Prove, Improve And Approve The 2008 Form #2 2003
Post on 18-Jan-2015
724 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
Stephen D Spangler, CPA
Susan L. Schuchat, CPACavanaugh & Co LLP2381 Fruitville RoadSarasota, FL 34237
“Experience has taught us that in times of economic peril, we must be watchful. During hard times, there is often a rise in questionable or fraudulent activity, in overly aggressive or inappropriate fundraising, and in tax avoidance accommodation schemes of less than sterling character
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 20092
….Because public trust is so important to the sector, none of us wants the actions of the bad apples to overshadow all the good work that most tax-exempt organizations are doing.”
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 3
So……… in such difficult economic
times what are we to prove to the
general public, watchdog groups,
reporters and potential donors who
use our 990 and how best can we go
about it?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 4
1) Enhance Transparency
2) Promote Tax Compliance
3) Minimize the Burden on the Filing
Organization
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 5
We’ll take a look at the following issues today:
Proof of Public support for 501(c)(3) entities is crucial – reported on Schedule A
Related party transactionsCompensation and private inurementUBITProgram services
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 6
Schedule A
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 7
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 8
Schedule A – refer to your handout
Does your accountant prepare this for you?
Do you know how it is prepared?
Do you know where you find out what
support test you are required to complete?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 9
How do you keep track and for how long must a donor be considered not providing public support (disqualified or high support)?
Can you change from one support requirement to another?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 10
Conflict of Interest Policy
What are Related Parties?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 11
A policy that defines conflict of interest, identifies the classes of individuals within the organization covered by the policy, facilitates disclosure of information that may help identify conflicts of interest, and specifies procedures to be followed in managing conflicts of interest.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 12
04/10/23Cavanaugh & Co LLP
13
“Business relationships” are:
Employment relationships Contractual relationships Common ownership of business in excess
of 35%
One person is employed by the other in a sole proprietorship or by an organization with which the other is associated as a trustee, director, officer, key
employee, or greater-than-35% owner.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 14
One person is transacting business with the other (other than in the ordinary course of either party’s business on the same terms as are generally offered to the public), directly or indirectly, in one or more…..
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 15
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 16
“Indirect transactions”
…………..transactions with an organization with which the one person is associated as a trustee, director, officer, key employee, or greater-than-35% owner.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 17
Each is a director, trustee, officer, or greater than 10% owner in the same business or investment entity.
Ownership is measured by stock ownership (either voting power or value) of a corporation, profits or capital interest in a partnership or limited liability company, membership interest in a nonprofit organization, or beneficial interest in a trust.
Ownership includes “indirect” ownership (e.g., ownership in an entity that has ownership in the entity in question); there may be ownership through multiple tiers of entities.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 18
An entity that is owned, directly or indirectly,
(under constructive ownership rules of IRC
section 267(c)), by a given person, such as the
organization’s current or former officers,
directors, trustee, or key employees listed in
Form 990, Part VII, Section 1, or the family
members thereof (listed persons) as follows:
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 19
◦ 1. A corporation in which listed persons own more than 35% of the total combined voting power;
◦ 2. A partnership in which listed persons own more than 35% of the profits interest; or
◦ 3. A trust or estate in which listed persons own more than 35% of the beneficial interest.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 20
04/10/23 Cavanaugh & Co LLP
21
Grandchildren&
their Spouses
GreatGrandchildren
& their Spouses
Siblings
Children & their Spouses
04/10/23 Cavanaugh & Co LLP
22
Ownership is individual or
combined
Ownership of greater than
35%
What types of compensation must be reported?
For whom?
Look at Schedule J of the 990
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 23
Requires that a 501(c)(3) public charity operate so that none of its income or assets unreasonably benefits any of its board members, trustees, officers, or key employees (“insiders”). These types of individuals
Precludes any of the income or assets of a charity from unfairly or unreasonably benefiting, either directly or indirectly, individuals who have close relationships with their organizations and the ability to exercise control over them.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 24
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 25
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 26
The IRS encourages reliance on the rebuttable presumption test of section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulation section 53.4958-6
Under this test, compensation payments are presumed to be reasonable if the compensation arrangement is:
◦ .
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 27
1. Approved in advance by an authorized body composed entirely of individuals who do not have a conflict of interest with respect to the arrangement,
2. The authorized body obtained and relied upon appropriate data as to comparability prior to making its determination, and
3. The authorized body adequately documented the basis for its determination concurrently with making the determination.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 28
It is important to note that
participation includes a board member’s
silence or inaction where he or she is under
a duty to speak or act as well as any
affirmative action by the board member.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 29
Comparability data generally involves
looking to compensation levels paid by
similarly situated organizations for
functionally comparable positions.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 30
Once that test is met, the Internal Revenue
Service may rebut the presumption that an
amount of compensation is reasonable only if
it develops sufficient contrary evidence to
rebut the probative value of the comparability
data relied upon by the authorized governing
body.Cavanaugh & Co LLP September
2009 31
The Sarasota Community Foundation has prepared a free 48 page compensation study and guide
http://www.cfsarasota.org/portals/0/nrc/2008NonprofitCompensationReport.pdf
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 32
Failure to prove reasonable compensation results in Section 4958 IRC Excess Benefit Tax
Excess Benefits tax is meant to be punitive in nature and affects both the organization and the excessively compensated person
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 33
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 34
Intermediate Sanction Section 4958 of IRC
Excess Benefits
Amount Paid Total Compensation $500,000
Reasonable Value of Total Compensation 400,000
Excess Benefit $100,000 (1)
Initial Tax Rate 25%
Initial Tax $25,000 (2)
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 35
Intermediate Sanction Section 4958 of IRC
Individual Pays IRS $25,000 (2)
Individual pays back charity 100,000 (1)
Total individual pays $125,000
Excess Benefits tax on charity manager 10%
Tax Charity Pays $10,000
Guidestar has issued a information paper which is available on its website:
The Private Inurement Prohibition, Excess Compensation, Intermediate Sanctions, and the IRS’s Rebuttable Presumption
A Basic Primer for 501(c)(3) Public Charities
Karl E. Emerson, Esq.Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads,
LLP
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 36
UBIT – Unrelated Business Income Tax
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 37
Very large concern of the Internal Revenue Service and Congress lately
Creates tax revenues for government
Not declaring UBIT creates unfair competition with for profit entities
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 38
What is required on the 990Suggestions for recordkeeping
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 39
Section 501(c)(3) and (c)(4) organizations
and Section 4947(a)(1) charitable trusts,
must enter the total expenses incurred,
including the total grants and allocations (if
any) included within the total expenses for
each program service listed in Part III, line 4.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 40
The expenses for all program services
combined (Form 990, Part III, line 4e) must
agree with the total of the program services
column on line 25, column (B), Part IX, of the
return. The detailed information (revenue,
grants, etc.) required for the three largest
program services need not be provided on
Schedule O for the remaining program services.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 41
Program services should be reviewed regularly to see if they are still within the scope of the organization’s original exemption.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 42
Part III can be used to describe significant programs not previously reported to the IRS.
Note - the IRS (and everyone else) is increasingly looking at organizations’ websites and comparing them to information on their Form 990.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 43
An organization may conduct multiple program service activities within the same year. In this situation, it is not unusual to have expenditures relating to more than one program.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 44
Are you keeping adequate records? Are you providing enough detail such as
number of clients service, hours or volunteer services?
What are some of the ways you in the audience have changed your recordkeeping to accomplish this?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 45
Program services should relate to the organizations original Application for Exemption Form 1023
Do not report a fundraising activity as an exempt purpose accomplishment unless it is substantially related to fulfilling the organization’s exempt purpose.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 46
Offers an organization the opportunity to increase awareness about itself by fully describing its program services and all related expenditures. These activities can exert a positive influence upon a prospective donor.
Conversely, the lack of activities can provide an investigative reporter with an idea for a negative news story.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 47
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 48
According to the IRS:
Governance is the exercise of authority and control over an
organization.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 49
Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in the summer of 2002………
◦ …..Created largely in response to serious financial scandals involving Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing and other companies with publicly held stock
◦ …..Directly mandated or required the SEC and other bodies to enact a large number of corporate governance reforms
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 50
Most provisions of the act do not directly apply to nonprofit organizations
……………However, external forces such as donors, grant makers, current and prospective board members may create the desire to voluntarily adopt many of the principles of the act
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 51
The Internal Revenue Service reviews the board composition of charities to determine whether the board represents a broad public interest, and to identify the potential for insider transactions that could result in misuse of charitable assets.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 52
If an organization has local chapters, branches, or affiliates, the Internal Revenue Service encourages it to have procedures and policies in place to ensure that the activities and operations of such subordinates are consistent with those of the parent organization.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 53
However the Act’s provisions relating to the following DO apply equally to nonprofits:
◦ Criminal penalties for the obstruction of justice relating to the alteration, destruction or fabrication of documents
◦ Establishing and adhering to document retention policies
◦ Prohibition of retaliation against whistleblowers◦ Maximum penalties for wire and mail fraud
increased from 5 to 20 years
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 54
Responsible for hiring, compensation and oversight of the company’s audit firm and is the reporting entity for the auditor
Each member of the audit committee (minimum of 3) is an independent member of the board
Implements procedures for receiving, retaining and responding to complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters
Has the authority to hire any assistance it requires
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 55
Discuss independent audit with management, auditors including press releases and materials provided to the outside
Discuss risk policies and risk management Meet periodically with management, internal
auditors and independent auditors Discuss any problems discovered in the audit Report regularly to Board of Directors Set policies for any former independent audit
employees
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 56
SEC required to promulgate rules under the SEC act of 1934 mandating that the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer certify in each 10-k and 10-Q that the reports:
Have been reviewed Do not contain misstatements of material
fact nor are misleading Fairly presents the corporation’s financial
condition and results of operations
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 57
Officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls
That the design of such controls ensures material information is made known to the officers
Evaluates and reports on the corporation’s internal controls
Discloses to the auditors all internal control deficiencies or significant changes in IC’s
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 58
1. Role of the Board of Directors◦ Oversee the effectiveness and ethical
operation of the organization
2. Importance of Independent Directors◦ Assure the exercise of independent judgment in
key committees and general board decisions
3. Audit Committee◦ Comprised solely of independent directors
4. Governance and Nominating Committees◦ Focus on core governance and board composition
issues including size, leadership and codes
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 59
5. Compensation Committee◦ Determines the compensation of the chief
executive officer and other officers and assures that compensation is tied to performance and predetermined goals and objectives
6. Ethics and Business Conduct Codes7. Executive and Director Compensation8. Monitoring Compliance and Investigating
Complaints9. Document Destruction and Retention
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 60
The directors of a charity owe it a duty of loyalty……….
◦To act in the interest of the charity rather than in the personal interest of the director or some other person or organization
◦To avoid conflicts of interest that are detrimental to the charity.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 61
Audit committees (If no audit or financial
committee, then appointed Board Members)
Should the whole Board approve the 990?
What do you disclose on the 990 related to
Board approval and where?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 62
“When it comes to nonprofit governance, one size does not fit all.
Governance issues vary depending upon type, size, structure, and culture of the organization
…..It is not our job to determine the organization’s governance structure, policies or practices, or to make decisions for them”
………… EO Determinations CPE-GOVERNANCE May 2009
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 63
IRS GOAL IS NOT TO DICTATE SPECIFIC METHODS OF GOVERNING – JUST TO REQUIRE ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE
REMEMBER – THE 990 IS NOT CONSIDERED FILED IF IT IS NOT COMPLETE!!!!!
DON’T MISS ANY SCHEDULES REQUIRED
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 64
SOME SUGGESTIONS
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 65
Minutes, organizational documents, structures of committees and board
Your attorney (Excellent reference Bruce Hopkins Law of Tax Exempt Organizations)
Organizations to which your nonprofit is a member
Board of directors
Community Foundation of Sarasota
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 66
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE www.irs.gov/charities/index.html www.stayexempt.org
DOCUMENT RETENTION GUIDE IRS Publication 4221-PC, Compliance Guide for 501(c)(3) Public Charities, available on the IRS website.
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 67
PANEL ON THE NONPROFIT SECTOR • Issued reports in 2005, 2006 and 2007 http://www.nonprofitpanel.org/
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE project begun in 2000 to develop Principles of the Law of Nonprofit Organizations – draft issued in 2007
http://www.ali.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=projects.proj_ip&projectid=3
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 68
ABA COORDINATING COMMITTEE ON NONPROFIT GOVERNANCE
(issued its Guide to Nonprofit Corporate Governance in the Wake of Sarbanes Oxley in 2005)
http://www.ali-aba.org/index.cfm
BETTER BUSINESS BUREAUhttp://westflorida.bbb.org/charity/
ERI ECONOMIC RESEARCH◦ www.erieri.com
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 69
CHARITY NAVIGATORhttp:/www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=studies.ceo/
STRATEGIC PLANNINGhttp://www.managementhelp.org/plan_dec/str_plan/str_plan.htm
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA https://www.cfsarasota.org/NonprofitCenter/
tabid/53/Default.aspx
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 70
GUIDESTARhttp:/www.guidestar.org
PANEL ON THE NONPROFIT SECTORhttp://www.nonprofitpanel.org
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 71
Any more questions?
Cavanaugh & Co LLP September 2009 72
Stephen D Spangler, CPA
Susan L. Schuchat, CPACavanaugh & Co LLP2381 Fruitville RoadSarasota, FL 34237
top related