The Future of Services: Building Asynchronous, Resilient and Elastic Systems
Post on 16-Apr-2017
2861 Views
Preview:
Transcript
WEBINAR
The Future of Services: Building Asynchronous, Resilient and Elastic Systems
by Jamie Allen (@jamie_allen)
@jamie_allen
Traditional application architectures and platforms are obsolete.Gartner
@jamie_allen
Reactive: The new way of building software
@jamie_allen
• Accelerate teams• Reduce dependency nightmares• Increase application throughput
What are we trying to achieve?
Calvin and Hobbes, Bill Waterston
@jamie_allen
• Size is irrelevant
“Microservices” is a lousy term
Bing Images
@jamie_allen
• At the API• In our source• For our data
We want isolation
Wikipedia, Creative Commons, created by DFoerster
@jamie_allen
We want realistic data management• Transactions, especially distributed, will not work• Consistency is an anti-pattern at scale• Synchronous updates are a fallacy• Distributed locks for replication fail• Databases and Data Fabrics break these conventions
@jamie_allen
@jamie_allen
CQRS and Event Sourcing• Command/Query Responsibility Segregation• Immutable data• Available systems lack consistency guarantees• Replayable state for failure recovery• Completely isolated
Think in terms of compensation, not prevention.Kevin Webber, Lightbend
@jamie_allen
We want to ACID v2• Associativity and Commutativity are the path to scale• Idempotent and Distributed
Wikipedia, Creative Commons, created by Weston.pace
@jamie_allen
We want real resilience• It is merely whether or not something has been handled• It is only an external view, not internal where the failure has occurred• Resilience is being able to handle the “why” in a meaningful way
• Threads• Within One Node• Across Many Nodes• Across Many Servers• Across Data Centers
@jamie_allen
We want asynchronous APIs• Synchronous request/response semantics are expensive
• REST can be asynchronous, but still heavy• Each call requires a connection• Best used for external APIs
• Stream-based interactions for inter-service communication where responses are not required
• Message-based interactions for inter-service communication where responses are required
@jamie_allen
We want immutable deployments• We can bind a build of our application to a version of our configuration and
always know what is currently running • You cannot edit configuration and keep running
Dilbert, Scott Adams
@jamie_allen
We want to expose a “tip of the iceberg”
• Users see the public API• The API hides much complexity
MyBluePuzzle.org
@jamie_allen
We want Domain Driven Design• Knowing/understanding it is not necessarily a requirement• “Solving your pain” is the most important reason for microservices• In a greenfield project, Bounded Contexts and Aggregate Roots can help you to
decompose the problem
@jamie_allen
• Proxying• Service Discovery/Gateway• Stateless aggregation• Orchestration• Failure management• Versioning
We will have additional operational complexity
Complexityandotherbeasts.com
@jamie_allen
• Service API• Persistence API• Development environment• Production environment
@jamie_allen
• Create single project definition in sbt, use runAll, includes:• In-memory Cassandra with own keyspaces• A service locator• A service gateway
• Overload Mode: recompile and redeploy on save
Development Environment
@jamie_allen
• Deployment• Monitoring• Scaling• Can test locally with ConductR then push to production• Launch multiple instances with a single command
Production Environment (Lightbend RP)
@jamie_allen
LinksProject Site:http://www.lightbend.com/lagom
GitHub Repo:https://github.com/lagom
Documentation:http://www.lagomframework.com/documentation/1.0.x/Home.html
lightbend.com/pov
Reactive RoundtableWorld Tour by Lightbend
lightbend.com/reactive-roundtable
Proof of Value ServiceAccelerate Project Success
top related