Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance · PDF fileProject . 40f8 ES1017309 ... Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency
Post on 15-Mar-2018
213 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
. 40f8 ES1017309
. CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analyticallot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL
,Total Mer~ry by FIMS ·Total Metals by ICP-AES
' TPH -Semivolatile Fraction
!TPH VolatileslBTEX
Matrix: WATER
2
Evaluation: x = Quality Control frequency not within specification , ,/ = Quality Control frequency within specification .
10.0 10.0 10.0 1-
Quality Control Specification
j I ALS OCS3 re~ uirement
- .{ -,/
uali ty Control frequency within specification.
NEPM 1999 Schedule 8(3) and ALS 5~£S3_requirem~
NEPM 1999 Schedule 8(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Matrix: WATER
50f8 ES1017309
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL A Evaluation: x = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; v" = Quality Control frequency within specification.
, - Control Specification
boLo LU lU.U ....J ·I U.U ~ 1 "~t:"'M l:,j:,j:,j Schedule 6(3) and ALS QCS3 reqUireme~ __ -,
- -l
- ----- -1
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
'------'
Page : 60f8 . ES1017309 Work Order
Client Project
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD . 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM . In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Total Metals by ICP-AES
I! _. -.- -' .-. -. Total Mercury by FIMS
1_-_-.- ______ _
I Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
I Pesticides by GCMS
, f-==~-=-_,-.,-,::--:: _ , TPH - Semivolatile Fraction i __________ _
. PAH/Phenois (SIM)
- -TPH Volatiles/BTEX
I Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A
Total Mercury by FIMS
! Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
; Pesticides by GCMS
onweig drying period at 103-105 degrees C. This method is , , -_ ... ,.. .. _ ............ ... \. ___ , _.;hedule B(3) (Method 102) I
EG005-T---!- SOli I (APHA 21st ed ., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010) (ICPAES) Metals are determined following an appropriate acid --'--1 i digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum ! based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched
EG035T i standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)
; SOfL l AS 3550, APHA 21st ed. , 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCI2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an : I automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid .\ ! digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCI2 which is then purged into a heated
I quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with , NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)
- ~- -- EP066 SOIL 1 (USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against ___ ._1 i an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 504)
' EP068 SOIL I (USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against ; an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method
-!-~
!
- -1
EP071
EP075(SIM)
EP080
--r-SOIL I
SOIL
--I
1504,505) 1 (USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FIO and quantified against alkane i standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1) I (USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion Mode (SIM) and I quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with I NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507)
SOIL : (USEPA SW 846 - 8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS. Quantification is by I ! comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) I I Schedule B(3) (Method 501)
EG020A=T---r WATER I (APHA 21st ed., 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020): The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly I efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer,
-l
EG035T
EP066
EP068
i which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete I dynode ion detector.
WATER ! AS 3550, APHA 21st ed. 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCI2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an I automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic i mercury compounds in the unfiltered sample. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by I SnCI2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a , calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)
I WATER USEPA SW 846 - 82700 Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison I against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)
--1 (Appdx. 2) . I WATER USEPA SW 846 - 82700 Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison -- - - -- --:
. against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) I : (Appdx.~ ________ _
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page Work Order
Client Project
. 70f8
. ES1017309
. CH2M HILL PTY L TO : 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
, PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)
TPH Volatiles/BTEX
! Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges
- -Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge andT~
, Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option AConcentrating)
_.
, . i '--Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option B - ---r-\ Non-concentrating) I ;[Jigestion for Total Recoverable Metals --,----,
: Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids
EP080
* ORG16
ORG17A
ORG17B
EN25
ORG14
I , -r !
WATER
USEPA SW 846 - 8015A The sample extract is analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve of n-Alkane standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2) __ _ USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in SIM Mode and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule
: B(3) (Appdx. 2)
A WATER . USEPA SW 846 - 8260B Water samples are directly purged prior to analysis by Capillary GC/MS and
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
WATER
WATER
quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve . This method is compliant with : NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2) __ _ __
, USEPA 200.2 Mod. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then : cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for I analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is : compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 202) : (USEPA SW 846 - 5030AfSgotSolidiS- shakenWith-surrogate and10mL methanol prior to analysis by P urge and ... I Trap - GC/MS.
lin-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 20g of sample, Na2S04 and surrogate are extracted with 150mL 1 :1 -DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the
I desired volume for analysis. I In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2S04 and surrogate are extracted with 20mL 1: 1 --11
DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is transferred directly to a GC vial for analysis. ___ I
! USEPA SW846-3005 Method 3005 is a Nitric/Hydrochloric acid digestion procedure used to prepare surface and I'
I ground water samples for analysis by ICPAES or ICPMS. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2) USEPA SW 846 - 351 OB 500 mL to 1 L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel and serially extracted thre e--- - -
. times using 60mL DeM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined , dehydrated and concentrated for , analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2). ALS default excludes sediment which may be resident in the container. ----_._------'
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
: a afa : ES1017309
. CH2M HILL PTY L TO
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Summary of Outliers
Outliers: Quality Control Samples
The fo llowing report highlights outl iers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.
Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes
Matrix: SOIL
7440-50-8 f 115 % -1 90.1-114% r Rec;;very greaterth-an upp~;-contr;;i -limit _1 EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES
---------EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES
7439-92-1 i 123 % 85.2-111% Recovery greater than upper control limit I \-----------+I.cc __ --- .. -- -- -- 7440-02-0 ! 122% 88.3-116% Recovervareaterthan UDDer control limit I
• For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.
• For all matrices, no Duplicate outliers occur.
• For all matrices, no Matrix Spike outliers occur.
Regular Sample Surrogates
• For all regular sample matrices, no surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance This report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.
• No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist_
Outliers: Frequency of Quality Control Samples
The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.
Matrix: SOIL
8.3 10.0 NEPM !99~ Sch~dule _BJ3) an~ALS QCS~requirement
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
ALS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
Work Order : ES1017890
Client : CH2M HILL PTY L TO
Contact · MR BEN FARMER
Address PO BOX 5392
CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
E-mail : benJarmer@ch2m.com.au Telephone : +61 0299500200 Facsimile : +61 0299500263
CERTIFICA TE OF ANAL YSIS
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project · REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL QC Level
Order number : REBATCH C-O-C number · HTH-ALS-0001-005 Date Samples Received
Sampler BF Issue Date
Site HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT No. of samples received
Quote number SY/51711 0 No. of samples analysed
---
: 1 of 11
: Environmental Division Sydney
: Charlie Pierce
: 277-289 Wood park Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
: sydney.enviro.services@alsglobal.com
: +61-2-8784 8555
: +61-2-8784 8500
: NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
: 06-SEP-2010
: 13-SEP-2010
: 17
: 17
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information :
• General Comments
• Analytica l Results
• Surrogate Control Limits
NATA
WORLD REC OGNISED
ACCREDITATION
NATA Accredited Laboratory 825
This document is issued in accordance with NATA
accreditation requirements.
Accredited for compliance with ISOIIEC 17025.
Signatories This document has been electronica lly signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been
carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories
Celine Conceicao
Pabi Subba
Position
Spectroscopist
Senior Organic Chemist
Enulronmental Dlulslon S4dne4
Part of the ALS Laborator4 Group
277~289 Woodpark Road Smithfie ld NSW Australi a 2 164
Tel. +61-2-3784 8555 Fax. +61-2-8784 8500 www.alsglobal.com
Accreditation Category
Inorganics
Organics
I:.
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
2 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
General Comments
A The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than «) result is higher than the LOR. this may be due to primary sample extracUdigestate dilution andlor insuffient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When date(s) andlor time(s) are shown bracketed, these have been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. If the sampling time is displayed as 0:00 the information was not provided by client.
Key . CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
A = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
, Extraction Fluid Number -~ _.
Final pH
30f11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample ID
Client sampling date / time
- --. 1-----:-;-,-:--;:--t----:-:=---
ES1017890"()02
7.6 .,
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix : SOIL
Extraction Fluid Number
Final pH
4 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
0.1
0.1
Client sample ID
pH Unit
C4-1
23-AUG-2010 15:00
1.6
5.0
F1-3
25-AUG-2010 15:00
ES1017890-007
6.4
1.6
4.9
G1-1 25-AUG-2010 15:00 --1
ES1017890-008 - I
9.0 r 1.6
-j-
j ~
5.4
G2-2 25-AUG-2010 15:00
ES1017890-009
8.1
1.6
5.0
A G3-2
25-AUG-2010 15:00
ES1 017890-01 0
7.7
1.5
1
5.1
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
, Alter Hel pH ____ _
j Extraction Fluid Number
!Fin~~-
5 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
5.0 5.5 - -=-:;--- --1 -----r-- 5.0 _-l
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Extraction Fluid Number
I Final pH
6 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample ID
Client sampling date / time
0.1
1
0.1 pH Unit
-26-AUG-2010 15:00
1.6
1
5.2
- ~ 26-AUG-2010 15:00
ES1017890-017
8.8
1.6
5.1
A
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
7 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY L TO REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Sub-Matrix: TCLP LEACHATE Client sample 10
. Anthracene-d10
1-4-T-;rphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 0.1 _L_
I
1 <0.5
31.5
112
.J.... _____ 90.2 80.5 96.2
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
8 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Sub-Matrix : TCLP LEACHATE Client sample 10
Client sampling date I time
Anthracene-d10
4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0
0.1
0.1
%
%
C4-1
09-SEP-2010 12:00
86.4
92.2
F1-3
09-SEP-2010 12:00 ---'-,,-
ES1017890-007
+ --
<0.1
<0.1 I -,
I-,
G1-1
09-SEP-2010 12:00
ES1017890-008
<0.5
38.0
106
130
'106
104
114
G2-2 09-SEP-2010 12:00
ES1017890-009
<0.1
A G3-2
09-SEP-2010 12:00
ES1 017890-01 0
<0.1
<0.1
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
9 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
REBATCH-406484·ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Sub·Matrix: TCLP LEACHATE
; Anthracene·d10 -------- ---4-Terphenyl·d14 0.1
A Client sample ID
<0.1
<0.0010 -r- 1 r---
i <0.5 <0.5
I ~_~ 29.8 --t- - 89.6 --I I - -,
___ ~ 1 107 119
102 I 88.6 -- -,----91:9-- . % _~------ • __ .. ---,_ 103 _ __ ___ 88.9 I 90.7
% I - 110 . __ -.!.. 95.6 ---,--
98.3
--~ ---j
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
10 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Sub-Matrix: TCLP LEACHATE
Anthracene-diD
4-Terphenyl-d14
1719-06-8 - -1718-51-0
0.1
0.1
Client sample 10
%
%
.;111M
09-SEP-2010 12:00
r -- 99.8 -, -.~ -108
~
09-SEP-2010 12:00 .- - - _. ES1017890-017
37.1 ----
104
120
106 r--. 106 --r 116
A
------1
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
11 of 11 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Surrogate Control Limits
'---
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
A LS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEM ISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
Work Order
Client
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimi le
: ES1017890
· CH2M HILL PlY L TO
MR BEN FARMER
· PO BOX 5392
CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
ben.farmer@ch2m.com.au
: +61 02 9950 0200
: +61 0299500263
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project
Site · REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL QC Level
C-O-C number
Sampler
Order number
Quote number
· HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT
: HTH-ALS-0001-005
· BF : REBATCH
· SY/517/10
Date Samples Received
Issue Date
No. of samples received
No. of samples analysed
: 1 of 5
: Environmental Division Sydney
: Charlie Pierce
: 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
. sydney.enviro.services@alsglobaLcom
: +61-2-8784 8555
. +61-2-8784 8500
: NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
: 06-SEP-2010
: 13-SEP-2010
. 17 : 17
r !
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of th is report have been checked and approved for
release. This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
• Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
• Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
• Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
NATA
WORLD RECOGNISED
ACCREDITATION
NATA Accredited Laboratory 825
This document is issued in accordance with NATA
accreditation requirements.
Accredited for compliance with ISOIIEC 17025.
Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized
carried out in compliance with proced ures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories
Celine Conceicao
PabiSubba
Position
Spectroscopist
Senior Organic Chemist
E n u l ronm ental Dlulslon S 4dne4
Part of the ALS Laborator y Group
277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfie ld NSW Australia 2164
Tel. +61-2-3734 3555 Fax. +61-2-8784 8500 www.alsglobal.com
A Campbell Brothers Limned Company
signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been
Accreditation Category
Inorganics
Organics
t: _____ _
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
20f5 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than « ) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extractJdigestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
30f5 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
A The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for tile Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI-EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Resu lt < 10 times LOR :
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result> 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%.
. ES1017819-001 :Anonymous , EG005C: Arsenic 7440-38-2 ' 0.1
EG005C: Lead _ .. - -;-r
7439-92-1 0.1
ES1017890-004 ALS-DUP-003 7440-38-2 ' 0.1
0.1
0.0010 ---- --_.
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
mg/L <0.1 ,
<0.1 L 1
mg/L L 0.7 0.7
mg/L ,
<0.1 <0.1 , mg/L
,. <0. 1 <0.1
mg/~--<0.OO1O <0.0010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
No Limit
No Limit
No Limit
No Limit
No Limit
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
40f5 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
A The quality control term Method I Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material , or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Methoc/ Blank (MB) Report
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
5 of 5 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Matrix Spike (MS) Report
A The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte
recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (OQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report
Spike Spike R~.:overy (~L ~covery Limits (%)
CAS Number Concentration MS Low
---- r 7440-38-2 1 mg/L 107 70 130 --74 39-92-1 -r~ 1 mg/L 107 70 130
7439-97-6 ,-
0.100 mg/L 113 70 130 ------
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
----ALS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order
Client
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project
Site
C-O-C number
Sampler
Order number
Quote number
: ES1017890
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD : MR BEN FARMER : PO BOX 5392 CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
: ben.farmer@ch2m.com.au : +61 0299500200 : +61 02 9950 0263
: REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL : HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT : HTH-ALS-0001-005 : BF : REBATCH
: SY/517/10
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
QC Level
Date Samples Received
Issue Date
: 1 of6
: Environmental Division Sydney : Charlie Pierce : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
: sydney.enviro.services@alsglobal.com : +61 -2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500
. NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
. 06-SEP-2010 : 13-SEP-2010
No. of samples received : 17 No. of samples analysed : 17
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.
This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:
• Analysis Holding Time Compliance
• Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance
• Brief Method Summaries
• Summary of Outliers
Environm e nta l D l u lslon S 4dne4
Part of the A L S Labora tor 4 Group 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
Tel. +61-2-8184 8555 Fax. +61-2-8784 8500 www.a lsglabal.com
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
~
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
2of6 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analysis Holding Time Compliance
A The following report summarises extraction I preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times. Dates reported represent fi rst date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and rerun s. Information is also provided re the sample conta iner (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction I digestion is involved or period from extraction I digestion where this is present. For composite samples, sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composi te. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM (1999) . A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the ana lytes being determined on the resulting solution. For non -volati le analytes, the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest ana lyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days) ; Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days). A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
Matrix: SOIL
Clear Plastic Bottle - Nitric Acid; Unfiltered C9-1, BS-1 , C4-1, G2-2, H3-1, 12-1, B8-1
CS-1, ALS-DUP-003, F1-3, G3-2, H4-1 , 14-1 ,
Sample Date
09-SEP-2010
Extraction I PreparatIon
Due for extraction
09-SEP-2010 08-MAR-2011
Evaluation: x ; Holding time breach ; .,/ ; Within holding time.
Analysis
Due for analysis Evaluation
./ 1 O-SEP-201 0 08-MAR-2011 ./
"' 1 .J. __ --.l __ -,
Lab Split: Leach for Hg, Cr(Vl) and other metal 12-1
Lab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg ALS-DUP-003
- -Lab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg
BS-1
Lab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg F1-3, G3-2,
LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests C9-1, C1-1, - -
LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests B8-1
LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests G1-1,
- -. LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests .;!,III,
LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests 14-1
G2-2, H3-1
CS-1 , C4-1
H4-1
..,.
, 25-AUG-2010 I
, 23-AUG-2~ _ , 24-AUG-2010 I
25-AUG-2010
- ----t- -- -
I 23-AUG-2010 I
-------+----
, __ 24-AU~-2010
25-AUG-2010
26-AUG-2010
_-'--___ -'-_10-SEP-2010~ 07-0CT-2~~~ __
.,---- --,-22-SEP-?010 08-SEP-2010 22-SEP-2010
---'i------.,---.---..J---- . ~--+
19-FEB-2011 08-SEP-2010 19-FEB-2011 -----
20-FEB-2011 ' - I 08-SEP-2010 , 20-FEB-2011 --,--------1----- _. ,------
21-FEB-2011 08-SEP-2010 21-FEB-2011
OS-SEP-2010 08-SEP-2010 OS-SEP-2010
-I 07-SEP-2010 i i 08-SEP-2010 07-SEP-2010
r ,--- ._---._--
08-SEP-2010 08-SEP-2010 08-SEP-2010
09-SEP-2010 08-SEP-2010 09-SEP-2010
27-AUG-2010 1 0-SEP-201 0 08-SEP-2010 1 0-SEP-201 0 _.--L.. ___ . __ -L __
-~
./
./
./
./
./ I ._,
.It
.It
./
./
./
A Campbelf Brothers Limited Company
Page . 30f6 ES1017890
• CH2M HILL PTY L TO
Work Order
Client
Project • REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Matrix: SOIL
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved C9-1, C1-1, G1-1 , 14-1 , aI-,
C6-1 , C4-1 , H4-1, B8-1 , .-w
Evaluation. " = Holding time breach ; '" = Within holding time.
09-SEP-2010 09-SEP-2010 16-SEP-2010 ../ r- 1~-~EP-2010 "1
i 19-0CT-2010 , ./ I
I
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
4of6 ES1017890
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
RE6ATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance
A The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation : x = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; v' = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Rate (%) I Quality Control Specification Evaluation
Schedule 6(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
NEPM 1999 SchedUle B(3) and ALS OCS3 requirem~
--'=-'::_-+ __ -:5:-:.0:--_-'.--_-L_ .---+¢LS QCS3 requirement 5.0 ,/ -2LS QCS3 requirement ________ _
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
: 50f6 : ES1017890
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: REBATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
---'-'--- ----: Leachable Mercury by FIMS
:
\ PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SfM) -- --
Digestion for Total Recoverable Metals in TCLP Leachate
. 'TcLp for Non & Semivolatile Analytes---{
I I
.J Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids
EG035C
EP075(SIM)
EN33a
ORG14 t
SOIL
SOIL
' APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 The ICPAES technique ionises leachate sample atoms emitting a characteristic spectrum. This spectrum is then compared against matrix matched standards for quantification. This
! method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2) ~--~~~~~~~------------------~. i AS 3550, APHA 21st ed. 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCI2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an
: automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic 1 mercury compounds in the TCLP solution. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCI2 : which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration i curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2) ! USEPA SW 846 - 82700 Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in SIM Mode and quantification is by
comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)
(USEPA SW846-1311, ALS QWI-EN/33) The TCLP procedure is designed to determine the mobility of both organic and inorganic analytes present in wastes. The standard TCLP leach is for non-volatile and Semivolatile
: test parameters. SOIL "j USEPA SW 8""4-C:6- -- 3:-:5:-:1-::0-=-B-=-50""'0"--m-cL- to 1 L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel and serially extracted three
times using 60mL DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated and concentrated for I analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2). ALS default excludes sediment
___ .____ : which may be resident in the con.:;t.:;a;.:.in;.:e.:;r. _______ _
A
._----, !
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
: 6 af6 ES1017890
CH2M HI LL PTY LTD
RE6ATCH-406484-ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Summary of Outliers
Outliers: Quality Control Samples
A The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits) . This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only .
Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes
• For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.
• For all matrices, no Duplicate outliers occur.
• For all matrices, no Laboratory Control outliers occur.
• For all matrices, no Matrix Spike outliers occur.
Regular Sample Surrogates
• For all regular sample matrices, no surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance This report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.
Matrix: SOIL
Container I Client Sample 10(s)
LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests C9-1, C1-.. 1,
! LabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests 68-1
C6-1, C4-1
Outliers: Frequency of Quality Control Samples
The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.
• No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.
Days overdue
Date analysed
08-SEP-2010
~ -- --~----- ---, 1 I 08-SEP-2010
Days overdue
----,----I I
06-SEP-2010 1 2
07-SEP-2010 -'
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
- 68-
15. Appendix H - USEPA ProUCL Calculation Sheets
, 1
I
ANSTO - COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE -
- \
\ I
I
.. J
)
I . j
A I B I C D I E I F I G I H I I I J I K I L
1 Appendix H: USEPA ProUCL Calculation Sheets
User Selected Options ------
~ 1 ~' j
4 ' Full Precision ..
OFF
" Confidence Coefficient 95%
, ~ Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000 c----.
I
_ 8 LG1 (As)
.J 11 General Statistics
, 1 Number of Valid Observations 16 Number of Distinct Observations 15 -
14 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
, Minimum 5 Minimum of Log Data 1,609
!. Maximum 258 Maximum of Log Data 5,553
17 Mean 85.13 Mean of log Data 3.827
.~\ Median 62 SD of log Data 1.332
l SD 79.87
20 Coefficient of Variation 0,938
'>1 Skewness 0.98
l ~,} Relevant UCL Statistics
24 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
I Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.875 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.908
-1 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887
27 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
J Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
30 95% Student's-t UCL 120.1 95% H-UCL 340.5
1 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 269.7
95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 123.2 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 342.4
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 120.9 .--
33 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 485.3
~ ] Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
I k star (bias corrected) 0.807 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 36
~1 Theta Star 105.5
~ MLE of Mean 85.13
~ MLE of Standard Deviation 94.75
40 nu star 25.83
I Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 15.25 Nonparametric Statistics
.1 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0335 95% CLT UCL 118
43 Adjusted Chi Square Value 14.33 95% Jackknife UCL 120.1
t 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 116.7
Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.366 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 129.9
46 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.766 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 123.2
\ Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.144 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 119.3
I' Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.222 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 123.3 I' ? ;
Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 172.2 49
~ \l 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 209.8
'I Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 283.8
52 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 144.2
53 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 153.5
/ ~ ~ .,h Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 144.2
156 I I I I I I, Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
.B These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
l59 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
J
J
Page 1 of 12
,..§.l ..B. ..§l
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
I I I I I I 'G'-'-J .. ' r -A B C D E F H I I I J I K
LGn pi)f·---·----------------- ----·--------·-·----------------------------------------------------- -
General Statistics
Number of Valid Observations 116 .-
Number of Distinct Observations 15
Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics ----
Minimum 46 Minimum of Log Data 3.829
Maximum 1610 Maximum of Log Data 7.384
Mean 333.2 Mean of log Data 5.27
Median 251.5 SD of log Data 1.105
SD 390.7
Coefficient of Variation 1.1 72
Skewness 2.566
Relevant UCL Statistics
Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.707 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.919
Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887
Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distri bution
95% Student's-t UCL 504.4 95% H-UCL 812.1
95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 792.5
95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 560.8 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 988.9
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 514.8 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1375
Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
k star (bias corrected) 0.907 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Theta Star 367.4
MLE of Mean 333.2
MLE of Standard Deviation 349.9
nu star 29.02
Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 17.72 Nonparametric Statistics
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0335 95% CLT UCL 493.8
Adjusted Chi Square Value 16.72 95% Jackknife UCL 504.4
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 489.8
Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.465 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 665.4
Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.762 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 1209
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.173 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 514.7
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.221 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 569.2
Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 758.9
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 943.1
Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1305
95% Approximate Gamma UCL 545.5
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 578.2
Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 545.5
I I I I Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Tilese recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and lad (2002)
and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
-_. L
Page 2 of 12
\ J
I , I
I 1
. ,
)
A I B I C I D I E J F I G I H I I I J I K I L
114 .' . ~ LG1 (Mercury)
117 General Statistics
1''1 Number of Valid Observations 16 Number of Distinct Observations 8
120 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
121 Minimum 0.1 Minimum of Log Data -2.303
~ Maximum 41.4 Maximum of Log Data 3.723
,J Mean 3.2 Mean of log Data -0.971
124 Median 0.2 SD of log Data 1.719
~ SD 10.25
J Coefficient of Variation 3.205
127 Skewness 3.915
.~
) 130 Relevant UCL Statistics
-1 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
~ Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.336 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.787
133 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887
.~ ~ Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
~ 131, Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribut ion
137 95% Student's-t UCL 7.694 95% H-UCL 9.559
I~ 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 4.383
, .:;~ 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 10.1 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 5.684
140 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 8. 112 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 8.239
II
~ ~ Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
143 k star (bias corrected) 0.301 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)
~ Theta Star 10.61
MLE of Mean 3.2 ._--
146 MLE of Standard Deviation 5.828
'Il nu star 9.647
k Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 3.722 Nonparametric Statistics
149 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0335 95% CLT UCL 7.417
1~O Adjusted Chi Square Value 3.314 95% Jackknife UCL 7.694
11 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 7.279
1~2 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 2.605 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 94.94
153 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.834 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 40.7
14 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.352 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 8.138
,J5 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.232 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 11 .37
156 Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 14.37
!? 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 19.21
J 8 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 28.71
159 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 8.293
[ \0 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 9.315
I ]'1 162
Potential UCL to Use Use 99% Chebyshev (Mean, Sd) UCL 28.71
h} I I I 1 : 14
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCl.
1165 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
11 11.6 and Singh and Singh (2003) . For additional ins ight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
(;7
Page 3 of 12
I L
~ -;-;:;-,_ ._----_._----------_._----_._._--------_._ - --_._-- ---------- -----------_._--169 LGl (BaP) ~ - ---------------- --------_._----_._---- -_._---- --- ----- ------------------------
170 rl~7~1+---------------------------------~G-e-ne-r~aIS~t-at~is-t~ic-s----------------------------------------
~~------------------~~--~~~:----~,~-----,--------------~~--~~~~--~--~------172 Number of Valid ObseIVations l16 I Number of Distinct ObselVations 12
173
174 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
175 Minimum 0.5 Minimum of Log Data -0.693
176 Maximum 10.8 Maximum of Log Data 2.38
177 Mean 2.531 Mean of log Data 0_315
178 Median 0.9 SD of log Data 1.099
179 SD 3.107
180 Coefficient of Variation 1.228
181 Skewness 1.714
182
183 Relevant UCL Statistics
184 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
185 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.718 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.842
186 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887
187 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
188
189 Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
190 95% Student's-t UCL 3.893 95% H-UCL 5.646
191 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 5.533
192 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 4.165 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 6.9
193 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 3.948 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 9.587
194
195 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
196 k star (bias corrected) 0.811 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)
197 Theta Star 3.123
198 MLE of Mean 2.531
199 MLE of Standard Deviation 2.812
200 nu star 25.94
201 Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 15.33 Nonparametric Statistics
202 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0335 95% CL T UCL 3.809
203 Adjusted Chi Square Value 14.41 95% Jackknife UCL 3.893
204 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 3.774
205 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 1.262 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 4.738
206 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.766 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 4.072
207 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.261 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 3.869
208 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Va lue 0.222 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 4.125
209 Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 5.917
210 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 7.382
211 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 10.26
212 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 4.282
213 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 4.557
214
215 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Chebyshev (Mean, Sd) UCL 5.917
216 I I I I 217
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
218 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
219 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
220
1
.j
Page 4 of 12
A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H I I I J I K L
221 -------- --- --1 LG1 (PAH Tot)
I 224 General Statistics
?"r; Number of Valid Observations 16 Number of Distinct Observations 15
• 1,.
227 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
n Minimum 0 Log Statistics Not Avaliable
Maximum 301 .1
~.:> Mean 44.41
231 Median 11 .05
SD 78.3
, ,.1 Coefficient of Variation 1.763 ",- ",, 0")
234 Skewness 2.724
; ~ ; ~ Relevant UCL Statistics
237 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
; ! Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.612 Not Available
~ ~ Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.887
240 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level
~ "l
; ~ Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
243 95% Student's-t UCL 78.72 95% H-UCL N/A
?4~ Assuming Normal Distribution 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
f 95% Student's-t UCL 78.72 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen 1995) 90.85
~tf\J 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 80.94
247
; J Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
:. J Gamma Statistics Not Available Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)
250
I Potential UCL to Use
~ Use 95% Chebyshev (Mean, Sd) UCL1129.7 95% CLT UCL 76.6
253 95% Jackknife UCL 78.72
: ~ 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 75.46
: J 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 135.5
256 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 183.5
""f 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 78.36
: ~ 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 90.16
25~ 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 129.7
260 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 166.6
II 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 239.2
"'O~ I I 1 1 263
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
~'> These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
-J and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
266
Page 5 of 12
A I B I C J D I E I F I G I H I I J I K I L
~ ~---- --- - ------ ---------------------------- ----------- ------ ----------- -----------------------268 LG2 (As)
F=t------ -------------------- ------------ ----------- -------------------------------
~t_-----------------------------_=_-___,_=__,__c_----------------------------f 270 General Statistics F-'+-----------------,..,---,--~~-
Number of Valid Obs='::'ationj~ ____ :J ______________ Number of Distinct Observations 8 1Z.! 1-_________ _
, I 272
273 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
274 Minimum 5 Minimum of Log Data 1.609
275 Maximum 106 Maximum of Log Data 4.663
276 Mean 33 Mean of log Data 2.957
277 Median 19.5 SD of log Data 1.14
278 SD 35.77
] 279 Coefficient of Variation 1.084
280 Skewness 1.482
Warning: There are only 8 Values in this data
281
1 282
283
284 Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set,
285 the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusions
286
287 The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10-15 observations.
288
289 Relevant UCL Statistics
290 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
291 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.813 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.934
292 Shapiro Wilk Critica l Value 0.818 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818
293 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
294 295 Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
296 95% Student's-t UCL 56.96 95% H-UCL 187.5 ]
297 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 91.86
~_---------9~5=%~A7d~jU~s~te-d7-C~L~T~U~C~L~(C-h-e-n-~1~99~5~)~6~0~.8~8--~---------9-7~.5~~707C~he~b-y-Sh~e-V~(~M~V~U=E~)~U7C~L~1~1~7.~4-~ 299 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 58.06 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 167.5
300
301 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
302 k star (bias corrected) 0.747 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
303 Theta Star 44.17
304 MLE of Mean 33
305 MLE of Standard Deviation 38.18
306 nu star 11.95
307 Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 5.197 Nonparametric Statistics " .
308 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0195 95% CL T UCL 53.8
309 Adjusted Chi Square Value 4.128 95% Jackknife UCL 56.96
310 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 52.14
311 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.331 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 94.33
312 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.735 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 154.5
313 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.197 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 53.25
314 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.301 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 59.5
315 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 88.12
316 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 112
317 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 158.8
318 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 75.91
319 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 95.58
320
321 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 75.91
322 I I I 1 323
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
324 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
325 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
326
327
328 LG2 (Pb)
329
330 General Statistics
Page 6 of 12
L I A I B I C I 0 I E I F I G I H I I I J I K I L
331 Numb~~fVal~ Obse~ations l 8 Number of Distinct Observations 7
?~l . __ . -Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
I' --- ----------r-co----334 Minimum 10 Minimum of Log Data 2.303
~~5 Maximum 361 Maximum of Log Data 5.889
,- Mean 102.3 Mean of log Data 3.81
',J,, / Median 45.5 SO of log Data 1.431
338 SO 130.3
~ Coefficient of Variation 1.275
Skewness 1.494 ~- . 341
(I Warning: There are only 8 Values in this data
344 Note: It should be noted that even though bootstrap methods may be performed on this data set,
: 1, the resulting calculations may not be reliable enough to draw conclusions
.- ~ 347 The literature suggests to use bootstrap methods on data sets having more than 10-15 observations.
~'''~
~ Relevant UCL Statistics
" Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test 350
351 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.765 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.894
. k Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818
":J~ Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
354
. ~ Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
__ t 95% Student's-t UCL 189.6 95% H-UCL 1474
357 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 331.5
11 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 204.1 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 430.5
h 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 193.6 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 624.9
360
I Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
I~ k star (bias corrected) 0.542 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Theta Star 188.6 ------
363
'''']1- MLE of Mean 102.3
r, MLE of Standard Deviation 138.9
J 366 nu star 8.674
"''',? Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 3.131 Nonparametric Statistics
f Adjusted Level of Significance 0.D195 95% CLT UCL 178 ~
"cb. Adjusted Chi Square Value 2.351 95% Jackknife UCL 189.6
370 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 173.7
n Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.453 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 348.8
-,~ Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.746 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 605.1
373 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.211 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 176.8
h Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.304 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 191.1
j 5 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 303.1
376 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 390
--)7 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 560.8
[ 18 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 283.2
3)9 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 377.2
,, - i)
/-1 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 283.2
3J2 J I I I 383
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
\4 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
~.j5 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
386
Page 7 of 12
A I B I C I o I E I F I G I H I I I K I L
~r.-c--------------------------------- ---------- ------- ---------------- ----------------------------------388 LG2 (BaP) -'-= ------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------- --
389 P"'t----------- --- ---- ---------------- ------------G"enerai""'S.,-
ta""Cti,--st::-ic-s------ --------------------------1
~ ----------------:-:----;---:-:---:--:cc---=-,------,---391 Number of Valid observati0n¥- ~
------------------Number of Distinct Observations 3
392 ~3~9~3~-------------~R-aw-~S'Cta~t.,-is~ti-cs----------------,----------.,-Lo-g---tr-a-ns~f,--or-m-e-d~S~t-a~tis-t.,-ic-s--------~
394 Minimum 0_5 Minimum of Log Data -0_693
395 Maximum 1_6 Maximum of Log Data 0.47
396 Mean 0.725 Mean of log Data -0.438
397 Median 0.5 SO of log Data 0.478
398 SO 0.43
399 Coefficient of Variation 0.593
400 Skewness 1.697
401
402
403 Warning: There are only 3 Distinct Values in this data
404 There are insufficient Distinct Values to perform some GOF tests and bootstrap methods.
405 Those methods will return a 'N/A' value on your output displayl
406
407 It is necessary to have 4 or more Distinct Values to compute bootstrap methods.
408 However, results obtained using 4 to 9 distinct values may not be reliable.
409 It is recommended to have 10-15 or more observations for accurate and meaningful bootstrap results.
410
411 Relevant UCL Statistics
412 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
413 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.608 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.601
414 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.818
415 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
416
417 Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
418 95% Student's-t UCL 1.013 95% H-UCL 1.099
419 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1.242
420 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 1.073 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1.471
421 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 1.028 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1.921
422
423 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
424 k star (bias corrected) 2.86 Data do not follow a Discernable Distribution (0.05)
425 Theta Star 0.253
426 MLE of Mean 0.725
427 MLE of Standard Deviation 0.429
428 nu star 45.76
429 Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 31.24 Nonparametric Statistics
430 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0195 95% CL T UCL 0.975
431 Adjusted Chi Square Value 28.24 95% Jackknife UCL 1.013
432 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL N/A
433 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 1.751 95% Bootstrap-t UCL N/A
434 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.719 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL N/A
435 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.467 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL N/A
436 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.295 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL N/A
437 Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1.388
438 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1.675
439 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 2.238
440 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 1.062
441 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 1.175
442
443 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Student's-t UCL 1.013
444 or 95% Modified-t UCL 1.028
445 I I I I 446 Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
447 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
448 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
449
o
Page 8 of 12
"I I I
-j
J J J
J
~ I
, 1
I A I B I C I D I E I F G I H . I I l J I K I L
450 ---------- -------: - i LG4 (As)
453 General Statistics
""1 Number of Valid Observations 12 Number of Distinct Observations 11
, 45J Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
457 Minimum 0.5 Minimum of Log Data -0.693
, , Maximum 452 Maximum of Log Data 6.114
'T.,,-Mean 89.17 Mean of log Data 3.215
460 Median 36 SD of log Data 2.144
, 1 SD 130.8
, I Coefficient of Variation 1.467
463 Skewness 2.278
:1 Relevant UCL Statistics
466 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
; -1 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.703 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.903
, ! Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.859 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.859
469 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
""'t;) , t Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
I 95% Student's-t UCL 157 95% H-UCL 7515 472
473 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 618.8
, l 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 177.8 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 817.7
Ltl 6 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 161 .1 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1209
476
, ~ Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
,.J k star (bias corrected) 0.429 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
479 Theta Star 207.7
, } MLE of Mean 89.17
.J MLE of Standard Deviation 136. 1
482 nu star 10.3
• -U Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 4.133 Nonparametric Statistics
, Il Adjusted Level of Significance 0.029 95% CLT UCL 151.3
485 Adjusted Chi Square Value 3.557 95% Jackknife UCL 157
,A O~ 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 149.6
, ~ Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.213 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 244.7
48~ Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.785 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 411.4
489 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.127 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 155.5
b Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.259 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 181 .7
.. )1 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 253.8
492 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 325
~ Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 464.9
J1 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 222.3
495 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 258.3
~ '7 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 258.3
498 I I I I '-19 Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
10 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh , and laci (2002)
501 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician ,
"n2
Page 9 of 12
A I B I C I D I E I FI G I H I I J I K I L
~t-:-------------------.--.------------------ .. - --------- ---------- ---------504 LG4 (Pb)
r-'-' --------- .------.--.--------- .-------.-.. - - --------------------.- ------
~ ---------_._ ----------_. __ ._--- _ .. ---_._---------- _._------------------- --. _- -506 General Statistics
~t_----------------N--Um-·--be-r-oi Valid Observations 112
508 1--"-=========================~ _-.1 Number of Distinct Observations 12
509 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
510 Minimum 8 Minimum of Log Data 2.079
511 Maximum 2320 Maximum of Log Data 7.749
512 Mean 408.3 Mean of log Data 5.211
513 Median 214 SD of log Data 1.443
514 SD 627.8
515 Coefficient of Variation 1.538
516 Skewness 2.991
517
518 Relevant UCL Statistics
519 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
520 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.59 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.96
521 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.859 Shapiro Wilk Critical Va lue 0.859
522 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
523
524 Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
525 95% Student's-t UCL 733.7 95% H-UCL 2691
526 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1340
527 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 873.6 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1726
528 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 759.8 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 2483
529
530 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
531 k star (bias corrected) 0.617 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
532 Theta Star 662.1
533 MLE of Mean 408.3
534 MLE of Standard Deviation 519.9
535 nu star 14.8
536 Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 7.121 Nonparametric Statistics
537 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.029 95% CL T UCL 706.4
538 Adjusted Chi Square Value 6.325 95% Jackknife UCL 733.7
539 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 691.4
540 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.364 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 1415
541 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.766 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 1874
542 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.151 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 734.8
543 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.255 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 924.8
544 Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1198
545 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1540
546 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 2212
547 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 848.4
548 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 955.1
549
550 Potential UCL to Use Use 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 848.4
551 I I 1 I 552
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
553 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
554 and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
555
1 -.l
I J
Page 10 of 12
l I A I B I C J D I E I F I G I H I I J I K I L
556
r- -~ LG4 (BaP) ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
559 General Statistics
S~9'H ______________________ N_u_m __ be_r_o_f _V_a_lid_O __ bs_e_~_a_t_io_n_sL1_2 ______ i-____________________ N_um __ be_r_o_f_D_is_ti_n_ct_O_b_s_e_~_a_ti_on_s~10 _______ 1
!:>~ Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
56~3r-________________________________ ~~M_in~im __ um-+0~.~5~ __ ~~ ________________________ ~M~i_n~im_u_m __ of~L_0_g~D~a~t_a~-~0.~6~93~--1 ! H~r-__________________________________ M_a_x7im~u_m~1~8~3~ __ ~ ____________________________ M_a_xi7m~u_m_o_f7L~0_g~D~a~ta~5~.2~0~9 __ ~ !"J Mean 18.33 Mean of log Data 1.027
566 Median 2.1 SDoflog Data 1.719
1 SD 51 .97 ! ~------------~~~~~~--r-----------------------~--~ ! ~ Coefficient of Variation 2.835
569 Skewness 3.438
I Relevant UCL Statistics ! r+-------------~~~~~------------~------------~-----=~~~------------~
Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test 572
:-~I+-----------------------~S~h-a~Pi-ro~VV~il~k~T~e7st-S7t~at~is~ti_C~0~.3~8~ __ ~------------------------~S~h-ap~i-ro~VV~ilk-T~e7s~t-S~ta~t~is_tiC~0~.8~8~ __ _1 ! l Shapiro VVilk Critical Value 0.859 Shapiro VVilk Critical Value 0.859
J;+-----------~----~--~~~~~~--~--~-L------~--------~------~------~~~~~----~~------~ 575 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
f''7~ H-------------~--~--~--~~~~---------------r------------~--~~------~~~~------------_1
! ~1+_---------------A-ss-u-m-i-n-g-N-O-rm--a-ID~is~tr~ib~u-ti~on~--~~~~--_1--------------A-s-s-u-m-i-ng--L-Og-n-o-rm--a-ID--is-tr-ib~u~ti~on~~~~=---__1 57~ 95% Student's-t UCL 45.27 95% H-UCL 117
95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 32.48 579H-____________ ~~~~~~~~--~~~~--1---------------~~~~~--7.7.~~~~~__1
l 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 58.92 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 42.36 ! ~r+--------------~~~~~---~~~~------------------~~~--=~~~~~
I 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 47.76 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 61 .77 LvJ.
582 1 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
! ~~------------~~~~~~--r-----~--~--~~~~~~--~ ! J k star (bias corrected) 0.323 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
585 Theta Star 56.8
,. MLE of Mean 18.33 ! PHj--------------------~~~--~~~~~~--~------------------------------------------_1
l MLE of Standard Deviation 32.27 ! r,+----------------------~==--r--------------------------~ 588 nu star 7.747
:_~ Approximate Chi Square Value (.05) 2.589 Nonparametric Statistics ! ~H----------------------A~d~jU-s~te-d~Le-v-e71 -of~S~i-gn~i~fiC-a-n-c-er.0~.0~2~9~--1--------------------------------=95~O~Vo~C~L~T~U~C~L~4~3~.0~1----1
591 Adjusted Chi Square Va lue 2.157 95% Jackknife UCL 45.27
f'a~R-____________________ ~~ __ ~~~~~~~-+~~ __ ~ _______________________ 95_0_Vo_S_ta~n~d~a~rd~B~00~t~st_ra_p~U~C~Lt4~1~.6~4~~ l Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 1.569 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 370.1
! ~1~--------~--~-=~~~~--r---------------=~~~~=b.~__1 59~ Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0.813 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 206.3
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.303 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 48.02 59H5~ __________ ~~ ____ ~~ __ ~~~~~~~~~~ __________________ ~~~~~~~~~~ __ -4
~ Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.263 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 63.23
~J Data not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 83.72
598 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 112
h Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 167.6
1 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 54.85
601 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 65.84
Potential UCL to Use Use 99% Chebyshev (Mean, Sd) UCL 167.6
604 I I I I --2 Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCl.
~r-"f-------~T:;;h'--e-s-e-r-e-co-m--m-e-nd--;-a~t""io-n-s-a-re-"-b-as-e-d~u-p-o-n~t""h-e~re-s-u-Clt~s--:o--;f70th--:e-s--;-im:::-:u;-:la~ti:::-o:::-n :::-s;-:tu--:d~ie--:s--:s--:u:::m--:m:::a--:r:::iz--:e:::d--;-i --:n ';:;S7in--:g7h-, ';:;S""in--:g7h-, --:an--:d:;-;-:Ia--:c~i (;;2~0~0;;c2)~----~
6ri? and Singh and Singh (2003). For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician.
~n8~ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ~
Page 11 of 12
A I B I C I o I E I F G I H I I I K I L
~ --_._._-- _ .. _------_._-_ .. _--------_ .. . -_._--_._-_._---_._-_._--_._------------_._._---610 LG4 (PAH Tot)
...;:..:..;:.1-----_.- .. -------------... ------ .--.-.--------------------------.. -.- --- ---------... --.--.-.-- --.. --------
2..U ______ _ -;0:-:-;-:-:--------------------------612 General Statistics
:ill~ ________________ NuriiberofValid~~SeMiti(;nsT1-2- -=_~I=-_-_-.-___ -. --.-----:-:N-um-:-be-r-o-=f-=D-:-is-,ti:-n-ct-:o:C:b-s-e-rv-a-'tio-n-s'.~-:-1'='=-_ -_~=-
rill --------.-----------.-----.--.-------,-------;---,---;---.-~~:__-------1 615 Raw Statistics Log-transformed Statistics
616 Minimum 0.5 Minimum of Log Data -0.693
617 Maximum 1739 Maximum of Log Data 7.461
618 Mean 177.3 Mean of log Data 2.991
619 Median 21 .9 SO of log Data 2.224
620 SO 493.3
621 Coefficient of Variation 2.781
622 Skewness 3.427
623
624 Relevant UCL Statistics
625 Normal Distribution Test Lognormal Distribution Test
626 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.392 Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.977
, 1 627 Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.859
628 Data not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.859
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
629
630 Assuming Normal Distribution Assuming Lognormal Distribution
631 95% Student's-t UCL 433.1 95% H-UCL 9148
632 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness) 95% Chebyshev (MVU E) UCL 573.2
633 95% Adjusted-CL T UCL (Chen-1995) 562.1 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 759
634 95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 456.5 99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1124
635
l 637 k star (bias corrected) 0.29 636 Gamma Distribution Test Data Distribution
638 Theta Star 610.8
Data Follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level
639 MLE of Mean 177.3
640 MLE of Standard Deviation 329,1
641 nu star 6.969
642 Approximate Chi Square Value (,05) 2.153 Nonparametric Statistics
643 Adjusted Level of Significance 0.029 95% CLT UCL 411,6
644 Adjusted Chi Square Value 1.769 95% Jackknife UCL 433.1
645 95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 400
646 Anderson-Darling Test Statistic 0.926 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 2915
647 Anderson-Darling 5% Critical Value 0,821 95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 1684
648 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Statistic 0.263 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 458,1
649 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5% Critical Value 0.265 95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 602.2
650 Data follow Appr, Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 798
651 97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1067
652 Assuming Gamma Distribution 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1594
653 95% Approximate Gamma UCL 573.9
654 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 698,6
655
656 Potentia l UCL to Use Use 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 698.6
657 I I I I 658
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
659 These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Singh, and laci (2002)
660 and Singh and Singh (2003), For additional insight, the user may want to consult a statistician,
Page 12 of 12
I 'J
16. Appendix I - Statistical Assessment
95% UCL - Radiological
Location No11 backyard
No11 backyard No11 backyard No11 backyard
No11 backyard No11 backyard No11 Side yard No11 Garden No13 Foreshore No13 Foreshore No13 Foreshore
No11 Foreshore No11 Foreshore No11 Foreshore
No11 Foreshore No11 Foreshore
No7 & 9 Foreshore No 7 & 9 Foreshore No7 & 9 Foreshore No7 & 9 Foreshore No5 Foreshore
No5 Foreshore No5 Foreshore No5 Foreshore No5 Foreshore Foreshore hotspot Foreshore hotspot
Foreshore hotspot
Average
Standard Deviation
Medium
Skewwdness
DGCL is 100Bq/g total
Sample ID 81
82 82,2
83 83.2 84 86 88 F1 F1 .2 F1.3
G1 G2 G2.2
G3 G3.2
H1
H2 H3 H4
11
12 13 14 15 K1 Fore K2 Fore
K3 Fore
av I
Total Total Total U238 Th232 U235 activity activity activity
2,90 0.58 0.41
36.40 1.10 3.72
15.40 0.83 0,50
1.96 0.53 0.09 0.62 0.95 0.07
0.35 0.51 0.05 110.60 1.90 9.48
23.80 0.34 1.68 78.40 0.35 6.48
397.60 5.40 28.80 264.60 3.90 21 .60
0.67 0.43 0.05 239.40 4.50 21.60 60.20 1.00 4.44
42.00 1.50 7.56 95.20 2.70 12.00
56.00 0.91 0.38 0.35 0.21 0.05
37.80 0.99 1.20
19.60 0.35 0.94
29.40 0.94 0.68
3.78 0.89 0.11
0.85 0.25 0.08
2.38 0.49 0.09
1.29 0.54 0.08 280.00 2.10 7.08
15.4 0.81 1.8 56 2 8.52
Total Activity
3,89
41.22 16.73 2.58 1.64
0.91 121.98 25.82 85.23
431.80 290.10
1.16 265.50 65.64
51 .06 109.90
57.29 0.61
39.99
20.89
31 .02
4.78 1.18 2.96 1.91
289.18 18.01
66.52
Coeff Variation CV stddev must be <1.2 for Procedure D NSW EPA = 0.693 hotspot averaged incl Kfore
t (0 .05,19) 1.729 hotspot averaged incl Kfore
95% UCL average 76.74 hotspot averaged incl Kfore
ANSTO - COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE-
- 69 -
Total Activity averaged hotspots
3,89 28,98
2.11
0.91 121 .98 25.82
269.04
1.16 165.57
80.48
57.29 0.61
39.99
20.89 31 .02
4.78 1.18 2.96 1.91
124.57
49.26
71 .08
23.36
0.36
Secular Equilibrium - Radiological
Comparison of lower decay chain Pb- Bi-
Sample 210 214 RPD% Pb210/Bi214 81 207 280 82 2600 2600
82.2 1100 1400 83 140 290 84 44 41 85 25 25 86 7900 9600 88 1700 2100 F1 5600 5600
F1.2 28400 33700 F1 .3 18900 22100 G1 48 29 G2 17100 20000
G2.2 4300 4100 G3 3000 3500
G3.2 6800 8100 H1 4000 5400 H2 25 20 H3 2700 3900 H4 1400 1900 11 2100 2900 12 270 310 13 61 80 14 170 240 15 92 120
K1Fore 20000 23000 K2Fore 1100 1200 K3Fore 4000 5400
Average Std Dev
Duplicates - Radiological
0 .s cu Q)
J:1o Q. E 0.-
:::l cu 0 en
81 Dup002
H1 Dup004
11 Dup007
All activities are in Bq/g
Q)
..!!1o roO c..,.... u.,.... EN =N ra.a o..a (f)a.. :::la..
0
207 230
4000 3600
2100 2900
30 0
24 70 -7 0 19 21 0 17 16 -49 16 -5 15 17 30 -22 36 30 32 14 27 34 26 14 9
30 12 28
~o ..!!1 N o ..... c..,.... ON EN o...c ra .-0:::0.. (f)CC
10.53 58 10.53 91
32.00 94
- 70 -
Comparison of lower and upper decay chain Pb- Th230 or RPD% 210 Th234 Pb210ITh230 207 610 99
2600 2200 -17 1100 1300 17 140 73 -63 44 44 0 25 19 -27
7900 7900 0 1700 1700 0 5600 6200 10
28400 26700 -6 18900 22700 18
48 28 -53 17100 23200 30 4300 4600 7 3000 5900 65 6800 8000 16 4000 990 -121
25 27 8 2700 2400 -12 1400 1400 0 2100 1200 -55 270 220 -20 61 30 -68 170 190 11 92 110 18
20000 8300 -83 1100 1200 9 4000 8600 73
-5 46
Q) Q) 2 >. roN ?feN ..!!1L!) roL!) ~I() Q) >.
o.C"') Q.li'i~ rali'i~ U.,.... 0 ..... ,g~ OM EC5..E: ~o~ =N o..~ EN o..N 0. '-~:::> g.:::> ~f-.:t o.f- U :::lCC 0::: III 0:::::1 8 « 0 0
66 12.90 30 34 12.5 3.84 4.29 42 73.68 32 31 3.17 57.29 51.19
95 1.06 53 59 10.71 30.98 42.26
ANSTO - COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE-
~-~ o cu.-0'0.2: o..f-U 0::: «
11.08
11.25
30.81
I 1
Background Samples
Background Total 10 U238
2 0.7 3 0.56 4 0.56 5 0.7
6 0.28
Average 0.56
All results in 8q/g
ANSTO
- 71 -
Total Total Total Th232 U235 Activity
0.3 0.12 1.12 0.2 0.24 1 0.3 0.12 0.98 0.2 0.12 1.02
0.4 0.12 0.8
0.28 0.144 0.984
- COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE -
Client Reference:
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Our Reference: UNITS
Your Reference -------------Date Sampled ------------
Type of sample
Date digested -
Date analysed -
Arsenic mg/kg
Cadmium mg/kg
Chromium mg/kg
Copper mg/kg
Lead mg/kg
Mercury mg/kg
Nickel mg/kg
Zinc mg/kg
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
406484, Hunters Hill
45231-1
EVL-DUP-007
27/08/2010
Soil
31/08/2010
31/08/2010
40
0.9
16
33
320
0.6
7
460
.A. NATA V" ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Page 7 of 14
Client Reference:
Moisture
Our Reference: UNITS
Your Reference -------------
Date Sampled ------------
Type of sample
Date prepared -Date analysed -
Moisture %
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
406484, Hunters Hill
45231 -1
EVL-DUP-007
27/08/2010
Soil
31/08/2010
31/08/2010
18
.A-NATA V' ACCREDITED FDA
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Page 8 of 14
J
Client Reference: 406484, Hunters Hill
Method ID Methodology Summary
GC.16 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.
GC.3 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID.
GC.12 subset Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS.
GC-5 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC with dual ECD's.
GC-6 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD.
Metals.20 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.
ICP-AES
Metals.21 Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour MS. CV-AAS
LAB.S Moisture content determined by heating at 105 deg C for a minimum of 4 hours.
Envirolab Reference: 45231 .A Page 9 of 14 Revision No: R 00 NATA
V" ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Client Reference: 406484, Hunters Hill
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
vTPH & BTEX in Soil
Date extracted -
Date analysed -
vTPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 25
Benzene mg/kg 0.5
Toluene mg/kg 0.5
Ethylbenzene mg/kg 1
m+p-xylene mg/kg 2
a-Xylene mg/kg 1
Surrogate % aaa-Trifluorotoluene
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
sTPH in Soil (C10-C36)
Date extracted -
Date analysed -
TPHC10 - C14 mg/kg 50
TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100
TPH C29 - C36 mg/kg 100
Surrogate % o-Terphenyl
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
PAHs in Soil
Date extracted -
Date analysed -
Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1
Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1
Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1
Fluorene mg/kg 0.1
Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1
Anthracene mg/kg 0.1
Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1
Pyrene mg/kg 0.1
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
METHOD
GC.16
GC.16
GC.16
GC.16
GC.16
GC.16
GC.16
METHOD
GC.3
GC.3
GC.3
GC.3
METHOD
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
GC.12 subset
Blank Duplicate Sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
01/09/2 [NT] 10
<25 [NT]
<0.5 [NT]
<0.5 [NT]
<1 .0 [NT]
<2.0 [NT]
<1 .0 [NT]
88 [NT]
Blank Duplicate sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
01/09/2 [NT] 010
<50 [NT]
<100 [NT]
<100 [NT]
94 [NT]
Blank Duplicate sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
01/09/2 [NT] 010
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
.A. NATA V" ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery
LCS-6 31 /08/201 C
LCS-6 01/09/2010
LCS-6 99%
LCS-6 74%
LCS-6 140%
LCS-6 90%
LCS-6 96%
LCS-6 110%
LCS-6 125%
Spike sm# Spike % Recovery
LCS-6 31/08/2010
LCS-6 01/09/201 (
LCS-6 72%
LCS-6 84%
LCS-6 83%
LCS-6 83%
Spike sm# Spike % Recovery
LCS-6 31/08/2010
I LCS-6 01/09/201 ( I
LCS-6 98% I [NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 93%
LCS-6 103% j
[NR] [NR] j
LCS-6 93%
LCS-6 95% I
Page 10 of 14
1
Client Reference: 406484, Hunters Hill QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQl
PAHs in Soil
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1
Chrysene mg/kg 0.1
Benzo(b+k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.05
Indeno(1 ,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1
Benzo(g, h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.1
Surrogate %
p-Terphenyl-d14
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
Organochlorine
Pesticides in soil
Date extracted -
Date analysed -
HCS mg/kg 0.1
alpha-SHC mg/kg 0.1
gamma-SHC mg/kg 0.1
beta-BHC mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1
delta-SHC mg/kg 0.1
Aldrin mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg 0.1
gamma-Chlordane mg/kg 0.1
alpha-chlordane mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.1
pp-OOE mg/kg 0.1
Dieldrin mg/kg 0.1
Endrin mg/kg 0.1
pp-DDD mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.1
pp-DDT mg/kg 0.1
Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg 0.1
Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1
Surrogate TClMX %
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
METHOD
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
GC.12
subset
METHOD
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
GC-5
Blank Duplicate Sm#
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.2 [NT]
<0.05 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
94 [NT]
Blank Duplicate sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
01/09/2 [NT] 010
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
<0.1 [NT]
118 [NT]
.A-NATA V-ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Spike Sm# Spike %
Recovery
[NR] [NR]
lCS-6 102%
[NR] [NR]
lCS-6 99%
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 97%
Spike sm# Spike %
Recovery
LCS-6 31/08/2010
LCS-6 01/09/2010
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 104%
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 100%
LCS-6 92%
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 90%
LCS-6 99%
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 100%
LCS-6 100%
LCS-6 94%
LCS-6 102%
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 96%
[NR] [NR]
lCS-6 107%
Page 11 of 14
Client Reference: 406484, Hunters Hill
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
PCBs in Soil
Date extracted -
Date analysed -
Aroch lor 1016 mg/kg 0,1
Arochlor 1221 * mg/kg 0,1
Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0,1
Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0,1
Aroch lor 1248 mg/kg 0,1
Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0,1
Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0,1
Surrogate TCLMX %
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Date digested -
Date analysed -
Arsenic mg/kg 4
Cadmium mg/kg 0,5
Chromium mg/kg 1
Copper mg/kg 1
Lead mg/kg 1
Mercury mg/kg 0,1
Nickel mg/kg 1
Zinc mg/kg 1
Envirolab Reference: 45231
Revision No: R 00
METHOD
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
GC-6
METHOD
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,21 CV-AAS
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Metals,20 ICP-AES
Blank Duplicate Sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
01/09/2 [NT] 010
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
118 [NT]
Blank Duplicate Sm#
31/08/2 [NT] 010
31/08/2 [NT] 010
<4 [NT]
<0,5 [NT]
<1 [NT]
<1 [NT]
<1 [NT]
<0,1 [NT]
<1 [NT]
<1 [NT]
.A-NAYA 'V" ACCREDITED FOR TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Duplicate results
Base II Duplicate II %RPD
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
[NT]
Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery
LCS-6 31/08/201C
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 125%
[NR] [NR]
LCS-6 116%
Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery
LCS-4 31/08/201 0
I LCS-4 31/08/2010
LCS-4 102% I LCS-4 101 %
LCS-4 105% I LCS-4 106%
LCS-4 102%
LCS-4 110% j
LCS-4 105%
I LCS-4 104%
Page 12 of 14
Client Reference: 406484, Hunters Hill
QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQl
Moisture
Date prepared -
Date analysed -
Moisture % 0.1
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
METHOD
lAB.8
Blank
31/08/2
010
31/08/2
010
<0.10
.A NATA V' ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Page 13 of 14
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos 10 was analysed by Approved Identifier: Asbestos 10 was authorised by Approved Signatory: Asbestos counting was analysed by Approved Counter: Asbestos counting was authorised by Approved Signatory:
406484, Hunters Hill
Not applicable for this job Not applicable for this job @ERROR @ERROR
NT: Not tested INS: Insufficient sample for this test NA: Test not required
PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit RPD: Relative Percent Difference >: Greater than
NA: Test not required <: Less than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample
Quality Control Definitions Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents, glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples. Duplicate: This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable. Matrix Spike: A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist. LCS (Laboratory Control Sample): This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample. Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batched of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable. Matrix Spikes and LCS: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics and 10-140% for SVOC and speciated phenols is acceptable.
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
.A-NATA V" ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Page 14 of 14
Client Reference:
Report Comments:
Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier:
Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Asbestos counting was analysed by Approved Counter: Asbestos counting was authorised by Approved Signatory:
406484, Hunters Hill
Not applicable for this job
Not applicable for this job @ERROR @ERROR
NT: Not tested INS: Insufficient sample for this test
NA: Test not required
PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit RPD: Relative Percent Difference
>: Greater than
NA: Test not required
<: Less than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample
Quality Control Definitions Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,
glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples. Duplicate: This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable. Matrix Spike: A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist. LCS (Laboratory Control Sample): This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample. Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batched of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable. Matrix Spikes and LCS: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics and 10-140% for SVOC and
speciated phenols is acceptable.
Envirolab Reference: 45231 Revision No: R 00
.A-NATA 'V" ACCREDITED FOR
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Page 14 of 14
ALS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
Work Order
Client
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project
Order number
C-O-C number
Sampler
Site
Quote number
: ES1016932
: CH2M HILL PTY L TO
: MR BEN FARMER
: PO BOX 5392 CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
: ben.farmer@ch2m.com.au : +61 0299500200 : +61 02 9950 0263
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
: HTH-ALS-001 : BF : HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT
: SY/517/10
CERTIFICA TE OF ANAL YSIS
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
QC Level
Date Samples Received
Issue Date
: 1 of 18
: Environmental Division Sydney : Charlie Pierce : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
: sydney.enviro .services@alsglobal.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500
: NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
: 24-AUG-2010 : 30-AUG-2010
No. of samples received : 21 No. of samples analysed : 18
I: _____ -
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
• General Comments • Analytical Results • Surrogate Control Limits
A NATA V
WORLD RECOGNISED
ACCREDITATION
NATA Accredited Laboratory 825
This document is issued in
accordance with NATA
accreditation requirements.
Accredited for compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025.
Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Signatories
Celine Conceicao Hoa Nguyen PabiSubba Wisam.Marassa
Position
Spectroscopist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Metals Coordinator
signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been
Accreditation Category
Inorganics Inorganics Organics Inorganics
Enulronmental Dlulslon S4dne4
Part of the ALS Laborator4 Group
277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax. +61-2-8784 8500 www.alsglobal.com
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company 1" _____ _
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
3 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than «) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extractldigestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When date(s) and/or time(s) are shown bracketed, these have been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. If the sampling time is displayed as 0:00 the information was not provided by client.
Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
A = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
• EG005T: Poor precision was obtained for some elements on sample ES106932 #8 due to sample heterogeneity.
• EP066,EP068, EP075(SIM) : Particular samples required dilution due to sample matrix interferences. LOR values have been adjusted accordingly.
• EP080:Level of Reporting raised for toluene due to ambient background levels in the laboratory.
• EP080:The trip spike and its control have been analysed for volatile TPH and BTEX only. The trip spike and control were prepared in the lab using reagent grade sand spiked with petrol.
The spike was dispatched from the lab and the control retained.
Results confirmed by re extraction and reanalysis.
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
: 4 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix : SOIL Client sample 10
Client sampling date / time
ES1016932-002 ES1016932-004 ES1016932-005 ES1016932-007
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
5 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample 10
Client sampling date / time
ES1016932-005
A ES1016932-007
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
6 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
7 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL A Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
8 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO : 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
ES1016932-011 ES1016932-012 ES1016932-013
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
9 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
10 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample 10
ES1016932-015 ES1016932-016
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
11 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample 10
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
12 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix : SOIL
ES1016932-016 ES1016932-017
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
13 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL A Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
14 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
15 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER
A Client sample ID
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER
16 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Client sample 10
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
17 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Surrogate Control Limits
A
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
18 of 18 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
ALS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
Work Order
Client
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project
Site
C-O-C number
Sampler
Order number
Quote number
: ES1016932
: CH2M HILL PTY L TO . MR BEN FARMER
: PO BOX 5392 CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
: benJarmer@ch2m.com.au : +61 02 9950 0200 : +61 0299500263
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL : HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT : HTH-ALS-001 : BF
: SY/517/10
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
QC Level
Date Samples Received
Issue Date
No. of samples received
No. of samples analysed
: 1 of 14
: Environmental Division Sydney : Charlie Pierce : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
: sydney.enviro.services@alsglobaLcom : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500
: NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
: 24-AUG-2010 : 30-AUG-2010
: 21 : 18
:J
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of th is report have been checked and approved for release . This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
• Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
• Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
• Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 Signatories A NATA This document is issued in
accordance with NATA
accreditation requirements.
This document has been electronically signed by the authorized carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11 .
V WORLD RECOGNISED
ACCREDITATION Accredited for compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025.
Signatories
Celine Conceicao Hoa Nguyen Pabi Subba Wisam.Marassa
Position
Spectroscopist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Metals Coordinator
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been
Accreditation Category
Inorganics Inorganics Organics Inorganics
~------
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
2 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than « ) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extractldigestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
3 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
A The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI-EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting : Result < 10 times LOR :
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result> 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%.
ES1016932-005 I C1-1
<0.1 No Limit
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
ES1016932-013
4 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
C5-1
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
ES1016932-007
5 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
C1-3
EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 3.0
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
ES1016932-007
ES1016932-014
ES 1016928-002
: 6 of 14 ES1016932
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
C1-3
C6-1
EG020A-T: Zinc
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
ES1016663-001
7 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Anonymous
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
8 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method I Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method BlanK (MtJ)
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
9 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Method Siank (MS) Report Spike
Concentration
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Sub-Matrix : WATER
10 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
: Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.2
1
iJg/L
iJg/L
iJg/L
Method Blank (MB) Report
<1 .0
<1 .0
Spike
Concentration
0.5 iJg/L
0.5 iJg/L
76.4 58.6 119
88.3 63.6 114
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page 11 of 14 Work Order ES1016932
Client CH2M HI LL PTY LTD
Project : 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report Spike
Concentration
1J9/L 0.51Jg/L 79.5 62.2 113
1J9/L <1.0
Fluorene 86-73-7 I 0.2 1J9/L 0.5 1Jg/L 88.7 63.9 115
1 1J9/L <1 .0
Phenanthrene 85-01-8 I 0.2 1J9/L 0.51Jg/L 85.4 62.6 116
1 1J9/L <1 .0
M): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.2 1J9/L 0.5 1Jg/L 85.3 64.3 116
1 IJg/L <1.0
EP075(SIM) : Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.2 1J9/L 0.51Jg/L 96.3 63.6 118
<1 .0
EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.2 1J9/L ---- 0.5 1Jg/L I 95.3 I 63.1 I 118
1 1J9/L <1.0
: Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 I 0.2 1J9/L - I 0.51Jg/L I 89.3 I 64.1 I 117
1J9/L <1.0
218-01-9 I 0.2 I 1J9/L - 0.51Jg/L I 84.6 I 62.5 I 116
1J9/L <1.0 -Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.2 1J9/L - 0.51Jg/L I 83.5 I 61 .7 I 119
1 1J9/L <1 .0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.2 1J9/L -- I 0.51Jg/L I 92.7 I 61 .7 I 117
1 1J9/L <1 .0
Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 I 0.2 1J9/L - I 0.51Jg/L I 108 I 63.3 I 117
0.5 1J9/L <0.5
Indeno(1 .2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 I 0.2 1J9/L -- I 0.5 1J9/L I 102 I 59.9 I 118
1 1J9/L <1 .0
: Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 I 0.2 1J9/L - I 0.51Jg/L I 102 I 61 .2 I 117
1 1J9/L <1 .0
191-24-2 I 0.2 1J9/L -- I 0.5 1Jg/L I 104 I 59.1 I 118
<1 .0
10 1J9/L
1J9/L <5
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Sub-Matrix : WATER
12 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY L TO
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Method Blank (MB) Report
<2
Spike
Concentration
10 1J9/L 83.3 69 121
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
13 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
Matrix Spike (MS) Report
The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intra laboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this OC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte
recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Ouality Objectives (DO Os). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
Page
Work Order
Client
Project
Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Sub-Matrix: WATER
14 of 14 ES1016932
CH2M HILL PTY LTD
406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL
A Campbell Brothers Limited Company
ALS Laborator4 Group ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY & TESTING SERVICES
Environmental Division
INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order
Client
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
Project
Site
C-O-C number
Sampler
Order number
Quote number
: ES1016932
: CH2M HILL PTY LTD : MR BEN FARMER : PO BOX 5392 CHATSWOOD NSW, AUSTRALIA 1515
: benJarmer@ch2m.com.au : +61 02 9950 0200 : +61 0299500263
: 406484 ANSTO HUNTERS HILL : HUNTERS HILL WASTE CLASSIFICAT : HTH-ALS-001 : BF
: SY/517/10
Page
Laboratory
Contact Address
Telephone
Facsimile
QC Level
Date Samples Received
Issue Date
No. of samples received
No. of samples analysed
: 1 of9
: Environmental Division Sydney : Charlie Pierce : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
. sydney.enviro.services@alsglobal.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500
: NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
: 24-AUG-2010 : 30-AUG-2010
: 21 : 18
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.
This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:
• Analysis Holding Time Compliance
• Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance
• Brief Method Summaries
• Summary of Outliers
Enulronmental Dlulslan S4dne4
Part of the ALS Laborator4 Group 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
Tel. +61·2·&784 &555 Fax. +61-2-8784 8500 www.alsglobal.com
r:
top related