QOAM statistics - UNICA › sites › default › files › leo_waaijers_sc16.pdf · Castro, John Doove, Josh Brown, Katie Shamash, Lars Bjoernshaugen) Questions: 1. Is QOAM worth
Post on 04-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
Transcript
As per 25 November 2016 QOAM has
2616 registrants from 1364 institutions
filled
5037 Base Score Cards (by library staff) for 3820 journals, and
2803 Valuation Score Cards (by authors) for 1148 journals,
resulting in
1076 SWOT indicators: Strong 381
Weaker 116
Opportunity (to publishers) 575
Threat (to authors) 4
QOAM statistics
DOAJ – QOAMcomplementarity
DOAJ QOAM
Content
OA journals
Hybrid journals
OA articles
Quality control
Moderation
Crowd sourced
Accreditation DOAJ mirror
Publication fees
Web site quotes
Licence fees
QOAM is lean and agile(Confidentially: QOAM is poor)
Initiators/volunteers: Saskia de Vries, Leo WaaijersCoordinator: Laura Groenhuizen 0,2 fte
Supported in cash: SURFmarket € 19.000, Pica € 50.000
Current assets: € 5000 + 10 hrs ICT developmentCooperation: JournalTOCsSupport in kind:
Libraries: TUD, TUM, WUR, EUR, RUPublishers: MDPG, Copernicus, editorsFunders and others: FWF, MPG, OpenAIRE, SURFmarket
Goodwill: Everybody says “Great initiative, good luck!”
QOAM’s status
International expert team (Ralf Schimmer, Jan Velterop, Pablo de Castro, John Doove, Josh Brown, Katie Shamash, Lars Bjoernshaugen)
Questions:
1. Is QOAM worth continuing?
2. If so, how sustainable is it?
QOAM sustainability plan Towards an economic model for Quality Open Access market
Answers:
QOAM offers potentially important value propositions
QOAM needs an additional two year development phase
QOAM operational in 2019: consortium, merger, fremium model
QOAM’s sustainability
Wass will die Bibliothek?
Serving readers is library DNA. For readers OA is perfect. So, libraries are pro OA.
But for OA you need authors. So, libraries try to make authorsOA compliant. ”Wrong”, says MPG’s Ralf Schimmer:
“Make OA author compliant!”
Will your library step in?
My FAQ
top related