Steering Committee 2-15-2013

Post on 09-Jul-2015

1002 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

2/15/2013 Steering Committee

Transcript

Steering CommitteePeoria/Riverside Transit Study

February 15, 2013

Agenda

1. Definitions of Alternatives

2. Evaluation Results

3. Preferred Alternative

4. Next Steps

2/19/2013 2

Scenario Comparison

2/19/2013 3

Scenario A Scenario C Scenario D Scenario EScenario B

4,050 4,050 3,950 3,950 3,690

Existing Transit Riders

Based on technical analysis and public input, move forward with Scenario B(66th St. North to 81st & Lewis)

Trip Destinations

2/19/2013 4

Destinations for All trips on Route 105 Destinations for Work trips on Route 105

Ride Check Survey

2/19/2013 5

• April 24-26, 2012

(Tuesday – Thursday)

• 9 Routes surveyed

• 9 routes accounted for 64% of total ridership, of which 25% was on Route 105 (Peoria)

• 20% flag stops (5% of riders)

• Major stops at Pine, DAS, 41st

Street, 61st Street, and 81st

Street

• 4,000+ benefitting riders

Grouping On Board + Boardings

N Peoria + S Peoria 1,681

N Peoria + Downtown 2,819

S Peoria + Downtown 3,728

All Segments 4,114

Study Goals

• Goal 1: Improve Transit Access and Regional Mobility

• Goal 2: Support Economic Development

• Goal 3: Invest in Low-Cost, High-Impact Transit Infrastructure

• Goal 4: Build Community Support for the Value of Transit

Peoria-Riverside Transit Study Goals

2/19/2013 6

Description of Alternatives

• Bus Rapid Transit- BRT (based on MAP-21 requirement)

• Bus Rapid Transit Light – BRT Light

• Fast Bus

• Tulsa Enhanced

• Tulsa (+) Plus

• “No Build”

2/19/2013 7

BRT

2/19/2013 8

• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 50 min. Trip Time

BRT stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)

10-15 minute headways

5:30am-8:30pm

Monday-Sunday

Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.

Replaces Route 105

DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

ILLUMINATION

BRT Light

2/19/2013 9

• BRT LIGHT 50 min. Trip Time

BRT Light stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)

15-20 minute headways

5:30am-8:30pm

Monday-Sunday

Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.

Replaces Route 105

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

ILLUMINATION

Fast Bus

2/19/2013 10

• FAST BUS 50 min. Trip Time

Fast Bus stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)

30 minute headways (15 min w/rte 105)

5:30am-10:30pm

Monday-Saturday

Local Rt. 105 remains unchanged

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

ILLUMINATION

Tulsa Enhanced

2/19/2013 11

• TULSA ENHANCED 60 min. Trip Time

Stops every 2-3 Blocks (approx. 120 stops at 60 locations)

20 minute headways

5:30am-10:30pm

Monday-Saturday

Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.

Replaces Route 105

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

X TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

X ILLUMINATION

Tulsa (+) Plus

2/19/2013 12

• TULSA (+) PLUS 70 min. Trip Time

Local and Flag Stops (196 stops in 98 locations)

30 minute headways

5:30am-10:30pm

Monday-Saturday

Improves existing 105 service

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

X TICKET VENDING MACHINES

X NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

X PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

X SIDEWALKS

X ILLUMINATION

No Build

2/19/2013 13

• NO BUILD 75 min. Trip Time

Local and Flag Stops (196 stops in 98 locations)

30 minute headways

5:30am-8:30pm

Monday-Saturday

No change for existing 105

X DEDICATED LANES

X TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

X TICKET VENDING MACHINES

X NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

X PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

X SIDEWALKS

X ILLUMINATION

Evaluation Results

2/19/2013 14

Item Description BRT BRT LIGHT FAST BUSTULSA

ENHANCED

TULSA

PLUS

EXISTING

ROUTE 105

TRAVEL TIME

VISIBILTY AND

PERCEPTION

COMFORT AND

RELIABILITY

SAFETY

CAPITAL COST

OPERATING COST

change from

existing

FEASIBILITY -

Percent of Tulsa Transit

Annual Operating

Budget*

= 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5

$ 20.6M $ 18.6M $16.0M $ 17.6M $ 12.2M $0

$ 3.1M $ 2.7M $ 2.6M $ 2.5M $1.5M $1.3M

+ $1.8M + $1.4M + $1.3M + $1.2M + $0.2MNo Change from

Existing

17% 15% 15% 14% 8% 7%

*Based on Tulsa Transit Annual Operating Budget of $18 M

Item Description BRT BRT LIGHT FAST BUSTULSA

ENHANCED

TULSA

PLUS

EXISTING

ROUTE 105

TRAVEL TIME

VISIBILTY AND

PERCEPTION

COMFORT AND

RELIABILITY

SAFETY

CAPITAL COST

OPERATING COST

change from

existing

FEASIBILITY -

Percent of Tulsa Transit

Annual Operating

Budget*

SUMMARY SCORE

Evaluation Results

15

21 24 25 20 19 18

2/19/2013

= 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5

Fast Bus

2/19/2013 16

• FAST BUS 50 min. Trip Time, Stops @ 1/2 –mi spacing

30 minute headways (15 min w/Rt. 105)

5:30am-10:30pm, Monday-Saturday

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

ILLUMINATION

CAPITAL COST $16.0 M

OPERATING COST

change from existing

$2.6 M

+ $1.3 M

FEASIBILITY - Percent of

Annual Operating Budget15%

BRT Light

2/19/2013 17

• BRT LIGHT 50 min. Trip Time, Stops @ 1/2–mi spacing

15-20 minute headways

5:30am-10:30pm, Monday-Saturday

X DEDICATED LANES

TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT SIGNAL

TICKET VENDING MACHINES

NEXT BUS ARRIVAL

PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

SIDEWALKS

ILLUMINATION

CAPITAL COST $18.6 M

OPERATING COST

change from existing

$2.7 M

+ $1.4 M

FEASIBILITY - Percent of

Annual Operating Budget15%

Big Questions

• Which option do you think will be best for Tulsa?

• Why is that your favored option?

• Do you think that option will be likely to receive the needed financial support for implementation and operation?

• Is there consensus among the Steering Committee members?

2/19/2013 18

Big Questions

Wrapping up the Planning Process

• MTTA Board (Feb. 26th)

• INCOG Transportation Policy Committee (Feb. 27)

• INCOG Board (March 12)

Potential Sponsors with funding commitment

• City of Tulsa

• MTTA

• Tulsa County

2/19/2013 19

Next Steps

• Environmental Clearance

• Funding Commitments

– Local commitment first

– Federal grants?

• Design

• Implementation

2/19/2013 20

top related