fails the class.
We walk alot, but avoid strangers and if i take her
anywhere i have her on a tight leash. I would keep her
home but she loves to go in the car.. it makes her so
happy and My other one is just the opposite, hes very
social.
I appreciate all the comments about dogs and thereability to or not to conform to Our rules Its bee a very
big challenge for me , since getting a corgi, (my first
dog to live in the house 24/7) ive learned a more than i
ever expected to or thought i needed to know about
dogs in general, Especially this breed.
I sure hope im doing all i can, i wish we had a special
place i could take her to work this energy out and give
her a job off leash but theres none available in my city..
Like someone on her said her instincts are strong ,
much more so than my younger male.. NO amount of
treats or correction keeps her from wanting to pull
when a car drives by, or jump on Frankie to herd him
when they are running. She doesnt forget the things i
have managed to teach her , which all pertain to bad
habits in the house, but on the other hand id love to
see her out where she would have the chance to be
who she is..
Speaking of all the ways to train, i have only been
doing this for a 1 1/2 an my own experiences have
gone from choke the crap out of her to give her a click
and treat!! Infact that first trainer may have been the
reason shes so afraid of strangers?
Way to confuse me trainers! I was as ignorant as they
come when i started and unfortunately i believe she
was my guinea pig. Not a good thing with a strong
willed corgi. having said that i know she is mine i will
never give her up regardless of whether or not she
does what i wish shed do , im here for her and she
feels safe.
Im thankful she is not a bitter, she loves other dogs if
they dont try to dominate , she wants to be the boss,
she is awesome with my family, the grandkids adore
her and she them..
priscilla babbitt
onAugust 1, 2011 at
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
10/20
11:45 pm said:
Sorry about all the misspelled words, i was in
such a hurry, tending to dogs and a gran-baby.
I hate it when i dont proof read what i write..
MelissaonAugust 1, 2011 at 10:17 am said:
Hollywood (Paris Hiltons poor dogs anyone) along with the fact that so
many people view their dogs as children. I think its great that they
love their pets but too often they forget that they are still dogs, and
need to be treated as such. I celebrate my dogs birthdays with some
venison heart and a photo session. No party, no hats.
But for others their children/ dogs NEED THAT PARTY!!!
As for trainers, take Cesar Millan for example, I think they are givingthe dogs the best chance of surviving their owners. I dont know how
many episodes Ive seen where the owners had no clue at all about
basic dog behavior, so by helping the dog overcome their instincts
and traits the dog has the best chance of having a decent if not
perfect life with the owners .
S
onAugust 1, 2011 at 1:31 pm said:
I dont think Cesar Millan has much idea about dog behaviour, considering the
clear stress signs he ignores!
Elaine Axten
onAugust 1, 2011 at 3:46 pm said:
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
11/20
my dog would have a NERVOUS BREAKDOWN if i made her have a party.
shes not antisocial exactly, but she likes people better than dogs, and the
idea of putting her in a place where there was a lot of excited dogs would be
my idea of hell as well as hers.
she would go to a party that involved cats, though. when i take her to the
vets she more or less ignores other dogs, after all she sees dogs all the time,
but CATS! wh00t!!
Rachel
onAugust 1, 2011 at 12:40 pm said:
I wanted some time to think about this before I answered, and this is
what I came up with:
No, its not normal for dogs to tolerate everything. Thats why you get
reports of good dogs biting. They were pushed too far. And because
a lot of people work on the no biting EVER and dont work on
teaching bite inhibition (or dont bother teaching the dog anything
beyond dont go in the house), when a dog does bite, the bite does a
lot more damage because the dog doesnt know how much pressure
is too much. Also, the myth that a good dog will tolerate anything
has spread and people will push an uncomfortable dog untill it
becomes a cornered dog, and a cornered dog, with no place to run,
will bite. I dont know wheter these people just cant read dog body
language, or they read it and ignore it, but any dog owner or walker
has stories of people who wont listen when you say Please dont pet
my dog right now. There are also many owners who do very little
training. Not all, but a lot. Dogs who have never learned respect and
have learned that bullying gets them what they want.
I think we do need a revival of knowledge of what is real dog behavior.
There are too many shows where the animals are given human voices
and human wants and desires. Kids grow up seeing these and grow
up into adults who assume their dog or cat or horse thinks just like
they do, wants the same things, and shows emotions the same way.
Not only that, a lot of current dog training is based on out-dated sience
where dogs are equated to wolves, and wolves who were in captivity
and not acting like normal wolves. (Just finished reading Dog Sense by
John Bradshaw. A little scientific but a must read as he covers how
much scientist have learned over the past two decades about how
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
12/20
dogs think and what motivates them. Sorry for the side track.) So
people are expecting a dog to either act like them and see the world
the way they do, or to follow rules that apply to wolves and captive
wolves at that who are not acting the way they would if given a
choice. Either viewpoint looks at the dog as something other than
what he or she is, and sets up expectations that the dog either cant
meet, or doesnt know how to meet.
KellyK
onAugust 2, 2011 at 8:52 am said:
A revival of knowledge of what is real dog behaviorabsolutely! And I have
had a couple people who get pushy with my dog. It irritates me, it scares her,
no good can possibly come of it. Fortunately, most people I spend time with
on a regular basis know the drill and are willing to give her her space. And
when they do that, she warms up to them.
Anne
onAugust 1, 2011 at 1:20 pm said:
What I see a lot of in my training classes is families who just need a
dog they can live with. This means a dog that doesnt potty all over
the house, a dog that doesnt bark loudly all day and disturb the
neighbors, a dog that doesnt pull their arm off when they walk down
the road. I dont think any of these things are too much to ask for, in
ANY breed of dog. Sometimes it means the dogs behavior needs to
change, but sometimes it means the humans need to change what
theyre doing so the dog isnt set up to fail.
We also talk a LOT about communication- what a stressed dog looks
like (time to play some fetch and give up on that down thats not
working out) what play fighting looks like (do NOT pick up Smoochie-
poo, see how her body is relaxed and shes going back for more? The
pit bull is NOT eating her. Theyre wrestling.) and the like. Something I
see a lot of is families from other cultures who are getting their first dog
EVER. They didnt have dogs as children. None of their friends had
dogs. The only dogs were in the street, CERTAINLY not in the house,
so they have no idea what theyre doing. We have to start from
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
13/20
square one and help them first figure out what they even want out of
their dog, and do the very basics in talking to a dog. Its an
interesting experience, really. I wasnt raised in a particularly doggy
family, but we always had at least one and they were always
reasonably well behaved, so Im always a little amazed at what some
people will be tolerating. The four year old dog thats only mostly
potty trained, for example. Flabbergasting.
Julie E
onAugust 1, 2011 at 3:19 pm said:
This is a subject that Ive been thinking about for quite a long while.We have so very many breeds bred for thousands of years to do a
JOB: herding, hunting, verminating, guarding all very intense
activities that really require intense behaviors from our dogs. We also
have become a touchy-feely society that is reluctant to correct our
dogs, our horses, or our children. (There is discipline, and there is
abuse we arent talking abuse, here!) Everything is positive never a
no in sight. (As an aside, I had had to quit one agility club because I
wasnt allowed to say uh-uh to redirect my dog. It made him
confused that I wasnt really communicating with him, and he didntlike the happy-happy, joy-joy method. I am now allowed to stop him
and redirect he is having fun again.)
Modern society, however, really does not need such intense dogs
and thats where many people get into trouble. The vast majority
people dont have flocks of sheep or cattle to herd and guard. Most
people dont have large estates to hunt and guard. We have alarms
systems and pest control companies. We dont spend the day hunting
our dinner any more. We dont need our dogs to help haul in nets of
fish. The vast majority of us no longer fight our dogs in pits. In all the
years that Ive rescued/retrained, the majority of dogs that were given
up were given up for breed-specific behaviors: barking, digging,
herding/nipping, insane and undirected energy. Once the need to
perform a duty was addressed, the behaviors magically became
controlled.
There is great lamentation about the loss of instinctual drive in the
individual breeds of dogs that they have become more generic. We
live in a society that mostly needs companion dogs, not dogs that
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
14/20
need a physical job. I can definitely see how serious fanciers dont
want to lose the behaviors which are fundamental to their breed
after all, that is as much a part of the standard as coat color, etc. is,
but Im not entirely convinced it is what is best for the average dog in
modern society. I wonder whether it is necessarily a bad thing that a
Labrador is willing to retrieve all daybut doesnt NEED to. Or that a
Sheltie is bred to be quieter and less inclined to bunch up the children
with yaps and circling.
I think because of societal drift towards city life, we have lost our ability
(or indeed the patience to learn how) to read animals. They miss the
stiffened tail, the squared stance, the stink eye or other signals that
communicate play, distress, fear, and so forth. They inadvertently
praise the very behavior they wish to discourage. They feel guilt if they
have to correct. They feel fear that the dog might bite them (valid) or
that the dog may get bitten or hurt (also valid.) I thinks its an excellent
idea for people to learn Primal Dog. Once you understand that, it
becomes relatively easy to find solutions to doggie problems.
Most dogs are not endlessly tolerant, any more than most people. I
see nothing wrong with keeping a curmudgeonly dog away from other
dogs or small children, or terriers away from pocket pets that is a
way to address an issue. It might be the best way for a person without
the knowledge of how to train differently.
While were at it, can we please get rid of the phrase pet parent? Its
driving me nuts
ali
onAugust 1, 2011 at 5:28 pm said:
The expectation moved from well-trained dogs are useful dogs to
well-trained dogs are endlessly tolerant of absolutely anything and
never discipline, punish, or predate on anything.
this is the exact concept that I have expressed to people at work. I
am a veterinary technician and dog owner. I think its absolutely
ridiculous that dogs are expected to tolerate anything, without
reaction. For example, i have heard this several times from an owner I
dont CARE what my kid does to the dog, if the dog bites my kid, hes
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
15/20
over. Can you get any more unrealistic?? At the same time, i also find
it hard to believe that people are so lazy with training their dogs to
withstand certain necessary things, such as toe nail trims. My rationale
is: if we as humans can get a killer whale to open its mouth to brush
its teeth, or train a tiger to hold its leg out for a blood draw..why
cant we train our dogs to? the answer is simple, nowadays people
view their pets as ottomans, no longer objects with a purpose other
than to sit in our living rooms.
KellyK
onAugust 2, 2011 at 11:34 am said:
Wow, thats crazily unrealistic. And itd be so much better to teach the kid to
treat the dog appropriately (and keep them separated as much as possible if
the kid is too young to get that).
Melissa
onAugust 1, 2011 at 8:53 pm said:
I have to take a second to curve the topic, used properly a choke
chain is not bad, I train using them and my dogs are far from
traumatized. That said any tool has to be used responsibly.
rufflyspeaking
onAugust 1, 2011 at 9:07 pm said:
Absolutely agree. I was ready to jump in and stop it if the thread turned intoanti-training methods, dont worry :). Ive used every collar that exists and am
a firm believer that the best method is the one YOU can do best. There are e-
collar trainers who are the gentlest and most supportive dog-savvy people on
earth and they get fantastic results from their dogs, who are happy and joyful
workers. Ditto with clickers and chokes and prongs and ear pinches and
anything else thats in vogue now or unpopular now. If you can use it well, you
can train a happy dog with it. If you cant use it well, DONT USE IT. Find
something you CAN use well and your dog will do great.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
16/20
priscilla babbitt
onAugust 2, 2011 at 12:01 am said:
I still use the choke chain when walking Carly , i have to or she wont
listen at all.. i do think the old school trainer who was our first
experience with the chain, knew how to use it but she was so mean,
she made me cry twice!One vet teck who was teaching the puppy socialization class said
dont do anything thats not fun, well good luck with that.. i ask her
how many dogs she had trained ..zero, she has cats!
I also heard that very sensitive dogs can be traumatized by some
types of training, is this true? Believe me i have read and obviously still
need to read more and listen well. Maybe i getting to old to learn new
tricks..lol
I know i have along way to go with carly and im training a 7month old
as well.. i just want to know im using the correct method so i dontscrew them up more
Reminds me of raising my kids and questioning every move i made,
some choices were good, some were dreadful..
Rachel
onAugust 2, 2011 at 11:42 am said:
From personal experience I would say yes some dogs areeasily traumatized. My dad was trying to train our new dog, we
hadnt had her very long, and were still getting used to her (our
previous dog was, mostly, well trained and the adjustment
from familiar well trained dog to new, knows nothing dog was
a big one. Shagg tolerated a lot, yelling didnt phase him (all
the guys have loud voices and Shagg grew up with us while
we were still learning volume control). Dad caught the new dog
stealing a rather large chicken leg off the counter where it was
thawing and yelled at her. Shagg would have looked and
dropped the chicken (more likely would have left it alone
knowing he would get some later).
Sunshine not only dropped the chicken, she ran and hid under
the furniture and I had to get her out. She avoided Dad for the
rest of the day, and he spent a lot of time soothing her into
trusting him again. Dad hadnt meant to scare her badly, just
startle her into dropping the chicken, but what would barely
bother one dog had this one cowering.
That was the only time he yelled at her like that, it was just the
once a couple years ago, and she has long since forgotten.
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
17/20
However, had he continued to try training her that way, I think
she would very likely be a wreck. Had she ended up in a
situation where they tried physical punishment, she would likely
have severe behavior problems. I use clicker training, with
appropriate punishments (basically a loud hey when she is
ignoring me) and for her it works great. Other dogs need other
methods and I dont think it hurts to take something from
every kind of training. With us she is now quite confident, evenpushy, but obeys most basic commands except loose leash
walking and lie down.(We are working on those)
LouisatheLast
onAugust 2, 2011 at 1:01 am said:
Actually, to the commenter aboveI dont trim my dogs nails. Not
because Im lazy or unwilling to train him, but simply because I have
bigger issues to work with him on and dont need to provoke him into
hysterics over something like that- he absolutely loathes it. Im workingon training him to file them on a sandpaper-coated board so theyre
a bit less.talon-like.
Arthur is my special boy, and a prime example of this sort of thing.
Hes a pit bull mix of mystery origin, who I acquired from a
neighborhood kid who claimed to have found him. Possible, given the
rough neighborhood, but he was only about five weeks old. Since I did
the things I was supposed to with him (puppy kindergarten, gentle dog
park socialization time, visiting stores) and he still turned out to be very
uncomfortable with new people and very dog aggressive, I can only
assume its genetic or possibly a result of being weaned way too
young. Whatever it is, I struggle a lot with how much I can expect him
to adjust his behavior, and how much Im just going to have to accept.
Ive given up on having him ever interact with strange dogs. My goal is
not to make him dog park ready- its to make him tolerant enough
that other dogs can walk by him without him going berserk. My goal is
not to turn him into a Golden Retriever when it comes to strangers in
the house, but just to get him civil and trustworthy, and not have to
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
18/20
physically wrestle him into his crate when someone unexpectedly
knocks on the door. And other than those (admittedly fairly major)
problems, hes a near perfect dog: hes polite and attentive when it
comes to food and asking for attention. He cuddles, hes gentle and
patient with my toy poodle, he tolerates and even sometimes seems
to like the cats, and hes not even a bed hog. Hes also the most
genuinely loving dog Ive ever known, when it comes to his family. Yet
I know he fits a lot of peoples definition of a bad dog, because he ismost definitely not ever going to be the dog kids can run up to pet
when hes on a walk.
MelissaonAugust 2, 2011 at 8:54 am said:
I adore the bully breeds, its my firm opinion that they are not
problematic as a breed but due to irresponsible breeding and
ownership get the short end of the stick far too often.
Take a popular classifieds site. Ads on it, English Bulldogs 1507 last
count, Alapaha Blue Blood Bulldogges 68, Staffordshire Terriors 1955,
American Pit Bull Terriors 15393 and just for kicks Cardigan Welsh
Corgis 2. Craigslist is swamped with them, shelters are swamped withthem. I have met more aggressive labs and goldens then pit types
but thanks to dog fighter breeders and OMG LETS MAKE
MONEEEEZ breeders they are getting the shaft.
So your dog could very well be an unfortunate by product of bad
breeding, but he was lucky enough to find someone who is willing to
compromise with him.
Sorry for the bully rant but it hits a nerve with me.
Second I WISH more parents would teach their children proper dog
manners. My daughter is only 19 months and already knows to stop
well back from a strange dog and go pet puppy? before putting a
hand near them. Even with my two who would rather lick you to death
before flipping over to demand belly scratches Im half tempted to get
vests saying.NO TOUCH. Evidently small dogs give people the license
to swarm.
Brianna
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
19/20
onAugust 2, 2011 at 11:24 am said:
The small dog thing drives me crazy. Somehow everyone thinks they can just
swarm and smother them. My parents have two minature dachsunds and a
third almost standard size dachsund. The male standard size adores ALL
people and especially kids, will welcome anyone who approaches, and all
touching and petting. But, they also have one who is extremely afraid of
strange people and will try everything to get away, and the third has a lowthreshold to being touched and handled and her standard reaction is to
nip/bite when that threshhold is exceeded. Luckily, when they walk them and
are often assaulted by people and children who think OMG they are all so
cute, I MUST touch them, they can use Charlie as the shield and sacraficial
PR rep, while sheilding the other two.
Personally, I have a Corgi/JR heinz 57 rescue that loves her family and people
she knows, is essentially indifferent/ignores strangers and is therefore, less
than thrilled to be sidetracked, or touched by them while out and about.
Luckily, she is at least tolerant of any interaction that occurs, but I work to
minize the chance. She also has extremely unpredictable reactions to new
dogs. Sometimes she loves them and wants to run and play, and sometimes
she really cant stand them at all. There is absolutely no pattern I can dicern in
regards to size, or gender, or location that will predict her reaction. She is very
happy never interacting with other dogs, so we dont force the issue. I dont
want to spend my time at the dog park, or god forbid dog parties if she
doesnt.
Paula
onAugust 3, 2011 at 12:52 am said:
I am concerned about all the laws being passed that require dogs to
be perfect. Some places will confiscate and destroy your dog if it kills a
cat or a rabbit. Not all dogs like all other animals. I sometimes think
dog parks are one of the worst ideas ever. Way too many people are
not capable of knowing whether their dogs should be thrown loose in
an area full of strange ones. I too hate the term pet parent. I love my
dogs dearly but I am still their owner.
KellyK
onAugust 3, 2011 at 8:53 am said:
8/3/2019 The new definition of good dog _ _ Ruffly SpeakingRuffly Speaking
20/20
I think that if your dog kills somebodys pet, you need to be held responsible,
absolutely, but a dog shouldnt be destroyed for doing what a dog does.
Some dogs have a really strong prey drive, and owners of those dogs need to
keep them away from other animals that look like a snack. Personally, Id be
more in favor of fines and restitution (paying any vet bills and the replacement
cost of the other persons pet) the first time something like that happens. After
multiple times, it would certainly get to a point where destroying the dog is the
only option left, but that should only happen after someone has demonstratedrepeatedly that they cant or wont control the dog.
top related