PREVENTION OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS AND LOWER EXTREMITY AMPUTATION Barry Stults, M.D. Scott Clark, D.P.M Thomas Miller, M.D. University of Utah Medical.

Post on 16-Dec-2015

226 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

PREVENTION OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS AND LOWER EXTREMITY AMPUTATION

Barry Stults, M.D.

Scott Clark, D.P.M

Thomas Miller, M.D.

University of Utah Medical Center

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

CASE: Mr. M.C.

• 64 yr-old obese white male, not seen x 12 mo

• Type 2 DM (15 yrs)

BP (18 yrs)

Dyslipidemia (18 yrs)

CABG (10 yrs ago)

Claudication (today; 25 yds)

• Insulin/Metformin/Statin/ARB/Hctz/CCB/ASA

• “Sore on my left foot, Doc”

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

CASE: Mr. M.C.

• Clinical evaluation of heel ulcer:– Probe reached bone

– Extensive subcutaneous abscess

• MRI: extensive osteomyelitis

• ABI: 0.2

• Angiography: severe infrapopliteal, suprapopliteal obstruction– Not amenable to revascularization

• Uncontrolled infection despite antibiotics/drainage

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

AMPUTATIONS IN DIABETES

Common:• Worldwide – amputation 2 to diabetes q 30 sec.• U.S.A. – 80,000 amputations/y (2002)

– Higher rates in men, racial/ethnic minorities

Costly:• $60,000/amputation• $2 billion/y total costs

Lancet 2005; 366:1719 Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1598 Diabetes Care 2003; 26:495

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

AMPUTATIONS IN DIABETES

Tragic: “Rule of 50”• 50% of amputations transfemoral/transtibial level

• 50% of patients 2nd amputation in 5y

• 50% of patients Die in 5y

Clinical Care of the Diabetic Foot, 2005

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

FOOT ULCERS IN DIABETES

Precipitate 85% of amputations: “Rule of 15”• 15% of diabetes patients Foot ulcer in lifetime

• 15% of foot ulcers Osteomyelitis

• 15% of foot ulcers Amputation

Clinical Care of the Diabetic Foot, 2005

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

FOOT ULCERS IN DIABETES

Costly:• $30,000/ulcer• $9 billion/y total costs

Tragic:• Quality of life: ulcer patient amputation patient

– Burden of non-weight-bearing as ulcer heals– Lifetime behavioral adaptations to prevent recurrence– Fear of recurrent ulcer/amputation

• 70% ulcer recurrence in 3y

Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26:32, 128 Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39(Suppl 2):S129

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

TEAM CARE REDUCES ULCERS/AMPUTATIONS

Five clinical trials:

• Format: integrated, risk-stratified interventions– ID high-risk patients with exam:

• Frequent follow-up to detect early problems

• Educate/motivate self-care behaviors

• Prophylactic nail/skin care by podiatry

• Therapeutic footwear, if needed

– Prompt, multidisciplinary Rx of ulcersLancet 2005; 366:1676

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

TEAM CARE REDUCES ULCERS/AMPUTATIONS

Efficacy of team care:– 50-80% reductions in ulcers/amputations

• Economic modeling studies of team care:– Cost-effective if 25-40% reduction in ulcer rate– Cost-saving if > 40% reduction in ulcer rate

Applicable only to high-risk patients

Lancet 2005; 366:1719 Diabetes Care 2004; 27:901

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Sensory Joint Motor Autonomic PAD

Neuropathy Mobility Neuropathy Neuropathy

Protective Muscle atrophy and Sweating Ischemia

sensation 2° foot deformities 2° dry skin

Foot pressure Foot pressure Fissure HealingMinor trauma esp. over recognition bony prominences

Callus Pre-ulcer ULCER Infection AMPUTATION

Minor Trauma: Interdigital Maceration

Mechanical (Moisture, Fungus)

Chemical

Thermal

PATHOGENESIS OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCER AND AMPUTATION

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

OTHER RISKS FOR ULCER/AMPUTATION

Failure to adequately care for the feet:– Inadequate patient education– Inadequate patient motivation

• Depression, anxiety, anger more common in diabetes

– Physical disability• Cannot see feet 2 to retinopathy

• Cannot reach feet 2 to obesity, age (?50% of patients)

– Limited access to podiatry services

Age Ageing 1992; 21:333 Diabetes Care 2003; 29:495 Diab Metab Res Rev 2004; 20(Suppl 1):S13

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

CAUSAL PATHWAYS FOR FOOT ULCERS % Causal Pathways

NEUROPATHY Neuropathy: 78%

Minor trauma: 79%

DEFORMITY Deformity: 63%

Behavioral issues ?

MINOR TRAUMA

- Mechanical (shoes) POOR SELF-

- Thermal FOOT CARE

- Chemical

ULCER

Diabetes Care 1999; 22:157

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

DETECTING FEET-AT-RISK• History:

– Prior amputation– Prior foot ulcer– PAD: known or claudication at < 1 block

• Exam:– Insensate to 5.07/10g monofilament– Major foot deformities– PAD

• Absent DP and PT pulses• Prolonged venous filling time• Reduced Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

– Pre-ulcerative cutaneous pathologyArch Intern Med 1998; 158:157

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

RISK STRATIFY FOR FOOT ULCERATION

Foot Ulcer, % Office PatientsRisk Level %/yr (diabetes clinics)3: prior amputation 28.1% 7% prior ulcer 18.6%

2: insensate 6.3% 10% and

foot deformity or

absent pedal pulses

1: insensate 4.8% 17 - 30%

0: all normal 1.7% 66%

Diabetes Care 2001; 24:1442 Diabetes Metab 2003; 29:261

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

ANNUAL DIABETIC FOOT EXAMS2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC

Total

Private

Insurance

Medicaid-

Medicare VA Uninsured

% with foot

exam in

past year

63 64 65 84* 48*

*p < 0.01

Health Services Research 2005; 40:361

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF THE FEET IN PERSONS WITH DIABETES

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

SENSORY NEUROPATHY IN DIABETES

• Loss of protective sensation in feet– Sensory loss sufficient to allow painless skin injury

• Major risk factor for foot ulcer in diabetes• Detect with 5.07/10g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament

– Prevalence of insensate feet to 10g monofilament:• Age > 40y: 30% of diabetic patients• Age > 60y: 50% of diabetic patients

• Up to 50% have no neuropathic symptoms

Diabetes Care 2006; 29(Suppl 1):S24 Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1591

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

UTILITY OF MONOFILAMENT TESTING

Predicts ulcer/amputation in 5 prospective studies:• NPV (normal sensing) = 90-98%

PPV (fail to sense) = 18-36%• Prospective 32 mo observational study:

– 80% of ulcers/100% of amputations in insensate feet

• Superior predictive value to other tests:– Pin prick, cotton wisp, symptoms– ? 128 Hz tuning fork?

• ADA recommendation, 2006: also test vibration

Diabetes Care 2006; 29(Suppl 1):S25 J Fam Pract 2000; 49:S30 Diabetes Care 1992; 15:1386

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

USING THE 5.07/10gm MF (Tool-Kit)

• Demonstrate sensation on the forearm or hand

• Place monofilament perpendicular to test site

• Bow into C-shape for one second

• Test four sites/foot: Predicts 95% of ulcer formers vs. 8 sites

• Heel testing does not discriminate ulcer formers

• Avoid calluses, scars, and ulcers

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

USING THE 5.07/10g MF (Tool-Kit)

• Minimize bias:– Test sites in random sequences

– Test each site X3, sham test as 1 of 3

• Do you feel it? Yes or No?• Retest site if patient fails (misses 2/3 responses)• Insensate at 1 site = insensate feet• Falsely insensate with edema, cold feet• Test annually when sensation normal• Use < 100x/d; replace if bent; replace q 3 mo.• Purchase calibrated MF (See Tool-Kit)

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

PAD IN DIABETES

• Prevalence (ABI < 0.9): 20-30%– 10-20% in type 2 diabetes at Dx

– 30% in diabetics age 50y

– 40-60% in diabetics with foot ulcer

• Complications:– Claudication and functional disability

– Increases risk for concurrent CAD and CVD

– Delays ulcer healing• Increases amputation risk

• Not increase foot ulcer risk

JACC 2006; 47:921 Diabet Med 2005; 22:1310 Diabetes Care 2003; 26:3333

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HX TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

• Claudication at < 1 block suggests severe ischemia

Vascular Level Site of Pain

Aorto-iliac Buttocks/Thigh

Femoral Calf

Tibioperoneal Foot/Ankle

• Rest pain indicates critical ischemia– Toes and forefoot

– Difficult to distinguish from neuropathic pain

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

(After Pompogelli and Campbell, 2002)

Ischemic Rest Pain

Unilateral (usually)

Continuous; hs With dependency

Absent DP/PT pulses

Neuropathic Pain

Bilateral (usually)

Wax/wane

No change with dependency

Variable DP/PT pulses

HX TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HX TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

• Asymptomatic, severe PAD common in diabetes– Tibio-peroneal disease predominance:

• Unrecognized ankle/foot claudication

• No claudication

– Sensory neuropathy blunts/eliminates pain sensation of claudication and rest pain

Diabetes Care 2003; 26:3333

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

EXAM TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

• Pedal pulse exam:– Absent DP and PT: LR = 3.0-3.8 for severe PAD– Absent DP or PT not predict PAD

• Non-palpable DP (8%) or PT (3%) in normals

– Present DP and PT not R/O PAD!• 30% with PAD have one palpable pulse (collaterals)

• High PAD suspicion vascular testing– Claudication, foot ulcer

JAMA 2006; 295:536 Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1357 Diabetes Care 2003; 26:3333

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

EXAM TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

• Venous filling time– Technique:

• Sitting: ID pedal vein bulging above skin

• Supine: Elevate leg to 45° for 1 min

• Sitting: time to pedal vein bulging above skin

J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50:659 Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1357

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

EXAM TO DETECT PAD IN DIABETES

• Venous filling time

– Filling time > 20 sec predicts ABI < 0.5• Sensitivity = 22%; Specificity = 94%; LR = 3.9

J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50:659 Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1357

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

OTHER EXAM FINDINGS FOR PAD

• Helpful:– Femoral bruit (LR = 4.7–5.7)– Unilateral cool extremity

• Not predictive of PAD:– Atrophic skin– Hair loss– Capillary refill > 5 sec

Diabetes Med 2005; 22:1310 Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1357

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

VASCULAR LAB TO DETECT PAD

• Ankle/Brachial BP Index or ABI Testing– Screening: 2004 ADA recommendation

• “Consider” at age 50 and q 5 yr• Screen earlier if multiple CVD risks

– Diagnosis:• Claudication, absent DP/PT pulses, foot ulcer

– Limitations:• Underestimate severity if medial artery Ca++

• Consider pulse volume recording, systolic toe BP, vascular consultation if uncertain about PAD

Diabetes Care 2005; 28:2206 Diabetes Care 2004; 27(Suppl 1): S15-S35

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

INTERPRETATION OF THE ABI

ABINormal 0.91-1.30Mild obstruction 0.71-0.90

*Moderate obstruction 0.41-0.70 *Severe obstruction 0.40

**Poorly compressible >1.30 2° to medial Ca++

*Poor ulcer healing with ABI 0.50 **Further vascular evaluation needed

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

MOTOR NEUROPATHY AND FOOT DEFORMITIES

• Hammer toes

• Claw toes

• Prominent metatarsal heads

• Hallux valgus

• Collapsed plantar arch

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

From Levin and Pfeifer, The Uncomplicated Guide to Diabetes Complications, 2002

• Hammer Toes

• Claw Toes

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

From Levin and Pfeifer, The Uncomplicated Guide to Diabetes Complications, 2002

Hallux Valgus

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

From Boulton, et al Diabetic Medicine 1998, 15:508

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

PRE-ULCER CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY

Neuropathy inappropriate footwear:– Persistent erythema after shoe removal– Callus– Callus with subcutaneous hemorrhage: “pre-ulcer”

Autonomic neuropathy and secondary dry skin:– Fissure ulceration– Augment callus formation

Poor self-care of the feet:– Interdigital maceration with fungal infection– Nail pathology

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

RISK-STRATIFIED FOOTCARE MANAGEMENT FOR DIABETES PATIENTS

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

LOW RISK: CATEGORY 0 PATIENTS

• Annual comprehensive foot examination– Questionnaire completed by patient in waiting room– Examination form with decision-support

(See Tool-Kit)

• Every visit visual inspection if higher risk– Racial/ethnic minorities; alcoholism; homeless

• Basic education: self-management, appropriate footwear– Brief counseling– Written handout

JAMA 2005; 293:217

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HIGH RISK: CATEGORY 1-3 PATIENTS

• Annual comprehensive foot exam

• Inspect feet at every office visit

• Podiatry care stratified to risk level

• Intensive patient education

• Detect/manage barriers to foot care

• Therapeutic footwear, if needed

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HIGH RISK: CATEGORY 1-3 PATIENTS

Nursing tasks to facilitate foot exams:– “High Risk Feet” stickers to each chart (Tool-Kit)

– Remove patient’s shoes/socks• Increases % of foot exams in observational studies

– Determine that patient can reach/see soles of feet

– Stock 10g monofilament in each room• Consider training to perform 10g monofilament exam

– Provide patient education forms• Literacy/language appropriate

Diabetes Care 1983; 6:499 J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18:258

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

www.ndep.nih.gov/diabetes/pubs/feet_kit_Eng.pdf

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HIGH RISK: CATEGORY 1-3 PATIENTS

Regular prophylactic podiatry care:– Provide nail and skin care– Assess footwear needs– RCT: 48% RRR for recurrent ulceration– Optimal visit frequency not evidence-based:

Category 1 q 3-6 mo

Category 2 q 2-3 mo

Category 3 q 1-2 mo

Diabetes Care 2003; 26:1691 J Fam Practice 2000; 49(Suppl):S30

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

HIGH RISK: CATEGORY 1-3 PATIENTS

Intensive patient education:– 1 care clinician, podiatrist, educator contribute– Reinforce frequently – low retention documented– Patient to demonstrate self-care knowledge

• Questionnaires, tests are available (see Tool-Kit)

– Utility:• ? Reduced foot ulcer/amputation rates?

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Jan 25;(1)CD001488 Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26:38

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

BASIC FOOT CARE CONCEPTS

• Daily foot inspection– May require mirror, magnification, or caregiver– Educate patient to recognize/report ASAP:

• Persistent erythema

• Enlarging callus

• Pre-ulcer (callus with hemorrhage)

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

BASIC FOOT CARE CONCEPTS

• Commitment to self-care:– Wash/dry daily

• Avoid hot water; dry thoroughly between toes

– Lubricate daily (not between toes)– Debride callus/corn to reduce plantar pressure 25%

• Avoid sharp instruments, corn plasters

– No self-cutting of nails if:• Neuropathy, PAD, poor vision

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

BASIC FOOT CARE CONCEPTS

• Protective behaviors:– Avoid temperature extremes– No walking barefoot/stocking-footed– Appropriate exercise if sensory neuropathy

• Bicycle/swim > walking/treadmill

– Inspect shoes for foreign objects– Optimal footwear at all times

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

FOOT CARE EDUCATION TOOLS

• “Prevent diabetes problems: Keep your feet and skin healthy” Cartoons – minimal text – still simple www.niddk.nih.gov or ndic@info.niddk.nih.gov

• “Take Care of Your Feet For a Lifetime” – booklet Few cartoons – more advanced http://ndep.nih.gov/materials/pubs/feet/brochure/index.htm

• “Take Care of Your Feet For a Lifetime” – 1 page summary www.ndep.nih.gov/diabetes/pubs/FootTips.pdf

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

FOOT CARE EDUCATION TOOLS

“Diabetic Foot Care”– American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society– Multilingual translation

• Available in 20 languages

– Reference:

Trepman E, et al. Foot and Ankle International 2005; 26:64-107.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

EDUCATIONAL DEFICIENCIES: HIGH RISK PATIENTS

• 558 high risk patients:

Deficiency % Deficient

Not inspect feet regularly 50%

Walk barefoot/stockings 62%

Seldom/never test water temp. 40%

Trim callus with sharp object 48%

Not know to call ASAP for foot ulcer 58%

Not know how to select footwear 57%

From GE Reiber, 2003©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

BASIC FOOTWEAR EDUCATION

Avoid:

Pointed-toes

Slip-ons

Open-toes

High heels

Plastic

Black color

Too small

Favor:Broad-round toesAdjustable (laces, buckles,

Velcro)Athletic shoes, walking shoesLeather, canvasWhite/light colors½” between longest toe and

end of shoe

Diabetes Self-Management 2005; 22:33

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

THERAPEUTIC FOOTWEAR: GOALS

• Inappropriate footwear:– Contributes to 21-76% of ulcers/amputations

• Optimal footwear should:– Protect feet from external injury

– Reduce plantar pressure, shock and shear forces

– Accommodate, stabilize, support deformities

– Suitable for occupation, home, leisure

Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1832 Diab Metab Res Rev 2004; 20(Suppl1):S51

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

THERAPEUTIC FOOTWEAR: COMPONENTS

• Padded socks (eg. CoolMax, Duraspun, others)– Cushion metatarsal heads, heels, and decrease plantar

pressure– White, seamless, absorbent acrylic fibers

• Shoe inserts/insoles (closed-cell foam, viscoelastic)– Off-the-shelf– Custom-molded

• Therapeutic shoes– Extra-depth extra-width– Rigid rocker outsoles– Custom-molded

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

FOOTWEAR RECOMMENDATIONS BY RISK LEVEL

Low Risk (0) Proper style/fit, cushioned stock shoes

Sensation (1) Deep toe box shoes, cushioned insoles

Callosities, ulcer Hx Extra-depth stock shoes, custom-molded insole

Severe deformities Custom-molded extra-depth shoes and insoles, rigid rocker outsoles

Modified from The Foot in Diabetes, 2000, p.136©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

THERAPEUTIC FOOTWEAR: EFFICACY

• Decreases plantar pressure 50-70%• Uncertain reduction in ulcer rate:

– 1 prevention: no data

– 2 prevention: controversial reduction of ulcer recurrence• Analytic/descriptive studies decreases ulcers 50-75%

• 2 RCTs no benefit

• Benefits vary with footwear use, risk level?– Severe foot deformity, prior toe/ray amputation?

Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1774

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

MEDICARE COVERAGE OF THERAPEUTIC FOOTWEAR

• Certify diabetic patient with foot-at-risk

– 1° care physician

• Prescribe therapeutic footwear

– D.P.M., D.O., M.D.

• Prepare/fit therapeutic footwear

– Pedorthist, orthotist, prosthetist, D.P.M.• www.cpeds.org

Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26:42

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

MEDICARE COVERAGE OF THERAPEUTIC FOOTWEAR• Medicare pays 80% of payment amount allowed:

Total Amount Amount Covered by Allowed Medicare

Extra Depth shoes $132.00 $105.60Custom-made shoes $396.00 $316.00Diabetic Pre-fab Insoles $67.00 $53.60Diabetic Custom Insoles $67.00 $53.60

1 pair extra-depth shoes 3 pair insoles/y, or1 pair extra-depth shoes with modification 2 pair insoles/y, or1 pair custom-molded shoes 2 pair insoles/y

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

©2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

top related