[PPT]PowerPoint Presentation - MDCP'S Science Home Pagescience.dadeschools.net/elem/documents/profDev/2014-2015... · Web viewMillard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor
Post on 09-Jun-2018
223 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Department of Mathematics and Science
Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D.District Science Supervisor
Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri
Curriculum Support Specialists
DATA ANALYSIS GRADE K-5 Elementary Science Liaisons and
Coaches iCAD Session 1 (Sept 2014)
Data can…provide feedback on the past andprovide a basis to begin planningfor the future
What Kind of Information can Data Provide us?
Department of Mathematics and Science
IMPORTANCE OF DATA
• Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be.
• Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished.
• Predict and prevent failures.• Predict and ensure successes.• Establish foundation for Continuous School
Improvement/SIP.• Data drives instruction, and professional
development.
Department of Mathematics and Science
Effective Use of Classroom Data
TeachingUsingResults
Planning
StudentLearning
Assessing
Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit
• GRADE K-5 BASELINE AND PRETEST ASSESSMENT RESULTS (2014-2015)
DATA DISAGGREGATION
Department of Mathematics and Science
Science Pretest Results K-5 (MDCPS 2013-2014)GRADE Students
Tested% Below Mastery
% At Mastery
Average Performance
KINDERGARTEN 2013 2014
9,5094,462
58%60%
42%40%
62%61%
FIRST 2013 2014
10,2495,657
90%88%
10%12%
47%48%
SECOND 2013 2014
11,5656,020
80%78%
20%22%
51%53%
THIRD 2013 2014
13,2696,784
96%96%
4%4%
41%43%
FOURTH 2013 2014
12,5636,760
94%95%
6%5%
44%45%
FIFTH 2013 2014
22,67221,681
93%92%
7%8%
46%48%
Elementary Science Pretest Performance by Reporting Category (2013-2014)
GRADE LEVEL
LIFE SCIENCE
PHYSICALSCIENCE
EARTH & SPACE
NATURE OF SCIENCE
KINDER 62% 66% 59%
FIRST 53% 51% 42%
SECOND 49% 55% 47%
THIRD 37% 44% 50% 29%
FOURTH 2013 2014
49%49%
47% 42%34%
37%
FIFTH 2013 2014
45%47%
52%54%
43%45%
36%38%
Your thoughts…..• What reporting category do you think showed
the highest performance? Why?• What reporting category do you think showed
the lowest performance? Why?• How do you think the students performed on
the Fair Game benchmarks? Do you think they performed better than last year?
DATA DISAGGREGATION (Baseline 2013-14)
Department of Mathematics and Science
Grade 5 Baseline Assessment Results (District 2012-2014)
Year Assessment Student Tested
Average % Correct
Percent Proficient (70%)
2011 Baseline 24,141 45% 5%
2012 Baseline 23,076 47% 6%
2013 Baseline 22,672 46% 7%
2014 Baseline 21, 681 48% 8%
Question Group
Baseline 2011
Baseline 2012
Baseline 2013
Baseline2014
Nature of Sc 35% 38% 36% 38%
Earth Space
42% 45% 43% 45%
Physical Sc 51% 53% 52% 54%Life Science 46% 47% 45% 47%
Benchmarks 2012 Results
2013 Results
Difference (2013-2012) (%)
2014Results
Difference (2014-2013)
(%)
SC.3.L.14.1 37% 34% -3 37% +3
SC.4.E.5.4 42% 41% -1 44% +3
SC.4.E.6.2 30% 29% -1 33% +4
SC.4.E.6.3 50% 49% -1 51% +2
SC.4.E.6.4 41% 38% -3 42% +4
SC.4.L.16.4 46% 43% -3 46% +3
SC.4.L.17.3 51% 49% -2 52% +3
SC.5.N.1.1 32% 30% -2 32% +2
SC.5.N.2.1 35% 35% -0 35% 0
SC.5.N.2.2 50% 48% -2 50% +2
SC.5.E.5.1 60% 60% -0 59% +1
SC.5.E.5.3 55% 55% -0 56% +1
SC.5.E.7.1 37% 36% -1 37% +1
Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 - 2014
Benchmarks 2012 Results
2013 Results
Difference (2013-2012)
(%)
2014Results
Difference (2014-2013) (%)
SC.5.E.7.3 42% 39% -3 40% +1SC.5.P.8.1 56% 57% +1 57% 0SC.5.P.8.3 55% 51% -4 54% +3SC.5.P.9.1 44% 44% 0 46% +2SC.5.P.10.1 76% 74% -2 79% +5SC.5.P.10.2 52% 51% -1 49% -2SC.5.P.10.4 47% 46% -1 48% +2SC.5.P.13.1 48% 49% +1 51% +2SC.5.P.13.2 46% 44% -2 48% +4
SC.5.L.14.1 55% 54% -1 53% -1SC.5.L.14.2 44% 42% -2 44% +2
SC.5.L.17.1 48% 47% -1 47% 0
Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 and 2013
Grade 5 Science Assessments Calendar(2014-2015)
Baseline: August 18 – Sept 5, 2014 Fall IA: Oct 27 – November 14, 2014 Winter IA: Jan 26 - February 13, 2015
FCAT 2015: (April 13 - May 8, 2015)
Assessments• Interim Assessments (IA) for Grade 5
(All benchmarks will be assessed on Gr 5 Baseline, Fall and Winter assessments)
• Quarterly Science Benchmark Assessments (QSBA) for Grades K- 4 will assess benchmarks covered in each quarter: Quarters 1, 2, 3, 4
• QSBA for K-4 will be administered at the end of each grading period.
• QSBA Quarter 1 Admin window: Oct 27 – Nov 14, 2014 Available: First QSBA available October 22, 2014
13
Department of Mathematics and Science
• Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0:
• Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher• Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher• (Cut Scores)• Baseline Proficiency Level: 70%
Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores
Department of Mathematics and Science
Your thoughts…..• What reporting category do you think showed
the highest performance? Why?• What reporting category do you think showed
the lowest performance? Why?• How did our performance compare to the
State, Broward and West Palm Beach?
DATA DISAGGREGATION (FCAT 2014 Results)
Department of Mathematics and Science
FCAT Science - Grade 5
Year Total Students Tested
% Levels 3-5
Physical/Chemical Earth/Space Life/Environmental Scientific Thinking
Possible Points
Avg. % Correct
Possible Points
Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible
PointsAvg. % Correct
2014 25,638 51 16 69% 16 69% 14 64% 10 70%2013 25,560 51 16 63% 16 75% 14 71% 10 60%
2012 26,208 49 16 63% 16 69% 14 71% 10 70%
2011 26,422 49 13 69% 11 64% 13 69% 14 64%
2010 26,367 44 14 64% 10 70% 13 62% 14 57%
2009 25,801 42 12 58% 13 54% 13 62% 13 54%
2008 25,875 39 12 58% 14 50% 13 62% 12 58%
2007 25,993 34 12 50% 15 47% 12 50% 12 50%
GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS 2007-2014 DISTRICT LEVEL
Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) 2012-2014 (Retro)
Nature of Science
Earth and Space
Physical Science
Life Science0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80 70% 69%63%
71%60%
75%
63%71%70% 69% 69%
64%
FCAT 2012FCAT 2013FCAT 2014
Reporting Categories
PERC
ENT
(%)
Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT 2012-14)
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 50
5
10
15
20
25
3025% 25%
27%
12% 11%
24% 24%26%
12%13%
24%26% 27%
12%11%
FCAT 2012FCAT 2013FCAT 2014
Achievement Levels
PERCENT (%)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
10
20
30
40
50
60
34%39% 42% 44%
49% 49% 51%
Grade 5 Science FCAT Results 2007-2013 (District) (2012 and 2013 FCAT 2.0) (Levels 3-5))
YEARS
PERC
ENT
(%)
Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach (2012-2014)
State MDCPS BROWARD PALM BEACH0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
52% 49% 50%56%53% 51%
49%
60%54% 51% 49
57%
201220132014
State and South Florida Counties
PERC
ENT
(%)
2014 FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT TEST® 2.0 (FCAT 2.0)NEXT GENERATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS
State Report of District ResultsGrade 05SCIENCE
Total Test Scores
Mean Points Earned
% in each Achievement Level By Content Area
Grade
District
Number
District Name
Number of Students
Mean Scale Score 1 2 3 4 5
Percentage
Passing (Achieve
ment Levels 3
and Above)
Nature of Scien
ce
Earth and Spac
e Scien
ce
Physical
Science
Life Scien
ce05 Number of Points Possible 10 16 16 14
05 00 STATE TOTALS 195,645 201 21 25 28 13 13 54 7 11 11 10
05 06 BROWARD 18,705 199 25 26 26 12 11 49 7 11 11 9
05 13 MIAMI DADE 25,638 199 24 26 27 12 11 51 7 11 11 9
05 50 PALM BEACH 12,968 203 18 25 28 14 15 57 7 11 12 10
Source: Florida Department of EducationGr 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Scale Score L1 140 - 184 L2 185 - 199 L3 200 - 214 L4 215 – 224 L5 225 - 260
-School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims http://oada.dadeschools.net
http://curriculum.dadeschools.net
https://thinkgate.net/FLMiamiDade/
Data Online Resources
top related