Statement of Consultation - East Hampshire of... · Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council ... BNP Paribas Real Estate ... Environment Agency Estate Office F. R. Northcott Farm Manager
Post on 09-Apr-2018
216 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Statement
of
Consultation
Proposed Main Modifications Housing and
Employment Allocations
January 2016
1
Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation ................. 2
Who was invited to make representations? ..................................................................... 2
How were they invited to make representations? ............................................................ 2
Summary of comments and how they have been addressed ........................................... 3
Outcome ......................................................................................................................... 3
Appendix A – Consultees
Appendix B – Letter to all consultees
Appendix C – Response form
Appendix D – Deposit locations
Appendix E – Summary of representations received
Appendix F – Schedule of Proposed Main Modifications
Appendix G – Schedule of Proposed Minor Modifications
2
1.0 Introduction
1.1 This statement has been published to accompany the Council‘s Propose Main Modifications on the Submission East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan).
1.2 The purpose of this statement is to provide a summary of the Councils’ consultation process and outcomes. The statement has been prepared in accordance with the Town and Country (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.
2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation
2.1 The Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications was published for public consultation on 23 November and closed at 12 noon on 8 January 2016, lasting for a period of six weeks.
Who was invited to make representations?
2.2 All ‘specific consultation bodies’, ‘general consultation bodies’ and Councillors
were consulted. A full list of those bodies that were sent notification of the public consultation can be found within Appendix A.
2.3 Also all those people who had expressed a wish for their contact details to be
placed on the Council’s Local Plan consultation database were also invited to make representations (approximately 1,000 individuals and organisations). The consultation was open to all members of the public, District Councillors and Parish Council members.
How were they invited to make representations?
2.4 A letter was sent out by email or post to over 1,000 individuals and companies on
the council’s database inviting them to make representations and explaining how to do so by either filling out a response form or writing to us by email or by post. All District Councillors and Parish Councils were also contacted with the same information. The letter sent can be found in Appendix B. A copy of the representations form can also be found in Appendix C.
2.5 All the Plan documents including the Proposed Main Modifications, Site
Allocations Plan, the addendum Sustainability Appraisal and addendum Habitats Regulation Assessment statement were made available to view at the Council Offices as well as several deposit locations across the District (Appendix D).
2.6 All documents were available to download from the Council website
(www.easthants.gov.uk) and details of how to make representations were available.
2.7 Consultees were invited to make representations on the Proposed Main
Modifications only. A schedule of minor modifications, a plan showing the changes and a plan incorporating the changes were also made available.
3
Summary of comments and how they have been addressed
2.8 In total 30 individuals, organisations and statutory consultees commented. 7 representations received did not relate to the Proposed Main Modifications and were rejected by the Council. A written response was sent to each informing them of this. In total 186 comments were accepted on the proposed main modifications, 14 were in support of the changes. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the number of the representations received for each Policy. A summary of the comments received is attached at Appendix E. Appendix E only summarises the sections of representations which relate to the proposed modifications.
Policy Number of responses
Policy EMP1 2
Policy EMP2 16
Policy HN1 31
Policy HN2 5
Policy LP1 18
Policy CF1 9
Policy CF2 2
Policy CF3 3
Policy RC1 8
Policy RC2 16
Policy RC3 4
Policy FM1 3
Policy FM2 3
Policy FM3 7
Policy VL1 2
Policy VL2 4
Policy VL3 5
Policy VL4 5
Policy VL5 4
Policy VL6 5
Policy VL7 4
Policy VL8 3
Policy VL9 2
Policy VL10 4
Policy VL11 3
Policy VL12 2
Policy VL13 4
General 5
Outcome
2.9 The outcome of the consultation has resulted in two of the proposed main
modifications being withdrawn. These are MM53 and MM56 and they have been deleted from the schedule of proposed main modifications attached at appendix F.
2.10 A number of additional Minor Modifications have also been added. A full list of
these is set out in Appendix G.
5
Appendix A – Consultees
Organisation
6a Vision
A.H. Graham & Partners
A.O Broadway
A2 Dominion Group
Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd
Adams Integra
Advoco Planning
Alice Holt Action Group
Alliance Planning
Alton Business Club
Alton Chamber of Commerce
Alton Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Alton Society
Alton Town Council
Alton Town Partnership
Alton Western Bypass Action Group
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited
Annetts Farm
Applegarth Farm Shop
Ashill Developments
Association of Petersfield Businesses
Aviation Tool Corporation
Barratt Homes (Southampton)
Barton Willmore
Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council
Bedales School,
Bell Cornwell Partnership
Bellway Homes
Bentley Parish Council
Bentworth Parish Council
Bighton Parish Council
Blackburne & Haynes
Blackmoor Apple Shop
Blackmoor Estates Ltd
Blackmoor Game Ltd
Blue Sky Planning Ltd
BNP Paribas Real Estate
Bonnington Architects Ltd
Bordon Area Action Group
Bordon Area Action Group
Bovis Homes (SE Region)
Bowtell's Farm Shop
6
Boyer Planning
Boyes Turner Solicitors
Bradbeer Planning Ltd
Bradley Parish Meeting
Bramdean & Hinton Ampner Parish Council
Bramshott & Liphook Parish Council
Bramshott & Liphook Preservation Soc
British Telecommunications Plc
Brocks Farm Shop
Brookworth Homes Ltd
Bryan Jezeph Consultancy
Buriton Parish Council
Business East Hants
C J Butler Farms Ltd
Calleva Medical Ltd
Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) East Hampshire
Campaign for Real Ale Ltd
Candovers Parish Council
Carter Jonas
Catherington Village Residents' Assoc
CB Richard Ellis
Celab Limited
CGMS Consulting
Chawton Parish Council
Chawton Parish Plan Committee
Chawton Park Farm
Chichester District Council
Churt Parish Council
Civil Aviation Authority
Clarke Gammon Wellers
Cluttons LLP
Colliers CRE
Community Action Hampshire
Community First East Hampshire
Community Response
Compton Parish Council
Connell Land & Planning
Corrie & Co Ltd
Country Landowners & Business Association
Country Markets
Countrywide
CPRE (East Hants Branch)
CPRE (Hampshire)
Crest Nicholson
Crondall Parish Council
Crown Estates
7
Cyclists Touring Club Right to Ride
D & M Planning Partnership
Dalton Warner Davis LLP
David Ames Associates
David Wilson Homes Southern
DCM (Tews) Ltd
Deadwater Valley Trust
Defence Estates - South West
Denmead Parish Council
DHA Planning & Development
Dialogue Communicating Planning
Dockenfield Parish Council
Dr June Chatfield
Drivers Jonas LLP
DTZ
Durleighmarsh Farm Shop
East Hampshire Association of Parish and Town Councils
East Hampshire Cyclists Forum
East Hampshire Disability Forum
East Hampshire District Council
East Tisted Village Stores
Eastleigh Borough Council
Elstream Developments
Energy Alton
English Hampshire Lavender
English Heritage (Southern Region)
Entec UK Ltd
Environment Agency
Estate Office
F. R. Northcott
Farm Manager
Farnham Town Council
Farringdon Parish Council
Fight4FourMarks
fit2cook
Foreman Homes
Forestry Commission
Forge Farm
Format Milton Architects Ltd
Four Marks Parish Council
Frensham Parish Council
Friends, Families, Travellers and Law Reform Project
Froxfield Parish Council
G L Hearn
General Secretary Showmens Guild of Gt Britain
Genesis Town Planning
8
Gladman Developments
Goadsby & Harding (Commercial) Ltdb
Gosport Borough Council
Grange Farm Shop
Grayshott Hall Health Centre
Grayshott Pottery
Grayshott Society
GVA Grimley Ltd
Hambledon Parish Council
Hammer Trout Farm & Smokery
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust
Hampshire Chamber of Commerce
Hampshire Constabulary
Hampshire Constabulary Property Services
Hampshire County Council
Hampshire County Youth Service
Hampshire No 2 Circuit of Jehovah's Witnesses
Hampshire Playing Fields Assc
Hampshire Police Authority
Hampshire Primary Care Trust
Hansus Cottage Produce
Hants Farming & Wildlife Advisory Group
Hart District Council
Harting Parish Council
Haslemere Town Council
Havant Borough Council
Headley Down Community Association
Headley Parish Council
Henry Adams Planning Ltd
Herriard Parish Council
Hewetts Solicitors
Highways Agency
Hollywater Society
Holybourne Residents Association
Home Builders Federation
Homes & Communities Agency
Homes and Communities Agency (HCA)
Horndean Business Group
Horndean Parish Council
Hotel Solutions
Howard Hutton & Associates
Hyden Farm Organics
Ian Judd & Partners LLP
J & K Walther
J E Boyson & Son
J G Luff
9
J Rook Manor Farm Ltd
J S Evans Farm
John R Nicholson
Johnson Designs
Kevin Scott Consultancy
Kingsbridge Homes
Kirkwells
Knight Frank LLP
Laleham Healthcare PLC
Lambert Smith Hampton (NOMS)
Leith Planning
LEVVEL
Linchmere Parish Council
Lindford Parish Council
Liss & Liphook Surgeries
Liss Forest Residents Association
Liss Parish Council
Liss Village Design Group
Long Sutton Parish Council
Lucas Land and Planning
Luken Beck Ltd
M J Tosdevine & Son
M L Wilson & Son Ltd
Maltby Engineers Limited
Martin Critchley Associates
Martin Robeson Planning Practice
Martineau
Matthew Utting
MB Planning & Prows Ltd
McKenzie Brothers
Medstead Parish Council
Mill Farm Organic
Milland Parish Council
Ministry of Defence
Mobile Operators Association (MOA)
Mono Consultants Ltd
Mr Richard Stubbs
Mr Whitehead's Cider Company
MV & VH Povey
National Farmers Union
National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups
National Grid PLC
National Landlord's Association
National Trust
Natural England
Neame Sutton Ltd
10
Network Rail Property
New Forest District Council
NMB Planning Ltd
North Hampshire CCG
Northern Wey Trust
Northington Parish Council
Old Alresford Parish Council
Old Thorns Golf and Country Estate
Open Spaces Society
P G Lambert & Son
Paris Smith & Randall LLP
Peacock & Smith
Peak Quality Homes
Peter Brett Associates
Petersfield & District CAB
Petersfield Area Historic Society
Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group
Petersfield Society
Petersfield Tomorrow
Petersfield Tomorrow Town Design Statement Group
Petersfield Town Council
Phillips & Son Ltd
Planning Potential Ltd
PlanningSphere Ltd
Pollen Organics
Portsmouth City Council
Portsmouth Water plc
Preston Candover & Nutley Parish Council
ProVision Planning & Design
PRP Architects
Pub With No Name
PUSH
Queen Elizabeth Country Park
Radian
Rail Regional Policy & Deliv Dept of Transport Rail Groupart
Reed Farm Partnership
Reside Developments Ltd
Residents of Eastland Gate
Richard Ashby Associates
Robert Tutton
Rogate Parish Council
Roger Hill Architects
Ropley Society
Rother Valley Organics
Rowlands Castle Association
Rowlands Castle Parish Council
11
Rowledge Resdents' Association
Royal Mail Estates
RPS Planning
RSPB
Rushmoor Borough Council
Rydon Homes
S R Wittcomb
S. W Budden
Savills
Scott Brownrigg & Turner
Scottish & Southern Energy
Selborne Brickworks
Selborne Parish Council
Selborne Village Shop
Sheet Village Association
Sigma Planning Services
Simmons & Sons
Smiths Gore
Society of Sussex Downsmen
Somerfield
South Downs Gospel Hall Trust
South Downs Joint Committee
South Downs National Park Authority
South Downs Society
South East Hampshire CCG
South East Water
South Warnborough Parish Council
South West Trains
Southern Gas Networks (formerly Transco)
Southern Planning Practice
Southern Water Services
Sovereign Kingfisher
Sport England (SE Region)
Stewart Ross Associates
Stoughton Parish Council
Strutt & Parker
Surrey County Council
Susan Organ
Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio (Cellnet)
Terence O'Rourke
Test Valley Borough Council
TFA Ltd
The Courtyard Community Village Shop
The Environment Centre
The Good Intent
12
The Petersfield School
The Planning Bureau Ltd
The Secretary Alton & District Sports Council
The Selborne Arms
The Theatres Trust
The Waterlooville Trust
Thomas Eggar LLP
Tilford Parish Council
Timms Turkeys
Tourism South East
Town and Country Planning Association
Triple FFF Brewing
Turley Associates
Upton Grey Parish Council
Urban DNA
Vail Williams LLP
W A Wood
Waggoners Wells Residents Association
Waverley Borough Council
West Meon Parish Council
West Sussex County Council
West Waddy ADP
Westella
Weston Corbett & Weston Patrick Parish Meeting
White Young Green
Whitehill & Bordon Town Partnership
Whitehill Town Council
Winchester City Council
Woolf Bond LLP
Woolmer Service Station Ltd
Worldham Parish Council
13
Appendix B – Letter to all consultees Dear Sir/Madam, The modifications on the Council’s Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan) are now out for public consultation. As part of the examination process, East Hampshire District Council has prepared a number of suggested changes to the plan, known as 'proposed modifications'. These modifications fall into two types: 'minor modifications', which if implemented would not significantly change the meaning of the Site Allocations Plan and generally cover typographical errors or factual updates. However, the second type known as 'main modifications' are more substantial in that, for example, they would change the meaning of a policy or proposal in the plan. In addition to the 'main modifications' the Council produced a separate schedule of 'minor modifications'. However, these are for information only and do not form part of the consultation. The Inspector asked that the schedule of 'main modifications' be subject to a six week period of consultation: this consultation runs from 23 November 2015 to 12 noon on 8 January 2016. The schedule of proposed main modifications can be found on the Councils website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/ehdc-local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination. The Inspector will consider all comments made on these main modifications prior to issuing his final recommendations in the form of an Inspector's Report. Please note comments will only be considered that refer to a change as shown in the Schedule of Main Modifications. Representations can be made by completing a response form and emailing to localplan@easthants.gov.uk or by writing to Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council, Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4EX. Only those representations that are made in writing and are received by the Council within the six week period ending noon on Friday 8 January 2016 will be considered. If you would like any more information on the Site Allocations Plan, its associated documents or the Local plan process then please contact the Planning Policy team on 01730 234280 or visiting the Council’s website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination-library. Yours Faithfully,
Victoria Potts Planning Policy Team Manager
14
Appendix C – Response form
East Hampshire District Council Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) Main Modifications consultation 23 November 2015 – 8 January 2016 Main Modifications Consultation Form The East Hampshire District Housing and Employment Allocations Plan Schedule of Main Modifications (SASMM) includes a series of changes to the published Plan. These suggested changes are being consulted on for a period of six weeks. For advice on how to respond to the consultation, and how to fill in this form please see the guidance notes on the Council’s Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) website: http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan Submitting comments: Please fill in this form and return:
Via email to: localplan@easthants.gov.uk
By posting to: Planning Policy Team
East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX
Comments must be received by 12 noon on 8 January 2016. Comments
received after this time will not be accepted and will not be considered by
the Inspector.
Please fill a separate form for each Main Modification you are commenting on.
Please clearly identify which Main Modification your comments refer to using the
reference (i.e. MM1, MM2 etc.) in the SASMM.
For East
Hampshire use
Respondent no:
Representation
no:
15
Please do not repeat your previous comments as these have already been
considered by the Planning Inspector. Comments will only be considered that
refer to a change as shown in the SASMM.
All comments received on the proposed changes within the time period will be
considered by the Planning Inspector as part of the examination of the Site
Allocations Plan. The Inspector may wish to contact you to discuss your
comments and concerns, prior to concluding the formal examination into the Plan.
The personal information will only be used for purposes related to the consultation
and the Site Allocations Plan examination. The Council will place all the
representations and the names of those who made them on its website, but will
not publish personal information such as telephone numbers, emails or private
addresses. However other information will be shared with the Planning Inspector.
The information relating to your comments on the Main Modification (Part B) will
be published on the Site Allocations Plan examination webpage.
A) Your details:
1) Who is making this representation?
Name:
Organisation (if applicable):
Address:
Email:
Telephone:
Client’s details (only applicable if you are acting as agent on behalf of another person or business)
Name:
Organisation (if applicable):
Address:
Email:
Telephone:
16
B) Your representations: What do you wish to object to/support?
Please use a separate form for each Main Modification you wish to comment on. Only comments relating to a proposed Main Modification will be considered.
1) Please give the Main Modification reference your comment relates to.
Main Modification reference - MM:
2) Do you consider the proposed Main Modification addresses the following
issues in relation to the policies concerned?
Yes No Legally compliant Positively prepared Justified Effective Consistent with national policy
3) If you have answered ‘no’ to any of the above please specify your reason for
objecting below. You should make clear why the Main Modification is either
not legally compliant and/or unsound having regard to whether the
modification is not: positively prepared; justified; effective; or, not
consistent with national policy. Please see guidance notes for explanation of
these terms:
Continue on a separate sheet if necessary
17
4) Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the East
Hampshire Housing and Employment Main Modification legally compliant
and/or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested
revised wording of any policy or text. Please be as precise as possible.
Continue on a separate sheet if necessary.
Please note you should cover all the information, evidence and supporting information necessary to justify the representation and the suggested change. After this stage, further submissions will only be accepted at the request of the Inspector. You must return this form by 12 noon on Friday 8 January 2016. You can e-mail it to: localplan@easthants.gov.uk Or return by post to:
Planning Policy,
East Hampshire District Council
Penns Place
Petersfield
Hampshire
GU31 4EX
18
Appendix D – Deposit locations Deposit Locations: 1. Planning Reception, Monday - Friday East Hampshire District Council, 09:00 am - 05:00 pm Penns Place, Petersfield, Hants
GU31 4EX 2. Alton Information Office, Monday - Friday 7 Cross and Pillory Lane, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Alton, Hants GU34 1HL. (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) Saturdays 09.30 am - 12.00pm 3. Bordon Information Office Monday - Friday Forest Community Centre, 09:00 am - 04:45 pm Pinehill Road, Bordon, Hants (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) GU35 0BS 4. Horndean Parish Office, Monday - Friday Tyfield House, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Blendworth Lane, Horndean, Hants. PO8 0AA 5. Bramshott and Liphook Parish Monday - Friday Office, The Haskell Centre, 10:00 am - 04:00 pm Midhurst Road, Liphook, Hants. (Closed 01:00 pm - 02:00 pm) GU30 7TN 6. Local Libraries at Alton, Bordon, During normal opening hours Horndean,
Liphook and Petersfield.
Appendix E
Response number Rep Made Agent/Organsiation Obo? Modification
number Policy Summary of response
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 3 EMP1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 4 EMP1
Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 11 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 11 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 12 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 12 EMP2
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 12 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 13 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 13 EMP2
Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 13 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 14 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 14 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 15 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 15 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 16 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 16 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 17 EMP2
An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 17 EMP2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 18 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 18 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 19 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 19 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 20 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 20 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 21 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 21 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
Appendix E
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 22 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 22 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 23 HN1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 23 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 24 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 25 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust26 HN1
By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 26 HN1
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 26 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 27 HN1
New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 27 HN1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 27 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
Appendix E
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 28 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 28 HN1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 28 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 29 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 29 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
12 Martin Small Historic England 30 HN1
This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and would weaken the protection HN1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of....".
14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 30 HN1
The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 30 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 31 HN1Council express overall agreement but wish to express disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 31 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 32 HN1Council express overall agreement but wish to express disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 32 HN1
This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 36 HN2Appears to be a modification of a landscaping criterion to refelct the permission already granted in the policy.
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust37 HN2
No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 37 HN2The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 38 HN2
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 39 HN2
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 41 LP1 The proposed wording is supported.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 42 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against negative traffic impact is supported.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 42 LP1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for this site. The original wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed wording is unhelpful and HCC recommend that the previous wording should be retained.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 43 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding on-site movement is supported.
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust44 LP1
No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 44 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme is supported.
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 44 LP1The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust45 LP1
Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".
17 Heather Richards RSPB 45 LP1
Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 45 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against adverse impact on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 is supported.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 46 LP1The removal of the reference to the FRA from this policy is supported.
9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 46 LP1
Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 47 LP1The removal of the reference to provide infrastructure for sewerage (on and off site) from this policy is supported.
9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 47 LP1
Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 48 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding noise mitigation is supported.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 49 LP1The proposed amended wording regarding land contamination is supported.
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 50 LP1The removal of the reference to an Energy Strategy is supported as it is acknowledged that this requirement is covered in JCS Policy CP24.
Appendix E
20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 51 LP1
The removal of the reference to the provision of an Employment and Training Agreement is supported as it is acknowledged that this is required through policy CP5 of the JCS.
1 John and Anne Vincent 53 CF1
Down Farm Development site access has been changed to Green Lane only and the reference to the Chalton Lane access has been removed. Proposed wording "provide vehicular access to the site via Green Lane".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 54 CF1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
1 John and Anne Vincent 56 CF1
The words bowling green and been replaced by tennis courts. This does not reflect the planning permission for the allocation site but for the adjacent site. Proposed wording "provide public open space to include allotments, tennis courts, sports pitches, a sports pavillion and children's play facilities".
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust57 CF1
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 58 CF1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 59 CF1
New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.
Appendix E
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 59 CF1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
12 Martin Small Historic England 60 CF1
This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and would weaken the protection CF1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 64 CF1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 67 CF2Is the removal of a landscaping criterion because it is considered to be covered by JCS Policy CP29.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust68 CF2
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust74 CF3
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 74 CF3
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 78 CF2
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 80 RC1 Seems to be a weakening of the existing policy condition.
12 Martin Small Historic England 81 RC1
This modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of development on this site. It would also remove the helpful suggestion of early consultation with Historic England and HCC. The proposal is inadequate as it only requires any adverse impact to be "mitigated". This would weaken the protection RC1 affords to heritage assets. The SA Addendum fails to to identify the full extent of the proposed changes but still concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the existing wording of criterion e of Policy RC1.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust82 RC1
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 82 RC1
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
17 Heather Richards RSPB 83 RC1
We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed.
Appendix E
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 84 RC1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 85 RC1
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 86 RC1
New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 89 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 90 RC1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 90 RC1
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 91 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 92 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust93 RC2
By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 93 RC2
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 93 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 94 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
17 Heather Richards RSPB 95 RC2
We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 95 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
Appendix E
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 96 RC2
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 96 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 97 RC2
Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 97 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 98 RC2
New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 98 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
12 Martin Small Historic England 99 RC2
The proposed modification MM30 would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection that HN1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 99 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 100 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 101 RC2
This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 103 RC2
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust106 RC3
By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corrifors will be required".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 106 RC3
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
17 Heather Richards RSPB 107 RC3
We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed.
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 112 RC3
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
12 Martin Small Historic England 115 FM1
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to establish a record of the potential significance of the site. The reason for this proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM1.
19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 116 FM1
We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.
19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 117 FM1
We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust123 FM2
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 124 FM2
We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 128 FM3
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
Appendix E
12 Martin Small Historic England 132 FM3
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. The reason for this proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM3.
8 Roy Pullen Medstead PC 132 FM3
There is an inconsistency in the wording - on two different sites but covering the same problem. FM2 - provide improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge. FM3 - provide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road bridge.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust133 FM3
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 133 FM3
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 134 FM3
We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.
19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 135 FM3
We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 139 VL1
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
12 Martin Small Historic England 142 VL1
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated and weaken the protection that policy VL1 affords to a nationally important heritage asset. Reword as "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the Bentworth Conservation Area and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals".
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust143 VL1
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
12 Martin Small Historic England 149 VL2
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated. This would weaken the protection VL2 affords to nationally important heritage assets. Although both the existing criterion d and proposed new criterion e both refer to a Scheduled Ancient Monument, our records do not show any such monuments on or near the allcation site at Crows Lane. Retain the wording "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area and demonstrate hwo any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals".
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust150 VL2
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 150 VL2
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 154 VL3
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
2 Angela Jackson 156 VL3
The deletion of the sentence 'This should include measures to minimise the impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees and hedgerows within the site' has a specific significance not covered by the substituted text. It was not mentioned at the Examination that these words would be cut out, vitial to preserve the character of the local area. I request that the deleted sentence be re-instated to say "the existing woodland, mature trees and hedegrows must be protected".
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust156 VL3
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 156 VL3
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust157 VL3
Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".
17 Heather Richards RSPB 157 VL3
Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 162 VL4
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust164 VL4
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 164 VL4
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust165 VL4
Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".
Appendix E
17 Heather Richards RSPB 165 VL4
Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 170 VL5
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust172 VL5
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 172 VL5
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
12 Martin Small Historic England 175 VL5
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL5 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 179 VL6
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust181 VL6
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
Appendix E
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 181 VL6
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust182 VL6
Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".
17 Heather Richards RSPB 182 VL6
Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".
6 Nick StenningMedstead and Four Marks
Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group
186 VL7
It is the view of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group that we do not think that this reworded criterion will address the adverse traffic impacts from development of this site.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 186 VL7
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust188 VL7
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 188 VL7
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 193 VL8
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust196 VL8
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 196 VL8
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 200 VL9
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust202 VL9
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 207 VL10
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust209 VL10
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 209 VL10
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
12 Martin Small Historic England 211 VL10
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL10 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. Retain the wording " provide for the retention and careful management...".
Appendix E
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 214 VL11
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust216 VL11
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 216 VL11
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 220 VL12
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust222 VL12
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 227 VL13
HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.
Appendix E
15 Trevor CodlinHampshire & IOW Wildlife
Trust229 VL13
There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".
21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 229 VL13
The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.
12 Martin Small Historic England 231 VL13
The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL13 affords to potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".
4 R Bowery Liss Parish Council Support
The proposed modifications were considered at our Planning Committee on 7th December & LPC comments that it welcomes the modifications.
7 Pat Harris Alton Town Council SupportThe Planning and Transportation Committee Members agreed they had no comment to make.
13 Dr Pauline HolmesDorset, Hampshire & IOW
Area Team for Natural EnglandSupport
We have reviewed these modifications and have no comments to make.
16 Patrick Blake Highways England Support
We have reviewed the modifications and have no comment at this time
23 Lucy Howard South Downs National Park SupportThe NPA does not have any comments to make on the Main Modifications.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM1 EMP1 14
An overall site area of 9.4ha is allocated to accommodate
about 7ha of employment land. The site will be developed in
accordance with the following site specific criteria:
An overall site area of 9.4ha is allocated to accommodate
about 7ha of employment land. The site will be developed in
accordance with the following site specific criteria.
Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM2 EMP1 a a 14 provision of vehicular priority access from Waterbrook Road; provide vehicular access to the site; Provides flexibility.
MM3 EMP1 b b 14implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM4 EMP1 c 14 consider improving access to public transport; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31.
MM5 EMP1 d c 14
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network;
Clarification.
MM6 EMP1 e d 14
provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to
minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton
and the surrounding area;
provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of
development on the setting of Alton;Consistency.
MM7 EMP1 h 14
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should
be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater
than the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM8 EMP1 i 14
investigation of the extent and type of any contamination on
the site and identify any necessary mitigation measures
required;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP27.
MM9 EMP1 j 14
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM10 EMP1 k 14provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM11 EMP2 16
An overall site area of 3.55ha is allocated to accommodate
about 3ha of employment land. The site will be developed in
accordance with the following site specific criteria:
An overall site area of 3.55ha is allocated to accommodate
about 3ha of employment land. The site will be developed in
accordance with the following site specific criteria.
Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM12 EMP2 b 16implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM13 EMP2 c 16 enhance the bus facilities on Wilsom Road; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31.
MM14 EMP2 e 16maintain the footpath through Lynch Hill and retain the rural
entrance to it;DELETE Covered by new criteria c.
MM15 EMP2 i g 16
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
show that any loss of floodplain can be fully compensated.
Details should also include a Surface Water Disposal
Strategy. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the
run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place;
fully compensate any loss of floodplain; Site specific issue and remainder
covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM16 EMP2 j 16
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM17 EMP2 k 16provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM18 HN1 • extra care provision for the elderly;• a Care Village including independent living units and extra
care provision for older people
Clarification and reflecting
planning application.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM19 HN1 • a new 2FE primary school. • a new primary school and land for future expansion.
MM20 HN1The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific
MM21 HN1 c c 21provision of community facilities, including a two form entry
primary school, community centre and convenience shop;
provide community facilities, including a primary school,
community centre and convenience shop;Consistency.
MM22 HN1 d d 21
provision of vehicular access to all residential and
employment areas of the site, including access from
Rowlands Castle Road to serve land north of
Rowlands Castle Road and access from the B2149 (Havant
Road) to serve land north-east and south-west of Havant
Road;
provide vehicular access from Rowlands Castle Road to
serve land north of that road only and access from the B2149
(Havant Road) to serve the remainder of the site;
Site specific requirement to
reflect planning permission.
MM23 HN1 e e 21
provision of measures to reduce the traffic impacts of the
development on adjoining residential roads and improve
accessibility by non-car transport modes including the
provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network and provision over the A3)M) Junction 2, and the
ability to service the site by public transport;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local and strategic road network;Clarification.
MM24 HN1 f f 21
provision of new footpaths through the site to link with
Horndean Village, Hazleton Common and the South Downs
National Park;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Right of Way network, Horndean Village, Hazleton Common
and the South Downs National Park;
Clarification and consistency.
MM25 HN1 i i 21
include appropriate green infrastructure provision creating
connections to the wider green infrastructure network,
including improving the habitat connectivity between the
adjoining SINCs (Redcroft Row, Hazelton Common, Pyle
Farm Meadow South and The Holt);
provide new green infrastructure to connect with the wider
network, and to improve the habitat connectivity between the
adjoining SINCs;
Clarification.
MM26 HN1 j j 21
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to protect key
species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, woodland and
mature trees on the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification.
MM27 HN1 k 21
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should
also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the
site identified in order to protect the aquifer;
DELETECovered by JCS Policy CP25 and
by new criteria K.
MM28 HN1 l k 21
demonstrate that any development will not result in
contamination of groundwater as the site lies within
groundwater source protection zone 1;
not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater
(including turbidity). Site specific issue.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM29 HN1 o m 21
investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the
site including any potential contamination from the adjacent
historic landfill sites, to identify any necessary mitigation
measures required;
ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through
remediation works; andClarification.
MM30 HN1 p n 21
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance;
manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification.
MM31 HN1 q 21
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM32 HN1 r 21provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM33 HN2
Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential
development for about 40 dwellings on 2.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential
development for about 40 dwellings on 2.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM34 HN2 b b 22implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification
MM35 HN2 c c 22
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network including retention of and connection to the public
footpath along the northern edge of the site;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network and the public footpath along the
northern edge of the site;
Clarification and consistency.
MM36 HN2 d d 22
respond positively to the sensitive rural landscape character
to the western boundary and strengthen the green
infrastructure connections linking the wider area;
provide semi-natural open space along the western boundary
and strengthen links to the wider green infrastructure network;To reflect planning permission
MM37 HN2 e e 22
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on protected trees, including veteran
tree and woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts
are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MM38 HN2 f 22
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy.
Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and
off site drainage works and measures to prevent surface
water from the site discharging onto the adjacent highway.
The site should attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no
greater than the run-off prior to development taking place.
Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive
areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer;
DELETECovered by JCS Policy CP25 and
by new criteria f.
MM39 HN2 g f 22
demonstrate that any development will not result in
contamination of groundwater as the site lies within
groundwater source protection zone 1; and
not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater
(including turbidity). Site specific issue.
MM40 HN2 h 22
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM41 LP1 24
Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for
residential development for about 175 dwellings on 10.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria
Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for
residential development for about 175 dwellings on 10.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM42 LP1 b b 24
implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads
and Longmoor Road;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network including Longmoor Road;Clarification
MM43 LP1 c c 24
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network and retain the public right of way in an attractive semi-
natural setting;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural
setting;
Clarification.
MM44 LP1 d d 24
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to protect key
species along the southern boundary and habitats on site
including protected trees, including veteran tree and
woodland. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable,
appropriate mitigation will be required. Any biodiversity
enhancements should take account of the Biodiversity
Opportunity Area;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification.
MM45 LP1 e e 24
provision of a Screening Assessment as the site is within 5km
of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could potentially
have a significant impact on the ecological integrity of the
SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the
provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any
adverse effects is required;
provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse
effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection
Area.
Clarification.
MM46 LP1 f 24
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM47 LP1 g 24ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM48 LP1 h f 24provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including
noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from A3(M);
provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and
barriers, to reduce traffic noise from the A3(M); and Clarification.
MM49 LP1 i g 24investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the
site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;
ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through
remediation works. Clarification.
MM50 LP1 j 24
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM51 LP1 k 24provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM52 CF1 28
Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development
for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development
for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM54 CF1 b b 28implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM55 CF1 c c 28
include measures to improve accessibility by non-car modes,
the ability to service the site by public transport and ensuring
the connection of the site with existing cycle and pedestrian
routes including connection to the existing cycle route running
alongside the A3 and the Public Right of Way network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the existing
cycle route running alongside the A3;
Consistency.
MM57 CF1 f f 28implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification.
MM58 CF1 g 28
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should
also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the
site identified in order to protect the aquifer;
DELETECovered by JCS Policies CP25
and CP26.
MM59 CF1 h 28ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM60 CF1 j h 28
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance;
manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification.
MM61 CF1 k 28
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM62 CF1 l 28provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM63 CF2 30
Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for
about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for
about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM64 CF2 a a 30
provision of vehicular access to the site via a new access link
forming a priority junction with Drift Road in the location of the
existing driveway;
provide vehicular access to the site via Drift Road in the
location of the existing driveway;Consistency.
MM65 CF2 b b 30implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM66 CF2 c c 30
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes; andClarification.
MM67 CF2 d 30 provision of appropriate landscaping; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP29.
MM68 CF2 e d 30implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM69 CF2 f 30
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site
should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no
greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;
and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM70 CF2 g 30
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM71 CF3 31
Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential
development for about 18 dwellings on 0.7ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential
development for about 18 dwellings on 0.7ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM72 CF3 b b 31implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM73 CF3 c c 31
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network;
Clarification.
MM74 CF3 e e 31
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to protect key
species and habitats that use the site. Where adverse
impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be
required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
MM75 CF3 f 31
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should
be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM76 CF3 g 31
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM77 RC1 32
Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is
allocated for residential development for about 34 dwellings
on 1.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is
allocated for residential development for about 34 dwellings
on 1.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM78 RC1 b b 32implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM79 RC1 c c 32
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network and to the National Cycle Route 22;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network and the National Cycle Route 22;
Clarification.
MM80 RC1 d d 32
retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting.
Any residual loss of amenity is to be compensated for by
improvements to the right of way network in the local area;
retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting. Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM81 RC1 e e 32
provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the
development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) of
Rowland’s Castle and the setting of the Conservation Area
and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into
account and avoided or minimised within the proposals. Early
consultation with English Heritage and Hampshire County
Council’s archaeology adviser would be advised;
mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient
Monument of Rowlands Castle and the setting of the
Conservation Area;
Clarification.
MM82 RC1 f f 32
Implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to protect key
species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, protected
trees, including veteran tree and woodland. Where adverse
impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be
required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats;
Clarification.
MM83 RC1 g g 32
provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of
recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of
additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar
sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy;
provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational
disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional
dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs),
Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and
Clarification.
MM84 RC1 h 32
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a
Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures
required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and
surface water flooding including avoiding built development in
low lying areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure
that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to
development taking place. Water should also be directed
away from the most sensitive areas of the site in order to
protect the aquifer;
DELETECovered by JCS Policies CP25
and CP26.
MM85 RC1 i 32
demonstrate that any development will not result in
contamination of groundwater as the site lies within
groundwater source protection zone 1;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM86 RC1 j 32ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM87 RC1 k h 32
investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the
site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;
and
ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through
remediation works.
MM88 RC1 l 32
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM89 RC2 34
Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential
development for about 106 dwellings on 5.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential
development for about 106 dwellings on 5.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM90 RC2 b b 34implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM91 RC2 c c 34
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network including access at both Redhill Road and the B2148
and to the existing bridleway and Cycle Route 22 located to
the east of the site;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network, Redhill Road, the B2148 and Cycle
Route 22;
Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM92 RC2 d d 34improve the pedestrian footway and provide crossing facilities
on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road;
provide crossing facilities on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road
and improve the pedestrian footway;Clarification.
MM93 RC2 e e 34
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme which should include a plan to manage, maintain
and enhance the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC’s
ecological integrity and interest. The Scheme should also
include measures to protect key species and habitats
including Bechstein Bats, hedgerows and mature trees.
Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate
mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site whilst managing, maintaining and enhancing
the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC's; and
Clarification.
MM94 RC2 f 34
provision of a network of green infrastructure that integrates
all existing trees (whether protected or not) with other
vegetation on the site and its boundaries;
DELETE Covered by new criteria e.
MM95 RC2 g f 34
provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of
recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of
additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar
sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy;
provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational
disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional
dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs),
Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites.
Clarification.
MM96 RC2 h 34
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a
Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures
required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and
surface water including avoiding built development in low lying
areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the
run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place. Water should also be directed away from the
most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect
the aquifer;
DELETECovered by JCS Policies CP25
and CP26.
MM97 RC2 i 34
demonstrate that any development will not result in
contamination of groundwater as the site lies within
groundwater source protection zone 1;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM98 RC2 j 34ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM99 RC2 k 34
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance;
DELETE To reflect planning permission.
MM100 RC2 l 34
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM101 RC2 m 34provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM102 RC3 36
Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages),
Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17
dwellings on 0.6ha as an extension of proposed housing
development in Havant Borough to the south.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages),
Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17
dwellings on 0.6ha, as an extension of proposed housing
development in Havant Borough.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM103 RC3 b b 36implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM104 RC3 c c 36
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network and provide a new pedestrian footpath along Bartons
Road to connect the site to Wakefords Way West and
improvements to the pedestrian crossing on Bartons Road;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM105 RC3 d 36retain the existing Armco vehicle barrier which protects the
railway embankment;DELETE
Vehicle barrier located outside of
District.
MM106 RC3 e d 36
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include the provision of an adequate
wooded buffer to the adjoining SINC and measures to protect
key species and habitats including Bechstein Bats. Where
adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will
be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and measures to protect key species and habitats on
site, whilst providing an adequate wooded buffer to the
adjoining SINC;
Clarification.
MM107 RC3 f e 36
provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of
recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of
additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar
sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy;
provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational
disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional
dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs),
Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and
Clarification.
MM108 RC3 g 36
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a
Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures
required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and
surface water including avoiding built development in low lying
areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the
run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM109 RC3 h 36
demonstrate that any development will not result in
contamination of groundwater as the site lies within
groundwater source protection zone 1; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM110 RC3 j 36
developers should work with the District Council to ensure
that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it
can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM111 FM1 38
Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential
development for about 107 dwellings on 3.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential
development for about 107 dwellings on 3.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM112 FM1 b b 38implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM113 FM1 c 38provide an assessment of the traffic implications at the nearby
railway bridge;DELETE
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM114 FM1 d c 38
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM115 FM1 e 38
the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to
establish a record of potential archaeological significance of
the site;
DELETETo reflect the planning
permission.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM116 FM1 g e 38
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy.
Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and
off site drainage works and include measures to prevent
surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent
highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-
off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place;
provide measures to prevent surface water from the site
discharging onto the adjacent highway;
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM117 FM1 h f 38ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM118 FM1 j 38
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM119 FM1 k 38provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM120 FM2 40
Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 79 dwellings on 3.9ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 79 dwellings on 3.9ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM121 FM2 bensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Consistency.
MM122 FM2 c d 40
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network;
Consistency.
MM123 FM2 d e 40implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Consistency.
MM124 FM2 e f 40
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy.
Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and
off site drainage works and include measures to prevent
surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent
highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-
off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place;
provide measures to prevent surface water from the site
discharging onto the adjacent highway.
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM125 FM2 f 40
developers should work with the District Council to ensure
that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it
can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM126 FM2 g 40provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior
to the implementation of development.DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5.
MM127 FM3 41
Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential
development for about 51 dwellings on 3.64ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential
development for about 51 dwellings on 3.64ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM128 FM3 b b 41implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM129 FM3 c c 41
improvement works to Boyneswood Lane, Boyneswood Lane
between its junction with footway provision on site and its
junction with Stoney Lane, and to Stoney Lane between its
junction with Boyneswood Lane and its junction with Station
Approach (unless suitable alternatives can be provided);
improve the highway between Boyneswood Lane and Stoney
Lane;Clarification.
MM130 FM3 d d 41
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network including the provision of a segregated pedestrian
footway across the Boyneswood Road bridge;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network
Clarification.
MM131 FM4 eprovide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road
bridge;Clarification and consistency.
MM132 FM3 e 41
the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to
establish a record of potential archaeological significance of
the site; and to identify any necessary mitigation measures
required;
DELETETo reflect the planning
permission.
MM133 FM3 f 41
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard any
protected species that use the site, minimise the impact of
development on protected trees, including veteran tree and
woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification.
MM134 FM3 h 41
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy.
Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and
off site drainage works and include measures to prevent
surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent
highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-
off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development
taking place;
provide measures to prevent surface water from the site
discharging onto the adjacent highway; and
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM135 FM3 i 41ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage,
water supply and electricity (on and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM136 FM3 j 41investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the
site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required;DELETE
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM137 FM3 l 41
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM138 VL1 44
Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential
development for about 12 dwellings on 1.27ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential
development for about 12 dwellings on 1.27ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM139 VL1 b b 44implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM140 VL1 c c 44
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM141 VL1 d d 44have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MM142 VL1 e e 44provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the
development on the nearby Bentworth Conservation Area;
mitigate any adverse impact on Bentworth Conservation Area;
andClarification.
MM143 VL1 f f 44
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take
account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
MM144 VL1 g 44
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM145 VL1 h 44ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site); andDELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM146 VL1 i 44
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM147 VL2 46
Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for
residential development for about 8 dwellings on 0.6ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for
residential development for about 8 dwellings on 0.6ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM148 VL2 b c 46
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM149 VL2 d e 46
provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the
development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and
the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area
and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into
account and avoided or minimised within the proposals;
mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient
Monument and the setting of the Upper Farringdon
Conservation Area;
Clarification.
MM150 VL2 f g 46
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
MM151 VL2 g 46
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM152 VL2 h 46
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM153 VL3 48
Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for
residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.4ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for
residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.4ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM154 VL3 b b 48implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM155 VL3 c c 48
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM156 VL3 e e 48
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key
species and habitats should also be carried out. Where
adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will
be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MM157 VL3 f f 48
provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within
5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could
potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity
of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain
whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or
mitigate any adverse effects is required;
provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse
effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection
Area.
Clarification.
MM158 VL3 g 48
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM159 VL3 h 48
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM160 VL4 50
Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential
development for about 7 dwellings on 0.97ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential
development for about 7 dwellings on 0.97ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM161 VL4 a a 50
provision of vehicular access to the site from The Paddock
and improvement made to the standard of Headley Fields to
ensure that the link is suitable for use by all modes;
provide vehicular access to the site from The Paddock and
include improvements to the standard of Headley Fields;
To reflect the planning
permission.
MM162 VL4 b b 50implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM163 VL4 c c 50
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network;
Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM164 VL4 e e 50
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard
protected species that use the site and minimise the impact of
development on the mature trees and hedgerow on the
boundary of the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MM165 VL4 f f 50
provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within
5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could
potentially have a significant impact of the ecological integrity
of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain
whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or
mitigate any adverse effects is required;
provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse
effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection
Area.
Clarification.
MM166 VL4 g 50
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. This site should
be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM167 VL4 h 50
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM168 VL5 52
Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is
allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings
on 0.74ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is
allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings
on 0.74ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM169 VL5 a a 52
provision of a priority junction access and ensure any new
direct access does not encroach on the visibility requirements
of adjoining junctions in regular use;
provide vehicular access without direct access onto the A325; Consistency.
MM170 VL5 b b 52implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network including the A325;Clarification
MM171 VL5 c c 52
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification
MM172 VL5 f f 52
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on of existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site;
Clarification
MM173 VL5 h 52
provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within
5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could
potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity
of the SPA. A Screening Assessment is therefore required to
ascertain whether the provision of adequate measures to
avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required;
DELETE To correct a factual error.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM174 VL5 i 52
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE
MM175 VL5 k i 52
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and
manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency.
MM176 VL5 l 52
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM177 VL6 54
Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound
is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings
on 0.2ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound
is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings
on 0.2ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM178 VL6 a a
provision of vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road;
implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
Provide vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road. Consistency.
MM179 VL6 b 54ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM180 VL6 b c 54
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Consistency.
MM181 VL6 d e 54
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Consistency.
MM182 VL6 e f 54
provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within
5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could
potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity
of the SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the
provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any
adverse effects is required;
provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse
effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection
Area.
Consistency.
MM183 VL6 f g 54
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in Flood Zone 3 and low lying areas.
The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is
no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;
and
DELETE Covered by National Policy
MM184 VL6 g 54
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM185 VL7 56
Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM186 VL7 b b 56implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM187 VL7 c c 56
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM188 VL7 e e 56
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key
species and habitats should be carried out. Where adverse
impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be
required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification
MM189 VL7 f 56
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM190 VL7 g 56ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM191 VL7 i 56
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM192 VL8 58
Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 10 dwellings on 1.3ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for
residential development for about 10 dwellings on 1.3ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM193 VL8 b b 58implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM194 VL8 c c 58
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM195 VL8 e e 58the area of land to the north east of the site (west of Trinity
Hill) is to be retained as open space;
provide an area of open space to the north east of the site,
west of Trinity Hill; andClarification.
MM196 VL8 f f 58
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM197 VL8 g 58
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM198 VL8 h 58
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM199 VL9 59
Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated
for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated
for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM200 VL9 b b 59implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM201 VL9 c c 59
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes; andClarification.
MM202 VL9 e e 59
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to retain the
hedgerows bordering the site;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
MM203 VL9 f 59
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should
be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM204 VL9 g 59ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site); andDELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MM205 VL9 h 59
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM206 VL10 60
Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is
allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on
0.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is
allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on
0.8ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM207 VL10 b b 60implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM208 VL10 c c 60
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes Including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM209 VL10 e e 60
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM210 VL10 f 60
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM211 VL10 g f 60
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and
manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification.
MM212 VL10 h 60
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM213 VL11 61
Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in
Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15
dwellings on 0.69ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in
Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15
dwellings on 0.69ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM214 VL11 b b 61implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM215 VL11 c c 61
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM216 VL11 e e 61
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees
and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site.
Clarification.
MM217 VL11 f 61
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place; and
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM218 VL11 g 61
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM219 VL12 62
Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential
development for about 5 dwellings on 0.2ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential
development for about 5 dwellings on 0.2ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM220 VL12 b b 62implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
Appendix F
Main Mod
no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MM221 VL12 c c 62
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM222 VL12 e e 62implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MM223 VL12 f 62
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM224 VL12 g f 62 relocation of the existing allotments; re-provide existing allotments within the village. Site specific requirement.
MM225 VL12 h 62
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
MM226 VL13 63
Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential
development for about 15 dwellings on 0.95ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria:
Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential
development for about 15 dwellings on 0.95ha.
The site will be developed in accordance with the following
site specific criteria. Development shall:
To make the policy development
specific.
MM227 VL13 b b 63implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Clarification.
MM228 VL13 d d 63
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes;Clarification.
MM229 VL13 f f 63
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the
impact of development on mature trees (some TPOs) forming
part of existing hedgerows bordering the site. Where adverse
impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be
required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MM230 VL13 g 63
provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should
include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential
measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built
development is avoided in low lying areas where surface
water flooding is more likely to occur. The shite should be
attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than
the run-off prior to development taking place;
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25.
MM231 VL13 h g 63
provide for the retention and careful management of any
important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the
site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and
manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency.
MM232 VL13 i 63
ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied
unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so,
working with the District Council.
DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN1 Sub heading Sub heading 3 What is this about? What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan?
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN2 1.1 1.1 3
This is a consultation on the Proposed Submission version of
the Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations for East
Hampshire District (areas outside the South Downs National
Park (SDNP)).
The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and
Employment Allocations is the second part in a suite of
development plan documents and follows on from the Joint
Core Strategy.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN3 1.2 1.2 3
Proposed Submission means that this is the version of the
Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations that the
Council would like to submit to the Secretary of State for
examination. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain
views on the “soundness” of the plan.
Its primary purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the
individual housing and employment targets set out in policies
CP3 and CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set
out guidance for the development of these sites.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN4 1.3 1.3 3
Throughout the process of preparing the Local Plan: Housing
and Employment Allocations, a significant level of public
consultation has been undertaken. In order to inform
communities of the ongoing planning situation in East
Hampshire District, the Council undertook preliminary
community engagement on the housing and employment site
options covering the whole area outside the SDNP as part of
the draft Plan. A commentary of the events has been
produced into Local Interim Planning Statements (LIPS). The
LIPS events kicked off the plan process and stimulated
significant community interest. Consultation on the draft Plan
took place between December 2014 and February 2015,
comments received during this time have also helped to
develop the Plan.
This Plan uses the same overall housing requirement,
methodology (‘Liverpool’) and buffer (5%) as the JCS. These
have been found sound both at the Examination of the JCS
and at the Examination of the Housing and Employment
Allocations Plan.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN5 1.4 1.4 3
This process has ensured that the community, partners and
stakeholders have had the opportunity to influence key
aspects of the Plan. This has been guided by the adopted
Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) and a summary
of the steps undertaken is set out in the Statement of
Consultation which is published alongside the Plan.
The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and
Employment Allocations only covers the area of East
Hampshire outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP)
as shown in Map 1. This is because the Park Authority is the
Local Planning Authority for the SDNP and is producing a
separate Local Plan for the whole of the SDNP. For all
information about planning in the National Park please see
the SDNP website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN6 1.5 1.5 3
The purpose of this stage of consultation is to provide an
opportunity for you to comment on the matters that will be
considered by an Inspector who conducts the examination,
i.e. whether the plan:
a) has been prepared in accordance with the Duty to
Cooperate, legal and procedural requirements, and
b) is “sound‟. Soundness means:
· Positively prepared – the plan should be prepared based on
a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed
development and infrastructure requirements, including
unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is
reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving
sustainable development;
· Justified – the plan should allocate the most appropriate
sites, when considered against the reasonable alternatives,
based on proportionate evidence;
· Effective – the plan should be deliverable over its period
and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary
strategic priorities; and
• Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable the
delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the
policies in the National Planning Policy Framework
(Framework).
(Source: paragraph 182 National Planning Policy Framework,
DCLG 2012).
This means taking a disaggregated approach to the supply of
new homes and employment in each Planning Authority
Area, including the calculation of the 5 year housing land
supply.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN7 1.6 1.6 4
In preparing the Plan, the Council believes it has complied
with all the necessary legal requirements. In terms of the Duty
to Cooperate, the Council has worked with neighbouring
authorities and has produced a statement of compliance. The
statement provides evidence of how the council has co-
operated with neighbouring authorities and “bodies‟ on
potential cross-boundary issues. The council also believes
that the Plan meets the tests of soundness set out above.
It should be noted that Whitehill & Bordon, and areas covered
by emerging Neighbourhood Plans which allocate homes, do
not form part of this Plan. Further information is set out in
later sections.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN8 Sub heading Sub heading 4 What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan? delete
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN9 1.7 1.7 4
The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and
Employment Allocations will form part of the Statutory
Development Plan for East Hampshire District. Its primary
purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the individual
housing and employment targets set out in policies CP3 and
CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set out
guidance for the development of these sites. It should be
noted that Whitehill & Bordon and areas covered be
emerging Neighbourhood Plans do not form part of this Plan.
Further information is set out in later sections.
For the remainder of this document the East Hampshire
District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations will
be called the Site Allocations Plan.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN10 1.8 1.8 4
Upon adoption it will form part of the Development Plan which
will comprise the following:
• Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan:
Second Review (March 2006)
• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy
(adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and
South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014))
• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and
Employment Allocations
• Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013)
• Adopted Neighbourhood Plans
The Site Allocations Plan forms part of the Development
Plan, which will comprise the following:
• Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan:
Second Review (March 2006)
• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy
(adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and
South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014))
• East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and
Employment Allocations
• Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013)
• Adopted Neighbourhood Plans
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN11 1.9 1.9 4
Housing and employment site allocations are currently the
main priority in the planning system and that is why this Plan
focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the
Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East
Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created
and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will
consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries,
Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and
other Development Management Policies.
Housing and employment site allocations are currently the
main priority in the planning system and that is why this plan
focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the
Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East
Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created
and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will
consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries,
Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and
other Development Management Policies.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN12 1.10 1.10 5
For the remainder of this document this version of the East
Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment
Allocations will be called the Proposed Submission Site
Allocations Plan.
Whilst the National Park is a separate authority, East
Hampshire District Council has regard to the statutory
purposes of the National Park under Section 62 of the
Environment Act 1995.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN13 1.11 5
It must be noted that the Proposed Submission Site
Allocations Plan only covers the area of East Hampshire
outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP) as shown in
Map 1. Within the SDNP the Park Authority is the Local
Planning Authority and will be producing a separate Local
Plan for the whole of the South Downs National Park. For all
information about planning in the National Park please see
their website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN14 1.12 5
East Hampshire District Council is however, to have regard to
the statutory purposes of the National Park under Section 62
of the Environment Act 1995.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN15 1.13 1.11 7
Neighbourhood planning is a new element of the planning
system introduced in 2012 through the Localism Act. A
fundamental principle of neighbourhood planning is that it is
community-led, with the community establishing local
planning policies for development and use of land within its
neighbourhood. Neighbourhood Plans enable local people to
play a leading role in responding to the needs and priorities of
the local community.
NO CHANGE
MIN16 1.14 1.12 7
In East Hampshire District, the appropriate bodies for
producing Neighbourhood Plans are the Town and Parish
Councils. A Neighbourhood Plan must generally conform to
the East Hampshire District Local Plan and can promote
more but not less development than the Local Plan. Once a
Neighbourhood Plan is adopted it will become part of the
Development Plan for the district and will be used to assess
and determine planning applications within the
Neighbourhood Plan’s designated area.
NO CHANGE
MIN17 1.15 1.13 7
In East Hampshire; Alton, Bentley, and Medstead and Four
Marks are the three areas currently designated as
Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is
developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and
employment allocations and has progressed to consultation
stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites.
In East Hampshire: Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead &
Four Marks are the four areas currently designated as
Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is
developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and
employment allocations and has progressed to consultation
stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN18 1.16 1.14 7
However, if these Neighbourhood Plans do not become
adopted the Council will assess the need for it to identify sites
through a subsequent Development Plan Document (DPD).
NO CHANGE
MIN19 1.17 1.15 7
If further Neighbourhood Plans are prepared in the future and
include site allocations for housing and/or employment and/or
alterations to the Settlement Policy Boundaries, these
neighbourhood plans will supersede this Plan for their
respective designated areas.
NO CHANGE
MIN20 Sub heading What should I look at? DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN21 1.18 7
This document includes detailed site allocations and policies
to guide and manage development, deliver infrastructure and
create sustainable communities. These also set out how the
plan will be implemented and monitored.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN22 1.19 7
A Policies Map accompanies the Plan which sets out on an
Ordnance Survey map base, where development is proposed
and changes to existing Settlement Policy Boundaries.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN23 1.20 7
Alongside the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan
there is a Sustainability Appraisal report which explains the
alternatives that were considered for the sites, and the
reasons for the choices made. There is also a Habitats
Regulations Assessment, which looks at the impacts of the
Plan on sites of European nature conservation importance.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN24 1.21 8
The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan also reflects
the comprehensive evidence base which has been prepared
and updated to justify the Plan. This covers issues such as
housing land, employment land, flooding, transport,
infrastructure and viability and has been compiled primarily
either by the council or on behalf of the council by specialist
consultants, in conjunction with our partners and statutory
bodies.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN25 1.22 8
You can see the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan
and all related documents on our web site at:
www.easthants.gov.uk/draftsiteallocations
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN26 Sub heading 8 How can I get involved? DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN27 1.23 8
You can contact us directly as an individual, through being
part of a group such as a residents association or other
community or special interest group, or through your parish
council.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN28 1.24 8
This can be done by:
(i) using the on-line version of this document and linked
response form OR
(ii) by picking up, filling in and returning one of the response
forms, available from the Council’s website, the Council
offices and deposit locations.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN29 Sub heading 8 What happens next? DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN30 1.25 8
Figure 1 sets out the stages to the Plan. This current
consultation is highlighted. Following consultation the Council
cannot make major changes to the Plan if it intends to submit
it for examination. We will therefore endeavour to resolve
objections through minor changes if necessary, but will then
submit the Plan, the schedule of changes and any
outstanding representations to the Secretary of State (SoS).
The SoS appoints an independent Inspector to conduct an
examination into the soundness of the plan and the Inspector
determines what will be discussed at the examination, and
who should attend.
Figure 1: Illustrates the formal stages the plan is taken
through to adoption in accordance with the Town and Country
Planning (England) Regulations 2012.
DELETE
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN31 Sub heading Sub heading 9 The East Hampshire Context The East Hampshire Context
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN32 1.26 1.16 9
The JCS sets out the Council's overall approach towards the
local application of sustainable development through its
objectives and core policies. The JCS was jointly prepared by
East Hampshire District Council (EHDC) and the South
Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA). The National Park
covers 57% of the district and splits the area managed by
East Hampshire District Council into two halves, one south of
the National Park known as the southern parishes and an
area to the north of the National Park. The splitting of the
district into two separate Local Planning Authorities creates
some added complexity for place shaping for example the
main settlements of Petersfield and Liss are both part of East
Hampshire as a place but in planning terms are dealt with
independently by the SDNPA.
NO CHANGE
MIN33 1.27 1.17 10
The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the
district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of
the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and
examined as complying with the requirements of the
Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and
economic, social and environmental objectives for the district
and the amount, type and broad location of development
needed to fulfil those objectives. The Proposed Submission
Site Allocations Plan identifies and allocates specific sites
suitable for development in order to meet the JCS's
requirements for housing and employment and in so doing
makes a major contribution to delivering the objectives within
the JCS. The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan
covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of the
district outside the South Downs National Park.
The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the
district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of
the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and
examined as complying with the requirements of the
Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and
economic, social and environmental objectives for the district
and the amount, type and broad location of development
needed to fulfil those objectives. The Site Allocations Plan
identifies and allocates specific sites suitable for development
in order to meet the JCS's requirements for housing and
employment, and in so doing makes a major contribution to
delivering the objectives within the JCS. The Site Allocations
Plan covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of
the district outside the South Downs National Park.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN34 1.28 1.18 10
The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan sets out what
type and level of development will be promoted throughout
East Hampshire District Council’s planning area. The Plan
will provide more certainty for local communities, landowners,
developers and infrastructure providers about the future
pattern of development. Specific development proposals for
the sites identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain
planning permission before development can take place.
The Site Allocations Plan sets out what type and level of
development will be promoted throughout East Hampshire
District Council’s planning area. The Plan will provide more
certainty for local communities, landowners, developers and
infrastructure providers about the future pattern of
development. Specific development proposals for the sites
identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain planning
permission before development can take place.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN35 1.29 1.19 10
Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill &
Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a
base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is
identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725
dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic
allocation does not form part of this Proposed Submission
Site Allocations Plan and is proceeding on the basis of policy
guidance provided in the JCS and through a masterplan and
a series of planning applications.
Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill &
Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a
base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is
identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725
dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic
allocation does not form part of this Site Allocations Plan and
is proceeding on the basis of policy guidance provided in the
JCS, and through a masterplan and a series of planning
applications.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN36 1.30 1.2 10
Other significant settlements to the north of the National Park
identified in the JCS include Alton, Liphook, Four
Marks/South Medstead and Grayshott, each providing a
range of facilities for their local populations.
NO CHANGE
MIN37 1.31 1.21 10
The area to the south of the National Park has three
significant settlements, Horndean, Clanfield and Rowlands
Castle.
NO CHANGE
MIN38 1.32 1.22 10
The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan directly takes
forward Policy CP3: New Employment Provision and Policy
CP10: Spatial Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint
Core Strategy (JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall
target of 10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period
(up to 2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in
completions, existing planning permissions, existing
undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic
allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of
development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed
Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying
specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing
requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been
granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS.
The Site Allocations Plan directly takes forward Policy CP3:
New Employment Provision and Policy CP10: Spatial
Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy
(JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall target of
10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period (up to
2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in
completions, existing planning permissions, existing
undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic
allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of
development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed
Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying
specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing
requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been
granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN39 1.33 1.23 11
Policy CP10 of the JCS requires allocations to be made to
meet the following levels of housing in East Hampshire
District (outside the National Park):
• a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton
• a minimum of 700 dwellings at Horndean;
• a minimum of 200 dwellings at Clanfield;
• a minimum of 175 dwellings at both Liphook and Four
Marks/South Medstead;
• a minimum of 150 dwellings at Rowlands Castle;
• a minimum of 150 dwellings at other villages north of the
National Park.
NO CHANGE
MIN40 1.34 1.24 11
The use of ‘minimum’ targets does not mean that there is no
ceiling to the housing targets. The Inspector’s report into the
JCS was clear that, whilst the 10,060 new homes target for
the whole of the district over the plan period was the
minimum needed to meet the objectively assessed need, the
figure of 10,370 would meet all the need. Therefore a
relatively small degree of flexibility is needed around the
housing targets and is provided for within this Plan.
Housing need was established through the JCS Examination
at around 610 dwellings per annum, or 10,370 dwellings for
the whole of the plan period up to 2028. The figure of 10,060
was set by the JCS as the minimum number of new houses
that should be provided to 2028. The difference between the
two indicates the need for a modest degree of flexibility
above the minimum figure set by the JCS, and this is
provided for by this Plan.
Clarification.
MIN41 1.35 1.25 11
The housing land supply for the district as a whole is made
up of a minimum of 8,366 dwellings outside the SDNP and a
minimum of 1,694 dwellings within the SDNP making a total
of 10,060. Chapter 10 sets out more information about the
implementation and monitoring.
NO CHANGE
MIN42 1.36 1.26 11
The table below shows the number of dwellings being
provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets
established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning
permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy
Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this
document, as well as sites allocated through emerging
Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land
supply position (1st October 2014) can be found within
Appendix 2.
The table below shows the number of dwellings being
provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets
established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning
permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy
Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this
document, as well as sites allocated through emerging
Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land
supply position (1st April 2015) can be found within Appendix
2.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN43 Table 1 Table 1 11 Update figures to reflect additional commitments To reflect the latest position
MIN44 1.37 1.27 12
Employment provision and distribution in the district is set out
in Policy CP3 of the JCS which requires the provision of land
for employment use in East Hampshire district (outside the
National Park) for:
• about 7ha of employment land in Alton;
• about 2ha of land in Horndean for industrial (B2) and
business use (B1).
NO CHANGE
MIN45 1.38 1.28 12The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan contains
specific site policies to meet these requirements.
The Site Allocations Plan contains specific site policies to
meet these requirements.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN46 1.39 1.29 12
It should be noted that some of the site allocations have
already been granted planning permission. Further detail is
set out in appendix 1.
NO CHANGE
MIN47 1.30 12
Policy CP22 and paragraph 7.24 of the JCS requires housing
proposals capable of affecting the Wealden Heaths Phase II
Special Protection Area to consider, on a case-by-case basis,
whether a project-specific HRA is required. Housing
proposals falling within 5.6km of the coastal ‘Natura 2000’
sites will need to consider whether mitigation is required to
address the impacts of recreational disturbance, through in-
combination effects of additional dwellings, on the Solent
SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. Affected housing allocations
in this plan have a site specific criterion to address these
constraints.
Clarification
MIN48 1.40 1.31 12
Relevant national policies, JCS policies and the saved
policies of the Local Plan Second Review (2006) will apply
where relevant to all of the proposals set out in this Plan.
NO CHANGE
MIN49 2.1 12
The following sections set out, for each of the main towns
and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet
the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The
Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan focuses on
identifying specific sites to meet the individual housing and
employment targets set out in policies CP3 and CP10 of the
JCS. These specific site allocations meet the residual
development requirements for the district (outside the SDNP).
For each site there is a policy setting out the criteria that
subsequent planning applications will need to address. The
boundaries of allocated sites, which are all greenfield sites
beyond existing Settlement Policy Boundaries, will be
integrated into a revised Settlement Policy Boundary when
the Plan is adopted and are shown on the Policies Map.
The following sections set out, for each of the main towns
and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet
the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The Site
Allocations Plan focuses on identifying specific sites to meet
the individual housing and employment targets set out in
policies CP3 and CP10 of the JCS. These specific site
allocations meet the residual development requirements for
the district (outside the SDNP). For each site there is a policy
setting out the criteria that subsequent planning applications
will need to address. The boundaries of allocated sites, which
are all greenfield sites beyond existing Settlement Policy
Boundaries, will be integrated into a revised Settlement
Policy Boundary when the Plan is adopted and are shown on
the Policies Map.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN50 2.4 13
The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the
district cover Alton and Bentley. Work has been undertaken
in parallel with this Plan. In order to allow the local community
the widest opportunity to determine local policies for their
area, land allocations and policy guidance in this Plan is only
provided for those elements not covered by the respective
Neighbourhood Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans
be prepared in the future and include site allocations for
housing and/or employment, these neighbourhood plans will
supersede this Plan for their respective designated areas.
The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the
district cover Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead & Four
Marks. Work has been undertaken in parallel with this Plan.
In order to allow the local community the widest opportunity to
determine local policies for their area, land allocations and
policy guidance in this Plan is only provided for those
elements not covered by the respective Neighbourhood
Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans be prepared in
the future and include site allocations for housing and/or
employment, these neighbourhood plans will supersede this
Plan for their respective designated areas.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN51 3.1 13
The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be
identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site
identification and allocation process will be addressed as part
of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan.
The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be
identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site
identification and allocation process will be addressed as part
of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan. It should be
noted that the Alton Neighbourhood Plan Area covers the
village of Holybourne and therefore any housing allocations
for this village will be considered through the preparation of
the Alton Neighbourhood Plan.
Further clarification and update
to take account of status of
document and reflect matters
discussed at Examination.
MIN52 EMP1 f e 14
provision of a buffer zone along the river to protect and
enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of
the river and its corridor;
provide a buffer zone along the River Wey to protect and
enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of
the river and its corridor; and
Consistency.
MIN53 EMP1 g f 14
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to protect key
species and habitats. Where adverse impacts are
unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
to be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and
Mitigation Scheme and include measures to protect key
species and habitats on site.
Clarification.
MIN54 EMP2 a 16 provision of vehicular access from Wilsom Road; provide vehicular access from Wilsom Road; Consistency.
MIN55 EMP2 d c 16
include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to
existing external routes including the Public Right of Way
network and retain the Public Right of Way in attractive semi-
natural setting;
provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential
users, linked to existing external routes including the Public
Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural
setting;
Clarification.
MIN56 EMP2 f d 16
provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to
minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton
and the neighbouring residential area;
provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of
development on the setting of Alton;Consistency.
MIN57 EMP2 g e 16
provision of a buffer zone between the bank of the river and
any buildings to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of
the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for
any future maintenance;
provide a buffer zone between the bank of the River Wey and
any buildings, to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of
the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for
any future maintenance;
Clarification and locally specific.
MIN58 EMP2 h f 16
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take
account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area and protected
key species and habitats;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MIN59 4.4 4.4 19
HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings
2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1)
New school
HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings
Care Village including independent living units
2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1)
New school
Clarification and consistency.
MIN60 HN1A site of 62ha of land to the east of Horndean is allocated for
a mixed use form of development to include: NO CHANGE
MIN61 HN1 • about 700 dwellings; NO CHANGE
MIN62 HN1• land for about 2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1);
andNO CHANGE
MIN63 HN1 a a 21provision of accommodation for the elderly, including extra
care;
provide accommodation for older people, including extra
care;Clarification.
MIN64 HN1 b b 21
provision of about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business
uses (B1) and provision of an Enterprise Centre, close to
Junction 2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149;
provide about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business
uses (B1) and provide an Enterprise Centre, close to Junction
2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149;
Consistency.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN65 HN1 g g 21
provision of a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to
connect to the existing footway and provide a safe and
accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of
Junction 2 of the A3(M);
provide a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to
connect to the existing footway, and provide a safe and
accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of
Junction 2 of the A3(M);
Consistency.
MIN66 HN1 h h 21
provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to
minimise the impact of development on the setting of the
South Downs National Park and of the Grade II Listed
Buildings at Pyle Farm;
provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of
development on the setting of the South Downs National Park
and on the setting of the Grade II Listed Buildings at Pyle
Farm;
Consistency.
MIN67 HN1 m 21ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on
and off site);DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26.
MIN68 HN1 n l 21
provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including
noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant
Road and A3(M);
provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and
barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant Road and the
A3(M);
Consistency
MIN69 HN2 a a 22 provide a vehicular access to the site from Lovedean Lane; NO CHANGE
MIN70 LP1 a a 24
provision of vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road
via Lowsley Farm reserve housing site listed in the saved
East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review Policy
H2;
provide vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road via
Lowsley Farm Phase 1;
Site specific and to future proof
the document.
MIN71 CF1 e e 28
retention of hedgerows along with appropriate landscaping
and landscape enhancement to take account of the impact of
development and its proximity to the South Downs National
Park;
retain hedgerows and provide landscape enhancements to
take account of its proximity to the South Downs National
Park;
Clarification.
MIN72 CF1 i g 28
implement a scheme for protecting future occupiers from
traffic noise from the A3(M) and Chalton Lane to mitigate the
impacts of traffic noise from surrounding roads;
provide noise mitigation to reduce traffic noise from Chalton
Lane and the A3(M); andClarification.
MIN73 CF3 a a 31 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; provide vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; Consistency.
MIN74 CF3 d d 31
provision of any mitigation measures required to protect,
retain and enhance the western and northern landscape
boundaries;
provide mitigation measures to retain, protect and enhance
the western and northern landscape boundaries; andClarification.
MIN75 RC1 a a 32provision of vehicular access to the site via the access road
to the north of the site from Redhill Road;
provide vehicular access to the site via the access road to the
north of the site from Redhill Road;Consistency.
MIN76 RC2 a a 34provision of vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or
Whichers Gate Road;
provide vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or
Whichers Gate Road;Consistency.
MIN77 RC3 a a 36provision of vehicular access to the site via a single access
on to Bartons Road (in Havant Borough);
provide vehicular access to the site via a single access on to
Bartons Road (in Havant Borough);Consistency.
MIN78 RC3 i f 36provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect
the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line;
provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of
dwellings located close to the railway line.Consistency.
MIN79 FM1 a a 38
provision of vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road
designed to minimise the impact on the adjacent Doctors
surgery;
provide vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road
designed to minimise the impact of the adjacent Doctors
surgery;
Consistency.
MIN80 FM1 f d 38
implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard
protected species that use the site. Where adverse impacts
are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;
be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation
Scheme and include measures to protect key species and
habitats on site; and
Clarification.
MIN81 FM1 i f 38provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect
the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line;
provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of
dwellings located close to the railway line.Clarification.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN82 FM2 a a 40provision of vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood
Road as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak;
provide vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood Road
as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak;Consistency.
MIN83 FM2 b c 40 improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; provide improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; Consistency.
MIN84 FM3 a a 41provision of vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood
Lane/Beechlands Road;
provide vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood
Lane/Beechlands Road;Consistency.
MIN85 FM3 g h 41provision of public open space on site and retention of the
existing boundary vegetation;
provide on-site open space and retain the existing boundary
vegetation;Consistency
MIN86 FM3 k i 41
provision of increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE
Primary School to accommodate the likely number of primary
school children arising from the development; and
provide increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE Primary
School to accommodate the likely number of primary school
children arising from the development.
To reflect the planning
permission.
MIN87 VL1 a a 44provision of vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley
Road and incorporate junction radii;provide vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley Road; Consistency.
MIN88 VL2 a a 46
provision of vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane;
implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic
impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads;
provide vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane; Consistency.
MIN89 bensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on
the local road network;Consistency.
MIN90 VL2 c d 46have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN91 VL2 e f 46
appropriate landscaping and landscape enhancement to take
account of the impact of development and its proximity to the
South Downs National Park;
provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take
account of its proximity to the South Downs National Park;
and
Consistency.
MIN92 VL3 a a 48 provision of vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; Consistency.
MIN93 VL3 d d 48have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN94 VL4 d d 50have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN95 VL5 d d 52provide a pedestrian crossing on the A325 on the desire line
between the site and the northbound bus stop;NO CHANGE
MIN96 VL5 e e 52have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN97 VL5 g g 52
provision of appropriate landscaping and landscape
enhancement to take account of the impact of development
and its proximity to the South Downs National Park;
provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take
account of the impact of development and its proximity to the
South Downs National Park;
Consistency.
MIN98 VL5 j h 52provision of a noise assessment due to close proximity to
A325;
provide noise mitigation measures to reduce traffic noise from
the A325; andConsistency.
MIN99 VL6 c d 54have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN100 VL7 a a 56provision of vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South
Town Road;
provide vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South
Town Road;Consistency.
MIN101 VL7 d d 56have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN102 VL7 h f 56safeguarding of an element of the site to provide an
extension to the cemetery; and
safeguard an element of the site to provide an extension to
the cemetery.Consistency.
Appendix G
Minor
Mod no.Policy
Existing
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
New
paragraph/
Policy
Criterion
Page number
of Proposed
Submission
Plan
Current wording Proposed wording Reason
MIN103 VL8 a a 58 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; Consistency.
MIN104 VL8 d d 58have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN105 VL9 a a 59provision of vehicular access to the site from one access on
to Wield Road leading to a service road;
provide vehicular access to the site from one access on to
Wield Road leading to a service road;Consistency.
MIN106 VL9 d d 59have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;
have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village; andConsistency.
MIN107 VL10 a a 60 provision of vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; Consistency.
MIN108 VL10 d d 60have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN109 VL11 a a 61 provision of vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; Consistency.
MIN110 VL11 d d 61have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;
have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village; andConsistency.
MIN111 VL12 a a 62 provision of vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; provide vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; Consistency.
MIN112 VL12 d d 62have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN113 VL13 a a 63 provision of vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; provide vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; Consistency.
MIN114 VL13 c c 63 provision of passing places and footpath on Bighton Hill; provide passing places and a footpath on Bighton Hill; Consistency.
MIN115 VL13 e e 63have a design and layout of high quality and a character
which respects the characteristics of the village;NO CHANGE
MIN116 Appendix 1 Update to reflect latest position
MIN117 Appendix 2Update to reflect the Housing Land supply position as of 1
April 2015
MIN118 Appendix 3Update to reflect the most recent housing trajectory and
correct key and explanation.
MIN119 Map 1 Update title to reflect status of document
top related