Social Media and Nationalism: Evolving Concepts

Social Media and Social Media and Nationalism: Evolving Nationalism: Evolving ConceptsConcepts

Anastas Vangeli MANew Media Center Skopje

#glocal09

Presentation Outline

Nationalism and Internet: Basic Approaches Reflections on Nationalism and Social Media Survey and Examples Shortcomings Concluding Remarks

Statement

Social media extension to reality Nationalism is real, at least discursively Therefore social media “extend” nationalism Nationalist sentiment + use of social media =

reframed, arguably advanced concept of nationalism

Nationalism and Internet: Basic Approaches Erica Schlesinger Wass, Addressing the world:

national identity and Internet country code domains, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003

Contested domain names: the case of Macedonia: Greek vs. RM Macedonian domains, Macedonian and Bulgarian VMRO domains

Sociological approach: Eriksen and Bakker

Nationalism and Internet: Basic Approaches T. H. Eriksen: the Internet (media) can

nevertheless be instrumental in creating and re-creating a shared, collective past among its users. Examining the role of the Internet in building and maintaining national identities may thus enhance our understanding of the character and the enduring power of national myths and symbols.

Nationalism and Social Media

Major changes brought by social media, both on individual and social level

Fragmentation, decentralization, and the emergence of user-generated content

Social networking, virtual individuals and virtual “collectives”

Nationalist PR and brainstorming via social media

Nationalism and Social Media

Social media related to the emergence and development of strong and durable forms of nationalism-from-below, or a genuine decentralized form of nationalist discourse notably different from everything before

No need for nationalist leaders, elite, budget, headquaters to produce nationalist propaganda

Social Media as an asset to nationalist mobilization

Nationalism and Social Media The modernist/constructivist/instrumentalist

approaches to the nation are challenged with the idea of decentralization as there is no more just one single and most important agency of the nationalist mobilization; there are plenty and they have the possibility to reach anyone.

The ethnosymbolist approach is challenged too: it is not THE exclusive single shared narrative that prevails as a crucial factor of mobilization, but the one which the Wikipedia contributors agree upon.

Nationalism and Social Media

Nation reshaped: one of the basic premises was that the nation is imagined because its members will never meet the rest of their fellows. However, with the possibility that social networking offers, it is very simple for people that share interests to find each other, and befriend each other, even though it is online. The imagined “horizontal friendship” of the nation gradually becomes very concrete – yet no less imagined.

Facebook Nationalism: A Survey

(Methodological shortcomings) 98 respondents 85% said that were invited to a

nationalist/patriotic group/page/cause Only 4% said they have never seen

nationalistic/patriotic content being posted More than half see such contents frequently

Counting the Members of the Nation

34K Facebook Users Hate Greece

60K People “Kosovo is Serbia”

50K Serbs Get Ready to “Welcome” Croats. Time needed: 10 Days

General Impressions: Facebook

More support for “United Macedonia” than “United Ireland”

=> Most of nationalist content originates from SEE?

Radical and hate groups sanctioned fast (ex. Knife, Wire, Srebrenica; Holocaust Deniers)

Shortcomings

Generalization of what is nationalism Replace nationalism with _______ and you

might get similar results Lack of content analysis

Concluding Remarks

Nationalism not outdated even in post-industrial age

Social media content not necessarily progressive

The two (can) coexist Social media an asset to nationalism Surging nationalism 2.0?

Thank You

anastas.mk@gmail.comwww.vuna.info

www.twitter.com/woonawww.delicious.com/woona