R CHAPTE V I A R - Arizona State University

22

6M

EIN

part

ies.

T

his

opin

ion

.wals

enh

ance

d in

the

^eou

rse

of w

even

ts o

f th

e W

orL

d'w

ar b

y th

e ob

viou

tf'n

npos

sibi

lity

clfig

htin

g ru

thle

ssly

aga

inst

Soc

ial

Dem

ocra

cy b

ecau

se o

f th

abse

nce

of a

-mov

emen

t w

hich

had

"TO

be

mor

e th

an a

'p£

liam

enta

ri'a

n' p

arty

.I

talk

ed o

penl

y ab

out

tH^

to m

y m

ore

inti

mat

e fri

endS

.--W

hat

is m

ore,

I n

owlr

ad f

or t

he f

irst

tim

e th

e^ki

eaoc

cupy

ing

mys

elf

poH

^fca

lly l

ater

on.

And

thi

s w

as t

he/p

arti

cula

r re

ason

tha

t#*a

de m

e as

stm

y sm

all

circ

lejm

fr

iend

s th

at a

fter

tJs

eWar

I w

ould

activ

e as

an

orat

or a

long

with

my

nrw

essi

on.

I th

ink7

tifa

t I

mea

nt t

his

venj

/€er

ious

ly.

CH

AP

TE

R

VI

WA

R P

RO

PA

GA

ND

A

T T

HE

tim

e of

my

atte

ntiv

e fo

llow

ing

of a

ll po

litic

alev

ents

, th

e ac

tiviti

es

of p

ropa

gand

a ha

d al

way

s1 b

een

of e

xtre

mel

y gr

eat

inte

rest

to

me.

In

it

I sa

win

stru

men

t w

hich

jus

t th

e So

cial

ist-

Mar

xist

or

gani

za-

ns m

aste

red

and

knew

how

to

appl

y w

ith

expe

rt s

kill

. I

/ne

d ve

ry s

oon

that

the

rig

ht u

se o

f pr

opag

anda

re

pre-

|nts

an

art

whi

ch w

as a

nd r

emai

ned

alm

ost

entir

ely

un-

|,Qw

n to

the

bou

rgeo

is p

arti

es.

Onl

y th

e C

hris

tian-

Soci

al-

fc m

ovem

ent,

espe

cial

ly d

urin

g L

uege

r's t

ime,

acq

uire

d a

rtai

n vi

rtuo

sity

with

thi

s in

stru

men

t an

d it

owed

muc

h of

^suc

cess

to i

t.

|But

it

was

sho

wn

only

dur

ing

the

War

to

wha

t en

or-

|>us

ly i

mpo

rtan

t re

sults

a

suit

ably

app

lied

prop

agan

da|y

lead

. U

nfor

tuna

tely

, eve

ryth

ing

has

to b

e st

udie

d on

I ot

her

side

; for

the

act

ivit

y on

our

sid

e w

as m

ore

than

Itdes

t in

this

res

pect

. H

owev

er,

the

very

fai

lure

of t

he e

n-|e

enl

ight

enm

ent

on t

he

side

of

the

Ger

man

s —

a

fact

|ich

was

bou

nd t

o st

are

in th

e fa

ce o

f eve

ry s

oldi

er;—

now

|sed

me

to o

ccup

y m

ysel

f st

ill m

ore

thor

ough

ly w

ith|

que

stio

n.

Inhe

re w

as o

ften

m

ore

than

eno

ugh

tim

e fo

r th

inki

ng,

$ it

was

unf

ortu

nate

ly t

he e

nem

y w

ho g

ave

us o

nly

too

d an

obj

ect

less

on.