Seismicity Pattern of Pakistan and Surrounding Areasseismic.pmd.gov.pk/seismicnew/SeismicTrend.pdf · earthquake hitting a densely populated city could have devastating impacts. Besides

Post on 12-Jun-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Seismicity Pattern of Pakistan and Surrounding Areas

Pakistan Meteorological Department National Seismic Monitoring Network, Islamabad

Dated: 5th January2016

PMD

Mw 7.6,

2005

Depth

Islamabad

Northern Areas

8th October, 2005 Kashmir Earthquake Mw 7.6

and Aftershocks Distribution

26th Oct. 2015

Mw 8.1,

7th Dec. 2015

Mw 7.2

25th Dec. 2015

Mw 6.8

Tajikistan

Pakistan

26th October, 2015 Hindukush Region Earthquake Mw 8.1

and Aftershocks Distribution

543

754

675

771

848

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Last Five Years Frequency of Earthquake in and around Pakistan

Years

No of

earthquakes

General Seismicity Pattern of Pakistan & Surrounding Areas

A Brief Seismicity Analysis of Pakistan & surroundings:

1900-2015

4.0 to 4.9 64% of the total events,

25% from 3.0 to 3.9 and

9% from 6.0 to 6.9

Only 150 events with magnitude ≥ 6.0

28 events with magnitude range 7.0 to 7.9

Only 3 events have magnitude ≥ 8.0

Quetta

Gwadar

Arabian sea

Awaran

Karachi

Historical Earthquakes of Pakistan

MBT

Tadik basin

Seismicity Pattern in Hindukush Region

Tajikistan

Pakistan

Afghanistan

HK region

Sou

rce m

ech

anism

pattern

in H

ind

uku

sh R

egio

n an

d

surro

un

din

gs

Depth Profile of Hindukush Region

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

Dep

th (

km)

Magnitude

Part – 2 General Seismicity Pattern of

Pakistan

Seismicity Trend Analysis over Active Faults in

Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis

Islamabad

Himalaya Range

Main Boundary Thrust

Mw 7.6 2005

Active Faults and Source Mechanism of Earthquakes ( 1970 – 2015 , M > 5.5 )

Depth

Islamabad

Main Boundary Thrust

M 5.3 2015

Depth Mag

M ≥ 5

M 4 – 4.9

M below 4

Seismicity and Active Faults Near Islamabad

Future Large Earthquake Probability

Earthquake Frequencies for M = 4 – 4.9

Earthquake Frequencies for M = 5 – 5.9

‘a’ and ‘b’ value comparison on yearly basis between 2001 – 2015

Conclusion – 1

The Hazara/Kashmir Syntaxis

• Over all there is an increasing trend in Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis area since last five years.

• Frequency of intermediate rang events increased,

Seismicity in Main Mantle Thrust and

Nanga Parbat, Haramosh area

The Tectonic Map of the Area

Seismicity of the Region

Only one earthquake

occurred on 2002

with Magnitude

range 5.1-6.0

Conclusion – 2

The Main Mantle Thrust and Nanga Parbat Haramosh

Syntaxes

This area has potential of intermediate range

seismic activities (3.1-4.0).

Seismicity Trend in the Region of Salt Range

MAIN FAULTS IN THE REGION

• Kalabagh Fault

(North South)

• Jhelum Fault

(North South)

• Salt range thrust fault

(East-West)

Seismicity of Salt Range

Kal

abag

h F

ault

Jhel

um

Fau

lt

Salt range thrust fault

Chakwal

Mangala

Talagang

Salt Range Events Frequency

EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY TREND WITH RESPECT TO MAGNITUDE

FOR THE PERIOD 1975-2015

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

5/7

/75

2/9

/80

12

/27

/84

2/1

2/9

1

5/3

1/9

2

12

/8/9

5

4/2

8/9

9

1/2

2/0

5

3/1

0/0

6

2/2

2/0

7

5/1

/10

15

/05

/20

10

2/7

/10

23

/08

/20

10

27

/09

/20

10

15

/11

/20

10

26

/11

/20

10

31

/01

/20

11

18

/02

/20

11

11

/4/1

1

24

/05

/20

11

30

/06

/20

11

23

/08

/20

11

24

/10

/20

11

7/1

9/1

1

1/2

2/1

2

2/2

/12

3/3

/12

13

/03

/20

12

28

/05

/20

12

27

/07

/20

12

18

/08

/20

12

11

/10

/12

26

/12

/20

12

4/1

/13

1/2

/13

9/4

/13

6/8

/13

1/1

0/1

3

5/1

1/1

3

3/2

6/1

4

22

/01

/20

14

17

/02

/20

14

25

/03

/20

14

13

/04

/20

14

28

/06

/20

14

24

/08

/20

14

Mag

nit

ud

e

Conclusion – 3

The Region of Salt Range

1. Over all Earthquake occurrence frequency trend is same.

2. Area representing the moderate seismicity

Way forward

I. The risk of earthquakes has significantly increased due to the urbanization. A big

earthquake hitting a densely populated city could have devastating impacts.

Besides existing earthquake monitoring network, a dense network will be required

particularly for Northwest, northeast and southwest areas of Pakistan.

II. Earthquake Early warning system is recommended for Northwest, northeast and

southwest areas.

III. Increase the local capacity of earthquake prone areas for disaster resilience with

series of training workshops for regarding MEASURES TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS

OF AN EARTHQUAKE.

IV. For disaster Reduction planning is the best way for a more community to move

toward Disaster Resilience.

Thanks

Arabian Sea

India

China

Pakistan

Tajikistan

Russia

Iran

Saudi Arabia

USGS

PMD

BB Stations

Local and International Broadband Stations Network

34

Magnitude and Intensity

• MAGNITUDE

– Measure of earthquake size (energy)

– Quantitative measure

– Source Parameter

– Remains same everywhere

• INTENSITY

– Measure of the destruction caused by an earthquake

– Qualitative measure

– Site parameter

– Different at different places (Attenuation and amplification phenomena)

– Most commonly used intensity scale is “MMI or Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale.

Hindukush (Afghanistan) Earthquake 35

Magnitude and Intensity

• DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAGNITUDE & INTENSITY – Magnitude remains unchanged with distance from the earthquake.

Intensity decreases with distance from the earthquake epicenter.

– Magnitude measurement requires instrumental monitoring for its

calculation, however, assigning an intensity requires a sample of the felt

responses of the population.

Hindukush (Afghanistan) Earthquake 36

Different Magnitude Scales

Earthquake Magnitude

Richter Local Magnitude

Surface Wave Magnitude

Ms = log A + 1.66 log + 2.0

Body Wave Magnitude

mb = log A – log T + 0.01 + 5.9

Other Instrumental Magnitude Scales

MC , MD , MJMA

Moment Magnitude (preferred)

Mw = (log Mo)/1.5 – 10.7

top related