Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N Minneapolis, MN ...
Post on 23-Jan-2022
0 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N
Minneapolis MN 55411
Committee Meeting wwwminneapolisparksorg
August 19 2020 ~ Agenda ~ Wednesday 540 PM
Meeting Times are subject to change based on discussion from previous meetings
During COVID-19 - During the declared local public health emergency Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board has transitioned to an electronic format for its public meetings and hearings authorized under Minn Stat Section 13D021 to minimize the risk of exposure to or potential spread of COVID-19 Most Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live via webcast and TV options The video is also posted on the website usually two days after the meeting
I CALL TO ORDER
Chris Meyer Chair Commissioner District 1 Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large Jono Cowgill Commissioner District 4 Londel French Commissioner At Large LaTrisha Vetaw Commissioner At Large
II APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Wednesday August 05 2020
IV PUBLIC HEARING 630 pm TIME CERTAIN
41 Ecological System Plan Public Hearing
V ACTION ITEMS
51 That the Board adopt Resolution 2020-287 captioned as follows
Resolution 2020-287
Resolution Approving the Ecological System Plan
52 That the Board adopt Resolution 2020-288 captioned as follows
Resolution 2020-288
Resolution Approving Temporary Occupancy Under Section 4(F) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at
Committee Meeting P a g e | 2 August 19 2020
Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a Portion of Which is Within Peavey Park
53 That the Board adopt Resolution 2020-289 captioned as follows
Resolution 2020-289
Resolution Approving Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4Th Street in the Towerside Innovation District a Portion of Which is Within the Park Currently Referred to as Towerside Park
VI STUDYREPORT ITEM
61 Discussion of 1720 Marshall Street NE
VII ADJOURNMENT
Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N
Minneapolis MN 55411
Committee Meeting wwwminneapolisparksorg
August 5 2020 ~ Minutes ~ Wednesday 540 PM
During COVID-19 period we are adhering to social distancing recommendations the August 5 meeting will be held virtually Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live on City of Minneapolis Comcast channel 859 and CenturyLink channel 8002 and 8502 Although all commissioners will not be physically present the Board meeting is open to the public and social distancing will be encouraged
I CALL TO ORDER
The time being 1044 PM Chair Commissioner District 1 Chris Meyer called the meeting to order
Chair Commissioner District 1 Chris Meyer Present Vice Chair Commissioner At Large Meg Forney Present Commissioner District 4 Jono Cowgill Present Commissioner At Large Londel French Present Commissioner At Large LaTrisha Vetaw Present
II APPROVAL OF AGENDA
RESULT ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large AYES Meyer Forney Cowgill French Vetaw
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Committee - Committee Meeting - Jul 15 2020 550 PM
RESULT ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large AYES Meyer Forney Cowgill French Vetaw
IV ACTION ITEMS
V STUDYREPORT ITEM
51 Presentation of the Draft Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail Master Plan
VI ADJOURNMENT
Chair Meyer declared that the meeting was Adjourned
Packet Pg 3
Min
ute
s A
ccep
tan
ce
Min
ute
s o
f A
ug
5 2
020
540
PM
(A
PP
RO
VA
L O
F M
INU
TE
S)
Discussion Item (ID 5107) Page 1
TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Ecological System Plan Public Hearing
BACKGROUND A public hearing for the Ecological System Plan will be held on August 19 2020 at 630 pm During COVID-19 During the declared local public health emergency Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board has transitioned to an electronic format for its public meetings and hearings authorized under Minn Stat Section 13D021 to minimize the risk of exposure to or potential spread of COVID-19 Most Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live via webcast and TV options The video is also posted on the website usually two days after the meeting
You may provide comments for the Public Hearing by phone by completing this Form before 1200 PM on the day of the meeting
- Speakers will be sent a call-in number and conference ID one hour before the meeting - Speakers can call into the meeting using the call-in number and conference ID at its the scheduled time - Speakers will enter the meeting and be placed on mute where they can listen - Speakers can watch the meeting through normal meeting broadcast -Be aware that there is a 20-30 second lag between the call and the broadcast Please turn off the broadcast sound when you are called on to speak The Ecological System Plan document will be made available several days before the public hearing at the project webpage httpswwwminneapolisparksorgpark_care__improvementspark_projectscurrent_projectsecological_system_plan The Ecological System Plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Its main goals are to compile create and illustrate city-wide ecological data outline guiding principles for environmental management within the parks and challenge the community to rethink the city around them in terms of ecological function benefit and health
41
Packet Pg 4
Discussion Item (ID 5107) Page 2
RECOMMENDATION This item is for discussion purposes Prepared By Adam Arvidson Manager of Public Engagement amp Citywide Planning Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Skipped 08052020 220 PM Adam Arvidson Completed 08052020 220 PM Michael Schroeder Completed 08092020 1005 AM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08092020 840 PM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1147 AM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM
41
Packet Pg 5
Resolution 2020-287 Page 1
Resolution 2020-287
Resolution Approving the Ecological System Plan
Whereas The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) is the steward of the Minneapolis parks
Whereas The MPRB was founded in 1883 by an Act of the State Legislature and has the responsibility to design improve and manage parks in Minneapolis Whereas The Board of Commissioners approved the formation of an appointed Community Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Ecological System Plan and the CAC has completed its charge to provide community engagement and technical guidance on that plan
Whereas The Board of Commissioners has authorized and staff has completed and tabulated the results of a 45-day public comment period on the Draft Ecological System Plan
Whereas Because significant time passed between the 2019 comment period and because significant revisions were made based on community comment staff re-released a revised draft plan for another public review in 2020 Whereas Staff has completed review of the 2020 comments and revised the draft again to reflect that additional engagement Whereas A public hearing has been scheduled to allow additional public comment on the final Master Plan
Whereas The Ecological System Plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Whereas This resolution is supported by the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan which envisions ldquoUrban forests natural areas and waters that endure and captivaterdquo RESOLVED That the Board of Commissioners approves the Ecological System Plan and
RESOLVED That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution
51
Packet Pg 6
Resolution 2020-287 Page 2
TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Resolution Approving the Ecological System Plan
BACKGROUND
This Board action considers approval of the Ecological System Plan This plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Its main goals are to compile create and illustrate city-wide ecological data outline guiding principles for environmental management within the parks and challenge the community to rethink the city around them in terms of ecological function benefit and health Note that the Final Ecological System Plan document is not attached to this board action due to its size Instead it will be posted on the project webpage in concert with the public release of the Board agenda (httpswwwminneapolisparksorgpark_care__improvementspark_projectscurrent_projectsecological_system_plan) The planning process for the Ecological System Plan began in 2014 and has taken a winding route to this moment with several starts and stops as staffing levels and planning priorities changed over the following six years The planning process involved a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) appointed by the Board of Commissioners The CAC charge in this case was not to be a recommending body but rather a combination of technical reviewer link to community engagement and general process advisor The CAC met four times in 2014 and 2015 and an additional four times in 2017 During that time other in-person community engagement events took place The later years of the plan were marked by consultation with project partners and MPRB staff as well as the compilation of extensive research and mapping and the transformation of the myriad ecological ideas into implementable policies The official approval process began in 2019 and includes the following steps
◼ February 6 2019 The Board of Commissioners authorizes a 45-day comment period on the Draft plan which extends from February 14 to May 12 2019
◼ May 1 2019 MPRB staff presents the draft plan to the Board during the comment period as is customary
◼ A staff departure delays tabulation and revision of the draft document until 2020 ◼ May 1 2020 A revised draft document is re-released to the public because of the year
that had passed since the official comment period and because staff made significant
51
Packet Pg 7
Resolution 2020-287 Page 3
changes to the organization of the document based on that earlier feedback ◼ Staff extends the opportunity for comments on the revised draft for two weeks because
the end date would have landed immediately after the weekend of unrest following George Floydrsquos murder
◼ August 19 2020 Public hearing and consideration of plan approval Master Plan Overview The Ecological System Plan is organized into four main chapters Water Air Land and Life Though we understand that all these ecological themes are interrelated a policy document must make some distinctions in order to be implementable Certainly some policy directions span these themes Each theme chapter includes researched background information on best practices examples of MPRB activities in that topic area and case studies from the MPRB system and elsewhere The policy direction included in the plan takes the form of a hierarchy of Goals Strategies and Recommendations The recommendations are the most detailed items and can be assigned and tracked The plan contains multiple resources for implementation
◼ Detailed maps provide resources to implementers and the public as well as direct work outlined in some recommendations
◼ A matrix of every MPRB park site shows which environmental focus areas are most applicable to that park
◼ A matrix of recommendations assigned each one to a particular department or division so progress can be tracked
Though the maps are not currently in a user-friendly public-facing format that is the ultimate goal of creating them The plan itself callsmdashin its recommendationsmdashfor the digitization and dissemination of these maps along with other accountability measures Process for Tabulating Public Comment A Draft Ecological System Plan document was presented to the Board of Commissioners on May 1 2019 during an open public comment period which ended on May 12 2019 Subsequently staff tabulated the public comment and considered modifications to the draft plan During the public comment period the Draft document was made available to the public on-line at MPRB headquarters and at several key MPRB public buildings Respondents were able to comment via on-line survey printed surveys at the buildings or by contacting the project manager directly by e-mail phone or regular mail Approximately 280 unique comments were received during that time Many of the comments expressed concern with the overall organization of the document or requested clarity on what the MPRB was committing to in the plan That general sentiment
51
Packet Pg 8
Resolution 2020-287 Page 4
even more than specific individual comments drove a reorganization of the document and rethinking of how the policy recommendations are communicated The following is an overview of public feedback received in 2019 grouped into eight major themes Carbon Emissions suggestions to commit to a 100 zero-emissions fleet suggestions for more solar on park buildings Ecology and Habitat concern about prioritization of recreation over habitat suggestion for a stronger commitment to natural areas support for native plants and habitat connectivity suggestion for stronger language around light pollution Plan Functionality concerns about lack of detail and strength in the recommendations concern about the lack of accountability in the plan concern that the plan doesnrsquot link together topics and doesnrsquot go far enough Landscape Management suggestion to focus on native trees and plants support for reduced mowing and other environmental management practices Pesticides opposition to pesticide use in parks suggestion for extremely limited use of chemicals in parks Trees support for retention of standing dead trees for habitat suggestion to strengthen language around limiting tree removal suggestion to require no net tree loss from parks Water Quality suggestion for no net increase of stormwater runoff from parks support for strategies to reduce trash in water bodies Wildlife concern about lack of details related to wildlife and their habitat opposition to current wildlife management techniques concern about limited mention of Mississippi Flyway suggestion to protect areas if high wildlife value from human impacts suggestion to adjust high impact activities in parks to avoid nesting and migration seasons suggestion to require buildings and lighting to be bird safe All the data from the 2019 public comment period is attached to this Board action in several documents
bull The Theme Summary (Attachment B) organizes all the public comments according to major themes
bull The Public Comment Log (Attachment C) is a list of all public commentsmdashas summarized by MPRB staffmdashwith commenter names themes methods of transmittal and dates of transmittal This file is sorted by theme then by comment method then by commenter The summaries were generated by MPRB staff
51
Packet Pg 9
Resolution 2020-287 Page 5
bull The Comment Files (Attachment D) are compilations of the full un-edited text of all public comments
Normally after a public comment period the MPRB would quickly bring a revised plan to the Board of Commissioners for a formal public hearing and consideration for approval In this case the document changed significantly based on feedback from the 45-day comment period and nearly a year had passed since the formal comment period ended Therefore the Revised Draft was released for another round of comments This round was not considered another formal 45-day comment period although it functioned similarly (Attachment A includes all comments received during this time) Based on this additional review staff has modified the Ecological System Plan again into the version being presented to the Board for approval It is important to reiterate at this time that the CAC for this project was not a recommending body as charged by the board Therefore there is no CAC recommendation on this plan and the public comments are not considered in light of the impact on any CAC recommendation Staff has made modifications based on community feedback an additional focus group held as part of the comprehensive plan process and consultation with MPRB staff across the organization around what is possible and realistic The plan before the Board is a careful compromise of many points of view It charts a specific way forward around environmental performance It sets forth specific recommendations that can be assigned implemented and tracked over time The Ecological System Plan despite its long and winding route to final consideration by the Board of Commissioners will advance environmental performance across the system It will improve how the park system--and by extension the city and regionmdashconnects to the environment RECOMMENDATION MPRB staff recommends approval of the Ecological System Plan This action supports the 2007-2020 MPRB Comprehensive Plan through Vision Theme 1 Vision Theme 1 Urban forests natural areas and waters that endure and captivate
Goal Sound management techniques provide healthy diverse and sustainable natural
resources Goal Residents and visitors enjoy and understand the natural environment Goal People and the environment benefit from the expansion and protection of natural
resources
51
Packet Pg 10
Resolution 2020-287 Page 6
ATTACHMENTS
bull Attachment A - EcoSysPlan_Comments on Revised Draft_2020-0701 (PDF)
bull Attachment B - Ecological System Plan_45day review_ThemeSummary (PDF)
bull Attachment C - Ecological System Plan_45day review_CommentLog (PDF)
bull Attachment D - EcoSysPlan_45DayCommentPeriod_All_200701 (PDF)
Prepared By Adam Arvidson Manager of Public Engagement amp Citywide Planning Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Skipped 08052020 233 PM Adam Arvidson Completed 08052020 233 PM Michael Schroeder Completed 08092020 1007 AM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08092020 842 PM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1215 PM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM
51
Packet Pg 11
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
1 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Sigrid A
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I find the recommendations to reduce chemical use extremely vague and unhelpful
39 1 Continue to reduce pesticide and fertilizer applications based on recommendations from partners and advisory groups
What partners and advisory groups are making the decisions about use of chemicals in parks Hoe much is being used and what are the rates or reduction What is the goal
39 2 Develop and maintain Pest Management Plan for facilities consistent with IPM program
This implies that there is in fact no plan for chemical reduction
In general this feels like gaslighting
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
The system plan is very drafty and is not systems-based For example chemical use affects water animal life and vegetation but is not mentioned as it relates to the other areas
11COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday May 01 2020 43635 PMFriday May 01 2020 43635 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday May 01 2020 44132 PMFriday May 01 2020 44132 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000456000456
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 12
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
2 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Greg Lessard
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
22COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 04 2020 100707 AMMonday May 04 2020 100707 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 04 2020 104525 AMMonday May 04 2020 104525 AMTime SpentTime Spent 003818003818
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 13
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
3 65
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Im sorry but to create a feedback that in its design (Q2) asks you to pick a main topic to comment on is insulting and reinforces that these topics are separate and can be viewed independently and not as a whole and a system
Remember this feedback in on ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Water If a lake river stream creek or seasonal flood area (ground water) prior to industrial civilization was drinkable and free from things like Mercury and other made man persistent chemicals then they must be returned to that state
I agree with this water policy and their concerns but am sick and tired of hearing excuses made by city regional and state government as to why fundamental changes havent been made to drastically increase water quality in our city
I do not fault the Parks for this considering their ability to respond to the data they are seeing What I am seeing little of is how this one department or organization is allowed to get things done How are priorities set at the city metro and state level to ensure these projects dictate and inform public policy
As acknowledged the vast majority of water air land and animal situations we are seeing and setting goals to are from results completely outside of the parks control involve private parties and controlled through a complex network of political and social fiefdoms
Thank you for your continued efforts in keeping our urban lakes and waterways combustion engine free
Land I would also like to applaud the parks adoption of introducing Integrated Pest Management and the Xerxes Society Leave the Leaves policy
I dont think the light and noise pollution stance and goals are strong enough at all Sound and light is just as much a habitat as grass trees or water All animal plant and insect life need them and they are nearly all gone from a non-human standpoint and been replaced by human made sources This is unacceptable and its lack of being addressed in this plan is not acceptable
Constant additions to human made infrastructure in our parks is creating overdeveloped open spaces Another round of Parks Master Plans has been approved and the vast majority of them increase the made made infrastructure footprint and continue to reduce and control non-human elements within the park when considering improvements We must move on to an understanding that park improvements often times have nothing to do with humans or what human activities we can add to an open space but the opposite Why is everything framed from a human benefit standpoint This is not how ecology works and this is not how an animal within an ecology thinks or acts when contemplating its long term sustainability of its habitat and ecosystem
Air Air pollution from car traffic is not addressed enough in this Plan Banning and dramatically curtailing individual automobile usage to and from parks should be aggressively pursued
I support continuing the practice of seeking alternatives to individual parking spaces and parking lot additions in and around any city park
Lastly I think the fact we are trying to save Hiawatha golf course is an absolutely flawed idea and goes to the heart of whether or not these plans put together by the Parks really matter when it comes to money and power
51a
Packet Pg 14
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
4 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
See above comments about how to address if and where this Ecological Plan has any political clout or teeth in actual policy at the city or regional metro area level
Having this plan is a great thing and I encourage an ecological and systems approach to non-human vitality diversity and sustainability in all aspects of governance and decision making
Thank you for your devotion to habitat connectivity and health for all of our relations and their future generations that will inherit our successes and our failures
51a
Packet Pg 15
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
5 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Thomforde Stephen
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
1 What was the take home message of the sheep story Was it a) grazing animals which the vegetation we are attempting to restore co-evolved with grazing animals for millions of years and at some level of analysis all grassland-savanna vegetation was obligate to grazing animals but that doesnt matter any more for what ever reason we dont require keystone processes anymore b) grazing sheep are the perfect herbivore to restore to urban environments restoring the second trophic level the keystone disturbance mechanism on vegetation and the lightly grazed pastures described are the perfect habitat for keystone oak regeneration and sheep provide a mechanism to uptake nitrogen which if N builds up undesirable species prevail and grazing sheep correctly can increase carbon sequestration and provide dung that feeds insects that feed birds (redheaded woodpeckers whippoorwills etc) and keep the brush down so cool breezes prevail and sheep grazing provides jobs and food and fiber products to local foodsheds so if we can increase ecological integrity biodiversity ecosystem function (90 increase in ecosystem function when energy in grass is transformed to herbivore) and ecosystem services why wouldnt we Or is it a)
Way way over emphasis on forest Why not emphasis the most advanced productive provisional terrestrial ecosystem ever - Savanna What do we (commensurate experience) mean by forest A treed landscape isnt necessary a forest and most often it represents a very sick ecosystem (afforested) Savanna is a grassland with grassland trees (it all evolved together) and whether youre standing in a savanna or a prairie is a principle of scale not type Your problems with invasive spp dominating your forest is a problem of too many trees the wrong trees (nitrophtyes) and excess nitrogen not the species they are symptomatic more than not of social myths The concept of true hardwood forest existing in this glaciated terrain is highly improbable You want to increase ecological integrity biodiversity ecosystem services (eg earth cooling) your model is savanna
33COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 04 2020 104537 AMMonday May 04 2020 104537 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 04 2020 40126 PMMonday May 04 2020 40126 PMTime SpentTime Spent 051548051548
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 16
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
6 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Seems like a lot of old ideas old narratives based on a lot of phyto-centric assumptions and social myths Seem like theres a lack of higher ecological principles guiding rational planning We end up doing the same old same old same old thing over and over again
What are you trying to restore hyper realities or functional ecosystems and what do you mean by ecosystem function not to be confused by ecosystem services Understanding function from a thermodynamic framework will greatly increase our capacity to apply reasonable land management that will at least make sense verses planting a flower (tree grass etc) list from an expert flower planner imposing upon us their top 20 hits
The tree list 5 5 5 5 3 is too simple You know what Eisenstein said about models right this one sides on the too simple side of his remark Is this the hypothesis are maples hackberry and oak equivalents or do some trees actually contribute more to ecological integrity than others Yes we dont want monocultures of shade trees lining the streets and yes this is a human dominated landscape but some species on the 5 list the more primitive spp can really work against attributes such as nutrient regulation cooling ground layer diversity capacity to promote multi-trophic food-webs
I was expecting more from the MPRB so much more
51a
Packet Pg 17
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
7 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Tahera Mamdani
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
the Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
We appreciate the care and attention paid to this project May God bless your efforts amen
44COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday May 08 2020 80216 PMFriday May 08 2020 80216 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday May 08 2020 80729 PMFriday May 08 2020 80729 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000512000512
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 18
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
8 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Anne
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Please do not omit the Mississippi Flyway as part of the Minneapolis Parks Ecological System Plan Incorporating the Flyway could have positive impact at the continent level not just the city Do the good thing Thank you
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
55COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 09 2020 90345 AMSaturday May 09 2020 90345 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 09 2020 91218 AMSaturday May 09 2020 91218 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000833000833
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 19
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
9 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Andrew Willman
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Please protect wildlife through the Mississippi Flyway project They should be our 1 priority
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
66COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 10 2020 85658 AMSunday May 10 2020 85658 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 10 2020 85836 AMSunday May 10 2020 85836 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000138000138
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 20
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
10 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Liz
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I would like to thank the board for the recognition of light pollution impacts on wildlife Though several designations are mentioned I do not see Minneapoliss important status as part of the Mississippi Flyway mentioned in the Life section and I think that this perspective should be kept in mind as decisions are made
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
77COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 11 2020 90720 AMMonday May 11 2020 90720 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 11 2020 91510 AMMonday May 11 2020 91510 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000749000749
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 21
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
11 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Sharon Schmickle
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
The plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
88COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 11 2020 124816 PMMonday May 11 2020 124816 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 11 2020 125027 PMMonday May 11 2020 125027 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000211000211
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 22
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
12 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Marian
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I moved from Oakland CA to Minneapolis a year and half ago and the main reason I picked Minneapolis is because of the awesome nature-based recreation accessible to me within the city limits This is a major strength of the city and planners should recognized undeveloped open space and the amazing creatures in it as an asset and take steps to improve upon it
I suggest stronger protections for wildlife Setting aside land and habitat only go so far if there are no policies regulations to protect the plants and animals from the people sharing space with them We need stronger park policies on disturbing plant and animal life for example feeding harassing approaching bike path speed limits dog leash policies And policies are nothing without enforcement This is an opportunity to bring young people and minorities in as employed park rangers naturalists and interpreters versus entry level workers emptying trash cans and mowing lawns as is the case in my home park Powderhorn
Interpretation is another important aspect Investing in high quality accessible interpretation provides people with a greater connection to nature-based recreation and helps them understand the ecosystem with which they are interacting I would love to go to a naturalist-led tour of a city park and think many other people would too
Finally I would like to comment that investing wildlife protections and park enforcement is an equity issue I am a working class person who does not have a cabin up north or the ability to take excursions to national parks The city parks are where I go to experience nature and I know there are other people who do the same
To allow our parks to become overrun with motorized scooters dogs and otherwise well meaning people who litter feed animals and destroy plant habitats is to deprive working class folks of the opportunities other people of better means to enjoy wildlife
99COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday May 12 2020 70344 PMTuesday May 12 2020 70344 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday May 12 2020 72652 PMTuesday May 12 2020 72652 PMTime SpentTime Spent 002308002308
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 23
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
13 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Dividing the plan into air water and life is not indicative of a systems-based approach to ecology and I recommend you ask a trained ecologist to weigh in on your plan
Additionally I would encourage you to drop language that imply a binary between equity and environmental protections Access to green space and nature has so many health educational and well-being impacts on people My 7 year old next door neighbor is a 1st gen Somali-American obsessed with turtles He has only ever seen one at the Mall of America aquarium and I told him I would show him the Lake Harriet turtles once social distancing is over People like him who have opportunities to pursue their love of plants and animals are able to grow into their full potential as herpetologists wetland ecologists veterinarians or even just good turtle caregivers
This is just one example that I hope illustrates the need to eliminate phrases like balancing equity with environmental protections and other binaric phrasing during meetings and in official policy documents
51a
Packet Pg 24
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
14 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Karah Olson
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Hi there I would like to advocate for the birds specifically that this Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts Thank you for your consideration
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
1010COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 16 2020 73635 PMSaturday May 16 2020 73635 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 16 2020 73847 PMSaturday May 16 2020 73847 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000211000211
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 25
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
15 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Elizabeth
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Respondent skipped this question
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Respondent skipped this question
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Please explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway in your plan and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts With bird populations having declined 30 we need to do all we can to support them Minnesota is an important breeding ground for so many bird species itrsquos something that should be celebrated and promoted Hennepin County has one of the best park systems in the county and needs to continue to lead by example
1111COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 16 2020 82415 PMSaturday May 16 2020 82415 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 16 2020 83117 PMSaturday May 16 2020 83117 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000701000701
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 26
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
16 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Serena Willey
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
The Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts An investment in wildlife habitat protection and the restoration in Minneapolisrsquo parks system is essential Protection of the ecology of urban and park landscapes is tantamount to any long term plan
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
1212COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 16 2020 112907 PMSaturday May 16 2020 112907 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 16 2020 114451 PMSaturday May 16 2020 114451 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001543001543
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 27
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
17 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Rita Doucet
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
It is vital for the protection of birds that the Ecological System Plan include the Mississippi River corridor as a protected area The build up and build out of the city has created a more dangerous set of obstacles for birds migrating both spring and fall through our area Protecting the Mississippi corridor as safe habitat for migration is essential You must incorporate the Mississippi flyway in the plan as well as other wildlife areas of high value protecting these from human impact
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Hearings need to allow ideas and comments from the widest possible audiences and persons with concerns who are impacted by the proposed plan
1313COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 111637 AMSunday May 17 2020 111637 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 112613 AMSunday May 17 2020 112613 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000936000936
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 28
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
18 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Karen Norberg
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I would like to see bee lawns in our parks
More protection of the Mississippi Flyway
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
1414COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 25322 PMSunday May 17 2020 25322 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 25434 PMSunday May 17 2020 25434 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000111000111
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 29
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
19 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Linda Huhn
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
First Im happy there is such a detailed plan and also for the people working in the park system at all levels who care about the qualitiy of our parks and the park experience for all but mostly for how the plans seek to preserve habitat for species other than us
Second because this continent has lost 29 of bird populations in the last 50 years according to a Cornell Ornithology Lab report from last fall birds especially should be considered Not the least of the details on birds is that 1) we still have too many building-related bird deaths More bird-safe glass and other well-known measures are needed
2) Invasive species reduce bird habitat particularly buckthorn Buckthorn should be pulled up rather than cut My observation is that by the time a cut area is due for another cutting much has sprouted leading to the need for endless cutting MUCH MORE PUBLICITY is needed that urges residents to remove it from their own property and calls for more volunteers to pull buckthorn from parks to get ahead of this population
Third Bee houses--Are the ones at Lake Harriet Park near the bandshell cleaned every other year I understand they can become filthy and unfit for habitation Good article in Southwest Journal on this
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
It is a scandal that we are killing our lakes with road salt What is being done to prevent irreversible damage
1515COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 42520 PMSunday May 17 2020 42520 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 44327 PMSunday May 17 2020 44327 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001807001807
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 30
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
20 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Cindy Moews
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Please include protecting the Mississippi Flyway and other valuable wildlife habitat areas from human impacts
Wildlife birds nature is what makes Minneapolis and Minnesota such a beautiful place to live People (like me) may take it for granted Please protect as much as possible Tell me (and everyone) how I can help over and over again
Get insights from as many groups as possible since they have their own perspectives
Thank you
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
1616COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 42922 PMSunday May 17 2020 42922 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 44401 PMSunday May 17 2020 44401 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001439001439
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 31
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
21 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Jeannie
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
We live on the Mississippi Flyway I would encourage the Park Board to incorporate strong language and strategies to protect and provide habitat for both migrating and nesting birds One critical issue for spring arrivals is the availability of insects last yearrsquos seeds and berries nectar foliage and other necessities for fueling up and resting Planting and maintaining native plants that provide these necessities is very important I am very much in favor of planting much broader natural areas with native species in our parks
We really need to place a priority on educating the public about the need for and numerous benefits of less turf and more natural plantings Irsquom sure I donrsquot need to enumerate for you the benefits for the human recreational users of parks that accrue when we give equal care to the other species we share the parks with But many people donrsquot understand the inter-connectivity and that humans gain significantly when our co-inhabitants get their share of the priorities The park board can do a lot with public education to help park users become supportive of changes in vegetation and habitat
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
In reading through the plan I repeatedly see the need to educate the public so they too can become better stewards of our parklands and the large environment that surround them I think this needs to be a high priority
1717COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 50939 PMSunday May 17 2020 50939 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 52431 PMSunday May 17 2020 52431 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001452001452
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 32
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
22 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Kate Olender
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Please ensure that the Mississippi Flyway (httpswwwminneapolisaudubonorgblog2020421snsod1k33bay3xjwpx2t0srw2ce30zss_source=sscampaignsampss_campaign_id=5ebf3665077ad433f88e7741ampss_email_id=5ec0854e44af1600add4c99bampss_campaign_name=Audubon+Chapter+of+Minneapolis+Updateampss_campaign_sent_date=2020-05-17T003A293A09Z) be included in the Ecological Systems Plan Songbirds are already on the decline - lets protect them as they pass through and live in our Twin Cities
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
1818COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 53531 PMSunday May 17 2020 53531 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 60025 PMSunday May 17 2020 60025 PMTime SpentTime Spent 002453002453
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 33
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
23 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
W Lutz
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
In areas such as Roberts Bird Sanctuary and other Important Bird Areas I would like to suggest 1) planting cottonwood trees to be sure that Eagles have a place to nest when the big old trees die 2) protecting turtlesrsquo nests and access to water when the eggs hatch 3) protecting owlets from intrusions by photographers and others who disregard safety of the birds 4) prohibiting playback (playing of electronicdigital bird calls) in the natural areas by bird watchers and 5) prohibiting any spraying by MPRB personnel during critical migration times
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Thank you for listening about the importance of Roberts Bird Sanctuary as a critcal habitat that needs protection and needs limitation of human activity (dogs bikes runners etc)
Also with the COVID situation and the over crowding by people during this time we have had a vivid reminder of the need to expand open and green spaces for humans as well as wildlife birds and plants
1919COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 18 2020 11834 PMMonday May 18 2020 11834 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 18 2020 12557 PMMonday May 18 2020 12557 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000722000722
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 34
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
24 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Denise Scharlemann
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
We are writing to provide comment on the revised MPRB Ecological System Plan While it is clear that a great deal of thought and effort has gone into this document we believe that the importance of the Mississippi Flyway for migratory birds nationally and internationally as well as locally should be explicitly recognized in the section on Life Goals Strategies and Recommendations The Park Board can play a significant role in providing supporting habitat for migrating birds and protecting significant areas This should include developing strategies and advocating for policies that will mitigate the problem of bird mortality due to light pollution and building strikes
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
2020COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 18 2020 34052 PMMonday May 18 2020 34052 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 18 2020 35234 PMMonday May 18 2020 35234 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001142001142
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 35
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
25 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Robert Cochrane
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
We are writing to provide comment on the revised MPRB Ecological System Plan While it is clear that a great deal of thought and effort has gone into this document we believe that the importance of the Mississippi Flyway for migratory birds nationally and internationally as well as locally should be explicitly recognized in the section on Life Goals Strategies and Recommendations The Park Board can play a significant role in providing supporting habitat for migrating birds and protecting significant areas This should include developing strategies and advocating for policies that will mitigate the problem of bird mortality due to light pollution and building strikes
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
2121COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 18 2020 35245 PMMonday May 18 2020 35245 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 18 2020 35338 PMMonday May 18 2020 35338 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000053000053
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 36
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
26 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Claire Price
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Hello
I wanted to express my support for the move to support native plants and habitat connectivity reduce mowing and pesticide use and supporting migratory birds Thank you very much for all that youre doing its exciting to see initiatives like these gaining steam
Best Claire
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
2222COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 30602 AMWednesday May 20 2020 30602 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 51842 AMWednesday May 20 2020 51842 AMTime SpentTime Spent 021240021240
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 37
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
27 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Christie Nixon
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Keep the parks dark Artificial light has negative impacts on animals of all types whether they live in the parks or are passing by Disrupting their biological rhythms and behaviors will disrupt their short and long-term survival Humans too need dark places When is the last time you saw the Milky Way from Minneapolis Probably decades ago If lights MUST be used in parks follow International Dark Sky Association guidelines for lumens direction and control - (low Kelvin color - warm as possible confined to purpose area only (down not up and out) and movement (by people not animals) control Do not keep park buildings lit at night
Leave downed timber or dead trees in place During the last winter crews came through a part of Minnehaha Park that is near me and chain sawed the upper 23 of a 10 foot tree stump The removed piece contained a cavity that a woodpecker had nested in for at least the last two years (thats how long Ive been watching) Dont know why this partial removal let alone removal at all was needed Convenient height for the chain saw person Its still high enough for a car to hit Is less asthetically pleasing as a stump than it was as a natural trunk Parks should not be sterile they should be habitat If I want sterile Ill to to the soccer field
Be careful with rehabilitating any lake Look at the long term effects as well as the massive piles of dead fish youll see with any treatment Those massive piles make it easy to conclude that you had a success Yes you will kill carp and other rough fish but you wont kill them all and their populations will rebound Im intrigued by your electrofishing removal Thats a guaranteed annual rodeo but at least less harmful to other aquatic organisms than any chemical treatment Need any volunteers I was a DNR fisheries biologist for about 10 years
Keep doing streamside and lakeside habitat restoration and protection Natural vegetation is critical to terrestrial and aquatic health
Maintain and develop wildlife corridors at all scales through Minneapolis Work with surrounding cities and the counties to extend them
2323COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 92954 AMWednesday May 20 2020 92954 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 100027 AMWednesday May 20 2020 100027 AMTime SpentTime Spent 003032003032
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 38
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
28 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
51a
Packet Pg 39
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
29 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Janice Bisch
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I think that it is important to move towards creating more native environments in more of our parks Less mowing more native plant areas less pesticide use
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
2424COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 101933 AMWednesday May 20 2020 101933 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 102239 AMWednesday May 20 2020 102239 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000306000306
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 40
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
30 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
me
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Things I would like to see
our parks remain clear of plastics natural and forested
areas with some type of educational signage emphasizing ecological themes such as native plant and animal species how a forest works and evolves what this means for us as co-habitants of the earth how we maintain and nurture these spaces history of the land etc
amenities required to keep it clean like restrooms and more trash and recycle bins
park buildings be used as true community centers for people of all ages and interests and an emphasis on sustainable renewable energy used to run them
areas for sports and playgrounds shaded by trees or awnings to create comfortable seating space so people can still feel included and watch games or their kids even while seated
more community park open air theater spaces with stages and venues for neighborhood music art and gatherings
proper nigh lighting that doesnt light up the entire neighborhood but keeps the parks safe when dark
lots of available space to run around and play
2525COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 113054 AMWednesday May 20 2020 113054 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 115328 AMWednesday May 20 2020 115328 AMTime SpentTime Spent 002234002234
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 41
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
31 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
51a
Packet Pg 42
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
32 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Tyler Pederson
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I see youve (weve) got 37 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources in the Life section (AWESOME) but perhaps it could also be in the Land section too If it were in the Land too it would address erosion which is the underlying cause of habitat or life disturbance
Maybe it could say Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect sensitive landscapes from erosion
Ive made a similar comment in the Water section too
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Thanks
2626COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 10844 PMWednesday May 20 2020 10844 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 11334 PMWednesday May 20 2020 11334 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000450000450
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 43
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
33 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Tyler Pederson
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I see youve (weve) got 37 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources in the Life section (AWESOME) but perhaps it could also be in the Water section too If it were in the Water section too it would address erosion impacting water bodies think fisherpeople near lake edges or rogue trails crisscrossing slopes along creeks
Maybe it could say Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect shorelines from deterioration and water quality impairments
Ive made a similar comment in the Land section too
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Thanks
2727COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 11355 PMWednesday May 20 2020 11355 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 11914 PMWednesday May 20 2020 11914 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000519000519
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 44
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
34 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Charlie
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Please do a LOT more related to conservation habitat connectivity and wildlife sanctuary Ban fireworks displays Ban pesticide use Plant ONLY natives Close the parkways to cars Build turtle tunnels wildlife underpasses and overpasses Stop mowing everything Leave more wild areas Consider wildlife when adding fencing to allow for migration
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
The system today is unbalanced with way too much dedicated to recreation and human use
2828COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 12425 PMWednesday May 20 2020 12425 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 12811 PMWednesday May 20 2020 12811 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000345000345
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 45
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
35 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep trackof everyones comments You may use just a first nameor some other name You may still do the survey multipletimes with the same name
Respondent skipped this question
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
In order to improve air quality I would hope the MPRB would seriously consider opportunities to reduce vehicular traffic along parkways Unfortunately many of the parkway have turned into commuter routes with heavy amounts of traffic Not only does this create as unsafe environment for pedestrians and bicycles it also degrades the air quality for those using the parkway I think the MPRB could implement strategies fairly easily by simply closing certain portions or the parkways or adding stop signs and other traffic calming measures This would discourage people from using the parkways as commuter routes and make the parkways much more pleasant as we have seen during the coronavirus
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
2929COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 21 2020 115226 AMThursday May 21 2020 115226 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 21 2020 115903 AMThursday May 21 2020 115903 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000636000636
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 46
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
36 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Laura
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Im surprised that vehicle emissions of visitors within parks was not analyzed I think reducing the miles of parkway roads available to vehicles or slowing down vehicles on those roads would have a significant impact on air quality Converting parkways to being mostly pedestrians bicycles and transit would accomplish a reduction in vehicle emissions within the Minneapolis Park System Similarly reducing parking areas within parks would reduce stormwater runoff issues as well as heat island issues
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
3030COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 21 2020 120854 PMThursday May 21 2020 120854 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 21 2020 121342 PMThursday May 21 2020 121342 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000448000448
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 47
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
37 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Betsy Blume
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I think it is vital that the Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
3131COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 25 2020 61457 PMMonday May 25 2020 61457 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 25 2020 61845 PMMonday May 25 2020 61845 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000347000347
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 48
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
38 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Mary Canino
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
12 As an environmental professional expanding SWPPPs to each park property seems excessive Parks that are relatively flat and small (ie neighborhood parks) may be better served by construction SWPPPs (as needed) or city-wide Best Management Practices Main contributors to degrading runoff water quality include 1) exposed soil by mechanical means (ie during construction or urban-agriculture) or 2) slumping or erosion of vegetation due to saturated soil (ie rain or flood) Where there is low likelihood of these contributors the cost of producing or maintaining an annual SWPPP may not feasible
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Section 21 Soil contaminants Please disclose whatrsquos constituents are being analyzed in soil Is the concern direct-contact exposure or plant uptake Please disclose locations of sampling
3232COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 25 2020 92900 PMMonday May 25 2020 92900 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 25 2020 94650 PMMonday May 25 2020 94650 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001750001750
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 49
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
39 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Alex Roth
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
While topics like natural areas and ecological restoration could fall into both Land and Life it seems like the Life section is where most of the IPM invasive plant management and overall ideas of habitat quality and connectivity are housed
There should be a much larger focus on protection and restoration of natural areas in this section (and in the plan as a whole) There need to be tangible goals for improving natural areas including things like remove and manage invasive plant species on x number of acres each year
MPRB needs to be devoting more staff and more funding to restoring healthy natural areas which will become more resilient support more pollinators and wildlife provide more ecosystem services and better protect people and wildlife from issues related to climate change
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Please prioritize restoration and management of our natural areas
3333COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday May 26 2020 34821 PMTuesday May 26 2020 34821 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday May 26 2020 35627 PMTuesday May 26 2020 35627 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000805000805
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 50
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
40 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep trackof everyones comments You may use just a first nameor some other name You may still do the survey multipletimes with the same name
Respondent skipped this question
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Respondent skipped this question
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
3434INCOMPLETEINCOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 31 2020 125226 PMSunday May 31 2020 125226 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 31 2020 125316 PMSunday May 31 2020 125316 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000050000050
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 51
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
41 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Jessica R
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Water quality is a huge issue for our parks city and state The strategies outlined for dealing with stormwater runoff at the park scale are useful and would be highly beneficial if implemented widely However the issue wont be able to actually be addressed without a city-scale stormwater management plan - along bike paths roads neighborhood parks etc These park areas even those not considered parks like boulevards and narrow lawn strips that are under MBRBs management responsibility have the potential to create a really robust stormwater network that manages both park and urban runoff Theres potential for this to be huge - managing water creating new habitat corridors reducing mowing and management creating seasonal interest through nativeadaptive plants creating educationalinterpretive features introducing landscape features to new neighborhoods (not just limited to those adjacent to lakes) Thanks for your work
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
3535COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 01 2020 103732 AMMonday June 01 2020 103732 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 01 2020 104723 AMMonday June 01 2020 104723 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000950000950
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 52
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
42 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Katie Hill Brandt
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Emissions from small engines have a huge impact on local air quality Transitioning to electric lawn mowers leaf blowers snowblowers etc should be a high priority for parks
Also wood-burning in parks (bonfires or as a source of heat at winter festivals) should be banned across the board Emissions from wood burning contribute to haze and have acute and chronic health effects
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
3636COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday June 02 2020 92805 AMTuesday June 02 2020 92805 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday June 02 2020 93606 AMTuesday June 02 2020 93606 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000801000801
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 53
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
43 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Jennifer Smith
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I want the work on invasive species to be paramount
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Gas Powered Leaf Blowers have no place in the parks Their noise can be heard throughout all of Lake Nokomis when they are running They spoil the natural quietness of the morning and contribute to pollution The parks have just started to use them and it is an assault on the dignity of the environment the lakes and the people
3737COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday June 03 2020 11207 PMWednesday June 03 2020 11207 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday June 03 2020 11522 PMWednesday June 03 2020 11522 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000314000314
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 54
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
44 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Carin Peterson
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Introduction Maps or Recommendations Sections
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
My concern centers on The Mall There has been talk of taking away the ability to drive and to park on the last 2 blocks leading to the lakes- from Irving to the parkway I say this is unnecessary and unwarranted Those parking spaces cannot be replaced There is nowhere else in the area to make up for the loss of 50+ parking spots in an area already short on street parking
Instead keep the roads Turn the pedestrian walkway area into all native plants Plants that can absorb and filter storm water runoff racing downhill from Hennepin to the channel
And at the end of the mall ~ a sunken garden of native filtering plants
Same footprint Different mindset This way we address 1) need for more native habitat for pollinators amp birds 2) clean storm water before it hits the chain of make 3) saves MUCH needed parking 4) maintains traffic flow in an area always on need of additional outlets 5) encourages and fosters nghbd engagements as this is what nghbds want amp they could be involved in planning amp maintaining the gardens
Passive natural area in the heart of Uptown Bird watching from a nearby bench
This passive recreation is hugely important in a nghbd with MANY seniors
3838COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday June 04 2020 22621 PMThursday June 04 2020 22621 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday June 04 2020 24310 PMThursday June 04 2020 24310 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001648001648
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 55
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
45 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Very good grand concepts I hope there is enough wherewithal to accomplish goals without destroying some of the things residents most enjoy about our parks
51a
Packet Pg 56
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
46 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Ginny Halloran
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I applaud the Minneapolis Park Systems for the incredible job regarding putting together an ecological plan
Because these are relatively new related to scientific research areas I am especially impressed you have included carbon sequestration and biochar in your plan related to climate mitigation I hope you become leaders in these areas because the results are so promising to help with winwin climate mitigation solutions
Related to land healthy soil is a term that is missing in your document in my mind If you talk to some soil biologistsscientists they will speak to how diverse and complex the universe below our feet is and its been mostly fignored I would like to see the park board expand its ecological and educational efforts regarding healthy soil
Just one example ldquoSoil microbiologist and climate scientist Walter Jehne reminds us that water not carbon is the primary greenhouse gas and that water is responsible for most of the heating and cooling dynamics of our blue planet Water was left out of our current climate models because it was considered too hard to model (true) and because water plays such an enormous role in the climate that it was considered impossible for humans to influence (false)rdquo Healthy soil plays a significant part in this role httpsmediumcomdidipershousewhy-communities-should-invest-in-regenerative-agriculture-and-the-soil-sponge-431c27c8b34b
Nature has so much to teach us We are sooooo fortunate that our founding fathers incorporated that into our city through our park system I hope our park board takes that nature education and exemplification legacy and mission seriously to help us Minneapolis citizens become more aware and thus better caretakers of nature that enriches our lives so much
Thanks again for keeping Minneapolis a beautiful city in a park
3939COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday June 05 2020 53650 PMFriday June 05 2020 53650 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday June 05 2020 55234 PMFriday June 05 2020 55234 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001543001543
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 57
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
47 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Please continue to balance your efforts Please consider setting up an online link for citizens to be able to contribute to the wider cause of your efforts - planting amp caring for the urban forest updating buildings playgrounds etc
51a
Packet Pg 58
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
48 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Lila M Smith
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I am excited to see that you also want to expand habitat for pollinators and other wildlife Many of our parks are turf grass with some trees I understand that many people like to play on grass but every park would benefit by the addition of natural areas fronted by native gardens I love the more natural restoration parks and gardens but some parks have none and every community deserves a touch of healing nature For Parks with mostly ball fields I suggest including a path around them with native plantings I live in an area that lacks a nature trail and one mile from our closest park There is a peacefulness in walking in nature My ideal park would include a rain garden nature play area picnic area a Community Center native pollinator garden and a nature trail that would also serve joggers Thank you for advocating a better environment in our parks Right now we need healing healthy areas more than ever
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
I think it is great Improvements Training park crews on native plants adding new pollinator gardens and natural areas to parks and communities that lack them I am a volunteer that cares for Native Pollinator gardens but I can only do so much I think more habitat is needed and could be installed by Park crews Has the Park Board hired people to plan construct and maintain more native gardens and habitat
4040COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday June 09 2020 82829 AMTuesday June 09 2020 82829 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday June 09 2020 85158 AMTuesday June 09 2020 85158 AMTime SpentTime Spent 002329002329
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 59
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
49 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Keith Prussing
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Introduction Maps or Recommendations Sections
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
The maps are very helpful
Recommendations are clear along with what departmentsagencies are involved
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
What are the intervals for regular reportingupdates and who is responsible for making this happen How will they be held accountable
With the difficulty experienced in Spring 2020 in obtaining clear and timely water quality reports at Cedar Lake and Lake of the Isles about the cyanobacteria bloom how will you work to better with the public about immediate and ongoing water quality issuesconcerns
What is the timeline for implementation of these proposals and what is the action plan
What are the specific funding sources immediately as well as into the future
There should be an amendment process to the Plan to allow for new information
4141COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 124136 PMMonday June 15 2020 124136 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 125513 PMMonday June 15 2020 125513 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001337001337
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 60
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
50 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Gretchen H
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Land
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I agree with the recommendations of others re grassy areas Too many areas in parks are green swaths of grass which no one actually uses or rarely uses The area of Powderhorn Park which is above and North of the lake comes to mind Planting that area not just with flowering lawns but instead with native gardens would turn an unused area in to an environmental aesthetic and even educational asset I always think about how small and sad the very small area of native plants is at the eastern side of Lake Nokomis is There are many many areas of grass in most of the major parks and even in the smaller neighborhood parks which could be much more of an asset if the grass was gone
4242COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 22751 PMMonday June 15 2020 22751 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 30134 PMMonday June 15 2020 30134 PMTime SpentTime Spent 003342003342
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 61
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
51 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
I generally support the comments regarding favoring native species in terms of trees and other plants
I strongly support the elimination of the use of toxins
As someone who often picks up plastic litter not because I enjoy it but because I cant stand to see it poised next to a body of water waiting to fall in I can say that litter in the parks and along the parkways is a problem In Minnehaha Park my most frequented and nearby park I often see litter from the nearby Dairy Queen and the fast food chains along Hiawatha It would be very useful I think if someone could reach out to those businesses and come up with ideas on how to reduce the waste generated by their products People need options to Sea Salt certainly but if less waste could be generated (dont automatically provide plastic tops and straws for drinks) and if the businesses themselves could somehow be involved in discouraging people from littering it would be helpful and better PR for their business than seeing partially empty DQ containers all over the place
I see little signs in my neighborhood that say water-friendly lawn It seems that this just means that they rake their leaves This is not being water or life-friendly Raking some leaves in to garden areas to be used as winter mulch and using a mulcher-mower on the rest would be so much more water-friendly than using chemicals on the lawn in Fall and Spring or even buying that nasty colored mulch that was probably produced in a non-sustainable way
51a
Packet Pg 62
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
52 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Surapaneni Vishnu Laalitha
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
I have detailed comments on multiple sections of the plan Ive copy-pasted them below If you wish to get an easily readable PDF version please email me at vishnulaalithagmailcom
Im part of the MPRB Climate Resilience workgroup I would love to take some time to talk through these comments in detail as well if possible
Once again kudos on the great work Laalitha
4343COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 32547 PMMonday June 15 2020 32547 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 33252 PMMonday June 15 2020 33252 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000705000705
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 63
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
53 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
MPRB ECOLOGICAL PLAN 2020 COMMENTS
As a physician focused on the impacts of climate change on health I applaud the breadth of the Ecological plan proposed by the Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board
Park systems serve unique functions at the intersection of health climate and equity In cities our parks provide us solace through preserving nature Extensive research links parks with improved physical and mental health of communities MPRB has the ability to take on a leadership role and model climate-adaptive operations However unique to parks is not only the ability to reduce their carbon footprint but to sequester Carbon and help reduce the impacts of climate change
I reviewed the Ecological plan and offered some detailed critiques Irsquom very excited at the breadth of detail provided However the plan lacks urgency and the scale of action necessary to address the climate crisis
Please accept my following comments AWATER PREVENT DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY 1 Improve management of park-generated stormwater runoff
1 10 Prioritize replacement of asphalt pavement in areas where pavement is actively eroding and drains directly into the storm sewer system Comment Replace all asphalt pavements that require an upgrade with permeable pavement Despite high upfront costs this option has fewer maintenance costs reduces our dependence on fossil fuels and improves our water quality by preventing runoff When water runs off the asphalt it leaches PAH or polyaromatic hydrocarbons into our waters that are carcinogenic Phase-out all asphalt pavements in the Parks system by 2040
1 3 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and greywater infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits Comment Involve local communities to build capital locally Question How can this be incorporated into the parks system without leading to inaction ie how will we determine the feasibility What measures will be in place to document that and communicate that with the public Our concern is that broadly written rules like this can lead to inaction 14 Reduce impervious surface area in parks- Specific focus on parking lots Comment Convert all parking lots into green parking lots as described by the EPA and other suggested literature by 2035 in order to minimize stormwater runoff with clear signage to indicate so
3 Reduce the amount of trash and sediment in water bodies 3 3 Install additional maintenance control devices such as SAFL Bafe and SAFL Snout at key stormwater outfalls in coordination with partners Comment Add an indicator to ldquoEliminate single-use non-biodegradable containers in parks by 2050 This includes all items sold on Parks property Have a scalable plan to reach this goalrdquo Comment In order to reduce trash in water bodies Baltimore City has implemented a device called ldquoMrTrash Wheelrdquo Collaborate on this innovation to reduce the amount of trash that ends up in our lakes
B WATER BUILD RESILIENCY IN THE FACE OF CHANGING WATER LEVELS
7 4 Design lakeshores and stream banks to withstand or accommodate projected future flooding and withstand a higher level of erosive energy using bioengineering and native plants wherever possible Comment KUDOS
51a
Packet Pg 64
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
54 65
C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLAND 11 Focus tree planting in areas identified as having high heat island or low air quality Comment Focus also on the type of trees and that these donrsquot create excess pollen generation Minnesota already has an increased pollen season due to climate change Climate change and related increase in temperatures and CO2 concentration lead to more pollen production
12 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions 121 Examine fleet-wide emissions and estimate emissions generated by park employees then set reduction goals 122 Document and communicate options for hybrid and electric vehicles for all vehicle purchases 123 Develop small equipment inventory that includes emissions information then work to transition small equipment feet to alternative options such as electric or four-stroke
Comment Emissions here need to be further separated Emissions generated by Park employeesvisitors when they commute to workparks to recreate have to be separated from vehicle-emissions and equipment-emissions that are generated due to Parks operations
Once that is done the aim should be to get to Zero-emissions as advocated by the IPCC or the Minneapolis Climate Plan by replacing all vehicles and equipment with Zero-emissionselectric equipment (and not biodiesel or alternate fuels that ignore the emissions created during farming of crops that help create biodiesel and ethanol) - Eliminate all vehicle and equipment emissions by 2040 Reduce to 45 by 2030 Short-term goals are essential
126 Develop a transportation management plan and procedures for field staff that considers and optimizes travel time to and between parks and service centers in order to reduce overall vehicle miles and emissions Comment This is a great step We can work to incorporate changes wersquove had to make during the COVID pandemic into mainstream operations
15 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility - As the general public I would like more information about what the wood processing facility is why we need continued operations of a facility that creates particulate matter and what we can do to eliminate the wood processing facility altogether in favor of sustainable options for the planet and people
D AIR CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
14 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days Comment Intentionally partner with and incorporate ldquoTraditional Ecological Knowledgerdquo or TEK within our indigenous community to identify practices to use prescribed fires for ecological management
16 Reduce the agency-wide carbon footprint Comment We really have a chance to be science-based and bold in implementing climate plans here Aim for 45 reduction by 2035 and complete ZERO-CARBON by 2050 Following the IPCC guidelines
17 Advocate for and support carbon footprint reduction for park employees and visitors Comment Greatly appreciate this comment I would like to add more actionable items to this area Convert all eligible parking lots in the parks system into solar roofed-parking lots by 2045 that can then be used to store energy and charge electric vehicles This model is being currently employed on the West Bank of the UMN campus and there is great potential for collaboration This is also being implemented worldwide in a variety of locations These solar park partnerships could happen with local community solar farms to invest in our communities
18 Increase building efficiency 18 2 D i ffi i i t b ildi t th ti f t ti j i t
51a
Packet Pg 65
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
55 65
18 2 Design efficiency into buildings at the time of construction or major improvements Comment Once again I request concrete goals I recommend all new MPRB buildings need to be LEED platinum-certified Any upgrades to buildings will also be in ways consistent with a platinum certification
18 3 Perform energy efficiency improvements as part of general building and grounds maintenance including door and window sealing HVAC improvements lighting improvements enhanced insulation and others Comment Preferentially contract local companies that perform these audits to invest in our communities
20 Sequester carbon in the park system and urban forest 201 Study the ability and potential of parkland and urban forest to sequester carbon and identify areas of improvement through landscape change (in partnership with natural areas management) and other practices Comment Intentionally partner with and incorporate ldquoTraditional Ecological Knowledgerdquo or TEK within our indigenous community to identify practices to sequester carbon
K LIFE PROTECT MAINTAIN AND EXPAND URBAN FOREST 43 Maintain and expand extents of the forest canopy 431Set specific and realistic goals for urban forest canopy coverage with input from the Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission and share publicly Comment Outline the goal for ideal urban canopy for the Twin cities by 2022 in coordination with University partners Identify realistic milestones that help us reach our goal by 2040 Engage the public in efforts to improve and maintain urban tree canopy by using the ldquoadopt-a-treerdquo model
435 Continue pest monitoring and management programs in partnership with federal state and local agencies Comment Incorporate sustainable pest control measures including indigenous perspectives and knowledge
M REMAIN ACCOUNTABLE AND ADAPT WITH THE EVOLVING WORLD 49 Update this planrsquos implementation checklist and report at least annually to the MPRB Commissioners and general public Comment I applaud the accountability of MPRB I appreciate that you have considered re-evaluating your goals based on available future technology However I strongly recommend as the main takeaway for the overall plan to establish SMART (Specific Measurable Action-Oriented Relevant Time-bound) goals for all the indicators to track progress and remain accountable to the public
50 Communicate and coordinate plan implementation responsibilities of all departments and divisions Comment Based on the location of the Parks provide translations in languages to serve our Somali Hmong and other immigrant communities to make parks inclusive
Comment In addition an overall comment also is that there is a lot of language in the plan that states ldquowhen feasiblerdquo Irsquom concerned that this language could lead to inaction Eg Indicator 13 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and greywater infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits I understand that green roofs might not be possible due to the type of building roof and other structural factors Feasibility could also be due to lack of funding or lack of willingness of the agency to undertake the said project Irsquom especially concerned that this would be interpreted too broadly and invoked to slow down change especially on the front of climate action So I request the MPRB to provide a clear definition of feasibility to the public contingency plans in case a particular indicator is unable to be met and transparency as to why certain itemindicator was deemed not feasible
I also want to also thank the MPRB for extending the deadline on comments and your sensitivity to the collective crises of COVID-19 and racial injustice our city is dealing with I hope that these comments on this plan will only act as a starting point to more community
51a
Packet Pg 66
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
56 65
and racial injustice our city is dealing with I hope that these comments on this plan will only act as a starting point to more community engagement and plans that match the scale of action this climate emergency deserves
DrVishnu Laalitha Surapaneni MBBS MPH
REFERENCES Parking Lot Sealcoat A Major Source of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Urban and Suburban Environments httpspubsusgsgovfs20053147
Extreme allergies and global warming httpswwwaafaorgmedia1634extreme-allergies-global-warming-report-2010pdf
httpswwwmndailycomarticle201809acsolar
51a
Packet Pg 67
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
57 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep trackof everyones comments You may use just a first nameor some other name You may still do the survey multipletimes with the same name
Respondent skipped this question
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Respondent skipped this question
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
4444INCOMPLETEINCOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 53507 PMMonday June 15 2020 53507 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 53629 PMMonday June 15 2020 53629 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000122000122
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 68
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
58 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Anjali Bains on behalf of Fresh Energy
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Air
4545COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 105427 AMMonday June 15 2020 105427 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 91831 PMMonday June 15 2020 91831 PMTime SpentTime Spent 102404102404
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 69
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
59 65
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Comments below are given to assist in re-imagining ldquostrategiesrdquo as measurable ldquosub-goals as explained in our response to question 4
C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCE URBAN HEAT ISLAND
12 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions
Comment Fresh Energy recommends that Strategy 12 is turned into a collection of sub-goals specifically
bull 100 zero-emissions vehicles by 2040 for MPRB-owned light-duty vehicles bull Guidance issued by a set date (preferably within 12 months of the plan becoming final) on procuring low or no-emission alternatives to lawn care equipment and heavy-duty vehicles Guidance should be written such that goals of reaching carbon-neutrality in the City of Minneapolis by 2050 is achieved
bull Guidance issued by a set date on specific goals to reduce MPRB carbon emissions by creating efficient modes and systems of transportation for employees between park systems Guidance should be written such that goals of reaching carbon-neutrality in the City of Minneapolis by 2050 is achieved
D AIR CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
16 Reduce the agency-wide carbon footprint
Comment As above Fresh Energy requests MPRB reimagines this strategy as a sub-goal that aligns with the Minneapolis 2040 plan of carbon neutrality by 2050 eg ldquoMPRB to reduce agency-wide carbon footprint such that carbon-neutrality is achieved by 2040 with specific step reductions (eg 45 carbon reduction over 2006 levels by 2030) set by specific date (within 12 months of Ecology Plan becoming final) Fresh Energy also recommends MPBR defines what ldquoagency-widerdquo indicates (eg operations building energy usage etc) and split up as needed to ensure subgoalsrsquo progress is able to be tracked
18 Increase building efficiency
Comment As above Fresh Energy requests MPRB reimagines this strategy as a sub-goal that aligns with the Minneapolis 2040 plan of carbon neutrality by 2040 eg ldquoMPRB to reduce net carbon emissions associated with building energy consumption to zero by 2050rdquo
51a
Packet Pg 70
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
60 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Fresh Energy commends the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) for revising their Ecology Plan based on community input and for extending their timeline in light of local uprisings and demands for long overdue racial justice The details and strategies outlined in the MPRB indicate a depth of research and consideration that is encouraging
However we urge MPRB to redefine their goals in specific measurable action-oriented and time-bound terms such that MPRB may track progress and hold itself accountable while offering transparency to the public on its metrics and progressFor example reduction of emissions from park operations is not a clear goal towards climate change mitigation net zero carbon-emission of park operations by 2050 would be a clear goal one rooted to both IPCC recommendations and the Minneapolis 2040 Plan To achieve this Fresh Energy recommends maintaining the high-level ldquogoalsrdquo denoted by the alphabet letters and transforming what is currently called ldquostrategiesrdquo to specific sub-goals with measurable action
In this change recommendations would map out a path to the sub-goal and should include both assessment and analysis as currently written with the addition of set decision points (tied to a time frame or deadline eg ldquoby this dayrdquo) that necessitate action based on the completed analysis
Finally we applaud that MPRB researched and reflected on goals of the City of Minneapolis as it put together the Ecology Plan Fresh Energy strongly recommends that the plan goes one step further and explicitly align with and reference relevant goals defined in the Minneapolis 2040 Plan as well as the Transportation Action Plan which closed its final round of comments on its draft plan earlier this spring Doing so will ensure that synergies between the City of Minneapolis and MPRB are recognized and leveraged ensuring efficiency in action and shared outcomes
51a
Packet Pg 71
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
61 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Anna
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
Irsquod like to see MPRB improve wildlife bird and insect habitat through promoting native tree and plant species especially those that historically existed in the area (oak savanna some mixed woodland) There is plenty of data out there suggesting non native plants create habitat dead zones for insects and birds Also oak savannas were prevalent in the Minneapolis area pre-settlement an ecosystem that is endangered in MN Why not restore savanna in areas where large oaks already exist (being crowded out by mixed forest trees) Thank you for your consideration
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
4646COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 111726 PMMonday June 15 2020 111726 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 112602 PMMonday June 15 2020 112602 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000835000835
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 72
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
62 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Ryan Atwell
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Life
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
The plan needs more emphasis on preservation and restoration of native species and historical ecotypes (especially species and ecotypes that are threatened and endangered) MPRB parks are special I that they include (or have the potential to include) many of the species and historic ecotypes that are represented throughout Minnesota This is and will be increasingly important to Minnesotans in the future It is especially important to make note of the oak Savannahs and oak barrens that used to make up much of Minneapolis historical MPRB parks include many Such oak habitats some of which should be restored to savannah over time Aggressive approaches (including partnering with other organizations) to suppress invasive species need to be practiced to encourage native species using Integrated pest management approaches
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral
Respondent skipped this question
4747COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 111718 PMMonday June 15 2020 111718 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 113158 PMMonday June 15 2020 113158 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001439001439
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 73
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
63 65
Q1
What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name
Claire Ruebeck Jocey Hale James Reid
Q2
What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on
Water
Q3
What would you like to share about that topic area
See below
4848COMPLETECOMPLETE
CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday June 16 2020 43345 AMTuesday June 16 2020 43345 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday June 16 2020 44355 AMTuesday June 16 2020 44355 AMTime SpentTime Spent 001009001009
Page 1
51a
Packet Pg 74
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
64 65
Q4
Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general
Thank you for providing the chance to review the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Ecological System Plan (ESP) The MPRB ESP is a robust document and reflects thoughtful and dedicated work We appreciate the opportunity to share feedback which is presented below by topic area
WATER bullA Elevate the goal to go beyond ldquoPrevent Degradation of Water Qualityrdquo to assertively ldquoImprove Water Qualityrdquo bullA6 Respond to water quality realities - Issue and evaluate timely water reports - Monthly water testing and reports - Post to online for public review - Develop swimfish dashboard - Annual MPRB Comprehensive Water Quality Report httpswwwminneapolisparksorgwp-contentuploads2019012017-Water-Resources- Reportpdf - Establish protocols for issuing public notificationsalerts for water risks - Identify degradation causes what would improve the situation what action to take (by government organization individual) ndash create community knowledge and call to action
AIR bullC Establish goal and strategies for no net loss of trees aim for aggressive net tree canopy gain the Minneapolis tree canopy is declining coordinate with Minneapolis Tree Advisory Group for goals and timeline restoring tree canopy and reaching canopy coverage goal is an environmental justice initiative
LAND bullE1 Prepare inventory of all contaminated parklands and prioritize mitigations complete Natural Areas Phase II report bullF Turf Management ndash to reduce mowing requirements replace recreation lawns with native ground cover (clover low maintenance stoppable ground cover etc) allow native plants to grow wild where appropriate bullG31 Modify master plans to protect trees and eliminate negative construction impacts bullH Human-Created Negative Impacts ndash add goal and strategies to reduce noise pollution from machinery building equipment traffic transit etc
LIFE bullJ40 Include water health as part of habitat corridors and connectivity bull421 Carefully evaluate when to utilize interpretive and educational signage in parks consider installation costs and maintenance evaluate smart phone options to direct and educate optimize opportunities to point to other park resources (ie identify direction and distance to other key features such as swim park Eloise Butler etc) bullL2 Develop public dashboard to report on mercury levels in fish and eating advisory bullAdd goal to protect bird and other wildlife and develop associated strategies
GENERAL bullESP Utilization - Incorporate the ESP by reference in the MPRB Community Engagement Plan requirements - Cross-reference to other key MPRB planning documents Neighborhood Park Service Area Master Plans Reconcile community approved design concepts to ESP there may be conflicts (tree removal etc) Natural Areas Phase I and Phase II reports Regional Master Plans
51a
Packet Pg 75
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft
65 65
bullAccountability - Establish timelines for implementing strategies and accomplishing goals - Define success for each strategygoal bullCommunications - provide regular updates via website e-blast e-newsletter (note it would be wonderful to have a regularly issued MPRB newsletter that compiles all project updates) bullTechnology ndash develop app(s) to promote and report on - SwimFish Minneapolis - Hike Minneapolis - Birdwatch Minneapolis - Volunteer opportunities bullFunding - pursue collaborative researchimplementation grants related to ecological systems
51a
Packet Pg 76
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)
From Stephen GreenfieldTo Arvidson Adam RCc Ann Laughlin Constance Pepin Schroeder Michael Bourn BradSubject [External]proposed changes to the Ecological System PlanDate Saturday May 30 2020 62505 PMAttachments MPRBESP_Revisions_May30pdf
MPRBESPRevisions_May30_RenumberedRdocx
Adam attached are files containing the combined comments on the draft Ecological Systems Plan fromAudubon Chapter of Minneapolis Friends of Roberts Bird Sanctuary and Friends of MinneapolisWildlife (Given the extreme distress and danger in our city were not sure if yoursquore working or how yourprojects other than Parks for All are affected or if the June 1 deadline for comments still applies) Wersquove included two versions of the file with our comments one file uses the original numbering schemebut because that numbering scheme didnrsquot lend itself to changes welsquove also created a ldquorenumbered filethat proposes a more flexible numbering scheme to make revisions easier
We value the opportunity to propose these final changes since as you stated the document has changedsignificantly and nearly a year has passed since the formal comment period ended We are requestingchanges based on our strong belief that ecological and wildlife considerations must play a larger role indecisions about Park Board planning projects programs and priorities We also observed in our carefulreview of the draft that numerous important notes and points in some of the chapters were not reflected inrecommendations hence we suggest that these points be added In some cases we suggested groupingitems that belong together
Please take a look at the renumbered file at your earliest convenience and let us know if you havequestions We would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you via Zoom about our input
Thank you Ann Laughlin Audubon Chapter of MinneapolisConstance Pepin Friends of Minneapolis WildlifeStephen Greenfield Friends of Roberts Bird Sanctuary [External] This email originated from outside of the Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board Do not click links or openattachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe
51a
Packet Pg 77
Att
ach
men
t A
ttac
hm
ent
A -
Eco
Sys
Pla
n_C
om
men
ts o
n R
evis
ed D
raft
_202
0-07
01 (
2020
-287
E
colo
gic
al S
yste
m P
lan
Ap
pro
val)