Transcript
PAEPARDUsers’LedProcessAssessingEuropeanstakeholdersEngagement&Role
andderivelessons
OnAgriculture ResearchforDevelopmentEFARD
LaurianneOllivierJudithFrancis
CTA12/06/2016
PAEPARDUsers’LedProcessfromsupply-drivenapproachtowardsademand-drivenapproachinARD
WhatcanwelearnfromtheULPapproach?
EAFF: Extensive Livestock value chain in Eastern Africa with Specificfocus on Kenya & Uganda
PROPAC: Urban horticulture value chain inclusive of gardeningcrops in urban areas with specific focus in Congo Brazzaville, DRC &Cameroon
ROPPA: Rice value chain in Benin, Burkina Faso & Mali
FARNPAN: Groundnut value chain in Zambia & Malawi
COLEACP:Adding valuetomango non-food usesinWestAfricawith specific focusonBurkina-Faso,Côted’Ivoire
Newbrokeragemechanism
üPromoteresearchbasedonusers’needsandchallenges
ü Improveexistingmulti-stakeholderpartnerships
üReinforceexistingdynamicsatnationalandregionallevel
ULPObjectives
AssessingEuropeanstakeholdersEngagement&Roleandderivelessons
• EvolutionandachievementofULPsprocess- (engagementofEuropeanstakeholders)
• Motivationsandkeyconstraintstocommitmentandcollaboration• Roleofdifferentstakeholdersintermofknowledgecreationandknowledgesharing
• LearningprocessbetweenEuropean/Africanaswellasresearch/nonresearchstakeholders
ObjectivesofEFARDstudy
• Literaturereview• Interviewkeyactors
ü Questionnaire :ULPcoordinators(5),ULPpartner(~70),includingULPcoregroupmembersandAIFs
ü QuestionnairetoNONULPstakeholders(PAEPARDconsortium-25stakeholders)
ü QuestionnairetoPAEPARDcommunity(D-Group)
• Analyses,Reporting&Advocacy:- Codificationsystem(softwaree.g MAXQDA)
- Occurrencesandsimilarities(ULPVsULPandULPsVsConsortiacall1&2)
Method
MSHRQW04/2013
?
Deskstudy12/2012&02/2013
Deskstudy08/2012
Deskstudy08/2012
MSHRQW05/2013
Ouagadougou
MSHRQW03/2013Dakar
MSHRQW12/2012Nairobi
MSHRQW01/2013Brazzaville
2Conceptnotes2CoreGroups
4/2013?
Deskstudy06/2012
Deskstudy08/2012
Deskstudy03/2013
PAEPARDII4YE
Proposalsubmittedto
CRF?
1ConceptnoteCoreGroup11/2013
Ouagadougou
3ConceptnotesCoreGroup
??
1ConceptnoteCoreGroup9/2013Douala
ConsortiumInceptionWorkshop3Conceptnotes
10/2014
Proposalsubmittedto
BMEL?
Project-NutriHAFAfrica4/2015to?
Project-PAEPARD-FANRPAN?to?
Proposalsubmittedto
Gatesfoundation? Project-FANRPANATONU?to?
• ULPsevolution• Mainachievements
ULPsprogressed
ULPtimeline FANRPANdevelopedconceptnote&wonCRFproject(1)
- Commitment
- Collaboration
- KnowledgeCreation&Sharing
- LearningProcess&Capacityforreflexion
European &Africanstakeholders
Africain71%
European26%
Otherregion
European10%
African90%
European& AfricanstakeholdersCommitment
WastheengagementthesamealongtheULPsteps?
ActorschangeUserremainsconstant
European&African stakeholdersCommitment
Motivations/InterestsAfrica/European
Keyconstraints
o Interestforthethematic/federatingtheme
o Shareexpertise&experienceo Developingnew/existingbusiness
opportunitiesinAfrica(Ps)o CollaboratewithEnduser
o Funding(EU)
EUconstraintso Financialcommitment:e.g
compensationforparticipationofULPactivities
o Availability(longprocess- timeismoney)
Africanconstraintso Diverseconstraint(e.g
finance,time,communicationcapacity)
European&AfricanstakeholdersCollaboration
Leveloftrusto Goodo Changeswhen anewpartner is involved(conceptnote/proposal development step)
Keyconstraintstocollaboration
o Money:e.g.travellingcosto Timeconsumingo Long/discontinuousà waitand
seeattitude(commitment)o Communication:Languagebarrier
o Privatesector:exclusivityontheresults(IPRissues)
Powerdynamicso TowardAfricanduetolowparticipation
ofEuropeanstakeholders
o Changewiththetypeofactivity(e.gproposaldevelopment,researcher/nonresearcher)
• AfricansvaluethecapacityofEuropeantopublish– increasingvisibility
• Europeansvalueusers’experience(fromAfricanperspective)
• Sharingknowledge/creation:constraintbythedifferentperspectivesofresearchinARD(researchandnonresearchstakeholders)
European&AfricanstakeholdersKnowledgeCreation&Sharing
• RegionalMSHdialogueontheprioritiesidentifiedbyusers(federatingtheme)
• Actordiversityandskillisamajorstrength
• Enhanceduser(African)capacitiestoresearchbasedontheirpriorities• Strengtheneduserskillsininterpretingrequirementoffundingmechanisms• Increasedtheircapacitytodevelopconceptnote&researchproposal
European&AfricanstakeholderslearningProcess
NONULPstakeholderslearninglessons
Leveloftrusto Goodo EUtrustincreases when they start tosee thefirstresult
Powerdynamicso TowardAfrican
Keyconstraintstocollaborationo Funding-difficultytomaintainactivitiesoftheconsortium
Yes24%
No
76…
PAEPARDcommunity
PAEPARDUsers’LedProcess
Yes63%
No
37%
Demand-ledresearch
Yes81%
No19%
MSHR&Ipartnership
• Whoshouldsetthedemand?ü Usersü Allstakeholders
Researcher60%
Balance13%
Non-researcher27%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
PowerDynamic
0 1 2 3 4 5
Leveloftrust
PAEPARDcommunity
• ULPprocessisavalidprocessbutitis long (UEstakeholdersengagementislow).GeneralacceptanceofMSHResearchandInnovationpartnership
• Funding: ProcessforengagingusersinMSHR&Ineedstobeadequatelyfundedanddispersedinatimelymanner• Diversefundingincludingprivatesectornecessary
• Enhancedcapacitybuilding (users/non-researchers,researchers,African/EU).Value/importanceofresearchincreases
• CRF – ThissupportsMSHR&Ipartnershipandresults(e.g.publications,newproducts)areobtainedinashortertimeframe;EUcommitmenthigh.
• Theresearchcontinues
Conclusions
OnAgriculture ResearchforDevelopmentEFARD
LaurianneOllivierJudithFrancis
CTA12/06/2016
ThankyouForyourattention
AnyQuestions?
top related